Why don't you try to explain your points, instead of just calling them scam and shitcoin? These sorts of comments do not add anything to the discussion. Aren't the links enough ? Did you read them ? What is there to add ? One (ETCV) is using the fork to promote its coin. How many more "ethereum this" "ethereum that" do we need ? Same goes for Bitcoin and those tens of coins forked from the original one. Just read the posts from the guy promoting it in the ANN thread, he has no idea what he's talking about. The other (Nowa) is a scam project with fake team members. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin’s Latest Buying Streak Could Mean a Rise in Prices https://cryptoslate.com/bitcoins-latest-buying-streak-rise-in-prices/According to Bloomberg, the GTI Vera Convergence Divergence indicator is suggesting bitcoin is in its longest buying streak in six months. This means that if the buying pressure continues as it has over the past two weeks, then bitcoin could see a sustained increase in prices. ... According to Greenspan, one of the clearest indicators of Bitcoin’s bright year ahead is the industries built around it. He said that companies involved in Bitcoin and blockchain are hiring at a “rapid rate,” with new projects coming online every day. ... Mike McGlone, an analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, said that the reduction of tax-related selling is a good reason for the bounce. He also noted that the duration of that bounce is something to keep an eye on, as last year’s bear market will most likely resume, he said. |
|
|
|
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-google-taxes-netherlands/google-shifted-23-billion-to-tax-haven-bermuda-in-2017-filing-idUSKCN1OX1G9Google moved 19.9 billion euros ($22.7 billion) through a Dutch shell company to Bermuda in 2017, as part of an arrangement that allows it to reduce its foreign tax bill, according to documents filed at the Dutch Chamber of Commerce. The amount channeled through Google Netherlands Holdings BV was around 4 billion euros more than in 2016, the documents, filed on Dec. 21, showed. “We pay all of the taxes due and comply with the tax laws in every country we operate in around the world,” Google said in a statement. “Google, like other multinational companies, pays the vast majority of its corporate income tax in its home country, and we have paid a global effective tax rate of 26 percent over the last ten years.” For more than a decade the arrangement has allowed Google owner Alphabet (GOOGL.O) to enjoy an effective tax rate in the single digits on its non-U.S. profits, around a quarter the average tax rate in its overseas markets. The subsidiary in the Netherlands is used to shift revenue from royalties earned outside the United States to Google Ireland Holdings, an affiliate based in Bermuda, where companies pay no income tax. The tax strategy, known as the “Double Irish, Dutch Sandwich”, is legal and allows Google to avoid triggering U.S. income taxes or European withholding taxes on the funds, which represent the bulk of its overseas profits. However, under pressure from the European Union and the United States, Ireland in 2014 decided to phase out the arrangement, ending Google’s tax advantages in 2020. Google Netherlands Holdings BV paid 3.4 million euros in taxes in the Netherlands in 2017, the documents showed, on a gross profit of 13.6 million euros. Reporting by Bart Meijer; Editing by Anthony Deutsch and Mark Potter
|
|
|
|
|
Dybala VS. Mbappe ?
lol will never happen. Mbappe is much more than a talented player.
He's young, the best French and even world prospect and he's from Paris' suburbs.
He's also a huge marketing project, even more than Neymar. They bought him for 180 million, he's worth twice as much for PSG now... and I'm not exaggerating.
Plus Dybala wouldn't fit in Tuchel's system.
Paris won't want to sell Mbappe before a long time and Mbappe will want to stay as long as he thinks he has a chance of winning the Champions' League with this team.
|
|
|
|
|
What do you have to lose?
Just go there, read a few topics and if you feel like you have something interesting to add, just post it.
You'll quickly see if you fit there or not. If people don't understand you, they'll let you know right away.
