|
SOCIALISM
You have 2 cows.
You give one to your neighbour
COMMUNISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and gives you some milk
FASCISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and sells you some milk
NAZISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and shoots you
BUREAUCRATISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other, and then
throws the milk away
TRADITIONAL CAPITALISM
You have two cows.
You sell one and buy a bull.
Your herd multiplies, and the economy
grows.
You sell them and retire on the income
VENTURE CAPITALISM
You have two cows.
You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by
your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption
for five cows.
The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company.
The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more. You sell one cow to buy a new president of the United States , leaving you with nine cows. No balance sheet provided with the release.
The public then buys your bull.
SURREALISM
You have two giraffes.
The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.
AN AMERICAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You sell one, and force the other to
produce the milk of four cows.
Later, you hire a consultant to analyse why
the cow has dropped dead.
A GREEK CORPORATION
You have two cows. You borrow lots of euros to build barns, milking sheds, hay stores, feed sheds,
dairies, cold stores, abattoir, cheese unit and packing sheds.
You still only have two cows.
A FRENCH CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You go on strike, organise a riot, and block the roads, because you want three
cows.
A JAPANESE CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow and produce
twenty times the milk.
You then create a clever cow cartoon image called a Cowkimona and
market it worldwide.
AN ITALIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows,
but you don't know where they are.
You decide to have lunch.
A SWISS CORPORATION
You have 5000 cows. None of them belong to you.
You charge the owners for storing them.
A CHINESE CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You have 300 people milking them.
You claim that you have full employment, and high bovine productivity.
You arrest the newsman who reported the real situation.
AN INDIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You worship them.
A BRITISH CORPORATION
You have two cows.
Both are mad.
AN IRAQI CORPORATION
Everyone thinks you have lots of cows.
You tell them that you have none.
No-one believes you, so they bomb the ** out of you and invade your country.
You still have no cows, but at least you are now a Democracy.
AN AUSTRALIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
Business seems pretty good.
You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate.
A NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION
You have two cows.
The one on the left looks very attractive...
|
|
|
|
I also want to rape 15 year old girl
What. In my opinion raping girl is more natural, but still very wrong thing to do.
What. There was no homosexuality until the homos came out with demands of equality and "protection".
Double what. and the worst thing: i don't think he is joking. |
|
|
|
Now using your own logic, i could beat you with a baseball bat, and shove it up your ass when you are laying bleeding and defenceless on the ground, because i don't like the way you treat other people(you have a different opinion then me). You can try to do that, but there is no guarantee I will not manage to slash you with my knife in the process. I bet there are homosexuals who are talking about "tolerance" in front of cameras but in same time want to beat to death the anti-gay protesters. you don't understand what im saying! i do not want to hurt you. im just saying, by using your own faulty logic, it would be perfectly acceptable, because we have different opinions. are you saying you lack empirical evidence? There are no gays, bisexuals or similar people in my friends. I don't even suspect that someone might be such in hiding. so you don't know any, and still you think you are qualified to say something about all of them. "ugly unattractive women", did she have short hair? It is one of the unattractive things in lesbians, but not most ugly one. so all girl should have long hair. should they stay in the kitchen too? "pidoras", offensive slang for gay. Being gay is the most shameful and offensive thing to be. It really does not matter how it is called. In almost every part of former ussr gays are called pidors. It came from shortened russian word meaning "pederast", that came from medical term in latin. it does not come from latin, it comes from greek. and it means: "older man having a homosexual relationship with a younger man", notice the age difference, that is where it differs from homosexuality. you are uneducated, and irrationally angry. "gay pride", a festival/event where people that are a part of a sexual minority have a chance of showing the world how happy they are. I really don't understand that. Dressing like freaks and marching on streets. If I'm happy together with my girlfriend, should we both run half-naked on streets wearing makeup like circus clowns? it does not hurt me, It seems like you might be one of them! why? because i slept with a lesbian girl? are you flat out saying its okay