fonbet001.com not fiat!!

The odds here are decent, but not as good as some other sharp books like Pinnacle, SBOBet etc and betting exchanges like Betfair, Betinasia sharp exchange etc. Small leagues not being covered is another big con.

Epic stuff. I don't think I have ever seen a site offer the freebet amount along with the winnings before.

There is a clip in the Bundesliga where Mark Flekken went to drink water while the game was in play and his team conceded a goal. He claimed to have not heard the whistle for the restart of the game. Should bookies not settle bets on that game too, it could be interpreted as manipulation?

There are many such isolated incidents at the top level of the game, it is expected as you go lower to semi-pros, to amateurish football, there will be worse blunders in the game by virtue of their lack of quality and professionalism. I would not acknowledge highlights of the game as evidence of match fixing in this case along with drawing in ties of the players nationality. Fairlay will have to prove that there was an official ruling and a criminal ring was apprehended or something of the sort.

If bookies look hard enough, they can string together highlights of many amateur matches that could pass as fixing. Where do we draw the line with that?
If you take the bet, for such a high amount, you settle the winnings, count your losses and change your approach.

- Jay -

Throughout 2024, Sportradar Integrity Services monitored more than 850,000 matches across 70 sports worldwide and 1,108 suspicious matches were identified, a 17% decrease from 2023. The highest number of suspicious matches were found across Europe, the region historically facing the most significant integrity issues.

This is Francesco Baranca's LinkedIn profile for those interested in checking out who he is.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/francesco-baranca-26ab14129/
That's the integrity expert mentioned in the article Fairlay linked to last year.

I took a quick look at some of his recent posts and they are all about match fixing incidents in sports all over the world.
There is one interesting video showing a match from Finland. The keeper takes a goal kick and passes the ball to his defender. The player who receives the ball turns around and shoots it in his own net above the keeper. No one does or says anything.

If you do a google search on "Francesco Baranca Finland", you will find several of his posts where he talks about Finnish soccer. Among those is a case of Ukrainian and Brazilian players moving to Finland to play in low-division teams. I am only mentioning this because Fairlay was suspicious of a team consisting of Ukrainian players who performed badly in some matches.

What about the other 4 fixed matches. Names, teams and how everyone is associated is now being posted on forums. Some books no longer take wagers on some of the teams. There were 5 fixed matches that the player bet. I'll go over the first one. There are 4 Ukranian players on Futura. All 4 were involved in questionable activity. Others were clean.

Kiffen vs. Futura
1. Sinitsyn kicked the ball in his own goal.
2. Bazhan received a red card. No other red cards for the team.
3. Moiseiev received a yellow card. No other yellow cards for the team.
4. Kasakovv goalkeeper gave up 6 goals.

Can you tell me who are these people? I Googled it and cannot find anything about it.

You make it sound super relevant, yet I have a weird feeling it consists of You, Yourself and Irene.

We were contacted by another party who was working for a Betting Integrity Unit and hopefully can help us find the best arbitrator with the necessary experience

A football club in the fourth tier of Finnish football has become a tool of organised criminals involved in sports betting, according to Turun Sanomat.

TS interviewed Francesco Baranca, a sports integrity expert, who follows live betting markets during sports events to try and identify manipulation.

He says that one club's performances this season can only be explained by criminal involvement.

"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."

Baranca estimated that the criminals have earned more than a million euros in profits from the Finnish club's matches. He says some of the club's players and backroom figures have links to other teams in Kakkonen, the fourth tier of Finnish football, and Kolmonen, the level below that.

The clubs are geographically spread across different regions of Finland.

Baranca has investigated match-fixing for more than a decade. Until last spring he worked for the Ukrainian football federation heading up their ethics committee.

Finnish FA keeps watch on "certain clubs"
Marco Casagrande, Secretary General of the Finnish Football Association, told TS that the association has been following suspicious events in the club's matches.

"We know that there are grounds to follow certain clubs, and they have been tracked," Casagrande told TS.

TS reports that games involving the club in question are not offered for betting by the Finnish state owned gambling monopoly, Veikkaus.

However foreign bookmakers are able to offer odds on the games thanks to data scouts attending the matches and submitting realtime data for operators in Asia, for example.

We have been in contact with the authorities about the case.