Plus I'm sure you will be surprised by the quality of the posts. I would say you have more chance to find shitposts here written in broken English than there in German.
|
|
|
|
Here is a site about staking where you will find all the info about all the coins you can stake, especially the rewards you'll receive by doing so. https://stakingrewards.com/ |
|
|
|
On savait que Hitbtc allait bloquer les retraits pendant le Proof of Keys mais ce n'est pas le seul site a avoir "bugge"hier. Voici quelques echanges qui ont comme par hasard eu divers soucis et ont ainsi empeche les gens de retirer leurs coins : -Coinbase Pro https://twitter.com/CoinbasePro/status/1080861151452229632Service was restored at 19:30 PT, 1 hour after the original incident -Poloniex -Robinhood -Bitfinex https://twitter.com/bitfinex/status/1080868500338561024We are aware of some issues on our platform and are working quickly to resolve. Please be assured all funds are safe. We appreciate your patience. -Purse.io (ce n'est pas un echange mais bon...) -LBX (London Block Exchange) https://twitter.com/LBXSocial/status/1080928349407666182We have taken the exchange offline for some unscheduled maintenance. We’ll provide an update soon, thank you for your patience. |
|
|
|
|
Vous embetez pas a changer des trucs, je vais en mettre un autre d'avatar si ca vous gene a ce point.
|
|
|
|
Bonjour à tous,
Dans quelques jours aura lieu Constantinople, le hard fork Ethereum.
Savez-vous si tous les exchanges le supportent : Binance, Kraken, Bittrex, Kucoin, Bitstamp, etc...
Et idem pour MEW ou les Ledger.
A-t-on quelque chose à faire ? Ou est-ce automatique ?
Tu veux savoir si tu vas recevoir des sous en plus, et si oui a quel endroit, je suppose ? Regarde ici, on en parle deja : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081099.msg49030792#msg49030792Pour les ETCV, il vaut mieux tout mettre sur un wallet dont tu possedes la cle privee. Je doute que les echanges gerent cet airdrop. Mais bon, ca risque de valoir que dalle ce truc. |
|
|
|
From Theymos : Satoshi's lessonThe foundations of Bitcoin were set in stone 10 years ago today with the creation of the genesis block, and Bitcoin version 0.1 was officially released a week later. Version 0.1 was amazingly complete, and even more impressively, it had very few bugs. It also had great forward-compatibility, with explicit support for future softforks in the form of the OP_NOPn opcodes. Before anyone knew how a decentralized cryptocurrency would even work, Satoshi was figuring out how to add to Bitcoin things like smart contracts and payment channels. This is incredible, and a lot of people look at Satoshi's amazing accomplishments with Bitcoin and say stuff like, "Satoshi must be a crypto super-genius, the next Einstein." This, I think, is very much missing the point. When Satoshi was working on Bitcoin in 2007-2009, almost all of the core ideas of Bitcoin were well-known in the cryptography community. In 1996, a summary of previous academic work on electronic cash was published, talking at length about most of the low-level cryptographic primitives used in Bitcoin and using familiar terms like "double spending". Hashcash proof-of-work was well-known, and I remember reading about it prior to Bitcoin as an idea to prevent email spam. git uses the same unbreakable chain of hashes as Bitcoin's block chain, and was first released in 2005. Satoshi made one major leap: combining all these pieces to prevent double spending through a PoW block chain. This was impressive, but the same flash of brilliance could've happened to anyone who was following this stuff. Satoshi is not awesome because he was watching the crypto world and had a brilliant idea. He's awesome because upon having this idea, he carried it out. You know what I would've done if this idea had come to me? I probably would've mentioned it to a few people, maybe written some very basic code if I was feeling especially ambitious. You know what Satoshi did? He spent 2+ years contemplating every possible aspect of the system he could think of, and wrote code that worked brilliantly in the real world. Satoshi's code was good, but anyone who had read a good C++ book could've written similarly-good code. Anyone who had taken an intro crypto course or read a few books on the subject would understand Satoshi's usage of crypto primitives. The task of creating Bitcoin required a small flash of brilliance, moderate skill, and an unbelievably huge amount of dedication to thinking about, coding, and testing the system until it worked exactly as envisioned. Satoshi's lesson is that you don't need to be the next Einstein in order to change the world. Nor do you need to have