Should I be surprised once some foolproof information against Dean was provided he isn't here to respond? Good job there LoyceV, that's clearly something he can't even deny imo.
Serial scammer Dean Nolan has already covered that aspect of the argument by previously playing the following "I am totally innocent and did nothing wrong" card yesterday:
You're asking if a business would be different or change it's roadmap if 4-5 months ago it raised an extra $1 million in investment? What do you think the answer is?
He effectively is saying he is a dictator, he can unilaterally change direction to the extent of wanting to close betking down as recent as a few months ago as it was failing and was a waste of time then open bitsafe scam exchange and then again change his mind putting the bitsafe scam on hold while using EOS BKT tokens to give betking one more chance at success hoping to bring in 200,000 new users. It failed again, betking is dying fast.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5122856.msg50285774#msg50285774Serial scammer Dean Nolan is the one pulling all the strings without scrutiny. He claims he does it with general consensus of investors but there is no evidence of this. At the worst he is out-and-out lying but at the very least he is the one planting ideas in to the minds of investors then getting them to agree to his nonsense.
Think about it for a minute.... if there were 100 million BKB tokens created in the 2017 betking ICO and serial scammer Dean Nolan retained 30 million on behalf of betking for "ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development" where are those tokens now?
If there were 70 million BKB tokens sold in the crowdsale and serial scammer claims betking bought back 70 million tokens illegally using 600 BTC from the bankroll then that raises two very important questions. First, how many tokens are out there that were not purchased back because 30m + 70m = 100 million BKB tokens that were created....
... and second, if next to nobody owns any of betking anymore since almost all of them sold up - betking "owns" the remaining bankroll funds and betking owns whatever is left of the 50% of the 2017 ICO funds that were supposed to be used for "marketing, promotions, seo, design, development, server costs and legal".
It means betking is sitting on a lot of money even now and there are next to nothing in investors that partially own betking.
Serial scammer Dean Nolan is the only one who made a massive profit on the betking scam. Literally for doing little work he probably pocketed millions. How on earth does somebody who took an almost thriving business and drove it in to the ground because of mismanagement and greed manage to still stay in-charge a la dictator?
Oh well here we go.... this screenshot taken a few minutes ago shows what is left of the bankroll when the following information shows what was raised in the 2017 betking ICO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1842538.msg21483982#msg214839821,046.60623397 BTC
4,614.61055431 ETH
833.38469263 LTC
Total: $6,497,165.94 And 50% of it was supposed to go to the bankroll meaning: 500 BTC, 2250 ETH & 425 LTC were supposed to go the bankroll but this serial scammer Dean Nolan claims he used 600 BTC from the bankroll illegally to buy-back tokens when that was NEVER part of the 2017 betking ICO commitments.
Serial scammer Dean Nolan is an absolute disgrace by mismanaging $6.5 million of other peoples money gained from the 2017 betking ICO. Some of it no doubt ended up in his pockets and the rest spent unnecessarily.
The betking bankroll was worth $3.25 million immediately after the 2017 ICO ended but it was rising to around $9 million in its peak December 2017 ATH BTC prices but now the whole bankroll is worth lower than $150,000
Just less than 3 months after the 2017 ICO ended which brought in $6.5 million for betking, the whole ICO funds were worth around $19 million thanks to the ATH BTC prices in December 2017 but this scammer never allowed audits so nobody can be sure how he mismanaged funds and why BUT the state of the bankroll is clear which has shrunk since the 2017 ICO ended.
Show Posts
