As said on title.
Repayment amount and repayment date? 0.044 BTC on 31st December. Your collateral is too small for that. Current value of 50000 is 0.033BTC Can lend you up to 0.03BTC not more Then no need from you.I hope someone will fill the loan. What I'm saying is: you ask for 160$ of loan providing only 130$ worth of collateral. No one will fill this loan simply because you could keep the BTC and run away. It would be like selling those DOGE at a very high price. Increase the collateral amount, decrease the loan or lock your thread
|
|
|
As said on title.
Repayment amount and repayment date? 0.044 BTC on 31st December. Your collateral is too small for that. Current value of 50000 is 0.033BTC Can lend you up to 0.03BTC not more
|
|
|
Hey, If the collateral it Titcoin I'll fill this loan request. Please provide the collateral at this address: 13rJVwrBGfFdDyok7UWtiD98JXnxHWJkko Cheers edit: unless you want escrow for your collateral of course. Up to you. And you're not online on Discord
|
|
|
Congratz to the winner Here are my next numbers: 04 - 18 - 38 - 88 - 91
|
|
|
Anyway their was no ill intention in my messages and if you prefer to see them removed no problem. I'll stop bumping this thread and should I fill another demand you refused I won't warn you I did.
I have no problem regarding my or your lending. I am concern about your valueless post. Because the borrower will not see your post. It could bear good result if you could send him/her message directly. Don't worry I PMed him the post after writing it. It wasn't valueless from my point of view. It warned you that I was going to try to feel the loan, left a history of me trying to fill the loan, and let this opened for peer review. I mean someone could answer me "hey be careful, name cheap are well known for easy social engineering so the guy will just claim the account was hacked and will get it back in 2 hours". I might have misunderstood but that's the whole point of leaving the negotiations public: 13. NEVER DO BACKROOM DEALS VIA PM WITH NEW USERS. Make sure all deals are negotiated in the open forum for both public record and peer review.
Cheers
|
|
|
You are too old then me and your rank also superior to me. But I have to say you have a lack of marketing level. You have posted on my thread means the borrow will never see your post. Do you think others will see your posts? The answer will be no. Who, will see your post? Only I will see your post and I am not a borrower. So, posting here is valueless. But if you think you are increasing post for signature campaign then you are right.
I'm older with bigger rank but much less experience in lending, which is the important thing here. Don't worry about my signature, good thing for active members is that they don't have to be concerned by their numbers cause they always do much more than needed I just wanted to be polite both to you and him and ask directly precisions to the borrower on his original loan demand. From what I understood loans are always best discussed on public so I thought initiating conversation here was a good idea. Plus, it bumps your thread and I thought it was a polite thing to do. Anyway their was no ill intention in my messages and if you prefer to see them removed no problem. I'll stop bumping this thread and should I fill another demand you refused I won't warn you I did.
|
|
|
How do I, for example, give gold or precious stones? To provide a pledge.
You say "I have gold as a collateral" and then you see if someone accepts it as a collateral. I would for example. Then you send the gold to the one lending you and he keeps it until you repay the loan. You can use a trusted escrow if it's needed.
|
|
|
Sinking. I'm going to buy a handful of shares, db won't go under. Banks are going to be making money forever. Until they collapse definitively.
|
|
|
All the proof we need that the market is in the phase of this is a suckers rally. I believe it's not and they're about to be rekt.
Even if it was a sucker rally, once everyone thinks so and act accordingly, it becomes a real rally. All those shorts means bought coins, means solid bottom. Every time the price will drop, even a bit, closing shorts will make it up.
|
|
|
Ironically it’s the longs that are evaporating. Ratio massively skewed to short side. More rocket fuel for squeezes. Very crowded trade. Seems logical, the price surge is unhealthy. There is a good probability of the price going down again and they want in. I would go in too, if there wasn't SO MUCH SHORT ALREADY I think the amount of short is in fact a freaking good news because each short is making the bottom a bit more solid. You can't short if there is no coin to buy... And coins at 3500$ aren't so numerous...
|
|
|
nope hatred against russia was in ukraine beforehand, we have to ask ourselves where does that hatred get its funding from?
regards
Hmm... Maybe from USSR? Like all the rest of Easter Europe?
|
|
|
Btw 1BTC= 4K
Still so F***ing cheap ??
