(entirely possible).
After all, why would Roger be promoting alternative development plans that endanger the network? Freedom also includes the freedom to be a total idiot, apparently.
I know who Ver is. Who the f*** are you? Who's network is he endangering? Yeah, apparently. |
|
|
|
Depth yesterday was 8 btc.
Today, after 13btc volume selling, depth is 9 btc.
I'm going to put another 50 cents into it.
Depth now is over 14 btc. Means jack shit. Price is still less than you paid. Even though depth gone up. Good luck with your 1000% return. Please don't start a trading blog. Why would I start a trading blog? I am having a little fun with about 5 dollars. 5 fucking dollars. Does that offend you? No it doesn't. Invest your "fucking" house if you want to loose that as well! Have fun lining the pockets of the unsavoury, and perpetuating what should be finished. |
|
|
|
Part of it would be to drive new traffic to his bitcoin.com and subdomains. He has a forum that is not doing very well and a casino to promote.
Is that a real magazine? Who paid for this opinion of yours? Are you grumpy cos Ver has not employed your services yet? (lol above ^ noted) |
|
|
|
I can't believe I'm the only one seeing this: This user is currently ignored. hmyea nah, im seing this too, and for many others... such technology, great sensor ship! but its carlton and lauda that keeps quoting them wackos.. I see that as well. franky's nonsense cannot penetrate the hull of my stoutly built sensor ship!  Gmax is a saint for suffering through franky1 posts and responding in good faith, with such an indomitable hope of someday bringing light to the benighted Gavinistas. Oh, I'm not seeing that. I see Gmax hiding here, under cover of your stoutly hull, unable to answer (or better offer info) beyond your agenda. |
|
|
|
Add any advice you want.
Don't buy alts. |
|
|
|
Apologies for interrupting the silence.
Back to you tumbleweed...
Thanks, Some people eh. |
|
|
|
He owns 100,000+ BTC,
Oft, claimed, never proved-- I bet him and Wright are great buddies. Maybe it was true at one point, but one doesn't retaining 100,000 BTC by buying loads of ripple, ethereum, and every other highly hyped altcoin that comes around. If it is true, it's remarkable and sad-- to own so much bitcoin and yet spend none of it to help further the development of Bitcoin... and instead just investing in putting a sleazy looking gambling site on Bitcoin.com (and filling the site with pro ethereum news). Yeah maybe, maybe not. How much you betting? Posted in loo of another Ver btc. |
|
|
|
Why is Roger Ver continually making posts/complaints about the block size issues on facebook/twitter? I thought segregated witness was already being rolled out and will continue to be rolled out over the next few months while a longer term solution is developed? With the current bitcoin price the community doesn't seem to be fretting over this issue like they were in the past.
Can someone enlighten me?
Twitter, you t***? Go to Ver's forum and ask him why, then report back, thanks. Posted in loo of 1 btc from Ver. |
|
|
|
Depth yesterday was 8 btc.
Today, after 13btc volume selling, depth is 9 btc.
I'm going to put another 50 cents into it.
Depth now is over 14 btc. Means jack shit. Price is still less than you paid. Even though depth gone up. Good luck with your 1000% return. Please don't start a trading blog. |
|
|
|
|
no-ice-please,
You ignored all your own advise just yesterday, when buying neucoin.
(bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=944933.2760)
no-ice-please advise's on neucoin investing, (massive premine, presale, and whatever)
".... Neucoin, etc are not really doing much. This kind of project, done right, does not need any premine, ico, presale, whatever."
".... Bottom line, flip a coin if you want to know whether to buy or sell this one."
".... I invested about 0.01 btc in it at current price,"
".... I'm going to put another 50 cents into it."
".... Any gambler should see that as a fair calculated risk."
I'm confused about your strategy here.
Is this "gamble" you took for noobs also, or only advanced traders such as yourself?
Should advanced traders ignore the advice on this thread, as you do?
Is this thread designed to award yourself some credibility?
(your neucoin "gamble" already at 50% loss?)
|
|
|
|
Deathwatch.
225 low in last 24 hours.
Bets on when it falls to two digits? I think 6 days.
