You are missing the transparency of choosing the winner. Where is the table panel?  Why? |
|
|
|
Anybody in the future who reads this and trades in Canada i'd be interested in what you use I used to buy coins directly from the guy's at Waves coffee in their little office there back in the day before they even set up an ATM (they're long gone). Outside of the main exchanges, there isn't much for Canada save for Coinsquare and Bylls/Bullbitcoin if you don't care too much about KYC (as far as I know). I can't say much about either of these services, though as I don't personally trade very often, but some people who have used these say that they are alright. |
|
|
|
Sent, 48hrs I'll return 0.001938 BTC plus some extra Transaction has been sent. For (assumed) privacy's sake, I'm going to keep this confidential except in the case of critical importance. Otherwise, will confirm the transaction's receipt when the loan is complete. Note that this is loan is given without a definitive link between moni3z's current identity and their past identities, though there is significant circumstantial evidence to imply one. |
|
|
|
There are many others arts which more suitable to become the winner and should be choosen rather than most of those top 5 winners.  I too have different choices, but who cares? There was a lot of good out there and I don't think that even 10 spots would have fit all of the content. |
|
|
|
Anyway if there is somebody from Canada here, and can accept an Interac email for $30 (i only need $20USD really), for collateral then let me know otherwise cancel this thread Just give me an address either through a private message or through here. I'll send you the US$20. |
|
|
|
These two wallet doesn't belong to localbitcoin and even doesn't belong to any exchange (correct me if I am wrong). This two wallet belongs to a single wallet which should have private key. It might be from blockchain, electrum or something like this. Easiest way to immediately jump up reputation? State on the #bitcoin-otc channel, "I am moni3z on Bitcointalk," and you instantly get an A->B linkage. Confirm here, and it is set in stone as A<->B |
|
|
|
and now all my old accounts want piles of verification, the absolute state of memecoins in current year for small amounts even. No worries guys, I know how it works, also I could have emailed anybody a $30 interac payment (in Canada). Users are paranoid these days. Back in 2017, even, I found that this account from 2011, which used to hold BTC for the forum, was compromised by some random user and ended up in bad hands. There's a reason people like concrete links. The thing is, there's probably an easier way. The problem is, you don't reuse the old addresses in multiple unique input transactions. Bad for finding some modern address that relates to your old wallet. 1FActnPuuxVu4eU62YnCTYDmUDU6LgyYNz is one from 2017 Nov. |
|
|
|
As you see this is the problem, localbitcoins won't even let you look at your wallet without 'tier 1 verification': Where would we be without Bitcoin's decentralization?  Anyway no worries, there is a bitcoin ATM here I can get too eventually If you are going to come back to the forum in any capacity, I would still recommend creating some concrete link between the 2015 cryptographic identity and the current one: if at time you repaid a previous loan and you still have access to the wallet that did so, you could sign a message with those relevant addresses from the repayment transaction. |
|
|
|
Cancel the request then, I'll just go to a bitcoin ATM here on the weekend or Bitcoin-OTC where I have rep and use an escrow Honestly, if you just give me a screenshot of that receiving address from your LCB page that's probably good enough for me. This is not a situation where if I lose $30 I would be upset. The probability of someone taking over your account in this way is low enough that if I really did I get swindled, then hats off to the actor. Shoot over a new address and the screenshot.
Actually, if you have access to either of these addresses: 1B5H4xEEaDhmbPGFVTst2kymd9HFYhymoW 1JgaFPpfvBUMo4JzNctgGuqDcgNR3AirFk source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=750507.msg12523754#msg12523754Then that would also suffice. (Any public repayment addresses can be signed for verification)
And if anyone is curious about the original cxg post: link"I need BTC, roughly $30 to $40 (CAD) depending what you want to sell, name your price, payment is Interac (Canada)" |
|
|
|
Sign this address: 18gEM6Mjk9QmXs6GyvSFbNmfncPJr2Zq69 Source: Req 1BTC, return 1.2BTC 23Oct If this is OK same address 18gEM6Mjk9QmXs6GyvSFbNmfncPJr2Zq69 Thanks again 
I am not trying to say that this is a scam attempt or anything. However, keep vigilant for anybody who willing to give him the loans since the user recently woke up after for years inactivity and has been changed the account's password lately. There's a possibility this is a bought or hacked account even though his trust was green. This is the timeline (via BPIP): 9/3/2020 9:41:00 PM password reset via email 9/3/2020 9:41:04 PM woke up Just need to make sure with some addresses first.
