Child porn was never thriving on Twitter or literally any major social media network.
"gender twisting groomers" (whatever that is) leads me to think that "child porn" might have been redefined in nutcase newspeak just like "shadow banning" was. sEmAnTiCs! |
|
|
|
That's a real danger for sure. Your list neglect to include what most of you guys incorrectly (in my opinion) consider 'anti-semitism'.
You are an anti-semite, fyi. It makes sense that you don't really think they exist, I would expect most anti-Semites to agree with you. Racist people in general rarely consider themselves racist or believe racism is a legitimate issue. Just to support my argument for those who aren't familiar with your post history (I know you will argue this doesn't prove anything. I know it won't, to you.): Nobody is saying anything about 'every Jew'. Not even genuine anti-semites. I'm sure that there are antisemites but they are as rare as hens teeth and I don't think I've ever met one in the flesh. Questioning the truly clown-show details of the so-called 'holocaust' is certainly not antisemitism no matter what the ADL or whoever says. It's simply not being a brainwashed simpleton or a shameful coward who would sell the U.S. 1st amendment down the river to appease some of the most abysmal ethnic supremacists who ever walked the face of the earth.
one needs to be a Jew and/or a kiddie diddler to get AIPAC money.
Some of the most loathsome elements Kabbalistic interpretation seem to be much more broadly disseminated through the Jewish mindset than simply a small set of creepy Rabbis. Things like sufficiently read-in Jews 'creating worlds by speaking Hebrew'. i.e., lying out their asses and making up fictional stories about Russian soldiers war crimes. People who grew up in 'Christian nations' have a hard time getting their minds around such a thing and are thus commonly victimized by such tactics.
Later it was discovered that for a period of time hospitals in certain coastal regions such as Jew York were able to milk over $70,000 dollars per 'covid patient' out of the the government due to certain emergency funding.
|
|
|
|
I’m just glad that now Twitter is out of the hands of liberal psychos. They were prioritizing silencing conservatives while leaving child porn thriving on the platform. I’m not sure if liberals are mad that conservatives now have an equal playing field or if they’re mad their child porn provider is going away, but one thing is for sure, it’s going to get a lot more difficult for these gender twisting groomers to achieve their goals on Twitter, and I think that’s a huge win for society.
Jesus, how gullible are you? Child porn was never thriving on Twitter or literally any major social media network. |
|
|
|
Everyone seems to be ignoring the definition of a shadow ban that was given when the claim was made and using a different definition that would make the statement a lie.
Semantics is the weakest form of argument. Trying to use doublespeak now to pretend they weren't lying is ridiculous. Twitter was lying and got caught red handed. I'm sure the abuse goes even further than what we've already seen, and what we've already seen is enough to distrust our government. When you look into all the details of ex-alphabet boys getting positions in Twitter to make their manipulation easier from the inside and it's clear as day that this has been happening. Although everyone already knew this because it was obvious. Now it's fact instead of conspiracy theory. The really crazy part is that YouTube and Facebook are even worse offenders but have deeper pockets to avoid a buyout. I hope this latest set of events has them terrified and questioning their bad behavior. I hope it all comes to light in the end and liberals are able to digest they've been brainwashed while being mature enough to switch their views based on their new understanding of reality. Try to put your hatred for the libs and love of Elon aside and look at this rationally. They clearly defined 'shadow ban' at the time of claiming they don't shadow ban people. It's a reasonable definition. imo, it's the most reasonable definition. They clearly explained that they did do what people are now claiming is shadow banning (making it harder to discover some tweets without following the user or searching for them). Because they provided the definition when making the claim, there's really no semantic debate on what they meant. We know exactly what they meant. You can't read their statement on shadowbanning and argue in good faith that "they said they didn't shadow ban, now we know they do, they lied about not shadow banning". It's just not logical. Semantics is the weakest form of argument. Irrational, bad faith, uninformed arguments are weaker. |
|
|
|
In 2018, Twitter general counsel Vijaya Gadde denied the usage of shadow banning and suggested it was a conspiracy theory. Nonsense.
