Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2024, 04:56:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
821  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bug? /usr/bin/bitcoind "" on: September 19, 2010, 10:39:49 PM
I agree with using something like trac or mantisbt.  I suggest we try one of those two and if it helps improve things, then continue using it.  Otherwise it it doesn't seem to work, we still have the forum and nothing is lost.

Also, since `bitcoind ""` is not a bug, then for my gentoo linux ebuild init script to exec as that (dependent on /etc/conf.d/bitcoin containing BITCOIN_OPTS="") is the bug and I will fix that.
Fixed!
822  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: IRC meetings on: September 19, 2010, 03:04:35 PM
So... are these meeting actually happening anywhere?

I do not believe so.  I rarely see Xunie around anymore, and I have never seen satoshi.  What kind of meetings would be useful?
823  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Generating Bitcoins with your video card (OpenCL/CUDA) on: September 19, 2010, 02:02:18 PM
So I've been trying to figure out.. just how many coins did
1HZNsUqQxKVLmfPfCAzLwrnVDzx8CxwxnM
receive?

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=133.msg12921#msg12921
824  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [PATCH] connect to test network on: September 19, 2010, 12:19:23 AM
Definitely add a switch!  I'll add to my gentoo ebuild when there is a switch.
825  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Letter to the EFF on: September 19, 2010, 12:15:44 AM
How about now?  Anything?
826  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bug? /usr/bin/bitcoind "" on: September 18, 2010, 11:42:52 PM
I sent sourceforge-based message to Satoshi suggesting enabling MantisBT or Trac.  Perhaps he will notice it.
827  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Generating Bitcoins with your video card (OpenCL/CUDA) on: September 18, 2010, 11:22:16 PM
Yay!  $570 (was $650 a week ago) worth of Bitcoins spent by jgarzik.  Thanks much even though it doesn't benefit me personally.  Yay for community!

Enjoy, community!
(donations accepted at address in my sig, it certainly wasn't free Smiley)

I agree!  Donate to jgarzik until his initial funding is accounted for, and then some.  He deserves it. ^_^
828  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Gentoo Linux Ebuild on: September 18, 2010, 11:15:18 PM
Updated bitcoin-9999.ebuild to work with revision 155
829  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Bug? /usr/bin/bitcoind "" on: September 18, 2010, 10:19:22 PM
When I execute
Code:
/usr/bin/bitcoind
bitcoin daemon starts as expected.

When I execute
Code:
/usr/bin/bitcoind ""
error: couldn't connect to server

How come?  Is this a bug?

Satoshi: May we have a bug tracking system please? (size reduced since it was noticed by satoshi and is no longer necessary to stand out, which was meant as a bit humorous anyhow.)

Workaround for my gentoo linux init script:
Code:
BITCOIN_OPTS="-min"
which will then execute as `bitcoind "-min"`
830  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Bitcoin Compilation Warnings on: September 18, 2010, 10:08:05 PM
revision 155:
Code:
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-2.9" -I"/usr/include/db4.8" -DGUI -o obj/db.o db.cpp
util.cpp: In function ‘void ShrinkDebugFile()’:
util.cpp:739: warning: ignoring return value of ‘size_t fwrite(const void*, size_t, size_t, FILE*)’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result

g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-2.9" -I"/usr/include/db4.8" -DGUI -o obj/ui.o ui.cpp
ui.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void CMainFrame::OnIconize(wxIconizeEvent&)’:
ui.cpp:379: warning: ‘bool wxIconizeEvent::Iconized() const’ is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/wx-2.9/wx/event.h:2072)
ui.cpp:387: warning: ‘bool wxIconizeEvent::Iconized() const’ is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/wx-2.9/wx/event.h:2072)

g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-2.9" -I"/usr/include/db4.8" -o obj/nogui/script.o script.cpp
util.cpp: In function ‘void ShrinkDebugFile()’:
util.cpp:739: warning: ignoring return value of ‘size_t fwrite(const void*, size_t, size_t, FILE*)’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
831  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Payment Request mime type (instead of bitcoin:URI) on: September 18, 2010, 05:24:26 PM
A user can manually associate an application with a mime type: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Options+window+-+Applications+panel?style_mode=inproduct&as=u

However, I am uncertain how a linux application can pre-install mime types to be handled by firefox or other browsers such as konqueror, chromium, galeon, seamonkey, midori, opera, etc.

