I am not too sure about the reward, but I am thinking about the reward not being determined by the burn difficulty, but by (these are just ideas): either the PoW difficulty or the rate at which coins are burned.

As for the PoB difficulty, currently, it is calculated by the amount of coins burned. I will make it so that it adjusts to a target that would average a PoB block once every 3 or 2 PoW blocks[b/].

primer let it happen naturally. sometimes things must be let to flow at their own pace.

you can buy it, it' cheap like shjt atm lol

I have my 300 Slim in my wallet opened 24/7, after 3 days still no stake in POS...

Is this normal?

Cloudflare is under DDoS it appears, all sites using it are affected.

Trying to mine.

You've made it into a chart before

That gets you the burn coins, though - not the 'how many coins have been minted'

---

As there were some questions raised regarding the pools, here's some stats on that...
From 2014-06-25 12:00:00 UTC through 2014-06-28 12:00:00 UTC

		There were 3,031 blocks total. 1,037 (34.21%) were PoW 391 (12.90%) were PoB 1603 (52.89%) were PoS
		The average network hash rate was 2,949khash/s. The average hash rate at slimcoinpool was 888khash/s or ~30%. The average hash rate at block quarry was 394khash/s or ~13%. During the time primer- mined there, his average hash rate there was 241khash/s. The graph shows where he switched back to slimcoinpool. Note that in the graph, the network hash rate is as estimated by the slimcoinpool code (getnetworkghps), while pool hash rates are estimated at the pools according to shares.
		Variability may be too high to say anything meaningful about the pools' luck after 3 days. slimcoinpool laid claim to 332 (32%) of the blocks, block quarry laid claim to 93 (9%) of the blocks, leaving the vast majority of the blocks - 612 (59%) as being mined solo or at other pools. If going by the estimated hash rates, slimcoinpool's luck would be ~106%, while block quarry's would be ~67%. If going by the relative hash rates, block quarry's hash rate was ~44% of slimcoinpool's hash rate, block quarry's number of blocks was ~28% of slimconpool's number of blocks, giving a luck of ~63%. This can also be seen in the graph - despite having a claimed higher hash rate than slimcoinpool between 2014-06-25 12:00:00 UTC and approximately 2014-06-25 18:00:00 UTC, fewer blocks were found as indicated by the dots on the lines.

Sources:
block quarry hash rate, workers and blocks found: https://slm.blockquarry.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool
slimcoinpool hash rate, workers and blocks found: http://www.slimcoinpool.com/tbs
network hash rate: getnetworkghps, https://slm.blockquarry.com/index.php?page=api&action=public
block PoW/PoB/PoS data: slimcoin blockchain

For the curious - yes, there's a fairly big upward movement just outside the time period.  The network hash rate rose from ~2.75Mhash/s to ~5.82Mhash/s at the time of this post, and still on an upward trend.

---

Any progress about that?