'injected' is not equal to 'vaccinated'.  Many whistleblowers from the medical system are saying that almost everyone in their emergency units (and others) have been jabbed.

They are clearly also diagnosing people differently depending on whether they are jabbed or not.  Like defining 'covid' in 'fully vaccinated' people only if a PCR cycle threshold is reasonable (in the 20's) while for un-jabbed people they run the cycle threshold into the 40's which gets mostly false positives.  Never mind that PCR is inappropriate for diagnostics in the first place and is just a tool used to get number on papers to scare the shit out of 'the herd' or to keep the occupancy of the 'quarantine facilities' at what the managers want.

It was pretty obvious even way back in early 2020 when the initial 'vaccine' studies were being done (and proving disastrous if one actually evaluated the available info) that they were going to pass off the damage done by the gene therapy on 'covid waves' and 'virus damage' and the like.  That was one of the reasons for deeming every possible problem known to man as effects of 'SARS-cov-2'.  It's especially useful that the gene therapy turns the victim's body into a spike protein bioweapon factory just as does an infection of the virus itself, or so it is claimed.  That's why the 'authorities' like Gates knew, early on and for sure, that there would be several more 'waves' even though that is never how coronavirus has ever worked in the past.  They had a pretty good idea of when the injections were going to go into the arms.

It's looking more and more by the day that the so-called 'vaccine' is part of a depopulation operation, but it's still very much up-in-the-air what the percentage of people rubbed out will be, and how long it will take.

An alternate hypothesis is that the jab really is protection, or more generally, getting people conditioned to go in for a jab on direction from authorities and which would be used that way in an environment of more unrestricted biological warfare (which I've long considered the most likely major feature characterizing the next world war.)  The main idea that gives this theory strength is that the ruling classes tend to prefer as controllable a populace as possible.

Anyhoo, the very valid observation that those forced into the jab are those who need to or want to 'seek help' has some significant ramifications for humanity after the dust settles down a bit.  I must admit that I would probably enjoy a world with more capable people and fewer 'needy' people.  I just don't think that the net benefits are worth doing the deed, and the after-effects are highly unpredictable.  I (and those running the 'great reset') might be surprised and disappointed by the real-world consequences of doing people like that.

This dumb cunt cannot figure out what a private key is and what the 'distributed' part of a distributed block-chain is.

I should maybe not be so hard on her as she's more on top of things than most, but she's driven me to distraction for years with her giant blind-spots that don't seem to be going away.  Peeps could do better than her when it comes to finding solutions, and I certainly don't rule out that she's a deep cover 'one of them.'

I'd love to 'debate' one of these whole gaggle of 'financial guru' block-heads who somehow cannot figure out how to pull their heads out of their asses even with years of, supposedly, trying.  How much confidence can I have in them vis-a-vis their understanding of the legacy financial apparatus if they cannot figure out the very basics of crypto?

---

In other more related news, here's why my kids don't go to 'face to face' schools:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/h7zfCmI9j9fl/

If I ever do send them to a school there will be an armed guard watching over them at all times, and I doubt that would go over too well.  Most likely if I sent them to 'school' it would be a specialized private school where I knew the management well.  Something like the school which dis-allows jabbed teachers and students until we figure out if the sickness they are clot-shot they are injecting people with is spreading, and if so, how.

The population effect of administering neurotoxins and immune system disrupting 'platforms' in early life is a generalized dysfunction of mental abilities and a lot of immune system issues.  Particularly issues with allergies and auto-immunity.  This is useful because it weakens any potential resistance against the power structure.  People are broke and distracted just trying to deal with sick and failing family, and also to dumbed down to put two and two together.

Until 2020, a relatively few victims 'eat the big one' directly from the injections.  The design of these things avoid it.  Not because it would be an undesirable thing in it's own right, but more because it would cause resistance to the program more generally as people would wise up and resist.

By 2020, the health care strain of the highly vaccinated populations such as the U.S. were already under such pressure that there is no real hope to ever dig out of the hole.  In other words, the costs of just trying to treat the heath impacts would bankrupt the country leaving no excess money for such things as education, defense, etc.  At least in the longer term for the lifetime of the population.  Time for a controlled demolition.

The strategy with the plandemic is to generally accelerate the process of damage by use of injection.  Try to get it done so fast, and under such a state of confusion that people don't have time to react and take self-protective measures.  Having more vaccine damage within a few months than the full previous 30 years combined as represented by VAES was 'not a bug but a feature.'

Yes, the country will collapse, but that is kind of the idea.  People will be offered hope under a 'new global regime', but of course such a regime would also face an impossible problem.  They'll claim to have solutions and desperate people will grasp at anything.  As a matter of fact they will have solutions, and they've been not particularly secretive about these.  These are chiefly mass depopulation down to about 1/10th of current levels.  Anyone who wants 'net zero' will probably get exactly what they ignorantly asked for.

