both clock and memory has a speed gain, now i am trying ~1920mhz with ~2370mhz for memory with heavy undervolt to 0.9-0.91v which is a bit hard to do with afterburner

are you sure you OC aint to high, I can not manage more then 245 maybe 250 per 1070

1070, mode 1 is fastest, which is already auto setting for it, still 2x exe are gaining 100% GPU usage and a bit of more speed

lets hope that eqm_1.0.3 can push 1070 to 390 speed

With Zcash and asic you would need to have a lot of ram and buses communicating with that ram, so asic would be hard to design and build, no near as BTC and LTC, and speed would not be so drastic better then GPU can do

LOL greedy AMD as... I mean miners, could not even start proper topic, but as we need vote for a greed, we all know the results

don`t think Claymore have the size of the ass for all the ass lickers

owww someone need to start a topic how to kill the fee for same, I bet you all of them would just die for it, even if its just ~2% 

Go for 1060 or 1070, depending on price and your setup

Are you using Windows 10 anniversary version 1607?

after they fixed TLB on nvidia with wddm 2.1, I can say win7 is faster with claymore and genoil under win7 at all

yeah I duno too, but claymore with ethereum worked gr8, same ping, I needed 1h just with team viewer to switch software on 5 rigs, and it was not just for 5min but I keep it like that for ~1h on ethereum, and switched back to EQM when my ISP fixed the ping
still I don`t know how would other miners behave as i can not reproduce bad internet myself

Location server would not help, it was my local internet problem

Just had bad internet at mining location (ping 500-1000 or so) EQM miner was useless (stale job and reconects, etc), but claymore ETH miner worked with 97% efficiency even with so bad internet
would be nice to update protocol and make it more redundant

sadly crappy 280x can do 235sol/s at 1200/1600

Win 10, WDDM 2.1 375.95

1070 only 10MH/s

Please fix support for windows 10

280x ~170sol/s
rx470 ~170sol/s

I don`t get it, you got what you paid for... duno why ppl buy something no one ever promised ZCASH will have good price, now its that, tomorrow it can be 80% less or more

Just one card need monitor or dummy(hdmi->vha adapter as the card only have digital output)

you disabled problem is something of different problem

Have you started working on Nvidia version?

same, with samsung and new bios (micron fix) I even get 2500 (stable on same but some rejects on other cards) on ETH but zcash is write heavy and it will cresh so i keep them 2375 too, need to test 24h stability for more

I don`t know how exact you can adjust memory access to GPU memory, but ppl that compare and cry here thet RX 4xx should be fast as 390x should first learn that any architecture is different, the driver is accessing GPU memory as best as it can, if zcash need many small accesses and if 256bit bus is not wide enough its logical that 384 or 512bit bus will be better, even when we know with 2xx and 39x GPU and memory clock is more "aligned" and in sync then on RX cards which usualu work 11xx/2000

CRYING here RX4xx is pointless if you know NOTHING about internel GPU arhitecture and even less about zcash prof of work algo and how its computed

they sure do, if you undervolt(with OC and heavy TDP limit voltage drop per clock on same cards as gainward, gigabyte etc..) and run 2x exe file you can get 220sol with 115-120w per card