much money, or influence with the world's "movers & shakers". You just need to put in the effort. Satoshi, probably just an ordinary hobbyist like anyone here, saw that something was lacking in the Universe, and he fought tooth-and-nail for 2+ years until this imperfection was corrected. This is what makes Satoshi and his work my greatest inspiration. Bitcoin has come a long way in 10 years, but it still has much more room to grow, with both major challenges and major opportunities ahead. How Bitcoin moves forward - how Satoshi's work continues - is for as many people as possible to take personal responsbility for improving the Bitcoin ecosystem, creating interesting things, and changing the world for the better. Since we've long passed the moon, I hope you'll join me in aiming for the stars. |
|
|
|
Un topic de Theymos cree aujourd'hui : Satoshi's lessonThe foundations of Bitcoin were set in stone 10 years ago today with the creation of the genesis block, and Bitcoin version 0.1 was officially released a week later. Version 0.1 was amazingly complete, and even more impressively, it had very few bugs. It also had great forward-compatibility, with explicit support for future softforks in the form of the OP_NOPn opcodes. Before anyone knew how a decentralized cryptocurrency would even work, Satoshi was figuring out how to add to Bitcoin things like smart contracts and payment channels. This is incredible, and a lot of people look at Satoshi's amazing accomplishments with Bitcoin and say stuff like, "Satoshi must be a crypto super-genius, the next Einstein." This, I think, is very much missing the point. When Satoshi was working on Bitcoin in 2007-2009, almost all of the core ideas of Bitcoin were well-known in the cryptography community. In 1996, a summary of previous academic work on electronic cash was published, talking at length about most of the low-level cryptographic primitives used in Bitcoin and using familiar terms like "double spending". Hashcash proof-of-work was well-known, and I remember reading about it prior to Bitcoin as an idea to prevent email spam. git uses the same unbreakable chain of hashes as Bitcoin's block chain, and was first released in 2005. Satoshi made one major leap: combining all these pieces to prevent double spending through a PoW block chain. This was impressive, but the same flash of brilliance could've happened to anyone who was following this stuff. Satoshi is not awesome because he was watching the crypto world and had a brilliant idea. He's awesome because upon having this idea, he carried it out. You know what I would've done if this idea had come to me? I probably would've mentioned it to a few people, maybe written some very basic code if I was feeling especially ambitious. You know what Satoshi did? He spent 2+ years contemplating every possible aspect of the system he could think of, and wrote code that worked brilliantly in the real world. Satoshi's code was good, but anyone who had read a good C++ book could've written similarly-good code. Anyone who had taken an intro crypto course or read a few books on the subject would understand Satoshi's usage of crypto primitives. The task of creating Bitcoin required a small flash of brilliance, moderate skill, and an unbelievably huge amount of dedication to thinking about, coding, and testing the system until it worked exactly as envisioned. Satoshi's lesson is that you don't need to be the next Einstein in order to change the world. Nor do you need to have much money, or influence with the world's "movers & shakers". You just need to put in the effort. Satoshi, probably just an ordinary hobbyist like anyone here, saw that something was lacking in the Universe, and he fought tooth-and-nail for 2+ years until this imperfection was corrected. This is what makes Satoshi and his work my greatest inspiration. Bitcoin has come a long way in 10 years, but it still has much more room to grow, with both major challenges and major opportunities ahead. How Bitcoin moves forward - how Satoshi's work continues - is for as many people as possible to take personal responsbility for improving the Bitcoin ecosystem, creating interesting things, and changing the world for the better. Since we've long passed the moon, I hope you'll join me in aiming for the stars. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin represents more than 50% of the total market cap.
You've just been proven wrong.
End of thread.
|
|
|
|
et quand le réseau foudre sera plus simple, je saurai moi aussi l'utiliser.
Ca veut dire que tu seras encore plus rapide ? Comme l'eclair ? Elles vont etre contentes... les filles. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
