Seems to be a lot of arguing in this thread. Can anyone break down what's happening?
Is there direct relation to ponzi involvement?
I tried to get moreia (the OP) into thinking I wanted to start a ponzi with him in order to build trust with him so he would give up the identity of his alleged default trust account. I was not able to build up enough trust :/
I see. Not sure why I wasn't able to see that from the original post.
Seems to be a lot of arguing in this thread. Can anyone break down what's happening?
Is there direct relation to ponzi involvement?
1. QuickSeller = AcctSeller
2. QuickSeller is using default trust to lead a smear campaign against OP, under the premise of the OP's suspected involvement in a ponzi scheme.
3. OP is pissing in the wind.
4. bool DefaultTrust = withUs || againstUs;
I like this answer the most