   Some first result of their work can be seen in this statement:

   https://www.palloliitto.fi/ajankohtaista/miesten-kakkosen-ja-kolmosen-ottelumanipulaatioepailyt-palloliiton-kurinpitoon

   We also have been asked not to release funds.

   Ukrainian counterparty is no longer filing any claims and stopped contacting us - confirming that they have either been arrested or accepted that the case is not winnable for them.

FIRST SUSPICIOUS MATCH: FC KIFFEN VS. FC FUTURA (MAY 12)

Details of the match:
https://int.soccerway.com/matches/2024/05/12/finland/kakkonen/fc-kiffen-08/futura/4323169/

Highlights of the match:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4rC7403Dc4

Six orders were placed on May 12, with a total net profit of 1,181.81 mBTC. Orders were -4.25 and -4.50 handicap orders on FC Kiffen against FC Futura in Finland – Kakkonen Group A.

All six orders were live orders placed between the 23th and 28th minute of the match (the current result being 1-0 for FC Kiffen), and they were all winning orders as FC Kiffen won the match 6-1.

Details of the match and highlights of the match confirm several suspicious situations:

16th minute – FC FUTURA player Bazhan getting a direct red card for unnecessary foul (1:35 in highlights)
25th minute – FC FUTURA player Moyseev getting a yellow card for unnecessary foul (2:05 in highlights)
29th minute – FC FUTURA player Sinitsyn scoring a rather clumsy own goal (2:25 in highlights)
Also, FC FUTURA goalkeeper Kazakov was not putting much effort in doing his job.

It is interesting to note that all four players noted in the suspicious activity were Ukrainian players.

SECOND SUSPICIOUS MATCH: ILVES KISSAT VS. TAMPERE UNITED (MAY 19)

Details of the match:
https://nr.soccerway.com/matches/2024/05/19/finland/kakkonen/tampereen-viipurin-ilves-kissat/tampere-united/4323331/

Highlights of the match:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_qIT9T-FXk

Six orders were placed on May 19, with a total net profit of 1,132.33 mBTC. Orders were -3.75 and -4.0 handicap orders on Tampere United away at Ilves Kissat in Finland – Kakkonen Group B.

All six orders were live orders placed between the 14th and 19th minute of the match (current result being 1-0 for Tampere United), and they were all winning orders as Tampere United won the match 6-1.

With four Ukrainian players being included in the first suspicious match, it should be more than a coincidence that Ilves Kissat is the only team in the league that has Ukrainian players, and not only one but six.

One of those players was Kasperovych, which has done an awful job in the given match.

THIRD SUSPICIOUS MATCH: TPV TAMPERE VS. ILVES KISSAT (APRIL 24)

Details of the match:
https://nr.soccerway.com/matches/2024/05/19/finland/kakkonen/tampereen-viipurin-ilves-kissat/tampere-united/4323331/

Highlights of the match:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_qIT9T-FXk&t

Two orders were placed on April 24, with a total net profit of 372.01 mBTC. Both were Over 3.5 orders. Both were placed between the 20th and 21st minute of the match (current result being 0-0), and both were winning orders as the match finished with a total of four goals (TPV Tampere won 3-1).

Details of the match and highlights of the match confirm several suspicious situations:

48th minute – ILVES KISSAT player Indutnyi conceding a penalty (2:30 in highlights)
57th minute – ILVES KISSAT player Patjas scoring an own goal (3:30 in highlights)
78th minute – ILVES KISSAT goalkeeper Kasperovych easily conceding a goal (4:10 in highlights)


OTHER SUSPICOUS MATCHES:

Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres (Brazil – Pernambucano U20, May 18):
https://ke.soccerway.com/matches/2024/05/18/brazil/pernambucano-u20/centro-limoeirense-u20/atletico-torres-u20/4347487/

Nine orders were placed on May 18, with total net profit of 527.63 mBTC. They were handicap orders on Clube Atletico Torres. One was -4.25 order, two were -5.0 orders, three were -5.25 orders, three were -5.5 orders. All nine were winning orders as Clube Atletico Torres won 7-0.

Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro (Brazil – Paulista U20, May 17):
https://int.soccerway.com/matches/2024/05/17/brazil/paulista-u20/botafogo-sp-u19/inter-de-bebedouro-u20/4343121/

Eight orders were placed on May 17, with a total net profit of 758.98 mBTC. They were handicap orders on Botafogo FC SP. Three were -2.5 orders, one was -2.75 order, four were -3.0 orders. All eight were winning orders as Botafogo FC SP won 10-1.

