Need .03 BTC to test out bitbandit.eu ... will repay .05 BTC on the 16th... Ive traded more than the said amount so if someone wants to fund this without collateral they may, if not, never mind me asking.
Given past history I will lend it to you. Post or PM your BTC address and confirm agreement to terms: Loan amount: 0.03 BTC Recipient: nkocevar Term: 14 days Repayment amount: 0.05 BTC Repayment due: 16 June Terms accepted, address : 1PL328CQNaY2J1SpUZgeyVwwdQr2Cspuqy As agreed via PM, amended terms as follows: Repayment NEW amount: 0.06 Repayment NOW due: 5 July Hope you get paid back. Usually, this seems sorta sketchy.
|
|
|
Good. Hopefully, it's not a shitty system like PayPal and E-Bay currently has.
|
|
|
Trust me, PayPal is the worst example of a fair regulation you can give right now. I don't think Bitcoin needs regulation, I think people need to use common sense and use escrow more.
|
|
|
Ponzis are unreliable. Why is it that people think a signature campaign for a Ponzi is? A guy is promoting his Ponzi, and he's using your posts or your vulnerabilities to feed people into his Ponzi. Newbies or Jr. Members will be desperate for what? 0.00004BTC to 0.00003BTC? That's less than .20 cents, I believe. He wants to make it hard for you to get a good amount of money, so he won't have to come out of his pockets too much. If you're going to post 300 posts for .012 you're crazy.
|
|
|
Catchy slogan. It's good, since no other currency can currently say it. But of course, if Bitcoin is mass adopted, war and violence will start to occur. Nice slogan, though.
How? War is incredibly expensive. If governments cannot inflate currency to fund wars their ability to launch them is limited. Thre is no way to finance a major war in a bit coin universe. A minor war is still a war, or a 'regular' war. It doesn't have to be necessarily major is what I'm getting at. Hell, it might be a war against the government (Rebellion). And not to mention, if it's adopted, the GOVERNMENTS - yes, I'm writing this in caps - WILL MOST LIKELY GO TO WAR AGAINST EACH OTHER.
|
|
|
it wasn't all junk posts, so i don't mind PG doing all that.. i wouldn't read through all of it though.
They don't need to be junk for it to be spam.... there is no reason he can't edit posts to add more information like the rest of us. That was probably the mildest of his multi posts, just go back through his history. The 11 post streak I remember was literally 2 mins between posts, adding more and more stuff. I guess for some post count is more important than not spamming everyone else. I have him on ignore but 11 ignores in a row sure takes up half the page. you have something against old man PG? seems like a few around here do, but there's always drama. Only his posting habits. Its tiresome going into a thread and seeing the sheer amount of spam when he locks his teeth into something. Ignore <--- works wonders for spammers. Never ignored anybody on this forum, or any other forum I've been on. PG contributes tons to BitcoinTalk, like when he said I play with crayons. It would be a waste to ignore him, meaning, ignoring all of his awesome posts.
|
|
|
Catchy slogan. It's good, since no other currency can currently say it. But of course, if Bitcoin is mass adopted, war and violence will start to occur. Nice slogan, though.
|
|
|
I'm not going to say 'If Bitcoin' this or 'Bitcoin will be this high in' or state a whatever-the-hell value. A investment is a investment. It could lose value. Crash. Be forgotten. It can also rise. It's a 50/50 chance.
|
|
|
Wow. I am glad you got out of that situation okay. maybe inside a coffee shop or restaurant would be safer next time.
Well, as OP stated, he met with the guys in a crowded public place. Maybe next time you should bring a friend with you, especially when handling sums that might tempt muggers/scammers. Also, it isn't mandatory to have the wallet with you when you do a trade. Bitcoin allows a lot of stuff, just use your imagination. I think meeting in a building is better. If they would've gotten his phone in that square, he probably wouldn't have ever found them again. Being walled off is a bit better than being out in the open. In a building, two guys running with gas canisters to the doors is suspicious. In a square, it's still suspicious, but they have more freedom to roam.
|
|
|
I would suggest meeting in a cafe, or something. And bringing a friend. At least one that can defend you. You don't want Teddy the Bitch crying in a corner while they try to steal your Starbucks.
|
|
|
I think it's annoying, too. But isn't there a character limit for posts and threads? I think it'll be useful only then, though.
|
|
|
Could vouch for his services. Paid him .01BTC in exchange for a DoX, to see how Anonymoose I was online.
|
|
|
Username + Bitcoin Address would be useful. And proof of transaction. Not a ton of information, and why wouldn't you use escrow?
|
|
|
It depends if you're talking about a digital or physical gambling site.
|
|
|
You've only got 25 activity. If you created a new account now you'd have 28 by Tuesday. Plus, what does it matter? None of the big advertising campaigns will probably let you join with negative trust anyway.
Well how do I get rid of it then? Or at least get 'em back. 'Getting 'em back' will be worse than talking it over or dealing with it. You can't get rid of it. The people who negative rep'd you can only get rid of it.
|
|
|
Best Bitcoin fan fic there is, I guess. Really, you have some talent when it comes to the 'truth'.
|
|
|
Why would someone loan a GH/s, anyway? CEX.IO is barely profitable on them, and you could get way more than giving someone a few GH/s back.
|
|
|
I don't use E-Bay, but I find it amazing how first Dish, and than E-Bay. Other companies are thinking about it as well. I think Amazon even fired up about it.
|
|
|
Would you be willing to do a DoX of me (Will pay you.). Kinda want to see if there's any trace of my personal identity online.
|
|
|
E-Bay sides with the customers more, and Pay-Pal does, too, most of the time. This has happened numerous times. Customers have even broken goods themselves, like fine china or claimed that fake gold was fake gold. Guess who won?
|
|
|
|