It should not be a problem for regular gamblers as $250 wagered doesn't mean you lost that amount in a casino, sometimes you even win.


It's possible, so it could happen. But did anyone here share some big wins from free spins? Because I saw this guy, who is also active in gambling, enjoying his big win from free spins. Though it's not on MetaWin, I'm just trying to relate that it's possible to win big from a small free spin amount.

check his post.

Congrats @Coin_trader, you are so lucky today. With just a small bet, you were able to turn it into a huge amount.

I watched the replay, and even though it wasn't me who won, I still find it fulfilling to watch. Save that video in your files as wins like that need to be treasured. You know we don't win most of the time, so this is a rare occasion that we need to save and value.

Happy Weekend!

It would be nice if they remain that simple. I guess there's a reason why some casinos don't require KYC at the early stage, and that is to attract more gamblers. In my opinion, it's still better for them to get more volume, as that would generate consistent income on a daily basis.

So, crypto casinos, although regulated, still have an advantage over fiat online casinos since fiat casinos require KYC before you gamble. With crypto casinos, you don't have to worry about KYC as long as you aren't gambling with a significant amount. I'm ranging from $100 to $200 a week, and I haven't been required to pass the KYC yet.

I think that needs to be confirmed, as I don't think there's an exemption to the rules. Just like an exchange, if you can trade without a KYC and then eventually the exchange requires everyone to pass the KYC, then it should be addressed to all users, not just the new ones. The same goes for the casino. Although I haven't followed a lot about the KYC update since I have not faced any problem gambling without KYC, this is the kind of logic I think. So I want to know if someone new here who has registered in the casino was able to play without a KYC, or not anymore.

Here's the complete information about stake KYC>

https://stake.com/blog/kyc-know-your-customer-casino-guide

That's correct, you can play without KYC. Just create an account, and you are good to go. However, if you are a gambler risking a significant amount, I suggest that you follow the KYC process so you'll get your account secured. You won't be bothered by the KYC checks because you have already passed them when you started. But just read the link @Samrean ; full information is written there.

That's already a fail if a gambler chooses to pass the KYC first and then use a VPN, as it would be easier for the casino to track and match the information submitted in the KYC to the IP address where a gambler is accessing. Since VPN changes location, that will likely trigger the controls of the casino and create a problem on the gambler's end. Maybe choosing a non-KYC casino is the best solution. It's risky, but not riskier than using an online betting agent.

With all the comments here, I'm sure it's very transparent and users can use it as a reference before making a decision.
At least they know the risk now, if they'll still proceed, then that's really up to them.

I suggest that you convert that into figures and show us if that is really profitable. Saying favorites will win is easy, and though they win most of the time, the odds are very low. So let me put an example with figures. Say you keep betting on the favorites with odds like 1.20. With a $100 bet using flat betting (i.e., $100 per bet), you would need to win five times in order to get a profit of 100% of your bet. That's really challenging, as there's no guarantee you'll be able to hit five straight wins with those 1.20 odds. Because if simply doing that worked, then most of us wouldn't be saying that it's hard to win in gambling, or in sports betting, for that matter.

But honestly, are there still people who don't have access to online sportsbooks? I mean, OP wants us to contact him through Telegram, and that already requires an internet connection. Nowadays, as long as we can access the internet, we can find a sportsbook to gamble with. If the IP is restricted or the gambler is afraid of getting caught, then they should risk using a VPN. I'm sure there's always a way if someone is really eager to gamble.

Sorry mate, I think you'll have a hard time proving your system worked as you have been tagged with red paint already. And the word "unliimited" was really used as word like this looks so scammy at first look.

And this one too.. you mean we gamblers that will join you will not loss anymore?

It's just hard to sell this in a big community like bitcointalk TBH.

That's why he acknowledge that this forum is not his target group.
Obviously, most of us here gamble withoua a 3rd party as we go directly depositing on our casino's account, it's easy as 1, 2, 3 if you are a crypto person. OP's offer is not attractive, so there's no reason to shift and use a betting agent which definitely a risky one compared to just directly betting on a gambling site of our choice.


Sorry, but I think we call them (betting agent) as 3rd party, as you (gambler ) is the first party, while casino is the 2nd party.  

---

Definitely a platform used for you guys can communicate, but this isn't necessary for you as you can bet directly on sportsbook as you said.

When you are thinking of hitting it big in a short period of time, you don't think about the mathematical chances because it's very obvious that our chances are lower than the house's. Hence, our only chance is to win by luck. I understand, and I don't really consider it a waste of money as I personally bet on high odds that are almost impossible to hit. But of course, I will try and try, but this is only for small bets.

