I was not saying is not but it was more than enough to consider in trading. If someone got it to work consistently, then you can imagine yourself becoming rich a few years from the time you started. But the question is if that really exists in trading. Because with the volatility of the market and especially when bearish comes to happen, you can never expect such ROI. I would tell you OP that no matter what we do, we can't say there is consistency in trading. You may gain huge today but not sure by tomorrow and in the following days, it might be a big loss.

It was not just learning from someone's mistake but our personal mistakes. And it is not just we learn but have to do something to avoid such events. Most newbies come to invest with empty knowledge about it and no wonder why they will lose. We often give advice to DYOR, spend time learning to trade, don't rush- and all we did are a sort of investment warnings but too unfortunate that many we're tend not to listen but instead make their own way.

If they only just know how risky Bitcoin investment is, I could imagine that only a few people could take it. But it is not what we see, more and more newbies come because of this - "instant profit" which is circulated on the internet.

No way it's gonna be focus on 3-point shooting game for the Bucks, that's for sure. They can shoot from beyond the arc, but when it comes to Giannis, he's the "Greek Freak" for a reason. He knows how to own the paint, and he's in his prime, so that makes the Bucks way more unpredictable. Plus, they've got Lopez, who's a towering 7-footer, so they don't have any size disadvantages going on.

Now, the Lakers, on the other hand, struggle with those three-pointers. They're more likely to go hard in the paint, 'cause their 3-point game isn't strong.

Just as anticipated, the odds have been released in advance of tomorrow's fight. I'm quite interested in observing how Casimero plans to defeat Oguni. He's the clear favorite, judging by the odds but odd is attractive on winning by decision. The probability of that happening seems quite low. So, it's either he faces the risk of losing if the fight goes to the judges' scorecards, possibly due to hometown bias, or he might secure a victory by knocking out Oguni.

The over 6.5 rounds option is tempting, but, to be honest, I'm more inclined to take a chance on odds greater than 1.91, but I wanna say good luck to you.

Some might be got into that situation but have learned already and besides, nobody will be able to hold for nothing.
Some people will choose to hold crypto rather than get into trading because they know themselves that they are not fit to trade. Of course, there is no reason to do that either if we know that we just lose while holding gives us of what we aim for. Well, holding is the best option I see...less risk, less possible chances of losing but most of all, we have a big chance to earn more.

That is why even earning just a few $$$ is going to be considered as we are uncertain if we can do it someday. As the future of crypto is likely uncertain, we have to take the opportunity now while there is still a chance, or else, we gonna missed it at all.
I have invested a few coins, known coins, and hold them for some reason and would sell them as well for some reason. That is why I couldn't conclude that I'll be holding for long as it depends on the market situation but there is one thing that I was certain and that is to sell them with profit.

What I've gleaned from gambling is the importance of learning how to gracefully accept defeat. It doesn't imply that we should quit gambling when we're losing money. After all, the responsible approach is to wager only what we can afford to lose, and if we're acting responsibly, we should recognize that losses are an inherent part of the game.

Expressing distress over losses essentially reveals that we've been gambling with funds we couldn't afford to lose, which is a prime example of irresponsible gambling.

Furthermore, shedding tears on social media seems quite unreasonable. What's the purpose behind that? Is it to garner sympathy or to condemn gambling altogether?

Totally get what you're saying! Comparing Tapales to Uzbekistan is one thing, but putting him up against Inoue is a whole different ball game. Inoue's a global boxing sensation, no doubt about it. Uzbekistan's champ, while solid, hasn't quite hit that superstar status yet. So, if Tapales had to really grind it out for a split decision against the Uzbek, he better be ready to kick it up a notch facing Inoue – that's a whole new level of challenge right there!

I guess games can vary a lot from one another. When you mention a "house edge," it becomes really tough to come out ahead in the long run. Even in games with a house edge of less than 1%, winning consistently can feel almost impossible. Sure, there are those moments of luck when we stop and enjoy our winnings, but more often than not, we find ourselves back at it the next day, and sadly, the outcome tends not to be the same all the time so we lose.

Now, when it comes to skills, poker and sports betting are a different story. I do believe it's possible to win in these areas. What do you think?

It probably depends on the game. For instance, when there's a high house edge, especially in games like roulette, it's pretty much considered a luck-based game. That means you don't need skills to win; you just have to be lucky.

Now, if you're thinking about expecting consistent wins, well, I'd say that's a bit delusional and unrealistic. Just because you experience a win doesn't mean you'll win the next time. Most of the time, the house edge ends up being the winner, and we're not on that side.

ctto

https://www.boxingscene.com/rankings
https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/464003/boxing-schedule-2021-upcoming-fights-results/

---

Looks like Adrien Broner is making a comeback! I honestly thought his career was done after that Pacman fight, but I did some digging into his boxing record, and he's got two consecutive wins via unanimous decisions against Jovanie Santiago and Bill Hutchinson. Now, it's not a championship fight, but I couldn't help myself from starting this thread. I find Adrien Broner to be a really interesting boxer, and the way I see it, he might just be gearing up for another shot at a championship bout in the future.

