1. What is the entry # for your favorite design? #199 2. What is the reason you chose to vote for this design? It is a very "clean" and professional looking design. I like the contrast improvements we can see at the back of the P, especially since it makes it stand out on the very small image. The other design fades away and almost looks like the logo of a number of clones coins with no value that have come out recently. The original P design was generally kept in shape, and the leaf is a perfect symbolization of the energy efficiency that ppcoin will bring to the crypto world. I'm all in for #199  |
|
|
|
Since it is also only used by a probable-scamcoin at this point, I'd also like to express my preference that others not encourage/help non-developers use it for now, outside of improving the code/documentation in git.
(However, to be clear, I will also not hold any grudge or hard feelings against those who do.)
What makes you say that? As far as I see, primecoin and the same developer's ppcoin look like the only bitcoin-derivatives to bring something new and worthwhile to the table since namecoin. By ignoring the question, he gives off the impression that hes is trying to dissuade people from pursuing it while he capitalizes on a miner 100x more efficient. I don't know if thats what he is doing, but it appears to be the case since he has not stated his apprehensions beyond his provocative remarks. I second this. |
|
|
|
I'm getting 4 primes per second for PrimeCoin on a i7...
There have been a few optimized realeases since last night. How long did you let it mine for when you saw 4? Also, are you using all or most of the cores? |
|
|
|
My AMD FX-6100 six core is getting 700PPS |
|
|
|
It appears Trucoin has broken out of the asylum
Yeah he or she has been at it for several days now  |
|
|
|
Just tested the 3 new windows releases from anonppcoin, shinkicker and zalfrin. Zalfrins is the fastest but shinkickers didn't crash on exit. Heh... that's a new development. It also appears to be broken again, not pulling in new blocks as they come. Last time that was a UPNP problem. All right, here's a fixed version. Includes all dlls, shouldn't be crashing on exit, and should be following the blockchain properly.  https://www.dropbox.com/s/6dwcc5p1koj86vz/release5.zipSeems to launch ok on half my computers, the other half don't like it. |
|
|
|
I sold 70 primecoins for .25BTC on Coins-e a few hours ago and cleaned out the bid table. Lol I love small markets.
yeah suckers born every minute. why buy primecoin....hey I'll sell you actual real life prime numbers if you like people? I still have a couple more blocks that haven't matured yet, I'll probably dump'em when Primecoin hits BTC-E. $25 for running my desktop for 72 hours, not bad lol. yeah there be plenty of miners sweating on their block maturing, to get them sold asap while its the current flavor What exactly are you mining? How is primecoin the "current flavor"? |
|
|
|
yes I've done the following Connect your laptop to the eithernet port of the Avalon Setup your laptop IP address 192.168.0.101 (IPV 4) Open http://192.168.0.100it just won't go anywhere from there. It should bring up a page, but it doesn't and just times out. Any help would be great! will reward someone if can help regards, Brian Do you have a proxy configured in your web browser? |
|
|
|
I just got my unit here. I've tried to connect to it using the steps on the wiki. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/AvalonI get connection timed out, something like that when connecting to 192.168.0.101. any help would be greatly appreciated and would pay you a reasonable sum. Regards, Brian Are you going right from your laptop to the ASIC with a crossover cable? And of course the aforementioned change of IP. |
|
|
|
After flashing to the July update, my HW errors went from 3ish percent to now 30%. I'm thinking I will revert...
How are you calculating this? The correct formula to calculate HW% (with cgminer fieldnames) is: 100 * HW / (diff1shares + HW)
I can take another look and flash it again. I was doing HW/Accepted. I saw someone else say this was the proper way buried in this thread. The pool was also reporting a significantly lower hashrate with the newest firmware (I know, not always accurate) but with the old one the hashrate is a steady 71GH/s. I went to July update, down to June, down to May (slight improvement over July and June), and finally back to April. |
|
|
|
|
up i suppose - make an offer
|
|
|
|
Well it seems the little guys are out now. The big machines are up and running with the fixed code  . BTW seems like we have a 10 second gap between blocks now  . My proposed p2pool client can't operate when the network speed is the same as the p2p chain speed is supposed to be. Ahh that's disappointing. Too bad blocks are being found an entire 6 times faster than they're supoosed to be... |
|
|
|
|
I'm jealous right now. Waiting for the kind fellow who releases an optimized windows build
|
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing Mike270 We are now onto the 4th day of mining (74 hours since launch)... Some rough observations: - Day 1 block spacing was in the range 40 - 110 seconds | difficulty 7 - 7.2
- Day 2 block spacing was in the range 10 - 40 seconds | difficulty 7.2 - 7.33
- Day 3 block spacing was in the range 15 - 25 seconds | difficulty 7.4 - 7.6
If you are running the original binary released by Sunny, then you have very little chance of finding a block in less than 15 seconds IMO Yeah I'm watching all the blocks I'm not mining right now |
|
|
|
Great guide Fuzzy. I'm getting owned by our proxy though, can't even get the dependencies I need downloaded |
|
|
|
|
Proxy kicked my ass, I can't even download the dependencies I need
|
|
|
|
|
I am an idiot when it comes to linux and trying to run the command.. failing miserably. Can someone please roll this fix in to the full wallet so the whole package is available for download including the fix?
|
|
|
|
Doesn't appear to be me |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