Tampereen Ilves II vs. Ilves Kissat (Finland – Kakkonen Group B, April 11):
https://int.soccerway.com/matches/2024/04/11/finland/kakkonen/ilves-ii/tampereen-viipurin-ilves-kissat/4323304/

Two orders were placed on April 16, with a total net profit of 217.75 mBTC. They were Over 3.75 and Over 4.0 orders. Both were winning orders as the match finished with a total of five goals (Tampereen Ilves II won 5-0).

Finland’s Kakkonen league already has a history of match-fixing. Recently there were cases of match-fixing in Brazil as well. Several of them in the Paulista Football Federation, that the user was involved in as well.


BETTING HISTORY of the user:


Ilves Kissat vs. Tampere United   2.259   Ilves Kissat +4.0   98.99   05/19/2024 12:18   124.68   05/19/2024 12:44
Ilves Kissat vs. Tampere United   2.519   Ilves Kissat +4.0   150.00   05/19/2024 12:17   227.96   05/19/2024 12:44
Ilves Kissat vs. Tampere United   2.169   Ilves Kissat +3.75   149.99   05/19/2024 12:16   175.43   05/19/2024 12:44
Ilves Kissat vs. Tampere United   2.209   Ilves Kissat +3.75   150.00   05/19/2024 12:15   181.37   05/19/2024 12:44
Ilves Kissat vs. Tampere United   2.639   Ilves Kissat +4.0   150.00   05/19/2024 12:15   245.90   05/19/2024 12:44
Ilves Kissat vs. Tampere United   2.769   Ilves Kissat +4.0   100.00   05/19/2024 12:13   176.99   05/19/2024 12:44
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   2.069   Centro Limoeirense +5.5   49.65   05/18/2024 13:25   53.11   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   1.653   Centro Limoeirense +5.0   50.00   05/18/2024 13:25   32.67   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   1.892   Centro Limoeirense +5.25   49.00   05/18/2024 13:24   43.75   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   2.089   Centro Limoeirense +5.5   49.67   05/18/2024 13:24   54.11   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   1.909   Centro Limoeirense +5.25   49.99   05/18/2024 13:24   45.45   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   2.179   Centro Limoeirense +5.5   74.70   05/18/2024 13:23   88.10   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   2.019   Centro Limoeirense +5.25   50.00   05/18/2024 13:21   50.96   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   1.787   Centro Limoeirense +5.0   50.00   05/18/2024 13:21   39.37   05/18/2024 13:53
Centro Limoeirense vs. Clube Atletico Torres   2.618   Centro Limoeirense +4.25   74.22   05/18/2024 13:17   120.11   05/18/2024 13:50
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   1.990   Botafogo FC SP -2.5   70.00   05/17/2024 18:42   69.30   05/17/2024 19:11
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   2.790   Botafogo FC SP -3.0   70.00   05/17/2024 18:41   125.30   05/17/2024 19:11
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   2.730   Botafogo FC SP -3.0   70.00   05/17/2024 18:41   121.10   05/17/2024 19:11
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   1.917   Botafogo FC SP -2.5   80.00   05/17/2024 18:40   73.36   05/17/2024 19:11
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   2.490   Botafogo FC SP -3.0   70.00   05/17/2024 18:40   104.30   05/17/2024 19:11
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   2.180   Botafogo FC SP -2.75   70.00   05/17/2024 18:40   82.60   05/17/2024 19:11
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   2.070   Botafogo FC SP -2.5   74.00   05/17/2024 18:39   79.18   05/17/2024 19:11
Botafogo FC SP vs. Inter de Bebedouro   2.760   Botafogo FC SP -3.0   59.00   05/17/2024 18:38   103.84   05/17/2024 19:11
FC Kiffen vs. FC Futura   2.860   FC Kiffen -4.5   100.00   05/12/2024 13:27   186.00   05/12/2024 13:55
FC Kiffen vs. FC Futura   2.840   FC Kiffen -4.5   100.00   05/12/2024 13:27   184.00   05/12/2024 13:55
FC Kiffen vs. FC Futura   2.580   FC Kiffen -4.25   100.00   05/12/2024 13:26   158.00   05/12/2024 13:55
FC Kiffen vs. FC Futura   2.860   FC Kiffen -4.5   100.00   05/12/2024 13:26   186.00   05/12/2024 13:55
FC Kiffen vs. FC Futura   2.700   FC Kiffen -4.25   130.00   05/12/2024 13:25   221.00   05/12/2024 13:55
FC Kiffen vs. FC Futura   2.790   FC Kiffen -4.25   139.00   05/12/2024 13:22   248.81   05/12/2024 13:55
FC Kontu vs. FC Finnkurd   1.943   FC Kontu +0.75   31.00   05/09/2024 11:14   31.00   05/09/2024 12:28
FC Kontu vs. FC Finnkurd   2.640   FC Kontu +0.25   29.00   05/09/2024 11:13   29.00   05/09/2024 11:43
FC Kontu vs. FC Finnkurd   3.050   FC Kontu +0.0   29.11   05/09/2024 11:11   29.11   05/09/2024 11:43
Al Faisaly Harmah vs. Al Ahli Jeddah   1.840   Over 2.0   1.00   05/07/2024 13:10   0.84   05/07/2024 15:11
TPV Tampere vs. Ilves Kissat   1.943   Over 3.5   197.00   04/24/2024 16:20   185.77   04/24/2024 17:21
TPV Tampere vs. Ilves Kissat   1.970   Over 3.5   192.00   04/24/2024 16:19   186.24   04/24/2024 17:21
Ilves Kissat vs. SexyPoxyt   1.854   Ilves Kissat -1.5   0.99   04/20/2024 10:49   0.99   04/20/2024 12:05
EBK vs. FC Futura   1.952   EBK -2.0   5.00   04/16/2024 17:10   0.00   04/16/2024 18:21
EBK vs. FC Futura   1.662   EBK -1.75   10.00   04/16/2024 17:09   3.31   04/16/2024 18:21
EBK vs. FC Futura   1.632   EBK -1.75   20.00   04/16/2024 17:09   6.32   04/16/2024 18:21
FC Futura vs. MyPa   1.909   FC Futura +0.0   20.00   04/13/2024 14:31   0.00   04/13/2024 15:48
FC Futura vs. MyPa   2.470   Over 2.5   1.00   04/13/2024 13:43   1.00   04/13/2024 15:25
Tampereen Ilves II vs. Ilves Kissat   1.819   Over 4.0   44.00   04/11/2024 16:30   36.03   04/11/2024 17:21
Tampereen Ilves II vs. Ilves Kissat   1.826   Over 3.75   220.00   04/11/2024 16:21   181.72   04/11/2024 17:21
Cdp Junior FC vs. Millonarios FC   2.390   Over 2.25   99.00   03/23/2024 21:12   137.61   03/23/2024 22:21