to do things to people against their will, because they are drunk? It's not big deal to grab girl by tits or hug her. As long as she does not run screaming away. It is natural. so if she is passed out, just rape her. Love is the condition in which the happiness of another person is essential to your own. Too broad definition. I might care for well being of many people, but this does not mean I want to fuck them. i assume you love your mother, do you want to fuck your mother? as myrkul said: love and fuck, love and no fuck, no love and fuck. they are different things. Marriage, perhaps, can be defined as only between a man and a woman Homosexuals want to redefine marriage also. And man-women partnership loses the exclusivity if there are also recognized other models of "family". and so what? is there anything wrong about that? and not just to make you throw up:  |
|
|
|
Well, leaving aside the fact that if I were to go to a restaurant that served human flesh, I would most likely be eating it as well, I would imagine that in a restaurant setting, I would be unable to discern whether the man was eating pork, or long pork. So You think that eating human flesh is natural and You are OK with that? I think he is trying to provoke you with social constructivism. It is centered around "if everyone is doing it, it must be okay.", which your posts suggest that you are a advocate for. |
|
|
|
so because people have a different opinion about what is natural, you hurt them? When there is no other options, yes! And this is not about opinions, it is about homosexual practice. : In general, an opinion is a belief about matters commonly considered to be subjective, i.e., it is based on that which is less than absolutely certain, and is the result of emotion or interpretation of facts. Criteria for categorizing something as a opinion: 1. subjective 2. in-absolute certainty. (fuck yeah! quadruple negations!) 3. result of emotion. 4. interpretation of facts homosexuals considers love(a emotion) between people of the same gender natural(in-absolute certainty). Conclusion: it is indeed a matter of opinion. Now using your own logic, i could beat you with a baseball bat, and shove it up your ass when you are laying bleeding and defenceless on the ground, because i don't like the way you treat other people(you have a different opinion then me). should drugs be allowed, they are altering your body in unatural ways? The drug use should be decriminalized. And drug users don't challenge the fundamental order of society and junkies are not considered "normal people" and there are no pressure upon society to accept junkies as equal members of society. weed is a drug. alcohol is a drug. weed smokers and drinkers are considered normal people. drugs are messing with your body(FACT!), and are therefor unnatural. again by your own logic -> KILL ALL THE WEED SMOKERS, AND DRUNK PEOPLE! I don't personally know any gay people. are you saying you lack empirical evidence? The public gay spokespersons are ugly unattractive women or freaky gay man (so called pidorasi) and judging from gay pride, they are the most "normal" ones. "ugly unattractive women", did she have short hair? "pidoras", offensive slang for gay. "gay pride", a festival/event where people that are a part of a sexual minority have a chance of showing the world how happy they are. have you seen carnivals where the dancers have those really long feathers and all kind of shiny stuff on, while they are trying to shake their ass off. I would not risk in Your place getting drunk and passing out around any of them. done that many times, have even slept with one of them. The single intimate touch by another man probably can cause me vomit. i feel sad for you, because you are unable to recognize a beautiful thing. And being drunk relaxes control on behavior, there are numerous occasions when girls getting touched and stripped by drunk friends. are you flat out saying its okay to do things to people against their will, because they are drunk? |
|
|
|
Homosexuals are liars. They lie about their numbers and prevalence of homosexuality and bisexuality in society. They look and act like freaks. They use politicians to advance their cause. The same politicians are hostile against national and sovereign state. there is a lot of stuff that is unnatural(computers, money, midgets, ...) computers and money are tools. Humans make and use tools for tasks they need. Midgets are mistake of nature. If they ever decide to request special right or form false midget ideology like homosexuals did, they will be on same line as homosexuals. did they hurt you in anyway? I managed to hurt few of them but did not get caught. All that they were capable is to use secret police and corrupt court system to harass me for more than 5 years just for openly speaking against homosexuals in public. I'm really angry on them and if when the current political system collapses, they will be used as target practice. Pederasty and lesbianism were crime here until early 1990-ties and will be again, his time with much harsher punishments. so because people have a different opinion about what is natural, you hurt them? i know a lot of gay people, and they are generally not liars or freaks(well maybe when drunk, but whos not?) should drugs be allowed, they are altering your body in unatural ways? |
|
|
|
|
you seem quite angry with homosexuals.
