Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 07:05:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 194 »
781  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Dabs SCAMM ME, SCAMM REPORT on: February 20, 2016, 09:32:11 AM
I can give screenshots.  http://imgur.com/a/2G0rr
   And it's for real, he scamm me,

and what makes you think that that person is really dabs from BTCT? did dabs pmed you that skype id?
782  Other / Off-topic / Re: What are some backwards sports? on: February 20, 2016, 09:24:56 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_sport

some are weird. some are cruel. some are both cruel and weird.
783  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Cryptocheck- how in the *#!*! on: February 20, 2016, 07:53:20 AM
subtle attempt to get people to search out your crappy shitcoin..and make them talk about ur crap coin for you..

lol nice try, better try a different tactic next time.

damn these pump&dump scammers keep trying and trying. when will they learn they can probably make more money selling their dirty underwear to creepy guys on darkweb.. than thy would ever make on their crap coins

uh. it doesn't look like an altcoin. it's some kind of service that generate some kind of voucher for you. you can top it up with btc/usd and redeem it on various not-so-well-known exchange.

@OP
if you're russian try asking on the russian local board. they seem to use cryptocheck a lot.
784  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Albert Einstein: Bitcoin will take you everywhere on: February 20, 2016, 07:33:41 AM
IMO if this thing spread it'll be viewed as a shameful display of trying to put a word in someone's mouth even though they never said it.
785  Other / Off-topic / Re: Fire starting apes? on: February 19, 2016, 06:10:52 PM
okay then. assuming that they won't be scared of the hot red blazing flame, they're likely to create a lot of trouble and set fires everywhere. then humans will be forced to kill or contain them. which will lead to resentment if they ever gain more intelligence. well damn, then we'll have a war.

...and where did you get that pic from? that a real ape? nvm forgot there's the google image search.
786  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3 Hours no no confirm on: February 19, 2016, 05:50:19 PM
as I said the number of unconfirmed transactions are high right now and is increasing. the recomended fee will also increase. your 25 satoshi per byte fee is actually half of the current standard fee which is 50 satoshi per byte. the recommended fee will most likely change later so see this site before you send a tx next time.
787  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3 Hours no no confirm on: February 19, 2016, 05:25:46 PM
great it's confirmed - lock the thread and call it a day.


quickly!

poeple might realize there's somthing wrong.

with what? your spelling or your sig or..?  Tongue
edit: huh. you have that sig since january. didn't notice it while I was lurking in the speculation board.

in all seriousness, OP asked some more question and it's better to try to avoid another long confirmation time like this. but looks like OP called it a day (forgot to lock the topic though).

edit2:
ooh. I think I know what's wrong.
788  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3 Hours no no confirm on: February 19, 2016, 05:12:37 PM
thanks for the reply,

yeah it was strange it took so long to confirm especially as i included a really high fee. second highest fee to be exact.

is there stress testing going on the bitcoin network atm?

afaik there's no stress test. but there are more unconfirmed tx than usual. to avoid long confirmation time in the future, always check this site for the current recommended fee per byte.

and no you won't need to wait another 3 hours unless the next block takes 3 hours to mine.
789  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3 Hours no no confirm on: February 19, 2016, 04:57:58 PM
jaysus talk of the devil haha, i see it confirm there,

but how has it taken so long, when i sent it with the slider set to fast confirm, can anyone explain that ?

I edited my post above while you were typing. see that. hope that helps.
790  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3 Hours no no confirm on: February 19, 2016, 04:47:15 PM
already confirmed just now.  Grin
oh there's another question. that 0.00026 is per kilo byte. your tx is only 223 byte in size and that's around 20% of 1kb. so 26000*0.2 = 5200 satoshi
791  Other / Off-topic / Re: Fire starting apes? on: February 19, 2016, 04:43:56 PM
it happened already. look around you.
792  Other / Meta / Re: Boards that don't contribute to activity on: February 19, 2016, 03:53:57 PM
Shouldn't the trash board for any Local section, not even be accessible to normal members or is Trashcan the word that most resembles the board?
I don't know why our local trashcan is accessible to any users, including for write, and for what it was created.