Interesting. That's a lot of evidence against op and I feel like your team did the right thing here since he clearly took advantage of fixed matches in a pretty transparent manner and expected to get away since your site is a betting exchange.

I think to reach the body and legal things it will require a long time, if the OP and his team allows the abuser to continue with their abuse then they will just withdraw the funds and never coming back again.

It's will be better to freeze the accounts and then go for legal things.

It looks obvious that it's fixed and a team effort. So many coincidence, not real to happen.

"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."

I don't view their first post with the videos and explanations of moments from matches as evidence either. But good on them if they saw that and believed something was wrong. An investigation is underway that will hopefully shed more light on the events.

Fairlay was already on the list. My reason for checking that case involving allegedly fixed matches was because I was considering removing them after seeing the negative feedback on their profile. After I did, I decided not to. At the same time, I am not going to add Bitcoin-Betting to the table, but the reason for that has got nothing to do with the investigation of the Finnish league matches.

We were contacted by another party who was working for a Betting Integrity Unit and hopefully can help us find the best arbitrator with the necessary experience

nor any further information shared until these investigations are completed.

Please check his post history and feedback on this member and than ignore the rat.
I dont see any of his posts for a long time.

He is exclusive asking money from casinos to put them higher in his rat list
Dont expect this guy to understand anything you are saying, I learned that few years ago.

You're not really following.

A bookie will maybe have Finnish lower league football, or Czech Republic Table Tennis Healthy Grandpas tournament for 70+ year old players, but you'll be able to bet 5$ on it.
There's a reason behind it, because if you allow 100$ bets 5 people will give 200$ total to Grandpa 1 to lose to Grandpa 2.

