Welcome to your ideas and approaches to this field, for newcomers I think they are like seeds that are sown, and how the germination develops requires many different factors to bring the seed to fruition. that variety achieves the desired yield.

I highly recommend starting from the basics and small to nurture a long-term growth process, a few suggestions that I can give you

- Learn economic history
- History of scientific and technological development
- History of bitcoin and crypto development
- Improve health and spirit
...
There are many other things that I believe your journey will pay for itself. And of course we here are just like you, always trying to learn and share the knowledge we have to build a good community.

IMO, each different stage will have contextual circumstances for people to adapt to it, the will to overcome life circumstances or accept it is up to us to decide. So, ignoring the story of the circumstances that pushed us into difficult situations, what is the determination that we are showing? I myself was born into a family where I always feel proud and grateful, even though I receive many judgments from society, but that only motivates me personally to try to find the truth of my life. In life, the country I live in also has to go through many wars to be able to maintain peace. And the generation of people who have sacrificed their lives to preserve our country always remembers that gratitude, which is not only expressed through thoughts but also actions by living responsibly for this life. Each person's mission and lessons may be different, but in general, if you throw away personal interests and live to serve society, that is the return that I believe is the most concrete way to express gratitude.

I think it is not necessary because casinos still operate in their own way. The loss of a part of an already existing field can cause debate, but it has also been clearly stated about it. The decisions of the forum moderators and we members should respect them. And the collaboration, as the OP mentioned I think it is also an idea but it will be more straightforward that it will not be accepted, and as I expressed before, the casinos that appeared before also do not need additional that service or if they want, they must also be bound by the regulations.

And now by the time mixers are banned from the forum I think they've had enough time to come up with solutions that can continue to work for those who seek them out, and we also No need to think too much about it.

If you feel like the concept is still quite vague, then I think you should talk about the products appearing in this space and the DEX and CEX use cases.

Your assets belong to you, including your holdings of coins/tokens in your personal wallet. And whether you use some CEX like Binance, HTX, OKX,... and obviously your assets in those exchanges are held by that service and you are only viewing your assets on the service, and when a problem occurs, you absolutely do not have too much initiative. And in contrast to DEX, the asset is managed by you, and how you like to use it is your way.

That's just a basic example of Defi products at work in the space, and while not entirely beneficial, it certainly provides a clearer view of freedom and fairnes.

IMO, it doesn't need to be too complicated. If it's just a payment option, as long as it's convenient for both the customer and the service provider. And if the agreement is accepted, the process continues as you mentioned, but the problem is the scale of the value of the products paid here and the balance between them, because we all see the problems Bitcoin's own in terms of transactions.

Although I also highly encourage the use of bitcoin in many different areas of life, the core commitment in life should still be maintained at a balanced level, not too skewed towards personal views. And perhaps from the previous suggestions, OP will also be able to choose a specific method and decision.

Yep, this is not the first time, but we all understand the risk of participating in memecoin, someone can gain x100, and conversely someone can lose their money completely.

The way many people only like to talk about profits in an unbalanced way is part of the reason it can be easy to attract, because we can't avoid greed and are easily swayed by FOMO about things we like. It obscures our sanity. I also went through many different levels of emotions with memecoin, what I concluded was that I was only willing to spend money that I was willing to lose completely like gambling. It doesn't need complicated analysis. Colorful doesn't mean much, because it's a memecoin itself and doesn't have much applicability, so don't get too complicated about your expertise in the field.

IMO, intelligence brings an advantage to any field, and that includes gambling. The game that I'm exposed to is really, if you look at the risk/opportunity ratio, making appropriate decisions shows intelligence. But it's clear that the boundary between intelligence and gambling is often only a small one, because in the end, the people who create the product are always smarter than the players, just like we work for a company to get paid, and the boss is still the one who gives us that job.

With gambling, sometimes the confusion between finding fun and making money (some) is very complicated, and seeing many people become addicted and fail, I am aware that even if I learn a lot, No matter how far I go in this field, I still know that I am a fool. So it only brings a taste of joy to life, and I also don't want to taste the pain of gambling, and the fault still belongs to the individual first.