Seems like she addressed it pretty accurately when claiming they don't shadow ban: https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/Setting-the-record-straight-on-shadow-banningThe best definition we found is this: deliberately making someone’s content undiscoverable to everyone except the person who posted it, unbeknownst to the original poster.
We do not shadow ban. You are always able to see the tweets from accounts you follow (although you may have to do more work to find them, like go directly to their profile). And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology. Everyone seems to be ignoring the definition of a shadow ban that was given when the claim was made and using a different definition that would make the statement a lie. I've always thought of shadow bans in relation to chat rooms. If someone gets shadow banned, they see their messages appearing in the chat but nobody else can. I believe this is the original use of the term. The twitter equivalent would be someone tweeting and nobody else being able to see it. Which isn't what's happening at twitter. |
|
|
|
I've been studying the subject a lot lately. It's not particularly easy to just 'switch sides' physically. Even the handful of nations who will sell citizenship (e.g., Turkey) do want upwards of half a million $$$.
You're studying something irrelevant. You don't need citizenship to pursue freedom in the dictatorship country of your choice. Russia will happily hand out permanent resident permits to pretty much anyone, all you need is a job. If he moved to Russia, I would expect him to continue his anti-main stream media/establishment views and ultimately end up in the gulhag for supporting the West, or lgtbq rights, or freedom of speech or something along those lines. |
|
|
|
I wonder how many german citizens would empathize with sentiments of these extremists? Is it a trend exclusively reserved only for elderly age demographics?
Are boomers considered elderly now? |
|
|
|
I already surpass him in this.
Oh really? Despite being unable to articulate an original idea and having the reading comprehension of a middle schooler he's averaged more than 11 posts a day for the past 9 years. Created almost 2,000 threads most frequently about articles from Mike Adams network of literal fake news sites that only exist to sell scam alternative medical supplements to the most gullible people on the internet. (naturalnews is the biggest). |
|
|
|
Ok aside from US political party donations and potential aid to the Ukraine which the media seem to want pushed under the rug. Do you want to grow up to be like BADecker? Because that's what's going to happen if you don't learn how to let a stupid conspiracy theory go. Ok aside from US political party donations and potential aid to the Ukraine which the media seem to want pushed under the rug. Why haven't they arrested SBF for the fraud he committed? Is he too big to jail like the banksters of 2008 we tried to get away from in crypto? Is it because he donated to both parties and by arresting him he can snitch on all of them? Your thoughts?
Well i am stepping in. One reason could be that they need to go trough mountain of evidence to even decide if they can extradite / contain him, and should they yet even do that. And, who is going to arrest him? He lives in bahamas and most likely haven't broke any laws in there, and bahamas likes to protect their criminals, if they would give up people easily, many criminals wouldn't choose it as place to live. Also it was FTX international that failed, didn't accept US customers so i am not even sure if they broke any US law. But this is a huge case and so many people and firms were affected that it can take months or even years to build a case against him. People just think that because ftx went down fast we could arrest him fast as well. Pretty much this. And even if they had everything in order to issue an arrest warrant today, why would they mess up SBFs busy schedule of incriminating himself every other day to a new major media outlet? |
|
|
|
Sam Bankman-Fried says he donated just as many millions to Republicans as Democrats, but didn’t publicize it because reporters would ‘freak the f–k out’“All my Republican donations were dark. The reason was not for regulatory reasons, it’s because reporters freak the fuck out if you donate to Republicans. They’re all super liberal, and I didn’t want to have that fight.”https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/nov/30/ftx-billionaire-sam-bankman-fried-dark-money-republicansSam Bankman-Fried’s FTX Collapse Touches Ukraine, the World Economic Forum, Silicon Valley and Both Sides of D.C. https://www.themainewire.com/2022/11/sam-bankman-frieds-ftx-collapse-touches-ukraine-the-world-economic-forum-silicon-valley-and-both-sides-of-d-c/"Sam Bankman-Fried is a name you’re going to hear a lot about over the next year – and rightly so. The implosion of his cryptocurrency empire is