If you allow big bets on amateur markets, you're an amateur bookie. Or, as I said already, a bookie with an agenda.

I'm done with this discussion.

I am exclusively a sports bettor. You, however, probably are not.

Finnish 1st Division is basically amateur. 2nd Division is fully amateur. 5th Division? Yeah, they probably fix games for beer, or just randomly drop points when they get wasted a night before the game.
And then comes Fairlay and Rating Place investigation, supported by experts - Finnish 5th Division game is fixed? Oh no, what a scandal! Congrats fellas, Mulder and Scully ain't got shit on you.

Solution? Don't offer those markets. If you offer them for huge amounts - then I guess you're a clueless sports bookie. Or one with an agenda.

That's what many people have asked and rightly so. There should definitely be a staking limit on markets where the possibility of manipulation is higher. Then, even if cheaters and match fixers try to do their dirty business at the bookie/exchange, they wouldn't be able to profit and cheat as much.

Also, do they still allow high-stakes bets to be placed on that league and other low-division Finnish leagues, including the clubs involved in the scandal?

What evidence? Are you talking about the Finnish article mentioning that there is an on-going investigation? That's not evidence. That's just a media report that may be based on actual evidence but we (the public) haven't seen that evidence.

Thanks. At the moment I won't be adding Bitcoin Betting to the table.

TS interviewed Francesco Baranca, a sports integrity expert, who follows live betting markets during sports events to try and identify manipulation.

He says that one club's performances this season can only be explained by criminal involvement.

"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."

I am familiar with that alleged match fixing case ,after reading most of thread on this forum.

Be that as it may , does this dispute that FairLay had against probably indeed a match fixer that won quite an amount on their site , with FairLay not granting him his winnings , prevent you from giving a try to Bitcoin-Betting.com ?

And if that's the case , is it because you fear of them withholding your balance ?

I haven't used them yet , but I was really considering it up until this point so I would like to hear the opinion of a senior member like you ,Haunebu.

If you feel qualified to handle the case, you may apply in this thread.

We are still looking for a reputable arbitrator to settle this between us.

@newfish1 wouid you agree  to have askgamblers.com as arbitrator in this case?

Anyway, we will wait for arbitrator's decision and will follow suit.

We were contacted by another party who was working for a Betting Integrity Unit and hopefully can help us find the best arbitrator with the necessary experience

nor any further information shared until these investigations are completed.

A football club in the fourth tier of Finnish football has become a tool of organised criminals involved in sports betting, according to Turun Sanomat.

TS interviewed Francesco Baranca, a sports integrity expert, who follows live betting markets during sports events to try and identify manipulation.

He says that one club's performances this season can only be explained by criminal involvement.

"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."

how is bitcoin betting A grade. never heard of them or any reviews.

Though I appreciate your trust in me by offering an access to your account [with you watching me], I don't think such step is necessary at this point, not to mention its a gross violation to privacy that I can't bring myself to do, especially without good cause or outcome. Just to be sure we're on the same page, I am currently inquiring for their side of the story. Once they give their side, the part of their narrative that matched with yours can be safely assumed as a truth point.

The other that contradict each other, that's where I'll work to prove things and get to the bottom of the matter: by placing you both on double blind test and ask several questions to get a narrative that's otherwise concealed.

So... we'll get to the part where I "investigate" you and BC.

For the time being though, I'm waiting for their side of the story.

Please tell me, do Owl and Coinroyale scam users?

By “colorful” perhaps you mean truthful and fact-based. CG has concerns about BC’s claims. I have concerns about BC’s claims. Players here have said that if BC lied about the loss limit date, they cannot be trusted. The only person saying otherwise is you, the one who said they could expedite faster than CG, who now says they  have issues with my complaint but do not want to introduce them. Instead, you prefer that evidence BC submits might make my complaint go away, rather than you presenting your own ideas. Thanks for your help.

Dear BC.Game Casino,

Thank you for your response.

However, I find it quite concerning that the player submitted his complaint on our platform as early as June 20, clearly indicating issues with the loss limit, and also provided multiple screenshots confirming that the limit had already been set at that time. Given that these screenshots were submitted directly within the complaint form, it seems highly unlikely they were taken after the fact.

Could you please clarify how it is possible that your internal records show the limit was only set on June 26? Any additional context or technical explanation would be appreciated.



Thank you for your cooperation.