The guy's already 34 years old, right smack in the middle of his career, but this journey could be his last shot to see if he's still got what it takes to be a champ again.

In the Welterweight division, under WBC, he's currently ranked at 15. It's probably not going to be an easy journey for him if he wants to become the mandatory challenger but probably Crawford possibly moving up in weight by that time already, so who knows.

I'm not entirely sure. When we look at the quality of opponents for both fighters, they've both faced some good ones. But it might just come down to personal judgment, like they say, 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder.' It's not directly related, but it's kinda like how we all interpret things differently, so we might not necessarily agree.

Now, speaking of heavy favorites, it's pretty obvious that Tszyu is the one in this case. However, that doesn't automatically guarantee his victory. Remember, odds can be deceiving. Sometimes they're overvalued, and that's exactly why the public can easily fall into the trap.

I reckon your point carries more weight since you've got it from an article, but for me, it's kinda just a hunch that their issues might run deeper. When they came over to the Philippines and started playing, I'm not really sure about the deal they had, 'cause it's like, way beyond their usual league. They might have been raking in some serious cash from what the league pulled in during that specific conference, though.


Is he talking about the players who scored gold in the Asian Games? Or is he referring to the ones who didn't make the cut because of that problem?

In terms of hotel expenses, it doesn't seem like a significant cost. The host league could potentially cover all those expenses, except for the players' salaries. That's just my suggestion, considering this is a business venture. If the players can bring in more revenue to the league than the league would spend, it's still a win-win situation for both parties.

So, I don't believe it's solely the issue of player salaries. The bigger concern might be the overall expenses that BAD (or any team) may not be able to offset with fan attendance. After all, fans are the primary reason a team becomes profitable.


It's November 5 based on the article shared by @Distinctin.

I can say that hyped projects are meant good for the short-term only. In fact, it has been proven already that many people got into it and earned huge profits which drives courage in the community. As we can see, people are looking for other meme coins, quite they have been into such trust and confidence. Unfortunately, those who come late struggle with the consequences and lose their money. Definitely, we can never say if it was totally good or it was bad, that will depend on what we experience.

If I earned a profit from investing in these meme coins, I would certainly be saying it was a good investment but if not, I surely hate them.

Hey OP, chill out a bit. Don't put all your faith in what you see or what these folks are pitching to you. You've gotta think long-term, but keep it real, ya know? Since we're talking sports betting here, I assume you're already gearing up for a journey that's gonna take a while.

Now, let's not get started on that 80% winning rate stuff, 'cause that just can't hold up forever. The law of averages is gonna kick in sooner or later. And from what I know, there's no sports bettor out there with an 80% win rate. That's off the charts, nearly impossible. Even 70% is pushing it, honestly. It's more like aiming for that sweet 65%, which can still bring in some good cash.

When it comes to your bankroll, start with a solid one and get the hang of bankroll management. That's a game-changer on this journey. All you gotta do is stay consistent with your picks, and remember that 65% win rate. That's the secret sauce.

To get the lowdown on bankroll management, just do a little digging. YouTube's got tons of videos on the topic.

In less than a month, we'll be getting back into the PBA action, and I'm super stoked! Finally, we get to see the new talents who got drafted this year in action. They had to push the start date because they were giving priority to international competitions, but since there's nothing on the international front, it looks like nothing's gonna hold back the return of the PBA.

Sadly, we won't be seeing the BAD this season since the team's been disbanded. I'm sure fans would have loved to welcome them, especially after they gave the Ginebra Gin Kings such a tough challenge in their first attempt. But hey, I'm still hoping for some top-notch entertainment, maybe even more than before!

When it comes to the purse, I doubt they'll spill the beans publicly, but I'm thinking it'll be fair for Tapales once this fight gets the green light. Now, hoping for this fight to be like Inoue vs. Donaire 1? Well, I'm not so sure. Inoue and Tapales, they've got their own unique styles in the boxing game, and their confidence levels, well, they're on different wavelengths.

I mean, Donaire was a superstar in his own right, reigning in the bantamweight division before Inoue handed him that tough loss. So, expecting a replay of that epic showdown might be a bit of a stretch.

That is why we should spend time searching and digging into a certain platform that offers huge ROI because most of them are false promises.
Well, choosing a single asset is not really a wise choice but investing in Bitcoin seems to be the safest one rather than choosing altcoins. In this case, I'd rather take the opportunity to invest solely in Bitcoin than have it shared with altcoins. Another reason is that investing in Bitcoin is not stressful, as long as we hold and keep our keys safely, we are secure and sure of profit gains.

It was not necessary for now but if we are talking and aiming for mass adoption, that is somewhat important and a must, as I believe.
We can consider that "crypto regulation" is a contributing factor that would affect the mindset of the people and gain trust. With this regulation, people have the confidence that the government is supporting this and whatever it happens, the authorities will help us.

Yes, many individuals are still doubtful about the capability of Bitcoin and one reason is a blatant scams happen to many exchanges I think, regulations will help to protect us and these scammers will stop.