Ugh your account is worth nothing, it's a scam.
He's been trying to scam with 50+ different stories for the past weeks. Yeah I know, looking at his trust, it's astonishing he keeps trying. Shh, I don't think he knows what that is. BUT WE MOST NOT FOIL HIS HOPE!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Earning it. You don't necessarily have to buy it.
|
|
|
|
Weren't you just saying how accurate your feedback was? I bolded it so you can read it properly. Even if he did do it then (I was around then, and never even saw them do that...) You can't provide any proof. It wasn't genuine. You still won't back it up. And if that negative feedback was about your post being removed, I dunno, post about it in Service Discussions? And again, he never paid anybody for 6,500 posts.
i posted the link to the thread as proof but since then the OP has been edited a bunch of times i never screen sniped it as i never felt the need to i will ask theymos if he is willing to look at the edits How about this: If he's not doing it now, how will your feedback affect him? Can'ty you guys just talk it out? i have no issue with talking to them but all i get is remove your negative feedback or see you in court from them I don't think either one of them has to say he was wrong, or the other was. I just think they should just resolve it like it is. They don't even have to be all sappy about it. |
|
|
|
Ugh your account is worth nothing, it's a scam.
He's been trying to scam with 50+ different stories for the past weeks. |
|
|
|
There's some crazy people that use this forum. 'Ye shall be warned! I started a Jesus fund Op here is the Adress: 13iomuQqZuoGLQGfmKmZBa7wTa1ebDAoLs
My Angels would love some donations, they can start cleansing then.
haha i think i'll just buy a 2800 BTC mansion. but thanks, anyway!! Sure. Buy a mansion with 2,800 BTC, and if you manage to do so, the property taxes of over $780K+. And managing a mansion is at least 200K per year. Not to mention, most mansions cost over $2,000,000+. But with ye magic, you shall do it. |
|
|
|
Why do so many people hate Badbear.... Hmmm... Yeah, because he does his job. If you don't want to get banned, don't do something to get banned.
I don't hate Badbear, in fact he has the BCX seal of approval, which by definition makes him a "Bad Bear"  ~BCX~ I see what you did there! However, it's clear that Bad Bear is a divine entity used by the real Satoshi Nakamoto himself. Do you want proof? I'm Satoshi Nakamoto. <----- It got leaked out. |
|
|
|
Hi,
Not sure, but isnt it little much expensive for 95 channels? As an example i am paying about 12-13$ for 90 channels and i am watching on 3 TVs..I am not living in USA. Is this a normal price for USA?
BR
Nope. Where I live in the US, I get Direct, and XFinity for less than $20 per month. On topic: So this isn't legal? Why would somebody use something illegal at all, just to stream 90 channels? |
|
|
|
yeah i know was just saying that to scare him off, I wonder if any scammers scammed another scammer though., That would be hilarious
I'm sure it happens regularly. One time I was cruising the dark web just to see what's out there... And there was someone selling hacked access to paypal accounts. Someone tried to buy one, sent some bitcoins, and never got the access...and then he loudly accused the seller of scamming. What irony. Too funny. I know that happened a bit on sites like you-know-what. Multiple credit frauds, police letter scammers, etc. |
|
|
|
How dare you guys use the Spanish 'haha' on such a serious thread? I find it funny how FBI agents would post pictures of themselves on Facebook. |
|
|
|
Weren't you just saying how accurate your feedback was? I bolded it so you can read it properly. Even if he did do it then (I was around then, and never even saw them do that...) You can't provide any proof. It wasn't genuine. You still won't back it up. And if that negative feedback was about your post being removed, I dunno, post about it in Service Discussions? And again, he never paid anybody for 6,500 posts.
i posted the link to the thread as proof but since then the OP has been edited a bunch of times i never screen sniped it as i never felt the need to i will ask theymos if he is willing to look at the edits How about this: If he's not doing it now, how will your feedback affect him? Can'ty you guys just talk it out? i have no issue with talking to them but all i get is remove your negative feedback or see you in court from them Then try and resolve it yourself. Probably P.M him about it. |
|
|
|
Weren't you just saying how accurate your feedback was? I bolded it so you can read it properly. Even if he did do it then (I was around then, and never even saw them do that...) You can't provide any proof. It wasn't genuine. You still won't back it up. And if that negative feedback was about your post being removed, I dunno, post about it in Service Discussions? And again, he never paid anybody for 6,500 posts.
i posted the link to the thread as proof but since then the OP has been edited a bunch of times i never screen sniped it as i never felt the need to i will ask theymos if he is willing to look at the edits How about this: If he's not doing it now, how will your feedback affect him? Can'ty you guys just talk it out? |
|
|
|
The Bitcoin Foundation, folks! Convincing people they still have a inch of power.