The boundary between risk and reward is no longer so important to me, because everyone has their own way of thinking, whether it is personal benefit, collective benefit, or even evil behavior. Bitcoin is always what it is, and it's natural for people to find different things and label it. The truth is that the bigger it gets, the more different labels it will receive.

IMO, peace in life means that we are no longer either competitive, but can operate through bitcoin or maintain the inherent nature that we support. But honestly, this life we ​​have has many views that we are forced to accept or rise up to change.

I also hope Trump can return to the White House in the next term, and I believe if that happens, many truths will be exposed that we will feel disgusted by. Although, from an economic perspective, what Trump did in the past received a lot of praise, I like that taxes will be significantly reduced and will promote general development. But returning to politics, I also think that Trump's determination and open personality will be able to ease existing tensions.

We are also soon entering the harsh campaign periods for the upcoming election, and things seem to be ramping up a lot, I have heard about the support of people wanting Trump back, because they are truly going through a complicated period.

Hype is an indispensable part of any field, and with this market itself, even Bitcoin and leading altcoins have hype on a completely different scale than other things so small that people often consider it a trend.

Looking back at the development journey of crypto, from bitcoin to ETH (POW), going through many stages from ICO, IDO, DEFI, NFT, metaverse, P2E, MEME, WEB3, AI, SOCIAL,... but the direction this type appears with different intensities but is all based on the main thing that is the volatility of bitcoin, and when the market is exciting is also the time when we witness a lot of nonsense, but with abundant money then everything can easily reach a bubble state. For those who cannot yet take advantage of the hype, they will have to continue waiting or give up playing in this market, overcomplicating the problem or simplifying it. That is how each of our perceptions is treated in the results we receive.

What nonsense are you talking about? Any competent person can access capital, as long as you meet the agreed terms.

So whose fault is it here? Do you really understand what you are talking about? In the past, the tools supported us, and we had the right to use them, but in reality, the meaning of your contribution to the tool is not there, so don't be too demanding and consider yourself as the center. You need to accept the fact that if you are not capable, you will not receive anything from society, it is not natural that complex problems permeate society, equality is inherent. It's because people don't have enough ability to adapt and need to know how to accept their own mistakes instead of blaming them.

In short, your perception has many problems with this life, it's just that it doesn't satisfy you so you're not satisfied with it. Anyway, if you don't change this thinking, you will always be dissatisfied with other things. Remember that when you don't have a good opportunity, it means you don't deserve it.

If this is a problem to help newbies, I will not direct them to invest, and especially not change their thinking about making money quickly with the terms ''GEM'', it is no different from thinking about looking to bet on gambling through the crypto market.

The fact that people new to this field do not want to learn but only like to look at the profits, is a way of talking about greed when something is easy to achieve. Try asking again why you don't accept DCA with a small capital, but brings stability and avoids risks with limited knowledge. This market is inherently fair, only those who refuse to learn, are greedy, impatient, even unlucky, lack asset management,... will take more risks on the journey of exposure to crypto.

Again, it's the way people talk to you or you see yourself in a cage with experts. Even though I joined this market quite early, I've never seen anyone seriously evaluate experts. Invest in crypto. They are just people who know more than you, and will also lead you to their ideals on a larger scale, so don't depend too much on someone, the initiative in the learning and decision process belongs to you, not anyone else. If everything was as easy as many people think about profits, there would be a lot of people making money, being honest with the truth and not blindly following attractive offers. Take more risks than opportunities, and when you accumulate enough, you will become more mature with your own investments.

People who have a lot of exposure to technological change can probably partly avoid these troubles. Although bad intentions appear, it cannot be denied that they have great potential to be applied to life and beyond. But changing too quickly also becomes risky because of adaptation. I think that inherently, the cyber environment also reflects the similar nature of life, the balance of good/bad. So how we choose to approach and deal with that, as well as spreading positive messages, will bring balance back. There are things that I saw on YT a long time ago about how to use AI labeled with crypto to navigate FOMO, but in reality it is only a small part of other complex problems.

It may sound like a good idea to spread knowledge, but something's shortcomings are not the reason a new product exists. We are in a transitional period of awareness about many things in life, including the financial system. You can answer for yourself, if not through the bank, where do you get the money to use it?

