Banul nu-i problema. Dar nu lansa o moneda cu scopul de a face bani. Daca vrei sa te apuci de un asemenea proiect, sugerez sa te apuci serios de treaba si sa cauti sa aduci in domeniul crypto ceva nou, ce momentan nu exista. Avem momentan moneda Elrond creata de romani, are un succes pana acum zic eu fenomenal si ideea lor de a aduce crypto in viata de zi cu zi e splendida.

Repet ceea ce mereu spun: cel care va aduce prima moneda usor de inteles si utilizat va avea un succes absolut. Momentan, ceea ce ii tine pe oameni departe de crypto este teama de a face greseli prin care sa-si piarda banii, teama de necunoscut. Ideea este ca ICO-urile sau IPO-urile te baga in niste responsabilitati de care trebuie sa te tii, daca nu vrei sa existe oameni care sa te caute de un "buna ziua" printr-un backtrace pe internet. Ca atunci cand e vorba de banu' omului, nu te prea joci..!

Bafta cu licenta si proiectul la care lucrezi.

Because it's a normal asset that has downfalls too, not just positive market changes. Corrections are very healthy and needed, so better have them now than later.

Convenience has a price. Privacy has one as well, usually even more expensive. Exchanging is instant and much simpler to use than placing orders is. And since all you have to do to instantly exchange a coin is to send an alt and receive another instantly in your personal wallet, there's a transaction fee you have to pay for the on-chain tx. ETH and BTC instant exchanges are usually way more expensive than altcoin exchanges are.

Binance's txs happen within their website, unless you withdraw. When you withdraw BTC or ETH, it's expensive even there as well.

I think it's a bad analogy since fiat has never made gold and silver obsolete. Maybe less used as a currency, but definitely not obsolete. I believe fiat will not be obsolete either, it's just going to turn into a digital version of it instead. Digital fiat will be a thing and will be more used than crypto imo. That's how I see it.

How does Bisq rely on traditional fiat payment systems? Bisq can run by exchanging alt to alt too, it's not just fiat you can exchange.

The most realistic alternative is atomic swaps, although we're still far from a working product. Nowadays it's so much harder to get a bunch of devs create something they will not profit off. Satoshi's gesture was epic and probably something only he and a very, very few more people would do (Laszlo's pizza?).

The markets would function very well off CEXs, especially if LN is implemented so that txs happen on the second rather than the first layer of the network. Rather than having so many withdrawals and deposits to CEXs, all could happen directly within your wallet.. not congesting the network anymore either.

What the freak is this thread, man. Over half of the stuff you said either is BS or makes no sense.

Yeah, DOGE might pump fantastically in the short term. But you can't compare a meme with a damn king of Blockchain. Doge doesn't even have a working wallet. From this fact alone, we can already see how "amazing" and "worthy" a DOGE investment is.

DOGE will drop to the floor as soon as the rich consider they made enough money out of it. Musk is pumping the hell out of it and at any given time, he could simply say "ok doge is crap actually" and the coin will go -90% within a week max. What happens is, people think they're getting rich purchasing DOGE which is actually the poor purchasing the rich's coins at a very expensive price - when the price drops and the rich earned enough, all those thinking they're gonna get rich will lose so much money. Remember that those bucks you see on your crypto portfolio

If you're comparing a meme to some serious project, perhaps you don't even know much about the coins at all. By saying "it's not going to go up 10x in the future" and mentioning false facts such as the one about DOGE's supply, you prove so much about your real interest. You're looking to get rich quick. Has Bitcoin ever promised to go up 10x in price, or even twice?

Keep dreaming, 'cause DOGE will never be Bitcoin.

I disagree. It's easy to predict there'll be a pump after halvings, but it's way too soon to say that the cycle repeats indefinitely. Perhaps other kind of global economical situations would break a streak of halving pumps. Moreover, the pumps after every halving seem to be lower and lower in % than previous ones - and as we advance through the trillions, it's gonna get even worse probably.

I mean, just look at all those previous price predictions by experts and how many times TA said we're entering winters and heavy crashes when exactly the opposite happened. In fact, I think Bitcoin is one of the most unpredictable assets!

He pumped DOGE clearly to his own advantage. Having the opportunity to quadruple your investment in a matter of hours just due to your influence and not profiting off it is quite silly unless you really care about the market's health. Let's be honest, DOGE wasn't/isn't going to be able to keep that price up. His influence will end up the same way McAfee's did.

Bitcoin wasn't really affected by his tweets. Although he did say "everything to the moon", pumping BTC is much more harder nowadays than pumping DOGE is. Besides this.. DOGE remains a meme, while Bitcoin continues to do wonders. That's the difference. Influence will continue to be used tho whenever someone feels like they have it.

So where exactly do the 90% of the coins go upon selling?

Come on, Bitcoin is still barely used in "everyday life".. how does anyone expect a shitcoin to have this much success instead?

