My guess is that he sold the account and deleted his posts as part of the deal. I can not imagine any other reason to delete years worth of posts.
He could be trying to cover up some kind of evidence, potentially about some kind of scam and/or evidence of his identity (likely because he scammed some large amount). I believe that a fairly decent number of scammers have done this in the past. Why do you think always to the scam possibility ? What if he only wanted to delete his posts for other reasons (like more privacy). |
|
|
|
No, I don't mean everywhere, I mean in forums that do not show the trust rating of a user alongside their post. Example: Hey guys, What are some methods of gaining bitcoin from scratch?  Preferably not faucets Join a signature campaign and invest half of your earning into a profitable cloud mining. That is how u make a lot in the long run due to the cumulative nature of this earning+investment strategy. This scumbag shill for the ponzi 'cloud mining' fraud cloudmining.website has taken to regularly posting in forums where his negative rating is not displayed, hoping instead to offer some 'helpful' advice and flaunt the gigantic banner promoting his scam in his signature space. He and his ilk are having to resort more and more to this tactic because they are finding it harder to rope in new suckers to their criminally fraudulent scams. Seeing as they are gaming the trust rating system by avoiding those forums where it is displayed, I think it would make good sense to at least prevent their signature from being included in their post if they are rated as untrustworthy. Thoughts? People are paranoïac...if they see investment or cloudmining somewhere they only see huge ponzi shemes. Your thread got the attention of one of the people accused of running ponzi. He run's a U2 and calls it cloud mining as it is a buzz word more likely to get a new person to invest in him. With released numbers he owes over .3 BTC to people who have paid a U2 will not make this amount ... so it is either a Ponzi or a bad investment depending on what way you look at it. I really like idea of taking away signatures from negative rated users. But I think it will be hard to get it passed. Just like I would love if known ponzi's would be blocked URL's here... but that wont happen either. It's hard to get a good solution. I think showing of negative rating in every forum is best possible outcome, and I don't know if we have enough support to get that through.This is more 'logic', trustscore viewable in any board/section of the forum |
|
|
|
Very intuitive, we have to take these informations and others, related to javascript usability, to spread in the forum, mainly in this kind of topic: Best Altcoin to invest in for 2016 and WHY - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1146310.380We have to intensify the hype when close to the launch, because the FUD will increase too. Shhhh... Just let the fudders post here They're doing a great job at keeping Lisk thread trending on top of other threads, which brings more people here.  No wonder Lisk will reach 1000 pages before even launches  ETH has only 365 pages since January 2014:  ETH has less troll & FUDster(s) than lisk, this is what I notice. |
|
|
|
Back to the Earth guys!!
It will be miracle if we see a price above 0.20$ at start.
Without working dapps, bigger and professional dev team this coin is doomed.
I may agree with you but you should remember that everything is possible in the cryptoworld scene . I assume that 0.006 BTC will be the stating price if it will be 0.006 btc * Lisk after the launch, do you really think it will go above ripple (I'm talking about the market Cap.) ?  100'000'000 lisk * 0.006 btc = 600'000 btc ~ 258.400.000 dollars (at the current price of 430,6 dollars * btc). I don't think it's possible , most probable and realistic 0,0003 btc * lisk - after pump & dump or dump & pump.... |
|
|
|
I would prefer if that condition would be applied for the banned users (only the users that have been banned due the excessive spam/sig ad) instead that your proposal. However at the end ... scam isn't against the forum rules, if it was against the rules I could say 'yes, your idea is nice'.
Sorry did I just read that right.. Scam isn't against the forum rules?? I have seen that moderators do not remove likely scams but i'm sure there is no rule saying scamming is ok on the forum.. Yes I think that scam isn't .. or better has never been against forum rules. I've never seen a staff mod interview in a scam dispute or banned an user because he scammed, most probable because he trolled or spammed. It's strange... but the forum works in this way, the staff members should not be considered as 'cops' . |
|
|
|
Back to the Earth guys!!
It will be miracle if we see a price above 0.20$ at start.
Without working dapps, bigger and professional dev team this coin is doomed.
