As a beginner who is trying to navigate my way through cryptocurrency, I’d like to ask some advice.
Considering the fact that scammers are everywhere, which app (exchange or trading platform) is the most secure to use for trading? Also, which security measure would you recommend to protect my coin once I start trading?
I believe this will not only help me, but also other beginners who might have the same concern.
I had been using Binance, but after a problem with them, I am using Bybit. Binance suspended my account, though they enabled withdrawal to withdraw my funds. It was my mistake, though; Binance is still one of the reputed exchanges. Later I liked the Bybit interface; for trading I have been using it for quite a while longer. Whatever exchange you use, just use it for trading purposes. Don't store your funds there for longer. You are responsible for securing exchange credentials. Don't store your credentials online; write in your notebook and secure it safely. So you may choose Binance. |
|
|
|
Originally launched in 2006 (1385 in Persian calendar), BiTaraf quickly became a favorite among football enthusiasts and group prediction fans. After a break, we’re back with a modern, fast, and transparent experience.
Do you have something to back your claim? You claimed you began the journey in 2006, which means 20 years back from today. So we are really interested to know why you took a break and why you think you should come back. And when you have taken the break, what was the domain? From the Whois data I can see the current domain registered on 8th August 2025. It means just a month ago you bought the domain, and it's going to expire next year. So don't you have a plan for a longer business model? As others are saying about the language, please understand the reality. Website's base language should always be English and keep the option for other languages. Otherwise, based on IP address, you can set up language, which will work automatically from your backend. However, please prove you have been online since 2006; definitely it's positive if you are telling the truth. Otherwise it would impact negatively on your platform. |
|
|
|
What is the main reason someone will have subaccounts when having accounts on several exchanges? I prefer several exchanges than subaccounts because I prefer to distribute my trading coins on different exchanges.
What about you? You prefer subaccounts or having accounts on different exchanges?
During use, the exchange subaccounts option comes up in front of me, but I have never tried to register there. To be honest, I don't find any point in using subaccounts on the same exchange where I already have a main account. Rather, I have been using accounts on different exchanges. For example, if something happened with my Binance account, then it would affect the subaccounts as well. Still, they might block both accounts for any reason. I am not only talking about storing funds; rather, there might be some other issues as well. However, it's always better to have accounts in different exchanges. A few days back I moved my Ethereum to two different exchanges for trade. After selling coins, again move funds to my hardware wallet. If something happens with one, then at least I have funds in another exchange. So I will strongly prefer using multiple exchanges. |
|
|
|
I have seen the news as well; they did what they feel is better to secure their wallet. Although I believe even quantum computing systems will become a threat for Bitcoin, it will take a couple of decades. Still too far to compute Bitcoin private keys in reverse. However, we have to keep in mind always anything could happen with your wallet. So we have to do best practice to secure our funds. Out of quantum, we may encounter hacks or virus attacks as well. So splitting funds into different wallets increases the security. However, whether it's a lesson or not, this is a good practice. We might take it seriously since quantum computers are becoming a threat for Bitcoin. My personal opinion is it's too early to think about quantum threats, but I agree to protect your funds in a different wallet if the amount is quite big. |
|
|
|
We want to reassure everyone that we are working around the clock to bring BetManor back online as soon as possible.
Right now, we are finalizing integration with a new provider to ensure everything runs smoothly, securely, and up to the standard that both we and our community expect. This step is taking extra effort, but it’s important so that once we reopen, all systems—games, payments, and support—will function properly and consistently.
We appreciate your patience during this process. Our priority is to make sure everything works accordingly before going live again, so that your experience at BetManor is seamless from the very start.
Thank you for sticking with us — we’ll be back online very soon.
We really don't want to see your useless updates anymore. Let us know the exact date of your relaunch. It seems you are gone, and a bot just keeps updating the community. You guys seemed unprofessional from the beginning. We tried to see that same promise come back and settle withdrawal. But there is zero action from your end. So please stop spamming with useless updates and come to the action to solve withdrawal issues. Trust me, unless you settle all the withdrawal issues as soon as possible, then even if you come back here, gamblers won't trust you a second time. It means you are going to lose potential gamblers from the forum, and it will be quite complicated to get back your reputation in the forum gambling community. |
|
|
|
|
That's not only a Ponzi scheme; this is a direct scam. In a Ponzi scheme they have at least a payment gateway to accept payment, and earlier investors get some return as well. But this scammer directly asked to send funds into personal addresses. Means the funds sent to this address are gone forever. Hope forum users haven't fallen into this scam.