The design of the gene therapy has to reduce immune function in order for the spike protein production resulting from the cell re-programming to not be rejected by the immune system.  As a result we always see a big spike in problems after injection campaigns, and a lot more people getting sick and dying from various things.  Standard illustration of the phenomenon here:

  Pandemic Of The Vaccinated Breaks Out On 99% Jabbed Cal Football Team!!!
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/p6opFZSIWlbw/

It's also probably the case that a sports may be put on hold so that young healthy people don't get caught dying on camera so much.  It's not good pub for the de-pop shot marketing campaign.

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/fd5eoUJLjvdM/

If anyone needs an example of 'low functioning', you really cannot do much better than these two retards.  They occupied themselves on a multi-page post about 'smoke detectors' a while back, and didn't even notice when people were playing off their retardation.  It was embarrassing.

To my knowledge it remains the case that the only 'approved' so-called 'vaccine' for 'covid' is labeled 'Comirnaty'.  It is not available for injection in the U.S. where it is supposedly 'approved', thus all injections so far have been given under EUA(thorization) where the inject-ee is fully responsible for any issues that may arise, and both the government and the maker have legal indemnity.

If anyone knows of any other government who has formally 'authorized' any of the gene therapies, I'd be interested to hear it.  Or, if 'Comirnaty' supply has started to make it to the U.S..  As far as I know they are still burning up their supply of Pfizer-BioNTech under EUA, and the others never did get 'approval'.

Of course there will be a ton of mainstream media articles implying or straight up lying about this but, they are corporate owned fake news and only sources like the alternative media who often back up their material with links and allow open comments are reliable.  Any content provider who is allowed to use Jewtube, Facefuck, etc is automatically in the 'not credible' category to me.  Doesn't mean they are lying; just that the will when it is important and they need too.  And that they will avoid no-go topics of importance.

Probably had nothing to do with this thread, but 'my family' got three more guns today so we have a selection in each of our house sites (or 'compounds' as they tend to be known here.)

I've had great luck getting women interested in guns by letting them fondle a tiny concealed carry piece like a Glock P42 (in this instance.)  Even hard-core Liberals like my family back in the U.S..  Fact of the matter is that women (rightly) feel somewhat more vulnerable than a large guy and they usually harbor a hidden desire to level the playing field a bit.  Everyone has undergone a ton of intensive government sponsored brainwashing geared toward demonizing firearms, but once she gets over the relatively small bump of being on the 'other side' it is relatively easy to just have a sensible attitude about them.  I find practicing a terrible bore, but it's kind of fun for people who don't have background experience with firearms and some women really get into it and become enthusiast.  Thankfully there is a range not far from us.  It's been on my to-do list to for the wife, kids, house help, etc, to make some trips down to the range and practice up.  When the new Glocks and shotgun comes in we'll do that.

A funny little aside about where I am at: concealed carry permits are temporarily revoked around election time.  I'd have to think that there are variances given for bodyguards and stuff, but I don't know because I try to stay out of politics.

If the meth-heads in my area knew they wouldn't have to face an armed homeowner, it would be carnage.  I can promise that.  Meth turns a person into a complete psychopathic animal, or at least a lot of the people who would be drawn towards it's use in the first place.

I don't have much patience for the typical gun nut who thinks they are going to stand their ground against the tyrannical government.  It's not the right tool for the job, and the govt are at least on the cusp of having/using weapons which most of these morons could not imagine.

No, the big 'threat' of a citizenry keeping and bearing arms is that the ability exists to have relative peace and safety WITHOUT a lot of 'help' and 'support' from the government.  The government (and the lefty idjuts) cannot stand this!

I did the calcs one time and my area had something like an average of 1.5 sheriffs deputies covering like 1200 square miles at any given time.  My area was a minimum of 1/2 hour away from a cop car starting immediately and traveling at full speed.  And again, confrontational crime was almost non-existent.  Most of it which was was domestic disputes, and these involve any tool which is handy meaning if someone doesn't have a gun they would substitute with an axe.  To the degree that a gun is an effective weapon it might serve to limit escalation to a degree.  In other words, they girl/guy might pick up a chunk of wood before he/she would pick up a shotgun were it available.  Would be an interesting study.

Per 100,000.  Lol!  In other words, no problem.

When I lived in the U.S. I was in one of the most highly armed areas of the country (and I still own 8 or 10 guns there.)  It's would be unusual for a household to NOT have at least ne gun kicking around somewhere.  Very very unusual to hear of someone getting shot either accidentally or on purpose.  But for suicides, almost without exception the injured or killed 'victim' richly deserved what he got and had usually been terrorizing people for much of his miserable life.  Most of the time it was one dirt-bag tweaker shooting some other dirt-bag tweaker, but again, it was pretty unusual.  When it did happen I consider it a savings of tax money and there for an added efficiency to the social fabric.

