Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 12:35:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 95 »
621  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][EXCHANGE] Poloniex - Crypto Exchange with BTC/NXT on: May 13, 2017, 02:21:33 AM
Anyone know what is the wait time for support ticket?

Everthing works for me btw... just they look so overloaded atm, ffs ppl with all the profit hire more ppl!
622  Economy / Exchanges / Re: **CEX.IO Bitcoin Exchange ** Buy Bitcoins with Cards in iOS / Android App*** on: May 12, 2017, 03:52:13 AM
I think its time to reconsider reopening litecoin support! Smiley
623  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner on: May 10, 2017, 08:29:54 PM
no more boost for this? i see that other 10% increase is possible if you squeeze more out of the code, other dev in other thread like sp have 10% more hashrate with their private miner

to be precise the private miner is 13% faster but price is steep only for big farms....
624  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: excavator by NiceHash - multi-algorithm advanced NVIDIA CUDA miner [1.1.4a] on: April 30, 2017, 10:47:01 PM
Every card brand has different TDP meaning, so for palit 1070 80% TDP is let say 130w, and for MSI gaming 80% TDP is 180w...

so TDP can not be compared as that
625  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Antminer L3 - 250mh - 400watt Scrypt miner coming soon on: April 18, 2017, 09:38:36 PM
First action should be UASF!!!

When we nail the guilty party, we should work on asic decentralization!

Any company that refuse and use centralization as mean of power, should be widely blocked!
626  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Antminer L3 - 250mh - 400watt Scrypt miner coming soon on: April 18, 2017, 05:22:54 PM
Jihan is using your $$ to destroy the one you gona mine!

Please see the real face of Jihan Wu!
627  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 14, 2017, 03:03:46 AM
Well then just activate segwit by masf or uasf if miner fails to push litecoin.... then we gona see

Activating segwit with bitcoin is not so "easy" because some ask for bigger block (BU) some wants nothing to change, then there is segwit, etc... so deceison is more complex and its more hard to get users wishes for one goal
628  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 13, 2017, 03:14:38 AM
Sure they helped as they could, and will support litecoin if it manage to activate segwit before bitcoin (which is almost 100%)
1. if masf (miner activation soft fork) fail we go to uasf (user activation soft fork) all is put to motion and will not be stoped!

now nothing can stop it

BU shills have nothing to offer to litecoin so they better be silent, but we know they are kinda chaotic 100%!
629  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 13, 2017, 02:57:01 AM
It's probably better if Segwit is activated. The amount of people using Litecoin is going down all the time. Will soon remain as another dumped altcoin. Sad

Why do you say that? Do you think the users will come back because of segwit and then later the Lighting network? Please state your reasons why you think that.

It comes back to my main question why segwit is necessary in litecoin. Most of the arguments made here are all speculative and made up by unqualified people who want to make themselves look smart.

1. bitcoin scaling problem
2. litecoin is on all, or soon on all exchanges
3. litecoin is one of top alts that have fair distribution with no premine, instamine and shady works of the ppl behind it
4. litecoin code is almost copy of bitcoin so dev that work on segwit, LN, etc will be happy to work on litecoin too

To the math yourself, market is mad due high bitcoin fees and slow trasactions, they don`t want BTC clone, they want scalibility solution as segwit!
630  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 12, 2017, 08:19:12 PM
Unnecessary because Litecoin's network is not crowd like Bitcoin's, this is only for pump, not the real use. If bitcoin signals SW, btc will be pumped too.

Please learn what segwit is, its not about block scaling why litecoin need it
As market want to test SEGWIT as solution for bitcoin problem, litecoin can be used for that test!!



What problem?
High fees and slow transactions.

Remove the block size limit and the problem is solved.

block size limit is just temporary solution which would harm security (big block more time to propagate) also more centralization as more resources would be needed for a full node
segwit is smart solution and not brute force!

also this is litecoin topic and you know litecoin does not need more block room!? or you confused us with bitcoin agenda while shilling for BU twats
631  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 12, 2017, 08:58:02 AM
Just calm down roger shill pls, don`t get heart attack

segwit is heavy tested at bitcoin test net for a looooooong period already, if you have any proff it gona go down, why don`t you post your finding

market support is there and can`t be faked, only ignorant ppl live in fear of new tech!
632  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 11, 2017, 11:42:49 PM
I think it is necessary for LTC to have Segwit first before BTC. This way we can see how Segwit works without compromising the entire Bitcoin community.  It is also a good way if ever it is successful to test several updates that comes with segwit implementation. 