Thanks for reporting this scam among our community. Such returns are unrealistic, and there is no such thing as a money-making machine. Sometimes I laugh when I see such scam methods. Just wondering why scammers are still foolish, because this is a very old method of scam, and almost every crypto user knows about such scams.
However, Flag supported and left negative feedback as well. But sadly, it seems the thread still exists.
|
|
|
|
Identity Theft: Once you submit your personal info, and if that website ever gets hacked, your data is out there forever. It can be used for all kinds of online transactions, legal or illegal, and that can haunt you in the future.
Privacy Exposure: Many of us chose crypto because of privacy, but now KYC has become the norm. To keep playing, some people give in and submit. Even though casinos are required to keep it confidential, hacks and breaches happen. If that data gets stolen, you lose the privacy you came here for.
Legal Liability: This is the biggest risk. If your KYC ends up tied to something serious like money laundering or terrorism, authorities won’t hesitate to go after you. And since it’s your name on the account, you can’t simply deny it, you already submitted your documents.
Everyone knows the potential risk about submitting our KYC to a third party, not only about gambling. But it seems gambling platforms are forced to do KYC lately. Some casinos launch without KYC, but later it seems they implement KYC for various reasons, like for legal reasons. We always prefer to use a non-KYC platform, whether it's gambling or non-gambling. The risk is always the same for all KYC platforms. We have seen a lot of data breaches from the exchange; it could happen with gambling as well. It would be misused for crime or something else. KYC means potential risk; we have to ignore it to avoid it where possible. There might be some good casinos who don't ask for KYC, and we should choose them. |
|
|
|
Banks use tools as a store of value by holding some assets in reserves, for various economic benefits. Although, adopting Bitcoin in such capacity, would have it's pros and cons. Obviously like controlling inflationary trends, and even help stabilize the volatility of Bitcoin to its users, and conversely such volatility could also alter the stability of a banks statement of financial position. All these could add up to a more stable global economy. Surely banks have started to think of such prospect
Banks reserve various assets to balance the risk. Due to volatility, they might not consider reserving Bitcoin against users' funds. But they might add Bitcoin to their own portfolio, like some other institutions that reserve Bitcoin. It does mean that from their revenue some of the part would be safely reserved. So they won't have problems even during the market dump. Because the reserve isn't against the value of the users' funds. However, I am not against reserving Bitcoin by the bank. Just wondering about risk management during the dump. If the reserve is executed by the government directly, then it's positive for the country. Even if a dump happens, it will definitely recover and create a new high. Banks would need to develop something before reserving Bitcoin to reduce the risk. |
|
|
|
Noticed from Cointelegraph, a solo miner mined Bitcoin block 912632 and almost earned $340K. It's quite surprising to me, though, but the solo miner successfully managed to mine an entire block and was fully rewarded. I don't know if the miner had a lot of hash power or if he is really lucky. It's kind of a twist in Bitcoin mining history, even though it's technically possible but very rarely happens. I haven't heard previously, or I wasn't witness to such a story.  Image Source: Cointelegraph Usually most of the Bitcoin blocked has been mined by the mining pool; those are combined hash powers from a group of miners or by mining firms. But it's exceptional that a solo miner solved an entire block, because there is a lot of competition nowadays in the mining sector. Do you think the solo miner is lucky, or does he have something special to increase the hash rate? |
|
|
|
Not only that, but the case is more than one year old. I am unsure if a casino/sportsbook keeps this evidence for that long. Of course, they may have a history of bets and account-related data, but it would be troublesome for them to collect the data from the odds provider (Betby in this case). So, I also think it will take a little more time for them to collect the information from Betby! Usually data is stored in the server. Unless they change the server provider, all the data should be available to their database. Because I know a little bit about how the backend works for a platform. However, in case they change provider, either server or game provider, they would have downloaded data. Or Betbay definitely has the data from where it could be resolved. FYI - Bitz.io just launched their signature campaign in this forum to get more exposure. Let's welcome them and expect them to stay around for a long time. Your support is important  Honestly, a lot of gamblers noticed Bitz after you launched the campaign. Means it has drawn attention from the forum gamblers. We can realise that from their announcement thread. Good luck to them. |
|
|
|
|
As far as I know some exchanges don't accept funds from gambling and mixer sites. So there is a high risk in accepting signature campaign payments on the exchange address. KuCoin detects address poisoning, but both addresses are different. But the user has to suffer now in such a case. I have learnt a lesson not to accept payment even from the client to the exchange address. If something went wrong, then your funds would be seized. This won't be good practice for high-ranked users when they know about potential risk.
