they gave negative trust rating because your clown army you support(doomad hosted) cried to them with victim tears.
No ser, Gregory Maxwell and Andrew Chow gave YOU negative trust-ratings because YOU have been spreading lies, disinformation, FUD, and have been gaslighting people. If you know the truth and you are right, then why the negative trust-ratings given to you by two of the most trustworthy people in the forum? Copy and paste? Frankandbeans, your big blocker Anti-Core-Developers posts are copy-pasted from Mike Hearn's and Roger Ver's propaganda. when your cult of idiots treating core devs as immortal gods cried to your gods to put neg trust.. that then becomes a meaningless reference to then ask why the negative trust.. because you know your cult leader requested it your just circling the same victim card you created for yourself. the whole debates i had in that era were about how segwit opens up an exploit that can allow junk.. and funnily enough ordinals proved my point my evidence is based on code and block data and backed up by researchable data and examples of exploits actually being used. your rebuttals are based on emotion and tears crying about crying gets you no where and proves nothing. apart from you are wanting to play victim by you not doing research, thus getting confused then crying that it must be me confusing you becasue i dont say the same songs as your cult. then crying about it.. says more about you than anyone if you want to learn. do your research. if you dont want to learn. stay ignorant jsut stop crying about the position you put yourself into as a self admitted 'pleb'(the insult YOU gave yourself) that feels like a victim.. you made yourself a victim, and you are unwilling to accept what you done to yourself. or more so not done to improve your circumstance you keep bringing up "negative trust, why" and "franknbean" you cant even come up with anything new, you just cycle the same tripe your mentor spewed at you saying franky is wrong because he made my sugar daddy cry, is not proof of any debunking of what i sayyou cant even articulate a way of saying it differently, independently of your cult leaders script
Ser, do your own research. They're hoarding, not selling.
anyway china is offering out gold.. just not back to america.. yes it took in gold and is now offering it out. that how trade works.. the only difference is they are just not offering it back to the west asia and the middle east are trading gold and shuffling it around they are even offering it to the real estate buyers as a way to keep the 'paper' price of real estate property at market rate while the buyer gets an instant "cash-back" in the form of upto 1kg bars of gold(yep its the sneaky way to protect real estate market while back-hander deals to offer discount after contract signed at market rate.. kinda smart actually, very economics savvy) as for energy now diesel prices are coming back to this past decades norms of the $3 range as oppose to the $6 high gold miners can mine again cheaper than last couple years. so expect golds ATH range now to correct again DOWN when gold mining season begins in spring other goods and products will see CPI relax too due to lower fuel costs compare to previous few years as for electrification of energy. well power plants still need to convert to renewables over next 20 years so expect longer term prices to not return to old prices. |
|
|
|
yes choices are narrower. but by pre-planning, even that can stretch the money, food to last a few days longer than expected
this is where people then have to get creative about increasing income
and yes increasing income is a different debate which is another category.. separate from the minimalist vs frugal planning concept
when you live in an area where there are buses, where there are shops that sell shoes/clothes. there are opportunities.
heck when you speak with friends and family and speak of the things they wish they could have, even that can be an opportunity. but thats for another category of discussion
Yes, some savings are still possible for those who are on a tight budget but saving some bucks every month will not lead to any fortune today. I think that the only solution for those people or families who struggle is to make some savings and instead of collecting bitcoins, saving is not about making a fortune.. its about having a small rescue package. a small emergency pot anything else you can accumulate ontop thats not needed in the short term incidents you can put into long term investments saving should be in easy access cash form.. investments should be in asset form savings is the easy access pot to save you from having to rush to sell assets or rush to use debt |
|
|
|
|
it was actually suggested the character of moses was the story of exodus wrote by the writer who put himmself into his own story to give himself some provenance..
you know.. write a story of fiction, make yourself the hero, tell people of the book and get people to sell, recite it around the villages and make yourself famous.
then with the fame then start the religion based on your rules you also created but saying the rules came from magic mystery giant in the clouds so no one can question it
my opinion. a science fiction writer started a campfire on the top of the hill by burning a bush to stay warm, found some magic mushrooms. started talking to himself while thinking the fire was his conscience speaking to him. and he envisioned his own path of gathering a flock of loyal people to follow him, one mushroom lead to another and by the time he sobered up and came down the hill. he had a action plan and rule book to start a religion
..