It will be nice when a user can click to confirm a transaction using Bitcoin as payment method and then to trigger bitcoin client to present the user with a dialog to confirm sending a specific bitcoin amount to a specific address; two clicks.
832  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Losing Critical Mass and Call to Action on: September 18, 2010, 03:59:51 PM
Quote
Hello ******,

I've blanked out the names.

Karsten Gerloff?  ^_^
833  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Market on: September 17, 2010, 10:50:12 AM
Please look into trade ID -755
You may want to contact dwdollar directly either through his site, email or through private message.
834  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: mtgox.com restriction to 4 decimal places on: September 17, 2010, 08:57:02 AM
I noticed BitcoinMarket restricts to 4 decimal places, so it seems fairly established already.
835  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: A slightly more open approach to bitcoin on the GPU on: September 17, 2010, 06:47:40 AM
Everyone developing this GPU thing seems to have an agenda.

Maybe noagendamarket should do it! ^_^
836  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Bitconent -The exponential Bitcoin Investment on: September 16, 2010, 08:24:38 AM
Name:     spndr7
Date Registered:    May 19, 2010, 02:36:24 am
Last Active:    September 15, 2010, 09:50:11 pm


September 15, 2010, 06:57:53 pm
Hi. I waited 1 week until today, now please give me back my money.
 
Regards

837  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [PATCH REQUEST] Variable ports (205BTC reward) on: September 16, 2010, 07:54:52 AM
Ah, cool.  Thanks for the confirmation.
838  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / mtgox.com restriction to 4 decimal places on: September 16, 2010, 07:35:38 AM
Be advised that this isn't implemented yet, but is in consideration.

Attempting to bid or ask for an amount:
2000@0.05055001 will result in a bid/ask placed for 2000@0.0506 <-- bitcoinmail!

2000 * $0.05055001 == $101.10002
2000 * $0.05060000 == $101.20000

$0.10 difference for 2,000 bitcoins isn't so noticeable, but, exchange 2,000 bitcoins back and forth for example 1,000 times if you are a trader

1000 * $0.10 == $100

Maybe 5 decimal places?  And then when you switch to 5 places, we can argue for 6 places, and then 7, 8, ... OVER 9,000? O_O

Quote
Sep 14 15:17:36 <mtgox>   I think I might be making it so prices are limited to $0.001 so there is more chance of trades happening
Sep 14 15:19:04 <necrodearia>   mtgox: Do you mean you will limit asks/bids to 3 decimal places?
Sep 14 15:19:18 <mtgox>   I'm thinking about it
Sep 14 15:19:27 <necrodearia>   How come?
Sep 14 15:22:10 <mtgox>   All markets have precission limits
Sep 14 15:23:44 <nanotube>   mtgox: if you do decide to limit it, at least limit it to 0.00001, not 0.001 (i.e., 5 rather than 3 decimals)
Sep 14 15:24:26 <mtgox>   yeah maybe 3 digits isn't the right limit but there should be some limit
Sep 14 15:28:44 <mtgox>   let me find the email where this was suggested...
Sep 14 15:29:46 <mtgox>   1) I think it would help the spreads a lot to lock prices to something,say two tenths of a cent, so available bids would be like $.072, $.074, etc. This would make Mt. Gox function more like a standard market, (no more .071195 type prices),and make it easier for people to see and plug pricing gaps. Once there's enough liquidity, you could open up tenths of a cent.
Sep 14 15:29:58 <mtgox>   Re: the spread -- the minimum spread would now be 0.2; more trades will occur as all the people who try to undercut any spread less than 0.2 now will just trade. And, as you say, it reduces annoyance for those trying to cut in line.
Sep 14 15:52:50 <mtgox>   well I think there is a reason all other exchanges limit precision of transactions. but anyway I'm not doing it any time real soon.

On a separate note
Quote
Sep 14 15:53:03 <mtgox>   Paging through your account history finally works
839  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: History of Bitcoin on: September 15, 2010, 10:47:52 PM
This wiki page was just for reference.  I suggest creating a "History of Bitcoin" specific wiki page for documenting the history.
840  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [PATCH] implement 'listtransactions' on: September 15, 2010, 08:39:10 PM
I've also made the following changes:

  • Slight change so that JSON-RPC binds to all/any IPs instead of just the loopback.

This patch doesn't seem to be compatible with this patch.  Can these patches be combined or is one better than the other?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!