I have been using a noncustodial wallet to receive my signature campaign rewards. If Bitcoin pumps and I need to sell my holdings, then I move the funds to the exchange. Otherwise, just hold on to the noncustodial wallet. I don't use any exchange address directly to accept my payment. It's pretty risky for me since I have suffered once.
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the forum; it's been a pleasure to see a new casino on the forum. It's good to see you realised about improving your official announcement thread. It's true the first impression of your official announcement thread would draw attention from the forum gamblers. So it's quite important to announce a well-designed announcement thread. BitRoll is a **no-KYC casino**. You can deposit, play, and withdraw without documents. We only step in if there’s obvious fraud or abuse.
That would be a real concern for the gamblers. No KYC is a better option for the gamblers, but gamblers shouldn't harass for multi-account allegations. Often we see that kind of allegation on the forum. So take care about gamblers, especially about forum users. Definitely you should prevent fraud or abuse, but it should be done in a decent way. |
|
|
|
Crystalmoney.org is a modern exchange service with a solid reputation and proven experience in the financial industry. We provide a convenient and secure way to exchange currencies and e-money anytime, day or night.
I don't know what you mean by 'solid reputation', because we haven't seen you yet. This is the first time I noticed your announcement thread on the forum. However, I admit it doesn't matter whether I noticed or not; it doesn't mean you won't be reputable. But after reading the thread, I tried to visit your website. For the review I tried to check on the Best_Change monitor. Not enough reviews found there. And an important thing is being disabled there. Can I know what the reason for disabling it there is? This isn't a good sign of reputable exchange at all. Often people visit exchanges from the Best_Change. If they found disabled status, they might not be interested at all. Also, this isn't a proper official announcement; it should be well designed to draw attention from traders. |
|
|
|
There are a lot of wars and conquering happening in the world. Some more well known than others. But all have people suffering. No matter from which side. But I got curious how could bitcoin play in such situations if there are conflicts happening in a specific area knowing that bitcoin is not governed by anyone and is borderless so it can reach other countries even if the authorities won't let usual transactions. Say if you wanted to send a donation to the Ukrainians for example, can you use bitcoin to do it? Has anyone tried it?
In such cases donations should be organised by the government or a non-profit organisation. There won't be any opportunities to donate in person unless you have a friend or know a person there. Whoever has a Bitcoin address can receive Bitcoin from anywhere in the world. So yes, you can donate to Ukraine if the above conditions are met. I haven't tried yet but have heard people donated through Bitcoin. This is an advantage of Bitcoin, and this is the goal of Bitcoin: you can make borderless transactions. It doesn't matter what the purpose of sending money is; you are able to send money without any third-party involvement. |
|
|
|
As we grow more, we hope to do some Bitcointalk campaign soon. I don't think we're quite ready yet especially when BTC is missing. We're adding BTC soon and researching how to do lightning payment. I'll keep yall updated!
It's quite surprising to me you haven't added Bitcoin payment yet when you've already added Bitcoin Cash and other altcoins. This is really something you are missing, and some gamblers often use Bitcoin payment. There is a reason why gamblers like Bitcoin too much: because when a pump happens, their portfolio also gets up. So you are losing such gamblers on your platform. It's been a while since you launched your announcement thread here but haven't focused on Bitcoin payment. However, we hope as soon as possible we will see the Bitcoin logo on your site. Besides that, you will do something to draw attention from forum gamblers, like promotional offers including bonuses. Even though you are quite older here, unfortunately, due to a lack of branding, many potential gamblers haven't noticed your platform yet. Hope you will focus on branding as well to draw attention from the forum gamblers also. |
|
|
|
The idea here is that there's a new term called "carry" that will slowly de-rank you if you keep posting/doing things that nobody appreciates. That is, you can't just apply yourself to the task of achieving a given rank, you also have to apply yourself to the task of maintaining it. Just like your "merit" is a >=0 balance based on logged events, your "carry" is also a >=0 balance based on logged events. There's a more general version of this idea where different forum actions attract different amounts of "carry", but, the simple version that I think should be experimented with initially is just one where there's a single type of system-generated "carry transaction": Whenever you make a new post, your balance goes up by 0.1. In effect, you'll need to earn at least 1 merit for every 10 posts you write (on average) if you wish to prevent your account from slowly drifting toward a lower rank. And you'll need to get beyond a 0.1 merit-to-post ratio if you're aiming to increase your rank.