There's no problem with continuously seeking a big win, as that is our purpose for gambling, aside from having fun. Isn't it more fun if we also win? I guess that's the ultimate goal of every gambler. However, we can't deny the fact that the majority of gamblers lose in the long run, but if you are lucky, you are one of the few who will be truly fulfilled.

Good luck @Betwrong! That's an extra 3.29 odds from Duelbits. Although it was just a 1-dollar bet, getting the big odds is already satisfying if hit. But those kinds of extra odds are really significant for those who are placing huge bets. You know, some even look for an extra .10 in the odds and see it as a great value. It's always a good job by Duelbits to keep this odds boost as their promo. It's pretty similar to Sportsbet, but they don't increase odds like this big.

Some gamblers who are not into crypto might use a betting agent, but it would need to be someone they really trust. They just want to make the process very simple, as studying how crypto works might be another burden for them.

It might be a little risky since they have to go through a third party, which I assume is not registered as a business, so their money could be taken away at any time. That's just the risk, but the good thing is they can give cash and get cash if they win. However, since there's an agent involved, I think the odds might be lower than the actual odds seen on sites like Stake. That's where the agent makes money from being a third party.

I guess in that matter you need to run a review campaign. I suggest you hire an experienced campaign manager from the forum to do the job. Having a review campaign will give you more insights about your site, such as recommendations on how to improve it. Anyway, welcome to the forum! Hopefully, you'll offer more payment options in the future.

That could only be implemented when you go to a physical place to gamble, not only in physical casinos, as people still gamble in places like cockfighting houses, etc. And actually, when you go to those places, especially small gambling shops, they don't ask for ID. So even if you're not 21 or older, you can still enter if you look older. However, that is not the main issue, as that only generates a small number of gamblers. The biggest issue is gambling online, where we have to admit even minors can gamble since not every platform requires KYC, or a kind of KYC that ensures the gambler is not really a minor. You know, there are casinos that may require KYC, but they'll just ask for some ID. With that, it can easily be cheated, as, let's say, I’ll borrow an ID from my parent to make it look like they are the ones gambling, but in reality, I am the one (minor) operating behind that screen.

So it's really challenging for the government to stop this. Additionally, not all online gambling sites are under the regulation of the Philippines, so that alone is another burden that is hard to solve, unless they restrict the site or worse, ban gambling altogether, which will also hurt the economy.

Thank you for the update and it’s good to know that we can expect it this month. But of course, you don't need to rush things. What's important is that you ensure everything is smooth, as first impressions during the launch are very important. You can't have people complaining after you’ve worked hard for the launch. Great job, and thanks for keeping the communication open here. We need this kind of update to know the current status of the project.

Copy that. I don't know with others, but me I always finish the whole session everytime I try the demo, doesn't matter if I end up winning or losing.

Is that numbers coming from the current promo? (MISSION ALERT: AVIATRIX CHALLENGE $150 USDT!) and this will end in August 5, 2024.
I try to read the rules - https://www.bitdegree.org/guilds/bitdegree/introducing-aviatrix-a-web2-web3-igaming-platform. and I saw that there are a lot of missions to be done, so I decided to pass and just wait until they fully launch. However, as what you notice guys it has been over 3 months since they posted here and we have no idea yet when they'll launch, at least @OP give us some ETA.

BTW, played the demo game again and loss all my $1000 bankroll in less than 30 minutes, but no worries money not real. 

I haven't been using MetaMask for a while now, but it's good this wallet was mentioned. Recently, I received an email asking me to submit for KYC, and I thought it was legit. Since I didn't use it anymore, I ignored the email. However, after seeing the name here, I searched to see if the email was legit. It turns out it was fake, as stated on their website.

https://support.metamask.io/privacy-and-security/will-metamask-ever-ask-me-to-verify-my-account/


Just sharing guys!

I guess we can learn from OP's experience that if we want to avoid hassle, we should complete the KYC at the beginning. OP is probably trying to withdraw his funds but was frozen and required to pass some KYC documents for the funds to be released. This is actually common now, but with Stake being the casino involved, I find it hard to believe unless proof has been provided for verification.

I'm guilty of this, and i can't blame myself because I still think that once we are gambling in crypto, we should still enjoy the anonimity, although not really happening at the current stage anymore.

I think not all casinos now have live support. It would be nice if they did so we could chat with support about our concerns. Some only want to respond through email, and the worst part is you need to wait for a reply within 24 hours. It's not instant, so you're left hanging on these very important things that you want to resolve immediately. Has OP already verified his account with KYC when he registered with Stake? Because if he did, then maybe this problem wouldn't be experienced.