science can carbon date things and show how old neanderthals and humans have been around and cave paintings have proven the limitations of the written word where most communication was of campfire stories not books for the adam and eve renditions
books came later with many revisions and many translations , scriptures before it pieced together where multiple different stories are made into one
like the story of character moses found as a baby is likened to/plagiarised from the origin story of king Sargon of Akkad legend
|
|
|
|
|
i wouldnt call it a war on bitcoin. id call it a WALL on bitcoin
creating barriers of entry is more about giving those with money, position, prestige a higher level of success and ease compared to the normal guy, its like artificially causing demand for the prestigious offering while making the start up look bad.
take anything..
you cant open a shop these days by just putting a sign outside your house. you need to buy liability insurance for any patrons. you need to get planning permission for any signage at the front of building, you need to change the purpose of the building from residential to business. then you have to pay some business tax to local government. you need to then build a business plan and submit it to a bank to get a business bank account. and so on and so on
its not a war on commerce, its just setting min standards to create a barrier of entry that benefit those that are ahead of the game instead of those starting out..
even farming. the EPA wants inspections, food standards, the list goes on.
making the family farm unsuccessful while bringing profits for the industrial farm
making the hobby miner unprofitable while the asic farm that meets the grade be successful
one prime example is things like carbon credits and income tax/cap gains
small independent asic users on a pools running from their home garage using grid electric they have no special contracts with vs a industrial asic farm that has all the most efficient asics in the most cheapest electric thats hydro power contracted thus not costing them carbon credits.. being big enough to afford an accountant that can avoid tax of cap gains.. will win compared to a hobby miner
so when governments are getting audited accounts from a asic farm paying after deductions just 2% tax legally. the hobby miner self-assessing paying upto 40%. the government will want to chase the small guy that avoids filing. so they may want to know all miners on the network to chase tax evaders
its the same game for many industries
so i dont see it as war.. more like a wall(barrier of entry) to benefit the privileged
if wall street sees citizens owning bitcoin direct as a competition to their hopes citizens buy their pension pot shares. then they will lobby for regulations that make barriers of entry for direct btc ownership by independent citizens
|
|
|
|
The US is a consumer market,
of only 250m earners with cash.. there is upto 7.7billion people that were ignored, less preferred due to US controls/sanctions/trade deals. Oh yes, locally our government only cares about their comrades, leaving those in "their" in misery caused by the same government, the Stalin chicken story applied to humans. Human nature is to forget about those who are not your kin. We are simply too many, the times people cared more was before Christianity took hold. Nature of many politicians is to provide for themselves. point is.. even if china wanted to trade with say.. canada.. due to how america positioned itself in the international markets US then started setting the rules of world wide trade meaning even trade between china and canada meant having to follow the law of the US by china removing itself from US trade commissions as part of brics and de-dollarisation china can actually then do proper mutually agreed terms deals with canada direct without the US stipulations its like gym memberships if you cancel the membership. you cannot then be sanctioned with conditions of using the gym facilities or be charged extra membership fees as a fine or be told what to do or not do.. because you are no longer a member. its like.. if you are not part of nato. then nato cant do anything to you.. which is why nato by not having ukraine or russia as members cant even get involved in the conflict.. countries are wising up that memberships into certain commissions come with conditions. and when conditions get bad. its time to leave and join a different membership with other benefits china does and will trade with hundreds of countries. just not under the terms of US trade commissions going forward |
|
|
|
we even had an ETF approved. I'm not in favor of "IOU-bitcoin", but that's a sign that it's being incorporated in the private sector. It may not take long until the (new) people in power are Bitcoin owners, and want to take it to the next level (e.g., officially recognizing it as whatever).
funny thing.. ETF are not even IOU bitcoin. there is no ownership claim current or future when buying shares.. funny thing is your prefered subnetwork you promote is about swapping future ownership. thus is IOU-bitcoin
anyways this topics mentions of the survey and this Any business is run under the same illusion. If it's not bothering those in power, they let it be. If it becomes powerful itself or starts pointing to the wrongdoings of others, action is taken to stop it or minimize its influence.
bitcoin isnt going away.. so "can" lead down a dark path where the next stage could be FERC getting involved with regulating what miners should be used in america(energy efficiency rating like kitchen refrigerators/washers), and EPA getting involved in location regulations depending on local/national grid demands on fosil powered plants in certain regions and NERC getting involved in location regulations limiting how many devices are operating on local circuits to avoid neighbourhood surges and brownouts and DoE getting involved in creating regulations of identifying and requiring registration of mining for flimsy excuses of preventing energy theft, environment impacts and social disorder caused by excess use above capacity plus more then just all of the above im not saying all this will play out. but its worth keeping an eye out and expect it might/could happen |
|
|
|
|
pooya using your own chart.. (where you prefer $40 as norm..) yet it only achieved 40 range in 5-6 months of the last 5 years and (for emphasis) only due to the covid effect of affecting shipments which caused the futures market to sell off at a loss.. where futures contracts needed to be sold at losses to find a place that will accept the oil
pooya using your own chart.. look at the average when it wasnt the 6 month crash.. when it wasnt premium 6 months
its 60-80
over 20 years it was 50-70
current price is 70-80 in february meaning its in the norm range
we are no longer in the 1980's where oil was far less.. the new norm is always higher then 40 years ago(30-50 range for NORM)
we are no longer in the 2000's where oil was far less.. the new norm is always higher then 20 years ago(50-70 range for NORM)
40's is not an expected norm, we ate long passed the 1980's,
sorry time and inflation have moved on from 1980's norms
its like you are suggesting bitcoin should be $6 because $6 was 2012's norm/average...