Anything under 10k$ is F***ing cheap as hell like the old one-legged prostitute of St Martin road at Paris So was i told.
|
|
|
1 - m0gliE thanks again man
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.0018 btc Repayment Amount:0.002 btc Number of days: In less than 3 weeks Collateral offered : I do have a name cheap account with some funds in it and a domain and hosting. Reason: I want to add and sort out my VPS invoice: https://portal.pivps.com/viewinvoice.php?id=72904Address : 1ET7kW6WTzuGKNcWVvq9sCJkvFj8PZA8EU I will surely pay you back. I am expecting some BTC funds, but it is taking some time and this bill is due. Sorry just highjacking your thread cause I might grant the loan as you already denied it. PM me the amount of funds you have and the domain name and hosting. We'll discuss it in PM. Cheers
|
|
|
So if I had the right amount, I would not have asked for a loan. And you say you need to have a lot of money to give you money. It sounds absurd! I do not understand then the point in this. It turns out I can ask only 0.2 BTC? Or is this also not right? Please google the definition of collateral. You can take a loan if you have something of 120% of value of the loan you want and you can give to the lender so he can be sure it's secured. That can be anything that has 120% of value of your need and can be sold rather easily: -Altcoins (you can have ETH for example without wanting to sell them for BTC) -precious metal (gold, silver...) -collectibles When you take a loan from a bank for a house for example, the collateral securing the loan is the house. If you default the loan the bank takes the house. Same thing here.
|
|
|
Hey Trueflip, I have a question.
Your deposit bonus says it must be wagered 35 times before withdraw. Fine. BUT:
-As every bet is taken 50% from cash 50% from bonus, does it mean in total we have to wager 70 times the bonus amount because only 50% from what we wager is coming from bonus balance?
-Do every bet count the same from every game? Betting 10mBTC at Chain's code is the same as 10mBTC at magic dice with 90% chance of winning?
-Are those rules the same for all deposit bonus or just the first 150% bonus?
Thanks in advance! Cheers!
|
|
|
I'd like to join, but I don't want to break forum rules.
You wouldn't break any rule. Worst that could happen would be to see the thread moved to Games and Rounds where I honestly believe it belongs.
|
|
|
$4,101
Which fucking idiot sold at the bottom?
Think it's a bit early to talk about bottom, that might be just a bounce Anyway I'm really happy I stopped everything a few weeks ago. So much better to just wake up and see "oh price increased, I'm a bit richer cool" than the stress of trading. Holding is much more simple than trading IMO.
|
|
|
You do not have any Trust , so giving collateral worth +20% of loan amount, everyone borrower risk losing it.
Hmm... That's a legit concern. Changed a bit the terms. But anyway considering my budget I don't think much risk is taken cause I would value my account higher than 0.3BTC. Thanks for your return though 4. Escrows accepted for your collateral if you fear seeing me running with it. Though I'd prefer without escrow as they add time reaction to every change.
|
|
|
Referendum initiative. The right for the people to decide the law and the constitution.
I didn't. I said I was in favor of more direct democracy. This is included. However taking people hostage is not the way to ask for it, and neither is degrading property. You're not the OP so you're not the one I was adressing the "you forgot" part Degrading property, violence, killing... All this is the basis of every strong social change that ever happened. If it's not the right way to ask for more power then what is? Peacefully demonstrating and politely asking? People forget that violence has always been the best weapon of the common folks. We're more numerous, we're stronger, we don't have to play the game by their rules. Who said violence was a bad thing? Who said we couldn't just go take the guillotine out again and go through European aristocracy all again? Damn some heads should rolls.
|
|
|
|