like if Enron and Bernie Madoff had a baby, and that baby became the 2nd largest Democratic Party donor on his 2nd birthday while partnering with the World Economic Forum and the Bank of Ukraine." "According to reporting from Coin Desk, the Ukrainian government partnered with FTX to help convert cryptocurrency “donations” into arms and war supplies. According to some estimates, between FTX and the National Bank of Ukraine facilitated the flow of up to $100 million worth of bitcoin and cryptocurrency for the war effort." Ukraine Partners With FTX, Everstake to Launch New Crypto Donation Website https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/03/14/ukraine-partners-with-ftx-everstake-to-launch-new-crypto-donation-website/"A press release on the Aid to Ukraine efforts reads: The official website for Aid For Ukraine, an initiative that raises funds from the crypto community for the benefit of Ukraine’s military and humanitarian needs, has officially launched. The initiative is powered by the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, FTX, and Everstake. This is the first instance of a cryptocurrency exchange providing a conduit for crypto donations to a public financial institution." Sam Bankman-Fried, FTX Founder: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know https://heavy.com/news/sam-bankman-fried-ukraine-politics-biden/Other than the $25 FTX credit for Ukrainian FTX users, all they did was help converting crypto to fiat. There was no laundering because Ukraine never sent anything back. Everything that was donated to the addresses shared by government officials were converted to fiat and deposited directly into Ukraines National Bank. Also, FTX was only involved for about a month in March/April and was only involved in exchanging a couple million of the couple hundred million. It's just a stupid conspiracy theory from idiots who love to make connections that don't exist but help confirm their bias. The mainewire article you posted isn't false. It explains the conspiracy theory can only be true if Ukraine was somehow investing in FTX. We now know that wasn't happening. The theory no longer makes sense. From the article: However, it’s unclear whether FTX’s relationship with Ukraine involved any Ukrainian investment into FTX. On the surface, it looks like SBF was virtue signaling his anti-Russian credentials by converting cryptocurrency for Ukraine – lending a crypto hand to the war effort. But with so many cryptocurrency shenanigans going on, it’s hard to know for sure what the flow of money really looked like. If Ukrainian relief money was flowing onto FTX’s books, that would raise serious questions for the U.S. government, considering U.S. taxpayers have shelled out more than $60 billion in aid for Ukraine’s war effort. Why The Theory That Sam Bankman-Fried Laundered Ukraine Aid Makes No Sense https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2022/11/15/why-the-theory-that-sam-bankman-fried-laundered-ukraine-aid-makes-no-sensePosts spin baseless theory about FTX, Ukraine and Democrats https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-ftx-ukraine-democrats-laundering-996663874380
|
|
|
|
that was what the mask mandates were about to find out your facial ID even if its obscured.
Didn't put much thought into that theory did you? I didn't have to use any theory because facial recognition is a worldwide reality and no theory unless you are living under a rock. Read what you said again: that was what the mask mandates were about to find out your facial ID even if its obscured.
I'll assume you realize now how silly it would be to implement mask mandates around the world so that "they" could figure out what people looked like with masks on. |
|
|
|
You know that Time magazine had Hitler and Stalin (twice) as person of the year as well... And they deserved it. Whether you've done good or evil is not considered when deciding who wins. Just who had the biggest effect on the news of the year. Its not because Putin wants control of the Ukraine our dear elite that run things behind the scenes want control of this world.
No, Russia invaded Ukraine because Putin wants to control Ukraine. You really think there's a secret club that called up Putin and Zelensky and said "we need you go to war with each other and make it look like Russia wants to control Ukraine and Ukraine doesn't want to be controlled by Russia so that we can control the world". That's ridiculous. Maybe this guy should be included in your post since he laundered I mean "donated" so much to the Ukraine:
Ukraine used FTX to convert all their crypto donations to fiat. That's literally all there is to the story. I don't think SBF even donated money directly to Ukraine. But if he wanted to, he wouldn't have made it a secret (unlike the dark money donations he claims he made to Republicans). |
|
|
|
So this war happened
because Putin wanted to control Ukraine. That's why this war happened.