Put your money in 100 shitcoins out of which only 1 gets to pump by 100x vs USD (while decreasing vs BTC parity) and you'll probably have dozens of times less money than you would've had by holding Bitcoin only right from the start. Add expenses such as time spent purchasing those 100 shitcoins from crappy no-name exchanges and getting a separate wallet full of bugs and with no peers for every single coin and you'll give up sooner than you think.

Shitcoins are great for short-term BTC multiplying speculation but other than this, no. They're just crap. And your time costs way more than these coins deserve.

Back in 2008 I remember people were basically hoarding everything possible. They had some kind of feeling of hoarding and purchasing stocks, real estate, anything just to make money and feel good. I see the same atmosphere around today, once again. But this time it seems even crazier. Money's being made out of any crap possible and people seem to be once again hoarding stuff.

I know quite a lot of people who've got into debt in the last year. They seem not to give a damn about a looming financial crisis. Meanwhile, Bitcoin is "toi expensive" but $1k worth of clothes aren't. Makes no sense, and it seems like people are going damn crazy with the spendings. Just look at DOGE. The GME hype as well. Ever since the GME hype, I thought we're in the middle of a "too-good-to-be-true" hype created by the Rich which will make stocks and prices parabolically go up before dumping harder than ever before, wreaking havoc and affecting especially the average investors..

It's probably a last hype before the disaster.

There are way too many for it to be just regular Joes trying to negatively affect the price. It's probably a spam coming for large whales in an attempt to further dump the BTC price. Corporations need this so they can buy up lots of BTC before the actual high of this halving.

DOGE doesn't even have a properly-functioning wallet. I can't believe a coin that doesn't even have a working wallet can get to top 5 coins by market cap..

What will its price be? Soon, if Musk keeps taking advantage of markets, it might be a friggin' lot more than I may imagine. But over the mid-to-long term? It's gonna wreck so many hands.

Ceea ce am spus mai sus e strict din experienta personala.. mai putin partea cu supunerea legilor din Romania, pentru ca atata timp cat esti cetatean roman si lucrezi si traiesti aici, pe teritoriul RO, nu ai cum sa te supui altcuiva decat autoritatilor romane.

Cu exchange-urile tip Binance si ceea ce se stie public si oficial... nu as baga mana in foc ca relatia ANAF se rezuma la cea dintre ei si bancile care sunt o entitate financiara rezidata in Romania. Suntem si in UE, informatiile pleaca dintr-o parte intr-alta, plus ca unele treburi se fac in spatele cortinelor cum s-ar spune.. eu zic ca decat sa risti sa iti iei card si sa te crezi anonim cheltuind mii de lei/euro prin Romania crezand ca ANAF nu va sti nimic, mai bine stai in banca ta ca nu stii cand te trezesti cu vreo notificare in plic.

Si cum spuneam... cardurile astea VISA sunt totusi VISA, ceea ce inseamna ca sunt recunoscute la nivel global. Si ma gandesc eu.. nu exista vreo autoritate care sa aiba un database cu cardurile VISA si MasterCard si detinatorii lor pentru investigatii anti-frauda? Ca mi-ar fi greu sa cred ca daca exista o tranzactie suspecta, ANAF va zice "stati, baieti... inapoi, ca asta-i anonim, nu-l stim!". Iar in cazul in care ANAF vede ca de pe cardul tau au avut loc niste tranzactii ciudate si incep sa caute sau sa notifice alte autoritati din lume, avand in vedere ca si Binance se supune legilor anti-frauda, cum-necum tot se ajunge cumva la identitatea ta daca vrea cineva sa te caute.

Ideea e sa nu te bazezi strict pe ceea ce se stie despre ce stie si cum lucreaza ANAF-ul. Asa stim multe si despre CIA, NSA, etc.. dar nu cumva s-au facut si inca se fac prin ei anumite chestii pe care ajungem sa le cunoastem abia dupa 50 ani, cand (si daca) se desecretizeaza? Suntem in era tehnologiei.. o cercetare asupra unui individ e la cateva click-uri distanta intr-o baza de date globala. 

Legat de profit, nu ai o evidenta a banilor pe care i-ai introdus in crypto? Oricum, legea pentru plata a impozitului pe crypto eu stiu ca nu se aplica retroactiv ci de prin 2018... (sau 2019, nu mai stiu cu exactitate), iar singurul ban pe care ai de platit impozitul la ANAF este profitul. Daca ai pus 10.000 RON in Bitcoin si acum scoti 5.000 RON, nu ai de completat nimic si ba chiar mai poti scoate inca 5.000 fara probleme. Eu asa stiu - din moment ce banii respectivi nu reprezinta un profit, nu ai de ce sa platesti impozit pe ei. Daca ai pus 5 lei in vreo moneda cu staking si acum ai ajuns sa ai 500 lei, dupa 4 ani de staking, profitul tau e de 495 lei.

Cert e ca, asa cum zice si Neurotic, ceea ce vorbim aici e ce credem ca ar fi mai bine, pentru ca nu e nimic 100% clar. Dar asa cum le sugerez mereu celorlalti sa faca, mai bine apelezi la un expert in domeniu decat sa te iei dupa niste pareri pe un forum. Mai ales daca e vorba de declarat la ANAF, pentru ca odata ce pui semnatura pe hartie.. acolo ramane.

