Sounds like a good idea. Hopefully he will get back with us soon. As a WebMaster/SA all the downtime that the site has had is not good at all.
Agreed, Downtime is rarely good. I have sent you a pm in hopes we could talk and work some sorta agreement out |
|
|
|
|
Well I will ask the next logical question, Once the 90 days go by and it is not possible to ROI on the units how soon will hashfast give us our new modules to start mining with?
|
|
|
|
we have been here before. just auction bitmit on the front page of bitmit. the person who pays the most will be the person who believes he can get the most value out of it so it will then be relocated to its highest value application. this is how a market economy works. someone who believes they can pay $50,000 for bitmit and still make a profit is someone who has big plans, someone who has great ideas for how to take bitmit to great places. if that person is wrong than it will be sold again and again until someone buys it who isn't wrong.
please tosaki. do this right, it doesn't matter who runs it so long as the person who runs it proves that he believes that it is as valuable as we believe it is. please please please auction it off to the highest bidder.
to anyone else who is reading this, do what you can to communicate this message to tosaki.
I emailed Chan the owner but he has not responded. Lately he has been taking longer and longer to reply to my emails. I have been chatting with him lately over emails I had emailed him also. I have all the resources to keep it up and running for a very long time. NEVER to be sold again.   Do you have any interested in a partnership? Rather then me and you bidding it out on a war? Well seems to me bitmit has decided just to let their service burn for the next 4 weeks. I won an auction I while ago and i can not pay for it nor did i get an email saying I won. So it is just sitting there saying Winner Starsoccer but I cant go to an orderpage to pay as it does not exist. |
|
|
|
Has someone done a nice chart yet if its is even possible to get a full ROI. Otherwise im going to start hoping they just dont deliver and refund in full BTC
Not withstanding what was said to one guy in a closed office, do you really think they are going to take a 200% loss refunding essentially every BTC payment batch 1 customer at $300/BTC (if the price stays the same until December) when most of them paid at $100/BTC? That is a rhetorical question BTW, as this is a company that accepted orders under one set of Terms and Conditions, and then sent out order confirmations a week later with an updates terms link on the bottom that added a new "guaranteed" date to the end of the year all while claiming the new conditions apply retroactively and that refunds are not possible prior to then. They'll do what they please. Agreed, before id rather seem them go backrupt then give me my machines that make me 1btc. Also for those interested I submitted my bet to http://bitbet.us/propositions/ as soon as it confirms I will let you know |
|
|
|
|
Has someone done a nice chart yet if its is even possible to get a full ROI. Otherwise im going to start hoping they just dont deliver and refund in full BTC
|
|
|
|
|
well I am glad to hear that the MPP is changed to start at october 30th but even tho I think it will end up not being near enough.
Looks like my prediction that BFL ships before hashfast will come true
|
|
|
|
we have been here before. just auction bitmit on the front page of bitmit. the person who pays the most will be the person who believes he can get the most value out of it so it will then be relocated to its highest value application. this is how a market economy works. someone who believes they can pay $50,000 for bitmit and still make a profit is someone who has big plans, someone who has great ideas for how to take bitmit to great places. if that person is wrong than it will be sold again and again until someone buys it who isn't wrong.
please tosaki. do this right, it doesn't matter who runs it so long as the person who runs it proves that he believes that it is as valuable as we believe it is. please please please auction it off to the highest bidder.
to anyone else who is reading this, do what you can to communicate this message to tosaki.
I emailed Chan the owner but he has not responded. Lately he has been taking longer and longer to reply to my emails. I have been chatting with him lately over emails |
|
|
|
next week they will start to ship. If this was a dream, yes. 3 hours left to the 24 hours timeframe given yesterday. Well time is ticking and the chance they dont post an update is very great. Personally at this point every word of theres that they break just gets piled on to the lies we can expect in the future |
|
|
|
|
Ito love bitmit and have emailed the owner about buying the site. I would love to continue the site and think it has huge potential.
|
|
|
|
|
personally at this point im hoping there are major delays and i can just get a refund of my exact amount of coins. Its clear at this point the correct move would have been knc and as much as I dislike BFL, BFL may end up shipping before hashfast.
|
|
|
|
Not sure why BFL is so interested in this thread.