100% Agree, that is the reason LTC is now over 9$ a lot of bitcoiners now look at litecoin as next valid and future good alternative which can help bitcoin (as most alt coins just want to take bitcoin place) litecoin never was like that

also on the positive side they will see in real how UASF gona work, and if needed for bitcoin in future would be very valuable

so at the end I hope bitcoiners help us and not see litecoin as some evil scam shit coin as they see all or most alts
633  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 11, 2017, 11:25:19 PM
What you expect from Jihan or roger ver shills.........

segwit is just one step, nothing wrong with block increase but its the wrong way if we can do that smarter as segwit open more future possibilities, also increasing is bad for decentralization and security die the block size and time needed to go over all nodes

ppl and market are eager to test segwit, and some evil ppl think that will destroy their greedy plan for bitcoin fee to be 50$ per transfer, and they bet it WILL!
no one will stand and use coin that is centralized by chines mining mafia!

LOL at how whoever disagrees with the party line is automatically a Jihan or Roger Ver shill. Where do I get my pay? Cheesy

You are brainwashed by Blockstream propaganda.

You did not write ANY REAL EVIDENCE to support you claim...

You are just trolling me, and jihan/roger troll looks like that

And i don`t thing Blockstream is god as you shills look at Jihan, they were slow with segwit and no faster solution in 2016, we today would not be here if they had been more ope to market need!
But I am no dev and I have no right to criticize anyone as I am doing nothing!
634  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 11, 2017, 06:10:26 PM
What you expect from Jihan or roger ver shills.........

segwit is just one step, nothing wrong with block increase but its the wrong way if we can do that smarter as segwit open more future possibilities, also increasing is bad for decentralization and security die the block size and time needed to go over all nodes

ppl and market are eager to test segwit, and some evil ppl think that will destroy their greedy plan for bitcoin fee to be 50$ per transfer, and they bet it WILL!
no one will stand and use coin that is centralized by chines mining mafia!
635  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 11, 2017, 03:19:00 PM
Unnecessary because Litecoin's network is not crowd like Bitcoin's, this is only for pump, not the real use. If bitcoin signals SW, btc will be pumped too.

Please learn what segwit is, its not about block scaling why litecoin need it
As market want to test SEGWIT as solution for bitcoin problem, litecoin can be used for that test!!



What problem?

where do you live in a cave?
(high fees, limited transaction per minut, etc)
offchain scale and lightning network can be shared on both BTC and LTC, so if litecoin have segwit/LN his resources can be used for BTC lightning transfer

I was wondering if using segwit, won't people start scamming each other like in the example below? Or am I not reading it correctly?

"Who benefits?
Anyone spending unconfirmed transactions: if Alice pays Bob in transaction 1, Bob uses that payment to pay Charlie in transaction 2, and then Alice’s payment gets malleated and confirmed with a different txid, then transaction 2 is now invalid and Charlie has not been paid. If Bob is trustworthy, he will reissue the payment to Charlie; but if he isn’t, he can simply keep those bitcoins for himself."

Source: https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/


segwit is the bug fix for the problem you are writing, that can happen now on bitcoin and litecoin and on all the clones...

636  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 11, 2017, 01:44:53 PM
Unnecessary because Litecoin's network is not crowd like Bitcoin's, this is only for pump, not the real use. If bitcoin signals SW, btc will be pumped too.

Please learn what segwit is, its not about block scaling why litecoin need it
As market want to test SEGWIT as solution for bitcoin problem, litecoin can be used for that test!!

637  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Segwit for LTC really necessary? Why? on: April 11, 2017, 02:14:20 AM
Chines miner are toxic, at least few ppl that control it
You need to look at mona and VTC hash rate, nicehash ranting to see malicious plot by some group (we all know who they are jihan wo, roger, etc)  to block segwit on any alt there (at least know) they might miss some small ones

Same thing they now fight on LTC, that`s why you can not trust greedy miner that for few $$ (well more then few) will sell his hash as we sow few days ago some hash power shifted from segwit (bat pool) pool to fucking jihan pool antpool in matter of minute ...

Segwit is primary a patch that will allow crypto progress and more security, litecoin 100% today does not need bigger block so using and testing on it would be GR8 idea which no one can say is not good

Main downfall of litecoin was no edge development which any shit other alt use no one needed just to make hype
Now when market ask segwit on litecoin we have some VERY EVIL PPL that must be stoped if we wont to see crypto progress in general!
638  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. on: April 11, 2017, 02:03:37 AM
That`s the reason litecoin is going nuclear with UASF... whole crypto mining in china is toxic and manipulated .........
639  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. on: April 10, 2017, 09:10:28 PM
VTC hash go up, because Jihan renting hash at nicehash to block segwit......... the idiot is insane
640  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Decentralize LTC mining, change algo to GPU POW on: April 02, 2017, 08:44:30 PM
I have updated the list of anti segwit litecoin pools, please all email them and ask for segwit activation:

http://ltc1btc.com/ support@ltc1btc.com
https://www.batpool.com/ support@batpool.com
https://www.clevermining.com/ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448649.0
https://ltc.bw.com/pool/i support@bw.com
https://prohashing.com/
https://www.antpool.com https://twitter.com/BITMAINtech

So far I got reply from prohashing that they support segwit but have problem with it code and need time to upgrade pool!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 95 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!