There were a fair number of incidents of a homeowner protecting his/her family and property, but rarely were shots fired.  Most of the problems were with tweakers, and even being high on meth they still tried to avoid confrontations and did their (almost daily) property crimes only when they thought nobody was around.  But sometimes they made a mistake.

Wow!  These people are connected and careful, so it very likely is true.

Newsom very surely would have arranged a 'safe' injection, and in the highly unlikely instance that he is to stupid to have done so, his minders would have.

Wouldn't it be something if one of the few decent people in the California political cesspool made a little mistake and got a real Moderna clot-shot queued up 'by accident' instead of the saline?  Honestly, it wouldn't take a particularly decent person to be completely enraged at Newsom's child sacrifice operation and decide to do something about it.  Or even just someone who had one of their own become collateral damage already.

As for Newsom, Guillain-Barre is way too good for the guy.  A severe case of Transverse Myelitis to finish him off would be just what the doctor ordered.  Maybe God is saving it for Newsom's equally evil twin Justin Trudeau.

The celebrity doctors who ultimately earn a living off Big Pharma by way of advertising revenue 'beg' people to take the clot shot of course.  Many other doctors who have nothing to gain and everything to lose are saying that the injection makes little sense and are giving very compelling evidence for their positions.

I find the skeptical doctors who have open scientific discussions to be vastly more credible than the CNN doctors, or the doctors working in the shadows of the state bureaucracies and medical/industrial corporations.

It might still work to a degree to just 'go berserk' and destroy everything (before the existing political apparatus get's their chance to do the same anyway) and string everyone up who's thought to be involved in the covaids operation.  Wouldn't be pretty, but neither is the trajectory we are on.

Slightly more gentle, and possibly effective alternative/augmentation, would just have a 'people's court' and with findings of coviads operation's damages equal to all value owned by corporations, governments, reserves, etc.  As a method of retrieving damages, nullify all fiat currencies and only use crypto-currencies for commerce.  Instantiate as many crypto-currencies as necessary to provide the needed liquidity, and let the markets sort out the different values.

Sadly, everyone is falling right into the trap because they don't understand the '4th industrial revolution'.  The Western peeps are fighting central banks which control the money flows.  Loss of profits are not meaningful to these corporations.  They WANT supply issues and shortages.  They WANT the overpriced Western workers gone, and  by VAIDS or by failure to comply makes no difference.  PLENTY of trainable slaves from the 'developing world' to do what jobs robots cannot 5 years or so down the road when things start to stabilize out a bit.

We're just getting started, peeps, and with the unrestricted biological warfare we have only got the briefest of glimpses of what the other side has in their arsenal.  If there is not some very significant high level of defection on the other side, I don't see things going well.  At all.

Links just go to top level.  Useless.  It's a marker I used to detect bullshit, but...

A lot of 'bullshit' is ultra-true.  When one's mods-opperendi revolves upon telling lies to the sheeple, a common method of dealing with inconvenient truths is to spin them into a disjointed weave created by con artist operatives (aka, 'controlled opposition' aka 'limited hangouts'.)  Infowars, Hal Turner, Stew Peters, etc are a couple of examples of this principle in my analysis.

Once one understands this principle, a lot of good data can be gleaned from the controlled opposition by reading between the lines.  However, it is not really very necessary because

  A) there are way more honorable and more clever people than there are hours in the day who are NOT playing these games, and

  B) the controlled opposition really only 'produces' information that the A) people already covered, or is going to soon be exposed and 'go viral' anyway.

 

It is required by law for every medical professional to use VAERS, yet very few have even heard of it.  That partially explains why the reporting rate was found by Harvard to be less than 1%.  Harvard (through a health care system for the organization) had some ideas about how to make the system work better.  When they tried to engage the CDC about this, they literally had none of their calls returned and the CDC would have no further engagement with them.  The CDC seems to have the system working just the way they want.

As of the plandemic it has been discouraged to use the system by hospital administration in some cases (although I've heard the complaints well before the plandemic since I studied vaccine programs long before this.)  Many whistlblowers speak to this as one of the reasons for the under-reporting.

The data insertion framework is deliberately screwed up to discourage filing.  If a time-out hits, all previous data is deleted forcing one to start over again.  This would pretty much have to be a feature rather than a bug.

Information is followed up on by the CDC before it is made publicly available as I understand things.  In fact, one of the main complaints that users have is that the CDC does not follow up in a timely manner and sometimes not at all.  Many who analyze this data have noted that reports are sometimes withheld for months before suddenly appearing.