Otherwise, I'll send it to the address. Repay me the amount I paid in transaction fees and we're good. |
|
|
|
The following list will be updated as the unhandled reports continue to trickle through the report queue. There are roughly 1600 left, though this may overlap with some "no-action" results. List of users sorted by no. good reports filed against their posts, from approximately June 2020 onwards: 522| onrise
302| fortunecrypto
169| ethereumhunter
140| gweedo
120| quality.crypto
117| TheICE007
116| michellee
113| zaim7413
103| FloridaKid
99 | n0ne
98 | litepool.ru
97 | kramat
95 | luckyflop
94 | gantez
91 | OrangeII
86 | Subbir
81 | krayzie32
78 | sangjoewara
78 | DonFacundo
76 | calandra78
71 | Falconer
69 | miningguru
69 | cunguks
68 | awakpane
64 | pilosopotasyo
62 | udidrone
62 | Oceat
61 | ansarose1
60 | meldrio1
60 | leatutz
59 | FlamingFingers
58 | TheClownSong
53 | Negotiation
51 | Krislaw
47 | kang_kung
46 | bitpotter
45 | Denies Distro
44 | hinorizk
43 | JeffBrad12
38 | dimastegar
38 | Burogh
37 | rendravolt
35 | Paycoinzzz
33 | shinratensei_
33 | NewRanger
30 | bxipp
28 | GDragon
28 | beveryu778
26 | Nellayar
22 | terrific
20 | Taskford
20 | magnum cyber
20 | eidoscore
19 | lunnatic
17 | Justin999
17 | DeadCoin
17 | Asuspawer09
16 | bitcoinst
15 | jajorforce
13 | PancongStreet
12 | TitanGEL
12 | FIFA worldcup
12 | drlukacs
10 | pawanjain
Total reports: 4508 Total users: 87 Average reports/user: 51.81 Worst offender: onrise |
|
|
|
I'd say signing the PGP key from an old staked Bitcoin address means a lot more than a photo ID. I like to differentiate cryptographic identities from individuals, since this allows us a bit more granularity. The core difference is that of verifiability: one is unable to link digital and analog identities without a lot of effort or without huge privacy holes, but when you separate the two, you can find links between the elements of each subset. |
|
|
|
Perhaps if there was a more formalised structure to the Forum people could be held accountable for their actions (more accountability = more secure??) , and as I said, a third party KYC could validate users - issue a token similar to the captcha token a person can use at log in (they'd still have to physically log in). All the Forum has to loose is the user name and password details as it is already plus token which could be cancelled if there was ever any doubt a user was who they say they are. This is redundant if you simply use BTC addresses in the place of usernames and sign your messages. Perhaps you've been swayed over the years because of all the altcoin crowd, but tokenization is not necessary for every single thing. |
|
|
|
have they done changed these rules ? As of this post, no. You still have these exact terms on their ToS page: 8.1.1. On Slots, Casino Games and Live Games Your deposit amount must be wagered, be turned over 2 (two) times;
8.1.2. On Sportsbook Services You have to make at least one bet with minimum stake of 50% of Your deposit amount (example: if Your deposit amount is equivalent to EUR 100, You have to bet minimum EUR 50 on any position You can select on Sportsbook Services); Direct link: https://fortunejack.com/faq/terms_and_conditionsArchive: https://archive.is/ANiCl#selection-949.0-953.258 |
|
|
|
The previous day showed the participant pool dropping by 2 participant(s), from 78 to 76. Those that were dropped are the following:
Remaining participants just got their final prize increased by 2.63%, to 13.15 mBTC Now using a simple bash script to make the calculations as quickly as possible. |
|
|
|
|
Hello, kbaptou.
Through your post history, there is a common trend of assuming the conclusion in order to create a model to find valid arguments to demonstrate the conclusion. However, this is a causal loop and falls into irrationality when taken outside of the limited scope within the model.
Rather than start with, "ChipMixer is a scam, and here's why," it would be better to begin with your premises. "These are event(s) that are indicative of a scam. These are linked to ChipMixer in this way. Therefore, ChipMixer is a scam."
Tunneling on a singular point means that your biases cloud your vision from other things you may overlook.
|
|
|
|
The previous day showed the participant pool dropping by a single participant, from 79 to 78. Those that were dropped are the following:
Remaining participants just got their final prize increased by 1.28%, to 12.82 mBTC Nearly 300 participants are gone, and by the time the number reduces to 74 you will have passed the 80% drop-off mark. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