Russian government pressure.  Tongue joking.
I think Russian sub is the only board with a "local trashcan". deleted topics from all other local boards goes to the normal trashcan. ofc I may be wrong.

btw the list of recommended board is growing larger... and I see some people recommend the lending section. I don't agree with this. if you're going to exclude all boards that's prone to spam then there's also the gambling section. better to just ban signature campaign in that case.
793  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain stress test on: February 19, 2016, 03:43:14 PM
Is blockchain undergoing a stress test?

no. even if there is it won't affect a non-existent transaction.
be patient and wait. contact their support if it takes too long.
794  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] POTENTIAL FULL MEMBER account STARTING PRICE 0.00000001 BTC on: February 19, 2016, 03:40:04 PM
This is an auction for a Potential Full member account sorry for the incorrect subject if any mods see this please edit it.

you can move it to another board, edit the title, and move it back again.
795  Economy / Speculation / Re: wtf is going on?! on: February 19, 2016, 03:01:51 PM
Edit: I see the hospital have reportedly paid the hackers $17'000 in BTC. I wouldnt have expected them to have admited to paying them anything. I wonder how much they really forked over.

Where is this info please?

the internet? just google "hospital ransom 17k" and you'll surely find it. nvm Paashaas posted an article. the first time I saw that I thought they paid the rumored $3.4M. now that will make the market move.
796  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hackers demand $3m bitcoin ransom from hospital to unlock vital files on: February 19, 2016, 12:35:56 PM
the media has always been spreading these bad news about bitcoin, i remember a while back it was another robbery which happened in New York city in broad daylight. they mugged the guy's bitcoins.

but eventually all of them are going to be forgotten without any significant effect on bitcoin popularity.

Yeah I know but confusing 40 btc with 3 millions? Oo

I agree. this article says that the hackers demanded $3.4M initially but for some reason accepted $17K instead. another article stated that the $3.4M demand were just false reports. I'm not sure which one is right, but the latter article have the hospital's president and chief executive words as their source.
797  Other / Meta / Re: Boards that don't contribute to activity on: February 19, 2016, 10:44:16 AM
Also i think post count should be given more weight over date of membership. I see legends with hardly any posts.  I can't how they are contributing more to the board than those that are active and posting daily.

I agree with this, increase the maximum potential activity per period (maybe 2-4x), and increase the member level requirements the same 2-4x.

That would be a big mess I think, because then all the Legendary members will no longer one, because their activity's value would have been decreased. However, if you multiply the actual aticivty, then everything is okay.


In case you implement that certain sections will not count as activity, will i then work retrospectively? - So previous activity earned in those section will be removed?
Or is it possible to make a cut-date, so from this day and forth will activity in the mentioned sections no longer count?
Personally I think the cut-date is the better choice, if possible.

I totally agree with that, but I don't think that it will be possible.

naw. any kind of change should affect everyone. old or new. else it wouldn't be fair for the new users (IMO).

also about the activity/rank requirement thing. unless I misunderstood something multiplying users' activity is the same as changing nothing.

edit:
btw I am fully aware that 21% of my posts is on the Off-Topic board.
798  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Tony Robbins discovered Bitcoin! on: February 19, 2016, 10:28:26 AM
for some reason I misinterpreted the title as "Tony Robbins is Satoshi" lol. still not sure if this will have a big effect but it surely is a good news.
also I see there are some people trying to promote their preferred altcoin to him.
799  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What does the b standard for in "b-money"? on: February 19, 2016, 09:19:06 AM
most likely Bit (maybe satoshi knew about this. hence the name bitcoin.).
or simply just B as in A-Money/B-Money.

I think it is Broadcast-Money or Bid-Money (not "Bit"), but those are just guesses.

I take it those guesses comes from reading this? bid-money doesn't really describe its real purpose though.
800  Other / Meta / Re: funkymunky hacked on: February 19, 2016, 08:28:55 AM
I've messaged Theymos with a signed PM but nothings progressed.....

it may take a few weeks before your account get recovered. you're not alone, just be patient. some users are also waiting for their account to get recovered.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1349419.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1341799.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1339269.0

who knows how many more that wasn't posted in public.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 194 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!