Easiest decision Time has made in recent memory...  |
|
|
|
# Large corporations and businesses use resources like the internet far more to lowball employee salaries and benefits. In contrast to workers using the internet as a tool to organize, network and represent their own best interests. The type of information sharing associated with trends like facial recognition are used far more by wealthy elites than they are by average joes. Despite the advent of smart phones and the internet, average joes almost never use technology as a tool to improve their circumstances.
I think pretty much the opposite of each of your points here is true. It's like you just arrived from a planet that hasn't figured out the whole internet thing yet but they do have sci fi movies based on the concept. that was what the mask mandates were about to find out your facial ID even if its obscured.
Didn't put much thought into that theory did you? |
|
|
|
November 30, 2022
The SCOTUS set the conference date for Jan 6, 2023
(The 9 Justices will meet January 6, 2023 to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will oficially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)Brunson Bros. drain the swamp Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al.,
(Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)
Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other.
The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.
The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS),
Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.
THE LAWSUITBoth lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election. BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..." THE QUESTIONHow can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES. THE RELIEF THAT LOY AND RALAND ARE SEEKINGThat defendants be permanantly removed from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.
BACKGROUND Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation. The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation. Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a "Complaint" and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy's lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland's lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS. Here are the events of both lawsuits: ...  Ok, finally we get to see is the kraken real or is BADecker a lunatic, it all comes down to this very serious case that, because of how urgent and time sensitive this matter is, SCOTUS will talk about on Jan 6, more than half way into Bidens first term. If they decide to take it and then rule in favor of the plaintiff, then plaintiff (who is representing himself) will get 3 billion in damages (tax free!), Joe Biden will be removed from office, the kraken will unleash it's fury and BADecker will no longer be considered a lunatic. |
|
|
|
TwitchySeal is promoting violence as well because TwitchySeal is a Nazi.
You're the one claiming almost half the adults in the United States have no place in society and should be locked up... I will always treat all graduates from all universities as violent sociopaths who have absolutely no place in decent society and who need to be locked up.
Um. K-12 and college are prison (because all these institutions promote violence except for prisons which try to reduce violence). College graduates have therefore experienced a lot of incarceration. And the student loan debt is slavery. So tell me again how it is wrong for me to suggest that college graduates deserve a little bit more incarceration?
Since there aren't enough prison cells for the 100+ million people that you say have no place in society and should be locked up, how would you suggest locking them up? Maybe just build some big camps and see how many can be stuffed in each one? And what should happen to the people that say they don't want to be locked up and refuse to cooperate? |
|
|
|
Ukraine isn't an ally.
Ukraine is most certainly an ally of the US and other Western countries and they haven't been conquered by anyone since passing the referendum declaring their independence in the 90s. |
|
|
|
The Kraken is almost here. A case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, not for election fraud, but because loads of Congress people, along with Biden, Harris and Pense, would not investigate obvious insecurities regarding the election. If won, these people would be immediately out of office... for treason and breaking their oaths of office. The case is being adjudicated on by SCOTUS right now. Take a look at the Rumble site below. Also, watch another video at https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html?fbclid=IwAR0OKVlapmCGMbE4MZqJ78AA4fv2jSpH8LEozBamL_2oFebW8Yjy49-SWWELoy Brunson Discusses Supreme Court Case That Could Change Everything: Loy Brunson Discusses Supreme Court Case That Could Change Everything: Treason! Every Congressman Who Certified the 2020 Election Should Be Removed Now Get the Brunson Lawsuits at https://7discoveries.com/If you want to support the show, you can donate here: http://bit.ly/cd-donateThis episode of Conservative Daily is brought to you by DCF Guns. We all see what is happening in America right now. It has never been more important for you to arm yourself, and most importantly, learn how to use your arms safely and effectively... Wow I guess it's finally happening. The Kraken is almost here. And as soon as it arrives you won't look like a lunatic any more. How exciting. |
|
|
|
TwitchySeal is promoting violence as well because TwitchySeal is a Nazi.
You're the one claiming almost half the adults in the United States have no place in society and should be locked up... I will always treat all graduates from all universities as violent sociopaths who have absolutely no place in decent society and who need to be locked up.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