Don't you feel this will encourage merit abuse? For those who achieved the ranks by earning merits, for them it's not a hard task to earn one merit for ten posts. But definitely spammers will exchange merits between them. So the idea still will benefits spammers. Real contributors don't have any issues at all. On the other hand, forcing merits for each ten posts really looks like a stupid idea. Sometimes even a good contributor doesn't receive merits in their ten posts. But maybe in the next post they will receive 10 merits. So forcing isn't an ideal idea at all. The current merit system is working well. Still a lot of people struggling to achieve their ranks. Even some good posts have been underestimated and not receiving merits unless someone points it out. Because it doesn't possibly merit all the good posts by merit sources, they might miss a lot of things. However, the idea isn't much useful at all. Merit is a reward of your post, not a matter of force. |
|
|
|
Welcome to the forum. Your announcement design looks not very good compared with your website. You might improve it a little more. Because in first impressions gamblers should realisewhere they are going to play. However, whatever the design, your service should be better than others. Each account is personal, and each person may only have one account. Using multiple accounts to bypass our bonus limits or max bet sizes is prohibited. We claim right to remove any winnings or reset balances on accounts that have broken these rules. Here we can see multiple accounts, but I don't find any point about KYC there. So how are you going to prevent users from creating multiple accounts? Or am I missing something there? If there is no KYC and you want to prevent multiple accounts, then we might see a lot of allegations later about accounts being closed for multiple accounts. Either they will abuse your system or something else. |
|
|
|
When Binance futures went down earlier today, it reminded the risk of relying solely on a single exchange. Though I didn’t have a position opened on it at that period because i already placed a trade on Bitget at the time but i know those who were stuck. This just shows why you should have options open as a form of risk management because this can happen to any exchange at any time.
I still stand on ‘no exchange is perfect’ but having a backup to spread your activities on would definitely save some stress when the unexpected happens which is why OKX is my third one. Just like having a diversified portfolio and having multiple investments basket, having different exchanges is a good decision in my opinion. Do you also use multiple exchanges or you stick to one ?
Though I am not a future trader, this problem would happen in spot trade as well. Those that are related to the internet can't assure uptime always; there might be something happening or maintenance mode as well. Usually I don't rely on a single exchange and don't store funds there. I move the funds to my hardware wallet after buying from the exchange. And if I need to sell, just move to the exchange, but don't rely on a single exchange. Always use multiple exchanges for that. Just a few days back I sold and rebought my Ethereum. I send two different exchanges to sell my Ethereum. Once I bought back then, funds were sent to my hardware wallet. I can't really trust a single exchange when the funds are big. Because I have suffered before from Binance about freezing funds, though later they unfreeze and release my funds. |
|
|
|
This was a post I've been thinking about for several months.
like when someone a little older thinks back on his life, in my case I thought back on one of my lives, the life on the forum
I remember when I was a total newbie Congratulations, finally you created the post for the anniversary. I have always been considering the forum like a family. Though it's a virtual world, I don't forget to visit this forum at least once a day unless I become too busy. However, you are a good contributor for the forum; I hope we will find you as good as always. It doesn't matter what your profession is or what you want to achieve, but your contribution matters to us. I'm much more advanced now as a user and in my use of bitcoin and technology, maybe it's time to create something myself, maybe it's time to become big (adult)
Definitely you can show your creativity. You can express what you learnt from the forum and what you can create for the community. At the beginning I wasn't very aware of the forum and Bitcoin. Slowly realised everything, though I want to create something but don't have coding skills. Hope you can do something that would be useful for us and you as well. Good wishes for you. |
|
|
|
So the question is, "Is there really no way out for gamblers to stay fit and in control?" Is gambling addiction inevitable?? If winning and losing lead to addiction, how can we maintain our sanity?
I admit winning and losing both would lead to gambling addiction. That doesn't mean they won't come out from the gambling anyway. Those who have been losing constantly in the gambling want to recover their losses. But if, unfortunately, they are unable to recover their losses, they borrow and take out loans for gambling. At the end, when they don't find any way to get money, then they are forced to leave gambling. Because they don't have money to lose anymore. That's how they would get out from the addiction. But for winners, it's quite hard to leave gambling. Because they don't have an issue about losing funds. Sometimes they might lose, but overall they have funds. So losing doesn't affect them. Probably if someone earns big, that could settle their life, and then they might leave gambling to avoid further losses. This is the only way I believe to get out from the gambling addiction for winners. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