.. sorry we have moved on from that market cycle. dont expect $6 again. we are a few market cycles away from those kind of price norms.. sorry
..
as for energy shortages..
macro:
well even in the 1980's they knew oil is not renewable. they even calculated potential reserves and put a supply depletion deadline of 2050 when all reserves are gone if staying at the demand growth rate predictions of 1980's forward, if nothing was done about it. this was the true trigger of then needing to shift to renewables by 2050.(climate was just the excuse to get funding via sympathy/ health fear(energy companies dont want to lose their profits. so prefer others pay the costs of changing the product/business model to keep their business in operation for the next generation) and why would people want to fund the early stoppage of using oil.. make it a health and safety concern)
micro:
dont treat the temporary events of supply issues (low demand or high supply or the opposite) or old prices as reasons for lower expectations of now.. what to expect now: nows price is the norm for the next decade.. you know.. inflation compared to 20-40 years ago's price
dont expect things to go back to prices of the 1980's norms (30-50)
|
|
|
|
If only we know how bad the economy is degrading globally, we would want to push ourselves to our limit and focus on that our skill or business. Taking it up to the next level. Some persons are still skeptical about the business they own, while some are waiting for the opportunities, they were promised to them by friends or relative and others are comfortable because they have rich people around them that if they place a call, they will answer them.
As the economy is getting worst it is difficult for a responsible adult to go to bed without planning on how to grow his business or how to attract new customers, not just new though but potential customers and business partners that will have big influence in his business. Time waits for no man. Yes, the life is filled with ups and down, but we won't stop trying so that we can have that impact on the existence of man just like how other nerds have done.
when it comes to business, stepping up your game comes in many forms product, production, people, processes, potentials, partners, patrons, position, publicity, price, profitability (im sure there are more 'p's) most of the p's are intertwined with each over, changing one can effect on another. potentials: this is having a plan for the future, or always be on the look out for opportunities. always have an active ongoing plan that evolves processes: this is looking into refining the business. things like efficiencies, training, production methods people(employees): much like processes, having the right team and removing the dead wood product: much like people, having the right product and changing the product if its not in demand. production: also much like processes, changing the efficiency of production or tweaking the product to meet needs. looking at materials cost and manufacturing costs. this can also mean looking for partners to produce it for you at scale partners: are there other businesses that can compliment or work with your product to drive demand/supply/popularity patrons(customers): looking at your customers.. existing, potential and even those that lost interest. finding ways to gain more customers, meet their needs position: this is how big your product is in the market. where its sold, how accessible the product is to the market publicity: this is how well known your product is. is it something everyone needs or a niche and how/whom you advertise it to price: this is more about finding the acceptable market rate that will get your product to sell with ease profitability: this is the accounting. looking at the costs and finding cost efficiencies(other P's).. looking at the markets of acceptable pricepoints. working out profitability and ways to increase it via the other P's ... always be working on the P's |
|
|
|
Tech layoffs continue.
Mozilla (Firefox) laid off 60 people this week. Cisco Systems 4200 people and Instacart round about 250 people. And these are just the better-known companies. This does not include many small start-ups that no longer receive follow-up financing and go out of business completely.
now i think you are scraping google search for stats... for the sake of scraping google for stats .. so here is one ask google what the average turn-over/churn of employees is.. it will tell you 30%+ good turn-over/churn is under 10% people no longer stay in careers for 10 years they change jobs every 1-2 years by choice. (mainly to improve income) but especially in the under 30yo's not ready to settle into a "career" because employers yearly pay reviews dont always offer payrises by standard, so need to swap jobs to get better pay and not get stuck in a rut employee/employer loyalty is low in tech this can be over 50% its because new projects require new skills.. so they recruit per project. EG one season of the year they are concentrating on back-end. next season front-end/ui.. next season debug and product testing so can go through 3 teams of skills in one year we are no longer in the era of microsoft that keeps people around for decades regurgitating the same 'word' software with a new fancy UI every couple of years so when there are stats that show under 10% turn-over... its not news, or worthy stats.. thats just business norm Tech layoffs continue.