is there a reason why you don't like them? the "its not natural"-response does not cut it. there is a lot of stuff that is unnatural(computers, money, midgets, ...)
did they hurt you in anyway?
|
|
|
|
If you copied an address and private key onto a document but randomly changed 1 character in the address and 1 different random character in the private key.
How hard do you think it would it be to crack?
Thanks
extremely gross overestimate 256*256 = 65536 combinations to try -> less then a second on a average computer |
|
|
|
awesome troll thread. watching!  |
|
|
|
I was wondering if that was technically possible using the SMF platform.
almost everything is "technically possible". |
|
|
|
|
you throw away your card, and say that it was stolen, and the last 5 uses was by the thief.
|
|
|
|
the price on bitcoin.
from what exchange? I want to keep this forum and exchanges separated. |
|
|
|
|
You use IE, you are Swedish -> You deserve it.
|
|
|
|
and to answer my own question: yes, it will go up exponentially
Sorry - I must have got confused - but glad that you worked out the answer - are you suggesting that Bitcoin should be changed to allow for quicker mining of blocks? no not at all. i was just wondering what would happen to the difficulty if some crazy dude with tons of ASICs was to mess with us, and put all the blocks 2 min apart. i don't about all the 51% attacks, panic and other stuff. i was just interested in the difficulty. |
|
|
|
Doesn't LTC basically do this already (i.e. blocks at around 2.5 minutes)?
no their network are defined by having intervals of 2.5min. im talking about increasing the mining power 5 times every 2.8 days. and to answer my own question: yes, it will go up exponentially |
|
|
|
|
if there was a block mined every 2 min, how would the difficulty change when the network tries to adjust to 10 min intervals? exponentially?
i know that its not likely to happen, but i am just wondering.
|
|
|
|
... may ...
you speek the truth, sir. the moon may fall down too. |
|
|
|
the attacker in man in middle attack can also be passive observer. He is not required to modify the plaintext messages, just decrypt, store and resend encrypted with his own key. The security question will go trough as without MITM attack.
Now we are talking about authentication rather than encrypted channel security. They are different animals.
they are different, but if you can't authenticate, encryption does not really matter. |
|
|
|
Even if all your computers are so virus infested they're a biohazard, the chances of the SAME attacker having control over ALL of your communications lines are ridiculously low.
NSA, go look it up you don't know what it is. no one is talking about vira, you should really go read some more about basic cryptografi, as you cleary don't understand. Yeah, because the NSA has people being paid to listen to your phone lines, read your email and IMs, and intercept and read your regular mail.  if the information is sensitive enough, then Yeah! tap all the stuff. but the only hard thing to do here is the phone, the rest is text based and can easily be faked. the only impossible thing is pre-distributed public keys(gpg or similar), but that would require the two parties of the communication to meet at least once. Text based communication is not easily faked if you ask a question that very few people would know. simple example: Alice to Attacker: answer this question _, and i will believe you are bob. Attacker to Bob: answer this question _, and i will believe you are bob. Bob to Attacker: this is the answer to the question: _. Attacker to Alice: this is the answer to the question: _. Alice to Attacker: hello, bob! Attacker to Bob: kthxbye. and the Attacker and Alice continues the conversation. It is really that simple, and security would not be any better even with public-key cryptography(unless they where pre-distributed). now, please STFU and go learn some basic cryptography. Delay, idiot. I don't ask the question then go get something to eat. If it takes them too long, it becomes suspicious. have you heard about computers? (btw. you are ignored now, have a nice and ignorant life) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