I may agree with you but you should remember that everything is possible in the cryptoworld scene . |
|
|
|
Just curious maybe that is guy special member on this forum
Nothing of special, it's just a user who deleted his post for some personal reasons. However it is obvious he will lose his rank in the next days/weeks and he will be able to gain it again (he should only start to post normally). |
|
|
|
|
I would prefer if that condition would be applied for the banned users (only the users that have been banned due the excessive spam/sig ad) instead that your proposal. However at the end ... scam isn't against the forum rules, if it was against the rules I could say 'yes, your idea is nice'.
|
|
|
|
pensavo che avessi più di un delegato sulla testnet, il fatto del tilt confermerebbe l'ipotesi del cpu intensive, magari è pure uno xeon a 8 core purtroppo tutti i vari rpi e similari sulle IOPS dei dischi sono ridicoli, vale anche per quelli con la SATA che alla fine si appoggiano sulla USB. No, ovviamente ho solo 1 delegato che sta forgiando. |
|
|
|
hai più di un delegato ? hai notato anche tu l'alta intensività nell'utilizzo della cpu nella tua esperienza ? e pensare che parlavano di raspberry mi sa che l'ultima versione prenderebbe fuoco Tecnicamente potrebbe girare anche sun raspB pi3, ma praticamente no... in che senso 'ha più di un delegato' ? Un paio di noi è già su un server dedicato, dove gira solo il client lisk. Un utilizzo intensivo della cpu l'ho avuto solo durante lo scorso spam test, dove un utente ha mandato 600 tx in pochi secondi mandando in tilt la rete. |
|
|
|
Mi sa che l'abbiamo già fatta, esiste anche un gruppo telegram dove discutiamo di lisk.
se è per questo vi ho anche votato, solo che vedo nuovi delegati italiani che si aggiungono e non ho il quadro completo di quanti siano e sopratutto del "peso politico" che potenzialmente si possa raggiungere votandoci a vicenda. ho effettuato alcuni test sulla mia VPS domestica un N3700 a 2.4ghz con 8GB di ram e 250GB di SSD su VDSL 100/20Mbit e ho notato che il nodo è veramente pesante la cpu che viene tenuta costantemente al 100% e temperatura dopo pochi minuti già a 55° non oso immaginare ad agosto cosa possa accadere  dubito che una VPS single core economica possa fare meglio su che macchine siete ?Alcuni su server dedicati, altri VPS acquistate da vari provider. |
|
|
|
What happened to all the speculating? All those numbers telling me I'm going to be loaded were the highlight of my day.
The hype is ended, now IOU lisks are not more interesting... Waiting the launch of real lisk. |
|
|
|
perché non facciamo una bella lista di tutti i delegati italiani per votarci a vicenda ?
Mi sa che l'abbiamo già fatta, esiste anche un gruppo telegram dove discutiamo di lisk. |
|
|
|
activity adjusts again today right? I don't know if mine has updated yet...have another shot at legendary today I believe...lol
You just hit that. welcome to legendary club. Thanks  Welcome to the club @keithers ! |
|
|
|
|
It seems that this tiime they will launch lisk and there will not be any delay , c'mon liskers !
|
|
|
|
Their exchange made 'blooom' . |
|
|
|
The IOUs are being traded, right? So, they´re fungible at least if that means mutually interchangeable. Maybe I´m misunderstanding something.
they have no blockchain to transport the actual token from one exchange to the other, thats why they are not fungible OK, they´re not transferable except within the exchange. Exactly, you can only trade with them directly in the platform. |
|
|
|
how many coins you need at least to become a delegate?
100 I think Yeas you are right, to register as delegate you need to pay 100 lisk. |
|
|
|
The price discrepancy between the exchanges is kind of strange. The price on one has been up to five times higher on one than the other. It has narrowed now but is still large I think three times or so.
We are talking about IOU lisks so it's normal.... only a 'limited supply' is available for the trading. |
|
|
|
MA scusate, visto che se ho capito bene si può vendere quello che avete comprato all'ico senza averlo fisicamente, perchè quelli di voi che hanno comprato a 18k satoshi non creno thread di vendita? Se su yobit comprano a 0,02, fate guadagni a palla
E secondo te non l'hanno già fatto ? Dai un'occhiata qui : - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=161.0ah ecco, non avevo visto quella sezione, però pensavo più ad una cosa nella sezione italiana, ho visto che solo uno in mercato italiano lo fa, cioè alchimista, che vende la bellezza di 5000 lisk se ho capito bene Ha anche aperto un thread qui nella sezione italiana : - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1430426.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
