Do I have select in pool vote what I think my IQ is, or the crappy value I got from IQ test? Because I was so disgusted I didnt try to take the test again.
BTW your IQ goes up the more tests you take and get familiar with the tests
Not like your vote was critical anyway The MENSA gave me an IQ of over nine thousand, yet I put 0-80 |
|
|
|
How does your post-saving work? With "localStorage" or on your webserver? If it is the second option I highly recommend you to read up on "localStorage".
EDIT: Already found it. You are using localStorage, smart move ^^ Saving different posts wouldn't be hard then, right? Can't you do something like "localStorage.setItem(TopicId, "message");" and clear the storage when someone post the message?
EDIT2: Improved my last edit a bit.
Sure, it's not hard at all, I just didn't think about this when I coded that About the cleaning: when the user posts the message OR after a certain time (24hours?) as F5/a browser crash/etc can leave a saved message not sent |
|
|
|
|
Pour des phrases simples Google Traduction devrait suffire
Si leur réponse n'est pas claire, envoie moi un MP au pire
|
|
|
|
|
VEL?
Demande sur leur forum
|
|
|
|
I refuse to use shit browser
Why are you using Firefox, then?  I think that Firefox 26 is broken somehow. I'll investigate it when I can. According to the HTML 5 specification, 5.9.8 Navigating to a fragment identifier: For HTML documents (and the text/html MIME type), the following processing model must be followed to determine what the indicated part of the document is.
Parse the URL, and let fragid be the <fragment> component of the URL.
If fragid is the empty string, then the indicated part of the document is the top of the document.
If there is an element in the DOM that has an ID exactly equal to fragid, then the first such element in tree order is the indicated part of the document; stop the algorithm here.
If there is an a element in the DOM that has a name attribute whose value is exactly equal to fragid, then the first such element in tree order is the indicated part of the document; stop the algorithm here.
Otherwise, there is no indicated part of the document.
So, it will look for id="foo" followed by name="foo" Edit: As pointed out by @hsivonen, in HTML5 the a element has no name attribute. However, the above rules still apply to other named elements. Could this be the reason? See http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_name.asp also Edit: the forum uses <a name="new"></a> |
|
|
|
...  What happens when you click on "Show ratings." ? ... Nothing happens wen you don't click it. But if you got good eyes and are curious enough to click, you'll see the ratings.I don't want to be picky, but it's not what I'd call impossible "Too hidden" maybe "untrusted feedback" is pretty clear though, it's normal to be hidden: the real problem is that nearly nobody choses his own list Don't get me wrong though, I don't like the current trust system and we are to keep it I'd like that newbies start with an empty list |
|
|
|
|
Interesting question, I'd like an input from theymos on that
I'd guess that what is not allowed is what is illegal in the country of the server
|
|
|
|
the impossible to see "show untrusted ratings" option
wat When the trust page opens, only the trusted ratings are shown. For 99% of the users that happens to be the default trust (wild guess here, but I'd say a safe one). Like so: What happens when you click on "Show ratings." ? For 99% of the users that happens to be the default trust (wild guess here, but I'd say a safe one).
Just out of curiosity, is the real number public? |
|
|
|
|
Actually he said that the post-saving part might be used in bitcointalk.org's JS
We're exchanging PMs but it's not moving fast as he's busy (I guess), I'll tell you when I have more info
BTW, theymos asked me how the script behaves when there are more than one open pages
The answer is that it saves only one of them (which one is undetermined) and it's of course a bad behavior so whatever happens I'll fix this and save all the messages
|
|
|
|
|
linformaticien.com?
Je connais pas, et je risque pas de connaître apparemment...
|
|
|
|
|
De plus même si secp256k1 est cassée seules les adresses qui ont déjà eu des sorties sont vulnérables (puisque les autres n'ont pas diffusé leur clé publique)
Sauf si en plus de la courbe, sha256 ET ripemd160 sont cassées
|
|
|
|
BadBear already commented on this. The reason was kinda convincing by the way. ...
Anyone who is on the default trust rating but leaves theymos bad feedback for his involvement in the GLBSE scam (theymos still holds BTC owed to me) for example would be immediately removed by none other than theymos.
... Could someone other than Goat comment on this? Who has the authority to amend the default trust list, and was Goat removed from that list for leaving a negative rating to a default trust member? 1) Only theymos 2) No, BadBear removed him from his trustlist (thus removing him from the default trust) because he doesn't agree with the rating Goat gives (you can find the source in the recent Meta threads) |
|
|
|
Are we still seriously talking about this? No one likes the act of buying/selling accounts but we are not going to stop it. The staff have made that very clear.
It appears so. I'm sure this debate will rage as long as Bitcointalk exists itself. I hope you're wrong |
|
|
|
the impossible to see "show untrusted ratings" option
wat |
|
|
|
Wow, you have a three year account with no posts, whats even the point in complaining??? Age of account doesnt give you any certain rights, being active in this world will give u more rights.
My point |
|
|
|
Hmm maybe the guy thinks he has access to your mail account... I'd change the pass.
I know next to nothing about this thingies, but maybe it's the exact think this nasty man wants? So he can capture that data, while now he can't? (Because for evample s1lverbox set to be logged in forever, so he doesn't have to type his pass while logging) Sorry, I meant the mail pass |
|
|
|
especially when you lose posts all the time.
You should have installed BitcoinTalk++  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