Mozilla (Firefox) laid off 60 people this week. Cisco Systems 4200 people and Instacart round about 250 people.
mozilla 60 of 700 = 8.5% cisco 4200 of 85000 = 4.94% instacart 250 of 10,000 =2.5% so yea, when good turnover/churn is 10%.. it appears your looking for stats just for looking for stats. without understanding employment in any economy is not where everyone stays in the same job for 45 years, nor 10 years |
|
|
|
If don't have money to pay your mortgage or car lease ?
Can you Simple bring keys to the bank ?
I mean you got to estimate your case If you know you gona fail anyways dont pay them nothing just enjoy the the money while you have it.
Do you know any one who returned keys just back?
its not as simple as just handing back the keys when you sign up to a mortgage or lease, there's other things involved EG imagine a house of $200k purchase value you are not signing a house purchase of $200k your signing a contract of 15 years paying back $200k + interest. so if handing back keys and house went to foreclosure auction and sold for $140k because you couldnt maintain/repair and you didnt pay mortgage so mortgage is upto $240k you still owe $100k even after handing back keys same goes for car.. and yep cars depreciate alot so expect to still owe when handing back car keys |
|
|
|
If we all work together we can do it. What land on my name ? Im sure here are people who got land i will be providing finances If they provide their land and people. It's possible to do it ,yes i can loan or airdrop how much i want since i'll be printing money here not you  more comedy from you so your military education is lacking.. thanks for admitting that.. by the way "land-mine" = military type of bomb even a kindergarten kid has heard of those secondly you admit to not owning land but want people to sacrifice their land for your crap coin you have not even made.. thirdly you are already devaluing your crap coin by admitting to printing however much you like.. oh and um.. in crypto there is no print.. we dont do paper.. its called mined or minted.. so another failure on your part .. you really dont know how things work or know economics or much of anything.. but as i said great comedy |
|
|
|
|
first of all, great comedy
pretending to be highly organised with "military and construction" ideals.. but in reality we both know you dont have 2 bricks and a land mine to your name
second of all
offering loans of $1m if businesses go through vigorous checking/vetting of their person and business.. but then saying you will air drop $1b to recruiters just for spamming adverts
so rigorous checks for $1m but frivolous free handouts for $1b (1000x.)
i dont think you quite understand economics
..
like i said great comedy. shame you didnt offer popcorn
|
|
|
|
It is very head scratching to witness this happen to Barry Silbert. I certainly thought he would be one of the founders that would be remaining in the cryptospace until he retires because of old age. It appears he was part of the daisy chain of lenders and borrowers that he mentioned on 2021.   Also, what was he implying when he tweeted to Sam Bankman Fried that it is his turn hehehee. both in criminal trouble no surprise, with multiple cases involving DCG and its many sister companies. before FTX got infamous DCG even had FTX listed on DCG portfolio.. so DCG invested directly with FTX (from memory: i think it was about $250k direct equity investment of FTX in july 2021 + then offered $xxxm of loaned/collateral within FTX) as for "daisy chain"... i guess the "contagion" is no longer trendy |
|
|
|
Titan Mining CEO Ryan Condron explained, “At Titan, we believe in empowering miners worldwide. The Titan Lightning solution offers immediate access to mining rewards, enhancing liquidity and putting control back in the hands of miners.” The integration of the Lightning Network allows miners to receive block rewards every ten minutes with no minimum payout.
If this part is fully true, that means the pool prepare tons of Bitcoin on LN. After all, you can't spend mined Bitcoin before 100 confirmation. While the idea is cool, i'm not sure many miner really want or need to sell or use their mined BTC as soon as possible. users dont get to close out channels of fresh mined coin.. they are given already locked balance of old coins if the system was smart they would be operating as a mixer. taking in dirty coins(mixer inbound/in-flow). selling dirty coins to a mining pool(at discount) and the mining pool then distributing clean coins out to mixers(at premium).. to then close channel between pool and mixers ..for the mixers to then open channels with its mixer customers to offer out clean fresh mined coins as the outflow to mixer users, at premium .. for the pool to then open channels with its miner and send dirty coins to miners at better rate |
|
|
|
I find it's interesting how Bitcoin price can constantly increasing but the fees is still cheap, I thought both of them are following each other.