It really won't be hard for anybody to take them down, since, dare I say it - they don't control anything. They're just idiots that make people want to label Bitcoin a different way. There's at least 20k+ Bitcoin users out there that don't want to follow their rules.
There's got to be a hell of a lot more than 20k now involved in Bitcoin Of course there is. More than 60K merchants accept it. Over 100K people have adopted it. Meant to say: Over 300K people use the forum. |
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin Foundation, folks! Convincing people they still have a inch of power.
It really won't be hard for anybody to take them down, since, dare I say it - they don't control anything. They're just idiots that make people want to label Bitcoin a different way. There's at least 20k+ Bitcoin users out there that don't want to follow their rules.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, I wonder what Apple is going to do with this app.
Games!
No.... I really want to know what Apple wants to do with this app.
Company known for censorship, faulty products, and all along falling out of the original ideas for Apple. Wonder how a Bitcoin app will do.
|
|
|
|
I am actually pretty excited to see what changes are coming around the corner with this campaign over the next month...
I am also very excited to see a rush of new members on 1 June in this campaign and whats stunna going to do with all this You mean June 17th? Nope he did type it right...ritz campaign is ending june 1st I'm not sure, but I think UpDown will still be paying on a weekly basis at that time, so I don't see that most would prefer PD over UpDown at that time; they might consider changing when PD announces new rates, but at the moment UpDown still seems far more attractive. I agree. With this. Not to mention, I favor Up/Down's signatures over PD's. The blue and purple hues are pretty soft, and just my favorite colors all together. |
|
|
|
|
Why do so many people hate Badbear.... Hmmm... Yeah, because he does his job. If you don't want to get banned, don't do something to get banned.
|
|
|
|
you know someone should scam the scammer, take his collateral to teach these scammers a lesson
I don't think that'll be good on anybody. Especially encouraging people to scam 'scammers'. Yeah, he seems 'ella shady, but scamming him? Is that really the answer? |
|
|
|
i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz?  i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation i wonder why jelousy needs to be born  Well this is what I'm thinking. If he gave Ritz negative rating for promoting spam (which he isn't), he should give negative rating to the likes of Stunna and others who have these signature campaigns too. I don't really care about this trust rating, and neither should Ritz nor any user around here. exactly but why he only chased ritz then? how about the others Please read this thread and you'll know why Ritz was targetted => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=499007.1460I think, if all of us contribute in this thread with proper reasoning, we may take zackclark70 out of trust circle. ritz was never targeted the feedback that I gave it 100% accurate take a look at it what you will also find is that ritz has spammed my trust with a boatload of inaccurate negative feedbacks Are you sure about that? zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2) 2014-02-28 0.00000000 paying people up to 2.6 BTC for posting up to 6500 posts a month for his add campaign spamming up the forum and deleting any negative posts No signature campaign does 6,500 posts a month. None pay up to 2.6 BTC. Not to mention, other Signature Campaigns do the same thing. They can't control who spam. The feedback Ritz sent you: zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2) 2014-02-28 This guy calls people a scammer but has no proof, No facts & no evidence. He just decides to call them that, to bully them on board threads. This guy is a loser . AVOID AVOID AVOID. And don't put up with his trolling, bully tactics. It's your place and Ritz's to resolve this. Talk it out, jeez. at the time I posted the feedback they were offering up to 2.6BTC a month I cant remember what the price per post was but that is what they were offering at the time i am sure someone remembers that also someone should point out where i said he is a scammer all i did was leave negative trust rating because genuine questions were deleted from a self moderated thread and that he was paying people to post up to 6500 posts a month there is nothing in my feedback that says he is a scammer Weren't you just saying how accurate your feedback was? I bolded it so you can read it properly. Even if he did do it then (I was around then, and never even saw them do that...) You can't provide any proof. It wasn't genuine. You still won't back it up. And if that negative feedback was about your post being removed, I dunno, post about it in Service Discussions? And again, he never paid anybody for 6,500 posts. |
|
|
|
For the people that in the sig business for long, what kind of post stunna didn't pay you?
Posts that are less than 10 words and posts that consist of images or +1's are most likely all going to mean that you won't be paid for that particular post. Are you kidding or what?  Any post that is less than 10 words in length classifies as spam IMHO. If you're making posts that are as short as that then you aren't really contributing anything to whatever discussion you're in. Thank God that you're not Stunna! I can see what Diamond is hitting at. For example, your reply doesn't seem to be contributing to anything. Little relevance at all, actually. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think you're really competting that much with loljosh on the online wallet bit. Plus, no trusted member have used your services yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
