I can understand not letting the ML be parlayed with a prop cause then it would be a correlated play. But Nitrogen isn't letting you parlay the ML with ANYTHING. Very strange. I will definitely let you know if I find a good site to parlay this ML  |
|
|
|
|
Be active in trading and helpfulness.
The less you care about DefaultTrust status; the more likely you're to be added.
|
|
|
|
Title says it. We can find an escrow here and use vegas odds at the time of bet. I want Mayweather.
If there are some Pacman fans here, I'd be willing to bet on Mayweather through escrow too |
|
|
|
I heard Jetwin has the highest odds in most of the sports games! BTW, what game is it? I mean which sport?
LOL really? Looks very much like you're sig spamming to me and only bringing more attention to yourself. What game / sport is the pacquiao mayweather fight... Hahaha funniest thing I heard all week. Back on topic, I've used jetwin in the past and never had a problem. Much lower limits compared to other books though. What were you trying to parlay the ML with? I want to play the Mayweather ML but -220 is a bit high. Looking to parlay it with a baseball game or something else I have confidence in. If not I'll probably end up straight betting it at Jetwin |
|
|
|
Interesting site. Some good info. I havent tried Jetwin but have heard okay things. Might just try it out for this fight |
|
|
|
|
Looking for the best odds for this match.
Nitrogen hasn't changed the line since release and won't let you parlay the ML (lol)
What sportsbooks have the best line for this fight? And allow you to parlay the ML?
|
|
|
|
Man these guys get the biggest build up in sport ever, all over skysports for the past 2 weeks it seem, i guess this is to get the pay per view revenue money. Who knows if it will be a good fight really though its a lottery, could be very one sided.
It would be hilarious if someone was KO'ed in the first 5 mintues but Mayweather is a defensive fighter and theoretically it will go the distance. Tyson said it would be a KO winner |
|
|
|
Are these still available and how do I know this is legit?? Looking for these for a while just don't want to spend big bucks on it lol
He's most likely NOT legitimate. I wanted to buy one through escrow, and he never responded. |
|
|
|
Looking for up to 1.5 BTC through Serve please
Is it an irreversible payment method ? p.s. Sorry for being ignorant. I used to know most of the FIAT payments are reversible in nature. Technically, it could be but with Serve you need to enter a PIN to send money. The introduction of a PIN makes it much harder to argue that your account was compromised because that person would have to have knowledge of your PIN as well. I haven't received any chargebacks to date. *knock on wood* |
|
|
|
|
Looking for up to 1.5 BTC through Serve please
|
|
|
|
|
casinobitco.in = 2
Pros
-Has a casino with BJ/roulette
Cons
-Live odds are down
-Made 2 withdrawals - 1 was instant - the other pending for 4+ hours
-No 1Q lines
-Could not figure out how to create a parlay
-Layout is much to be desired
-1 deposit confirmation needed before bets
Don't see advantages of this sportsbook over say Nitrogen.
Bitcoin sportbooks world still has much to be desired
|
|
|
|
I agree on escrow guys not leaving feedback so easily. A good example is OgNasty for escrow...he did not leave me a feedback until at least 15+ escrows were done successfully. I think trust here should be VERY hard to earn as it does provide you with a lot of potential to scam. Several months back I was not at home and my hot wallet machine was down. I was able to get a 5BTC loan in roughly 20 minutes with 0 collateral due to my trust score. Most of the escrows are also default trusted level 2, so their ratings do count as extra. I do not think a user who takes a micro loan should get feedback left for it right away.
These are good thoughts and I agree, but how can they be enforced without the trust system being moderated? |
|
|
|
Why is Quickseller the target of so many threads in the Meta section? Feeling like a Vod 2.0 situation up in here.
Tomatocage left his alt account positive trust and you don't see threads dedicated to it. Unless that person is showing inherently untrustworthy behavior, it isn't really a big deal in my eyes.
Until there is solid proof of dishonesty or actual scamming, these threads should be locked to prevent pointless arguing.
I can't speak to the facts concerning most of these threads. I, however, was the victim of a smear attack by quickseller in which he deployed an alt to troll me and then dug into my past until he found a false accusation by a known scammer (from years ago) and then used it as a reason to neg-rep me with his main account. He did this in a (failed) attempt to get me kicked out of the signature ad campaign I was a part of, presumably as vengence for crossing him in public (ie, calling him out for his hotheadedness and suggesting that calling people idiots is not called for). That's my experience with him, as to the rest of these threads, you'll have to take them on their merits, I think. I've disagreed with Vod in the past many times regarding his enforcement of Microsoft policies and intellectual properties. Three striking differences between Vod and Quickseller which I notice are that (1) Vod maintains his cool and doesn't resort to name-calling and mudslinging when people disagree with him; (2) Vod actually removes negative trust when people talk with him about it (ie, he doesn't try to hold people's pasts over their heads for all time); (3) Vod doesn't seem to go on vendetta missions in which he's going to give negative trust to anyone who disagrees with him (if this were the case, I'd have negative trust from him since I don't agree that Microsoft policies should be dictating trust ratings on this board). The other thing to keep in mind is that quickseller is a known account farmer/seller so in adding neg-reps to accounts, he's actually driving up the value of his non-neg-repped farmed accounts. It's a black and white case of conflict of interest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interestAs far as I know, Vod has not been associated with any such behaviors. Negative trust for disagreements is against the limited trust rules. I looked at the thread in which you posted about receiving negative feedback and Quickseller posts no lies about you. You did fraud TF even though he is a known scammer. Nope, sure didn't. I'm surprised you seem to feel like you know what happened between me and TF over 2 years ago. Could it be that you're taking TF's unsubstantiated accusations as fact? Hard to see how you'd have some sort of access to TF's server logs or to my computer's history from so long ago. Surprising that you're not put off by the fact that TF is a known scammer and he accused me in that thread of taking 4 different amounts of money and then finally settles on "everything I ever withdrew". That seems right to you? Hmm. Well, you're opinions are for you to make. Did you also read through the threads where quickeseller uses and alt to troll me and threaten me? It's all good, facts are facts and at the end of the day, folks like quickseller don't end up with too much power for very long. Eventually the truth comes out (like it did with tradefortress). As far as buying/selling accounts, I'm sure Badbear knows about that and still has him under DefaultTrust so you probably won't get far with that argument.
