|
I don`t know, will try to see, but pool side is never stable in short time
|
|
|
|
So, anyone with 400 sol so we can show these AMD users to go living back in to the caves?  If 3x -sa would hold 400sol would be easy, duno why hash drop slowly, freq. power usage, temp is same, maybe hash calculations are off or 1070 memory get siturated or something after 5min from 400 to 370, after 10min down to 364 with 3x -sa, must be some way to fix in future and break 400 for sure! |
|
|
|
|
its a bit hard to play with OC and low TDP limits, it depend on GPU usage, temperature, miner and card bios (each have different power limits per TDP)
|
|
|
|
|
Not here under win10 -ca is doing 2x initializing per GPU at start of the miner... I have 5x GPU per rig
yeah I used -ca and -cd in same config so yeah that why I have it dubble
3x ca works but start very fast 400sol per 1070 (rig 5x card sum over 2000sol!) and then slowly drop to ~1800 after 4-5 min
|
|
|
|
Running -ca -ca instantly gave me BSOD - can be reproduced.
If I run two seperate ones it runs without problem.
-ca one is 2x instances, -ca -ca will be 3x, but worked for me on 8GB system and 5x 1070 win10 so run just -ca |
|
|
|
nicehash 1.0.3a GTX 1070 2000mhz GPU 2350mhz mem 370sol/s power usage is same but nicehash version due lower GPU usage reach more speed for same TDP (1880Mhz vs 2000 on 84% TDP limit) time for a new version and some competition  |
|
|
|
Forgot to mention, there is hidden secret:
Use two instances per GPU device: -cd 0 0
Or to launch two instances for every GPU device: -ca -ca
yeah now fixed (GPu usage 100% with 0 0 1 1,.... , but if there is no EU and USA server failover i will run EU + USA server exe |
|
|
|
temp and power use i a lot less then ewbf miner... speed some ~350-360 OC pls make it use 100% GPU and we will have 10% more if possible  |
|
|
|
Sure I know, but we need WAR in development, we almost never see that for nvidia, just look at sp_ he did not code anything big in a year or so |
|
|
|
Release today pls .
300 sol at 140w with nicehash pool locked, is the same as pool free with 260sol/100w, so it's pointless to wait for it, just see whattomine, it's pretty accurate for zcash at least you are wrong, you can always undervolt a card a bit with OC and TDP limit... and I am sure consumption will not be worst then ewbf for 100% because ewbf atm use ~90+ % of TDP of referent card at default anyway from OC I am expecting at least 360-370sol/s from 1070!  |
|
|
|
Nice hash support promised 320sol for 1070 at stock tomorrow ...... Let the WAR began! |
|
|
|
Actually, stock GTX 1070 gives 295 Sol/s!  well with the private 2% fee from that guy we are at 260 sol 100w, 300 sol at 130 watt isn't better, but it's nice to know that a 1070 can probably overcome any amd in the near future But on stock it is a better result. So it would probably also be faster at 100w? Moreover from what I have seen the nicehash miner uses more memory than GPU so it could be even more effective? that was true for last version, ewbf miner use a lot more TDP from GPU and memory interface is less used... looks like we gona see more optimizations soon, Nvida has very complex memory interface that is cluster as star based, memory access might be hard if they manage NV might be a lot faster then AMD not just 10-20% from RX 480 but even maybe dubble |
|
|
|
That pool isn't coded into the miner and probably won't be as it's a solo pool.
Pools have to be coded into the miner?? Thought it will work with all stratum pools. yes miner need to have fee account for that pool... if not, then it will not work |
|
|
|
I see some 3-4% on 1070 Still GPU usage is 92-94% like any cuda zcash miner to date, no one managed to get 100% with one instances far, that why i believe in future we might see more nice speed gains over AMD at least would be nice to see that, AMD miners are using any mean to say NV is crap, we need it to prove them wrong |
|
|
|
Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...
ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock
well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, yuou should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test its same on default, just turbo will boost a lot less because of TDP and temp limit then ETH and LBC, i hope some more GPU work optimization can be done. Also I hope ~350sol for 1070 in future |
|
|
|
|
Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...
ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock
|
|
|
|
Anyone on a WiFi connection, My router freezes after an hour or two after mining and the only new thing is this miner! What could be the issue? It was working for months ok?
never trust a wifi, for me it worked with one AP , with 2x AP it was mayhem .... |
|
|
|
|
I have loop command in bat and disabled windows error pop up, if it close that would be a lot better then to frezz, but no issue so far after update
|
|
|
|
@toptek deleted his post about his insider info and AMD hatred and 20% less power usage in mining new driver 16.12.1 is total failure for AMD miners, don`t try them they also now require signed bios for anyone who has modded RX 4xx si beware |
|
|
|
|
You don`t need Cuda toolkit just driver that support cuda 7.5 or 8.0, try newer driver
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