I don't want to separate which thing is better, because life today is not about winning or losing to see which thing is better. Instead, every product that is born is received and used in a way appropriate to life's context. Maybe people who know about crypto believe in it or simply look for profit opportunities to get back to living, but we still cannot separate centralized or decentralized finance.

The role of the United Nations in current conflict issues is no longer very effective, perhaps it will be useful when peace returns. Regarding the issue in the Middle East, I am interested, but I don't really understand too much about the politics or religion of either side. Honestly, this conflict will never end until victory belongs to one side. There are many reasons that I know, but at the core of the problem is the hatred that has lasted for centuries, and the information is so distorted that there is no real basis. Any complete information about who is right/wrong.

But anyway, no one wants conflict, perhaps we also need to accept the fact that war is a solution when the scope is too large. It's not as simple as the way we are evaluating this problem, but really only those inside the problem are aware of the complexity of that conflict.

Although I have mentioned this story many times before, it seems that it will continue to be repeated as a misconception about investing for many people. It will be quite similar to a child learning to ride a bicycle, he must learn the most basic things to be proficient, and it will take a lot of time for him to be able to control the bike as he wants, and with the right tools. Smart people will make things happen faster.

Back to the problem, security is like a way to equip the owner with safety, but it does not mean safety is guaranteed. For newbies, they encounter many problems with asset management, and make more wrong judgments about investing. They are easily informed about opportunities to start without foreseeing the consequences, and the element of luck is attached when people refuse to accept learning. If it's just keeping the private key, seed phrase, etc., there are thousands of different ways, even if people intend to bury it with death. But remember, it's important to re-understand how it works and reconsider what you're looking for with what you have.

Lol , Surely this title shows the truth of what is happening?

Although I'm not in this area, I'm not sure the work on this forum reaches the youth the OP is talking about, but I can agree that some groups have the opportunity to come into contact with the space and find income. But it's not too impressive because it's similar to how many other people know about this space, and frankly we still know for a fact that this field is not as popular as the way we operate on the forum.

Maybe the OP is just trying to create posts in hopes of receiving "merit", after all you need to make quality and relevant content. This is a valuable space for knowledge, not just for the purpose of making money.

Yep, maybe not for you, but it doesn't have to be limited to thinking in the way you mentioned, the sports betting market is huge, and there are many opinions about it. So play in a way that you think is safe. I also don't dream too much about the opportunity to make money, even though I'm also quite lucky when exposed to gambling. But I understand that the story of a player looking for relaxation is completely different from that of a player who has done their own research and calculations. There will also be individuals and groups that can be considered good players, and they have reasons to achieve good results in betting.

Anyway, I'm not someone who spends a lot of money on gambling, I'm happy to spend large sums of money, but to be honest I don't always do that. But usually I don't spend more than $50 on gambling every week, and there are even months when I don't play, so the target audience here will not be for me, just someone looking for comfort.

They say the ETH Spot ETF won't pass because Wall Street firms don't know how to solve the staking reward problem... The SEC could say no for many reasons, but staking is definitely not one of them, as none of the proposals mention staking at all.

When I was in school, everyone was encouraged to read the Wall Street Journal because it showed that I was an intellectual. Now, why do you read the Wall Street Journal? Don't you have Google at home to verify information? Why does the Wall Street Journal hate crypto so much?



FUD to collect goods . What's interesting is that some crypto fans like to share false information about other chains, as long as it benefits them...

As the saying goes, if you put 100 black ants and 100 red ants in a jar and then shake the jar, they will start fighting.

Never forget that the real enemy is not another type of ant but the person shaking the jar.

Concerning its familiarity in this space, although there is much information about regulations that have appeared to affect price stability, they still exist and are an indispensable part of the market. But in this space, it is difficult to guarantee that bad scenarios will not happen. I think the issue of choosing safe stablecoins for users on a small scale will not have too much of an impact, but on a large scale, that is a big risk sign.
It's unlikely that there are political issues behind why quality control and assessment are mentioned so much, but in my opinion, in a not yet completely decentralized environment, finding your own way out of this difficulty is difficult, and forcing stablecoins should probably also be researched. Honestly, from that point of view, I think the majority of people are more susceptible to flavor manipulation, and small-scale use is not too worrying.