Ok, took a little longer than 6 days, but we got there soon enough. Now trading at 0.00000060, new low at 0.00000045. Thanks Sandrine. Darteous is sitting on a 99% loss. But still clinging on to the dream of neucoin riches. no-ice-please sitting on 50% loss in less than a week. He's hoping his $5 neucoin investment will increase 1000 fold. If everyone was that daft, neucoin WOULD rule the crypto world. |
|
|
|
Jihan Wu is apparently tired of Gregory and Friends treating Bitcoin like their own personal plaything and tinker-ground.
Max blocksize limit must be decreased not increased. What Core devs accepted, as max blocksize increase road map, is already on the verge of gambling with the future of bitcoin. Arguing with big blocktards like Jihan Wu is a waste of time. He'd better move his pool on mining altcoins. Jihan Wu a big block retard because he wants to process a "few" more of our tx's? What pool are you running? |
|
|
|
What an incredibly moronic, toxic community this place has become. All over a disagreement on how bitcoin should scale.
There is no reason to tell someone who disagrees with you to go use another coin. That is incredibly immature and divisive... I can only conclude that this community is made up of a mixture of zealots who want to prove themselves right at all costs and asinine morons. Or so it seems from the last 20 pages of this thread or so.
The level of ignorance, vitriol and fanaticism being displayed here is rather disheartening to say the least.
Those who support bigger blocks should not be treated with disrespect merely for supporting Satoshi's original vision for on-chain scaling procedures.
" ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT" No constructiveness was ever intended here with such a thread title. Just gloating. Anyone thinking of a controlled block size increase is discredited as a "Classic" losers. Case closed. What a shame Core devs feel the need to repeatedly post here. |
|
|
|
thanks you franky1 for the explanation. "Hero member", sig campaign, nearly 3000 posts... yet not a clue of Bitcoin basics. This is disgraceful. This "1 hour" block prop, or "1 miniute" block prop has always been, and will always be. Now you noticed? Clueless sig campaign hero BCT members, helping to destroy BCT credibility. PLEASE REVOKE THIS USERS "HERO MEMBERSHIP"  seriously. if you think asking about a simple thing that i have never noticed before in the past two years in bitcoin destroys BCT credibility then you are clueless. If it took you 2 years and 3000 posts to notice this most simple basic thing is happening and not understand why, I think we can see who is clueless here. |
|
|
|
"Hero member", sig campaign, nearly 3000 posts... yet not a clue of Bitcoin basics. This is disgraceful. This "1 hour" block prop, or "1 miniute" block prop has always been, and will always be. Now you noticed? Clueless sig campaign hero BCT members, helping to destroy BCT credibility. PLEASE REVOKE THIS USERS "HERO MEMBERSHIP" seriously. |
|
|
|
And if Core do this under duress, their hand being called, Can Core then still claim competence? ^ incompetence? |
|
|
|
Easy to fix. Majority wants the entire package incl HF, so it will be done w/o any real issues.
Leads to reunion and peace.
Happy days
Exactly how did you measure this "majority"? Please enlighten me. Agreed, Who the hell wants a delayed, buggy segwit at this stage. |
|
|
|
bump.
is it ready yet?
It is still being reviewed. It's going a bit slowly. The code exists, the PR has been submitted, and AFAIK, it works. However, people are still reviewing it to make sure that there are no bugs and that it is optimized. AFAIK? exactly the problem with Core communication, the road map outdated, (I see your trying to help, but) Everyone knows afaik, and thinks it works, but no one seems to know wtf is really happening or going to happen or when. Is that, in some part, because segwit will have no effect on "block space" for many months to come. Whilst natural "user adoption" should continue to rise. mempool could gridlock, leading to a stupid pointless fees bubble and long delays. Bitcoin adoption stalled or permanently damaged. Core should answer this question clearly, Will it be "many" months, best case, before segwit has any noticeable effect on block space? (or longer, if ever) I think I know. |
|
|
|
bump.
is it ready yet?
Bump? Like, WTF is going on? |
|
|
|
|
so no segwit benefit for ages yet?, if ever.
(you lost me a bit there, need more time to compute)
But can anyone test such theories as (i think yours) a miner including a segwit block, pre segwit, to then activate later?
Or would that be off scope/unpredictable to achieve in test mode.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