when ETF are buying coin on exchanges.. it does not effect blockchain data when ETF withdraw from spot exchange to deposit into custodian.. a transaction is the same length of bytes of value for one output whether its moving a output of 330sat or 10,000btc its actually a benefit really if 100,000 were offering 0.1btc on a spot exchange. and one user bought 10k btc. the withdraw is just one output where as if it was say another 100,000 users. where usually only 10% then withdraw, it would use dozens of transactions for hundreds of users batched together over time |
|
|
|
I am still waiting for q waiting for the Q.. well thats what queues are for instead of waiting a week for exact moment 1sat is minimal might aswell throw in 1sat now and wait for lucky chance to get in before next week = same thing but sooner a couple 1sat/b got into a block just 34 minutes ago from time of this post  |
|
|
|
No innocent person deserves to be in prison because the government wants to get rid of criminals. I will not be happy to be in prison for a crime I didn't commit. There should be a review these the sentence and incarceration. I read that some of them were sentenced to as high as 269 years in prison and maybe some innocent citizens might have received such a harsh sentence.
US incarcerates many innocent people. US even still does death penalty there are people still n US prisons doing time for crimes that are now decriminalised where people can now do without being arrested but those in prison are still doing time for the exact same action heck US lets citizens carry guns but as soon as a cop sees a gun the cop has "right to defend self" and instantly kill someone for having a gun.. heck US cops even kills kids for carrying a water pistol, a phone or any object a cop mistakes for a gun intentional murder rate(2022 stats) per 100,000 rank population death count 48 7.8 496 el salvador 55 6.4 21,593 america there are 43.5x more physical murders in the US |
|
|
|
Ha, Valentine's Day is a product of consumerism and exposure to the fakeness of social media. Back then, if you have a flower and a handwritten letter, that's enough to celebrate Valentine's day. Nowadays, people become so materialistic and addicted to social media that they want to receive gifts and post it for other people's validation and affirmation. I do have a partner and I made it clear that we're not going to spend on fancy dates just because everyone does. Thankfully, she understands and insisted on us going for a quick ride in the mountains with packed lunch. Also, men shouldn't be pressured to always spend in a relationship. If you don't have the money, be honest and sincere about it. If she doesn't accept it, then better find yourself another partner whose capacity to understand your financial status is greater.
they guy had the money. was willing to spend that value.. its not about the amount.. and the girl declined the amount its about the form in which he displayed his offering which signifies how he see's her she took it [AS ALL WOMEN WOULD] as a sign that he was expecting intimacy in return for money.. AKA prostitution if he made a true romantic effort, even just flowers and a love letter he would have got a whole different response even a $2 heart shaped keyring would have got a better response from all women. including the OP's GF.. compared to any value of money small or big.. because its about the message it conveys also if he or anyone moved onto a different girl and handed them money on valentines day.. he would get same response no matter the girl. he sent the wrong message.. he subtly implied he seen her as a prostitute. as thats what the money implies. in this circumstance of intimacy expectation after gifts so heed his example everyone. dont give a girl money and expect intimacy especially on valentines without her thinking you want to treat her as a prostitute avoid such mistakes. get her anything cute/romantic. even if its cheaper/tackier .. just make a proper romantic gesture |
|
|
|
what most likely happened is the user typed in for instance 52.000 instead of 52,000 (period instead of comma)
so it sold down all orders from $52,000 down until $238 where all 1.7btc was eaten
also by using a crap exchange that only had <2btc between 52,000 down to single figures meant there was no order wall to prevent such drop
EG better exchanges that have more the 2BTC wall at 51,800 means the order would have only fallen to 51,800
I think it is not because Bitcoin price is high enough to ignore decimal. He can type 52000 and don't have to mind about dot or comma. If Bitcoin price is like $5 or $52, your assumption can be true because with these small price, $0.1 can make sense and have effect on profit taking. if you look at the OP image carefully.  where its showing just some of the prices of orders.. you will notice $47.335,36 period commaso a mis selection of putting a comma where a period should be and a period where a comma should be. would cause a order wanting to only sell at $52 ,000 become an order willing to sell all the way down to $52 .00 should a lack of buy orders not exist to to fill all sats sold before hitting bottom |
|
|
|
|
correction
locked funds ARE in custody of a pools channel, where the miner is given unsettled IOU inbound balance from channel partner,(expecting inbound balance that is NOT a miners self custody owned coin).. with the hopes of mutual cooperative channel closing to settle and later receive actual coin.
but
with a mining pool hosting/locking the reward as its input.. with multiple active HTLC(potential outputs with conditions) for its workers(miners) the mining pool wont just close its funding channel at one participants request.
the word "non custodial" has been abused to suggest funds are not centralised.. when actual meaning is funds are not self-custody.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