It is also telling that Inaba assumes everyone else is always lying that is called projection.
Last I read BFL still had not delivered 3 of 3 units per minirig orders and were shipping them piecemeal (1/3rd of ordered hashrate at a time).
So either
a) BFL finally caught up to 1 Jan (only 10 months later) in which case I guess that deserves a cookie. It wasn't a lie simply a mistake as I don't track BFL every word every day. Most people would say "your are incorrect we have shipped all of 2012 orders".
OR
b) Inaba is doing his classic twist and manipulate words. BFL shipped minigrigs as three 500 GH/s units. At one point they had shipped one "sub unit" per customer but not the full ordered amount. I guess Inaba would call that "shipping all orders". Most people wouldn't.
Either way I don't really care but I find it interesting that BFL seems to read this thread daily. Worried?
Just checked BFL they seem to be up to april of 2013. Good thing that estimation of all back orders would be shipped by end of September. Id figure November and even that is pushing it. |
|
|
|
wow thats alot.
NOTE: My math may be wrong! Well if my computer can check 200,000,000/Sec then thats 17 trillion addresses per day. Lets see how close I can get to guessing a private key. addresses per sec * seconds * minutes * hours * days in the year * age of Earth * some other number to get us close to guessing all possible combinations. 200000000*60*60*24*365*4500000000*10000000000000000000000 = 2.8 x 10^47 (close to how many possible combinations would have to be checked (I think)) So my computer would have to run constantly for the age of the Earth times 10 thousand billion billion (note that about 3 times is already older than the known universe) So my computer would be running past the heat death of this universe and probably still would have not guessed a key with a balance. hehe you proved a point. I was just saying alot as my pc only generates like 50million a sec and thats with my 2 gpus and cpu cracking away |
|
|
|
After reading this topic, I am going to generate 1million address a day...  lol, I was thinking about making software to to do this. Generate address and see if one address has any balance I think you can use VanityGen to do this. I know that VanityGen can generate 200,000,000 addresses a second on my computer, but it would be slower if you had to compare with your local blockchain for a balance every time. Also my computer is slow. wow thats alot. Yea I was considering for my program to just generate like 100 address then check all 100 address for a balance. Then add those address to a long running address list. which is checked every 5mins or something |
|
|
|
After reading this topic, I am going to generate 1million address a day... lol, I was thinking about making software to to do this. Generate address and see if one address has any balance |
|
|
|
Transfer the coins to a different address with a public message, telling the owner to contact me. If (s)he can prove ownership of the private key (by signing a message) I will return the coins minus a small finder's fee Well your option seems to be quite popular. Tho most people seem are just gonna take it and run Also voted for that one, although it's not exactly what I would do, it's the closest one. feel free to tell me what you would do and I can add it to the options |
|
|
|
Transfer the coins to a different address with a public message, telling the owner to contact me. If (s)he can prove ownership of the private key (by signing a message) I will return the coins minus a small finder's fee Well your option seems to be quite popular. Tho most people seem are just gonna take it and run |
|
|
|
Transfer the coins to a different address with a public message, telling the owner to contact me. If (s)he can prove ownership of the private key (by signing a message) I will return the coins minus a small finder's fee Added your option |
|
|
|
Just curious what you would do if this happened to you. And no this did not happen to me yet  |
|
|
|
|
I do not want this thread to turn into a huge conspiracy thread but wanted to state a view I had on it. I read a comment on reddit stating that maybe the SEC and other Commissions were involved. If this is the case if you really think about it they are probably costing more money closing down each site then running. I mean if you think about it GLBSE did have a few IPOS that were scams but most of the scamming IPOS ended up not making alot of bitcoins. In the end when GLBSE closed alot of IPOS didn't move anywhere and the owners just disappeared similar to what is happening right now with Basic-Mining and creativeX, the owner. Every time an exchange is closed more owners just disappear into the dust which is more costly then the amount of scams happening.
|
|
|
|
|
so another 1-2 so I am just gonna say we are at atleast 24hours now
Yes I do regret not making a few bids now as it seems I will miss the chance
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