Lastly, on every page there is a giant warning saying that mis-use is a federal crime.  It is highly unlikely that normal bored kids, bots, etc, would be messing around with the system in this way, and any thinking person should be scared shit-less that they will be tracked down.  It is possible and relatively easy to detect and discriminate out things like VPN's and the like, or have some sort of an e-mailed PIN or URL if fraud was a problem.

I have not heard of one legitimate instance of attempted mis-use of the system as you describe whether successful or not.  It really doesn't make sense that there would be given that follow-up is required.  Someone fed you some propaganda which doesn't pass any critical thinking test I'm afraid.

Actually, it probably would be significantly controlled like Ivermectin.

Fostering homosexuality is one of the most important operations to the NWO crowd.  Why that is is not very clear.  The CIA bullet-pointed promotion it as one (of many) things which could be used to lower population growth rates back in the 1980's IIRC, but it seems that there is more to it than that.

It is said that fraternal 'secret societies' use homosexuality internally to increase the cohesion of their 'brotherhoods'.  Might be a factor.  Certainly certain religious organizations are heavily into it, and without statutory age restrictions.

I've often wondered if perhaps normalization of perversions such as homosexuality and pedophilia were practical means to keep politicians and bureaucrats in positions of power after getting them into such positions (and controlling them) back in the 'old days' when such things were not so accepted by the sheeple.

Known by you for about a year since I told you about it.  That back when you were emphatically stating that RNA _never_ reverse transcribes since 'it doesn't work like that.'

===

As an aside more relevant to Badecker's post above:  The gene therapy theory of operation is to infect cells with new programing and have them create designer proteins.  Viruses do the same thing.

Cells of the body can detect a genetic infection (virus, cancer, etc).  When they do, they do three things:

 - cease production of proteins by shutting down ribosomes.

 - warn neiboring cells of possible infection in the area and to be ready.

 - commit suicide.

One of the challenges of the gene therapy approach (turning the victim's body into a drug factory which creates antigens) is that the person's normal immune system function sees the therapy as a dangerous infection and fights it.

In their infinite wisdom, the scientists working on the gene therapy took the approach of destroying natural immune function such that it doesn't render their goodie ineffective.  I learned this from presentations from the scientists themselves who were clearly completely oblivious to any potential down-side of destroying the natural immune system.  I have to assume that this is, in part, because they consider the world to be overpopulated with humans anyway.

Yesterday:  RNA can never integrate with DNA.  Impossible.

Today:        Well, the virus RNA can integrate with DNA, but vaccine RNA cannot.  For sure.  Strictly impossible.  'cause reasons.

I elaborated on this theoretical potential danger in EARLY 2020, and of course you ass-clowns spouted the standard 'impossible' party line as though you knew your ass from a hole in the ground.  Now with a gene therapy which doesn't work for shit and just causes massive damage, and is being forced on people anyway, some people would think you would be getting tired of being wrong over and over again on all the science and on all your projection.  Not me though; I know your game too well.  Works on dumb-fucks, but the dumb-fuck supply is running low now due in part to the exponential carnage.

Again, the virus is obviously a bio-weapon developed with gain-of-function engineering, and it (or one like it) was put forward for a grant to darpa to release into wild bat populations.  The grant was rejected, but it's not exactly rocket science requiring a lot of funding to release the thing so apparently someone did it on their own (or via a different grant or sponsors or whatever...clearly a whole lot of people knew it was coming.)  It's also as clear as the nose on one's face that the virus/'vaccine' were developed as a set.  So it doesn't even matter if the virus RNA or the 'vaccine' RNA is integrated.  Same diff.

Yup.  All the usual suspects on this board said emphatically over and over again it is 'impossible'.  Thinking people will have recognized fairly early that this gaggle of shills, trolls, and tards don't know shit about it.  Also, they/we will have seen the same lie over and over again in mainstream media.  Ergo, it didn't effect thinking people and their willingness to get the experimental gene therapy.  Probably it did ease the mind of some suckers however.  Oh well, that's how it goes.

It's worth note again that pretty clearly SARS-cov-2 came out of a lab and out of scientist's algorithms.  The same cadre of scientist who had been working on the vaccine for the virus and probably had vaccine finished before they put the finishing touches on the virus itself.

The troublesome aspect of this is that these scientist tend to be in and out of the same groups which involved Gates and Epstein, and the latter was quite frank about his desire to 'seed future humanity' with his and his friends superior genetic stock.  A virus/vaccine combo would be one way to do it, and probably one of the very most effective.

Oh yeah...the LNP's carrying the genetic payload make a bee-line for the sex organs (germ cells) for some reason.  Just sayin'.