It's all good. It's up to badbear to consider and stand behind who he considers as trustworthy. I can't speak for him. But the conflict of interest is in black-and-white. Another thing, please don't take this as a personal attack, but given quickseller's buying and selling and farming of accounts, how do we know you're not just a sockpuppet trying to deflect valid criticisms of him? I don't know the situation with TF. Like I said, I would have to take a closer look at what happened. A cursory look at the thread seemed to show that you admitted to using bots which is why I said you defrauded. Again, I don't know the full details which is why I haven't left any trust. I didn't look at any trolling threads. If there is serious trolling and harrassment, the proof should be submitted to whoever has Quickseller on their trust list. I'm a sock puppet? I've been consistently active and posting for close to two years. Don't get all conspiracy theory now. |
|
|
|
|
This is an awesome idea. Will hopefully prevent the situations where scammers imitate the names of reputable members.
|
|
|
|
Why is Quickseller the target of so many threads in the Meta section? Feeling like a Vod 2.0 situation up in here.
Tomatocage left his alt account positive trust and you don't see threads dedicated to it. Unless that person is showing inherently untrustworthy behavior, it isn't really a big deal in my eyes.
Until there is solid proof of dishonesty or actual scamming, these threads should be locked to prevent pointless arguing.
I can't speak to the facts concerning most of these threads. I, however, was the victim of a smear attack by quickseller in which he deployed an alt to troll me and then dug into my past until he found a false accusation by a known scammer (from years ago) and then used it as a reason to neg-rep me with his main account. He did this in a (failed) attempt to get me kicked out of the signature ad campaign I was a part of, presumably as vengence for crossing him in public (ie, calling him out for his hotheadedness and suggesting that calling people idiots is not called for). That's my experience with him, as to the rest of these threads, you'll have to take them on their merits, I think. I've disagreed with Vod in the past many times regarding his enforcement of Microsoft policies and intellectual properties. Three striking differences between Vod and Quickseller which I notice are that (1) Vod maintains his cool and doesn't resort to name-calling and mudslinging when people disagree with him; (2) Vod actually removes negative trust when people talk with him about it (ie, he doesn't try to hold people's pasts over their heads for all time); (3) Vod doesn't seem to go on vendetta missions in which he's going to give negative trust to anyone who disagrees with him (if this were the case, I'd have negative trust from him since I don't agree that Microsoft policies should be dictating trust ratings on this board). The other thing to keep in mind is that quickseller is a known account farmer/seller so in adding neg-reps to accounts, he's actually driving up the value of his non-neg-repped farmed accounts. It's a black and white case of conflict of interest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interestAs far as I know, Vod has not been associated with any such behaviors. Negative trust for disagreements is against the limited trust rules. I looked at the thread in which you posted about receiving negative feedback and Quickseller posts no lies about you. You did fraud TF even though he is a known scammer. As far as buying/selling accounts, I'm sure Badbear knows about that and still has him under DefaultTrust so you probably won't get far with that argument. |
|
|
|
a lot of positive responses for both boxer now only a few days again before the match i'm getting excited to watch
and whoever the winner i think he is the best boxer in this century
I have a feeling there will be a rematch at the end of all of this. Too much $$ to be made with another fight. i hope if would be happen like that so trough this fight there will be tooooo much BTCBTC, i wish Floyd Mayweather will be the winner of that on 2nd May,  i have no doubt Mayweather will won this fight and continue his winning rythem also, so wait for it and make huge profit from that fight. Tbh Mayweather should win this match. This will be one of the competition and is being publicized for a long time. There are surely multimillion bets being placed on these two fighters. Exciting time ahead just few hours till the fight starts. The fight is on May 3rd, it's april 30 Saturday May 2nd. Well, it's 3 days left from now. From the statistic Mayweather have a good one. But Pacquiao also good with their speed i think Pacman can beat Mayweather with 12 rounds or TKO.
The problem is Pacman and Mayweather old already 30++, i hope their stamina good.
No way Pacquiao is quicker in Mayweather. |
|
|
|
keno all the way till im 65. great odds
Almost everyone I see in the Keno section looks over 65 Isn't it like Bingo? I thought odds weren't that great but only need to drop a few bucks each game. |
|
|
|
|
Why is Quickseller the target of so many threads in the Meta section? Feeling like a Vod 2.0 situation up in here.
Tomatocage left his alt account positive trust and you don't see threads dedicated to it. Unless that person is showing inherently untrustworthy behavior, it isn't really a big deal in my eyes.
Until there is solid proof of dishonesty or actual scamming, these threads should be locked to prevent pointless arguing.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