I think the closest you can get is by using Komodo's Atomic DEX or Waves Exchange. Besides these 2, there's also Bisq but they have quite high fees especially when BTC mempool is clogged.

Out of them, Waves offers you the "smoothest" experience and the highest volume and liquidity.

Oh, Bitcoin is dying again... wonder if anyone has ever counted how many times it did so far If 10-20% is a big crash for you, just wait and see when it's gonna drop more than 50%.. or when it drops heavily for a few days, only to be followed by a bullish explosion.

It's Bitcoin. You never really know when to purchase and when to sell before it's too late. Best strat is hodling with DCA.

Binance este bazat in Malta, tu traiesti in Romania. Ei se supun legilor de acolo, tu celor de aici.

Pentru 1 si 2, fie ca faci prin cardul acela sau ca platesti direct din portofelul tau privat non-custodial, ANAF-ul poate ajunge sa aiba la mana o evidenta conform careia clientul X a cumparat bunurile Y cu moneda Z. Atentie! Binance desi e in Malta, inca are KYC. Asa ca.. in orice moment tranzactiile tale pot fi date mai departe in mana autoritatilor, atata timp cat ei considera ca sunt suspecte.

Pentru 3... pai cardul nu-i pe identitatea ta?

Binance o fi in Malta, dar de unde stii ca Binance nu lucreaza direct cu o institutie europeana anti-frauda care va primi in cele din urma informatia conform careia tu ai cardul respectiv? Pe langa asta... Vorbim de niste carduri VISA care se elibereaza pe numele tau, e o retea globala, nu-i ca si cum cardurile din Malta nu-s recunoscute in Romania!

Legile sunt simple: ai cumparat BTC la $1 si ai vandut la $10? Pe profitul de $9, platesti impozit. Ai mai multe tranzactii? Calculezi cat ai pus si cat ai scos pe fiecare tranzactie ca profit si atata platesti. Pe ANAF nu ii va interesa ca tu lucrezi cu unii din paradis fiscal - ei te vor executa aici..

Pai acum depinde... 150$ in conditiile in care vorbim de developeri din SUA sau alte zone bine-cotate si bine-dotate, inclusiv pe plan financiar. In Romania nu prea cred ca isi permite mai nimeni sa plateasca atat de mult.. din ce zice internetul, pare-se a fi plafonul undeva la $150/h, iar in aceste conditii avem undeva la $312.000 pe an pentru un developer cu job de 8h... probabil ca se platesc asa developerii din Silicon Valley, dar din Romania cu siguranta nu

Pot fi si salarii mult mai mici. Mult, mult mai mici. Am gasit pe eJobs un loc de munca.. cica ofera pana la €4000 pentru dezvoltare softuri blockchain. Te poti rezuma si la mai putin de atat, parerea mea.

Insa eu cred ca pentru unele monede lucrurile stau altfel. Cred ca unii dezvolta moneda, fac un ICO dupa care isi impart procente din el in functie de un contract semnat de dinainte. Posibil ca pentru unii sa sune mai atractiv sa primeasca un 5% dintr-un milion de dolari decat sa ii zici ca il platesti cu $4k/luna.

Satoshi certainly wasn't alone with the idea of a decentralized economy, yet only he was able to develop what we today know as "Bitcoin". Whether a team effort or not, does it even really matter anymore? Satoshi was here for a short time, until the project caught the necessary support to sustain itself without the need of him. It was sufficient and today I don't really think a comeback of his would matter anyway besides being a potential astronomical price magnet, probably Elon Musk x10

The only messages and footprints of his that I trust are those he left behind until he disappeared. Ever since he disappeared, any new footprint is a potential impersonator or bad actor who's got hold of his account(s). Therefore, your quotes dated after his disappearance are worth pretty much nothing.. Especially when it's this clear that isn't his kind of punctuation or grammar, lol.

Da, dar una e sa iti acoperi banii din start si alta e sa faci premine cu speranta ca o sa aiba si acele monede o valoare. Daca minezi si tu si o faci de pe la inceput, ai putea spune ca ai facut un fel de premine. Un premine neoficial, daca e sa-l numim asa. Monedele de azi care au premine sunt cu sansa foarte slaba de reusita din cate am observat. exista cateva, intr-adevar, care inca sunt existente si de succes si azi (ex: XRP.. cu exceptia problemelor legale recente).

Exista si monede care au developer fee la fiecare block. Exemplu: BEAM si ZEC (din cate stiu). E o buna initiativa pentru a te asigura ca developerii sunt remunerati pentru munca depusa, dar nu stiu ce-o fi cu BEAM dupa ce trec cei 5 ani de developer fees si developerii nu vor mai fi platiti pentru munca lor..

Una peste alta, dintre toate cred ca tot vanzarile directe de monede in stil ICO/IPO/whatever reprezinta cea mai sigura sursa de incasare pentru acoperirea cheltuielilor initiale. Asa te poti asigura macar ca ai un venit pe care te poti baza. Altfel, totul e mai mult pe specula si vise..