IamNotSure
|
|
March 18, 2014, 11:42:31 PM |
|
Anybody for a 1000 quark side bet? In 30 Days above or below 5000? I'll take Above
I take below if you agree to bet in BTC (50 mBTC)
|
|
|
|
Kmonk
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:18:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
dE_logics
|
|
March 19, 2014, 03:37:36 AM |
|
That would've been something of a though if it whould've been posted BEFORE the drop in prices.
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:36:11 AM |
|
great work i tweeted about support for moolah , this would actually help our current and future merchants. i think we should aim to build our own payment system , have shares open to all of the community so i'm still looking at that also. I think we should do something more revolutionary: Build an own payment system in cooperation with the Top Ten cryptos. We shouldn´t think in isolated application, we´re not back in Bitcoin times. I think Quark´s doing great on its own but long term there will only be integrated solutions. Cryptos shouldn´t be all competetive, we´re here for a similar goal. 1. We gather a pack of commited members from crypto communities that are capable and creative to push this project. 2. We create a crypto foundation with representants from every coin in the board 3. We raise money from every community and get this thing blasting. Imagine our thunderclap x 10. This is a chance to mark a difference between serious coins and the rest. Actually that's what i had in mind : ) our payment system should always support QRK and BTC LTC. then as we asses other partnerships move forward with them.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:50:22 AM |
|
ha ha it looks like these idiots are getting desperate - this is actually a good sign. again i will say 6 months for mining distribution and 6 months for price distribution, the lower it goes in that time the more chance that everyone has to get in at a good and reasonable level. as for the mining well, i'm promoting GPU miner, these mico minds do not understand that a GPU ratio is only at most 2x a leading CPU. anyone can check the numbers, there are plenty of clones to try it on, with the net lower power consumption of CPU this puts GPU and CPU at almost an equal level. I studied a currency called "Myraidcoin" it supposedly is multi has but a GPU can yeild up to or over 10mh# on it , but then when studied, it is apparent its actually not multi hash. it has multiple hashes, but hash orders them one at a time in order. its not cPoW. so in this case GPU is our friend. the market overheated after the Max announcement, everyone that emailed me i said there is plenty of time to buy, at that time we had not even started price stabilization. if these guys are on this semi unknown forum saying this i can only think they are trying to drive price movements for themselves.. ha, where do they think the people on the forums came from ?
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
Promethium
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:04:24 AM |
|
Anybody for a 1000 quark side bet? In 30 Days above or below 5000? I'll take Above
I take below if you agree to bet in BTC (50 mBTC) No, the bet is for QRK
|
|
|
|
dE_logics
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:16:57 PM |
|
The exchanges should try futures.
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:44:22 PM |
|
Altcoins: Brave New World Beyond Bitcoinhttp://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2014/03/18/altcoins-brave-new-world-beyond-bitcoin/guys even though its a small write up section for Quark - its a generally positive light and this is key in seeing that general Crypto education is spreading, in fact in many ways the MTGox charade has moved this process along , of course to law of unintended consequences. this from an investment point of view does more for Quark than any "pump" spam, this is a peer driven market. education is the key Crypto is a reality, Quark has the algo that is the probable final evolution the marke tis going to slowly come back to us, not only the Crypto market but the traditional market also -
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
greentea
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1418
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 19, 2014, 07:12:26 PM |
|
Altcoins: Brave New World Beyond Bitcoinhttp://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2014/03/18/altcoins-brave-new-world-beyond-bitcoin/guys even though its a small write up section for Quark - its a generally positive light and this is key in seeing that general Crypto education is spreading, in fact in many ways the MTGox charade has moved this process along , of course to law of unintended consequences. this from an investment point of view does more for Quark than any "pump" spam, this is a peer driven market. education is the key Crypto is a reality, Quark has the algo that is the probable final evolution the marke tis going to slowly come back to us, not only the Crypto market but the traditional market also - great little mention of Quark ... hopefully after the alt-coin bubble pops, people will again realize the potential of Quark
|
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
March 19, 2014, 07:48:48 PM |
|
Quark is a top Crypto you guys, i'm telling you, be confident. Quark 1 love baby
|
|
|
|
DigiWorld
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:15:41 PM |
|
There is a discussion on Reddit about quark multipool. Quark Profit-Switching MultiPool Idea?
submitted 1 day ago by fiatfoolgot quark?
So, I've seen other coins do this. Some of the POS coins that you can no longer mine have been setting up multipools, which mines the most profitable scrypt coin and then pays out in their own coin. (Mintcoin/blackcoin did this)
Now that we have the in-built miner, I'm wondering if we really need a standard foundation pool, since with people's wallets open the network will be secure and more distributed. (Just remember to keep your wallet open!! )
What if we setup a profit-switching multi-pool, for those that mine coins. The foundation could still manage this & charge a fee, but then we could mine on our GPU's and support QRK's price by getting paid directly in Quark. This would sell the other alt for BTC, then sell the BTC for Quark automatically...
What do you think .... good idea or bad idea?"
I think it is good ides. You can use CPU to mine qrk directly and maintain the network. And use other miners to get qrk by mining Scrypt and SHA-256 coins.
|
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
March 20, 2014, 12:09:55 AM |
|
There is a discussion on Reddit about quark multipool. Quark Profit-Switching MultiPool Idea?
submitted 1 day ago by fiatfoolgot quark?
So, I've seen other coins do this. Some of the POS coins that you can no longer mine have been setting up multipools, which mines the most profitable scrypt coin and then pays out in their own coin. (Mintcoin/blackcoin did this)
Now that we have the in-built miner, I'm wondering if we really need a standard foundation pool, since with people's wallets open the network will be secure and more distributed. (Just remember to keep your wallet open!! )
What if we setup a profit-switching multi-pool, for those that mine coins. The foundation could still manage this & charge a fee, but then we could mine on our GPU's and support QRK's price by getting paid directly in Quark. This would sell the other alt for BTC, then sell the BTC for Quark automatically...
What do you think .... good idea or bad idea?"
I think it is good ides. You can use CPU to mine qrk directly and maintain the network. And use other miners to get qrk by mining Scrypt and SHA-256 coins. Hmm sounds like a good idea, so you mine another coin and it gets selled automatically for Quark? And is this done with the Quark wallet or how does it work?
|
|
|
|
DigiWorld
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
March 20, 2014, 02:13:01 AM |
|
There is a discussion on Reddit about quark multipool. Quark Profit-Switching MultiPool Idea?
submitted 1 day ago by fiatfoolgot quark?
So, I've seen other coins do this. Some of the POS coins that you can no longer mine have been setting up multipools, which mines the most profitable scrypt coin and then pays out in their own coin. (Mintcoin/blackcoin did this)
Now that we have the in-built miner, I'm wondering if we really need a standard foundation pool, since with people's wallets open the network will be secure and more distributed. (Just remember to keep your wallet open!! )
What if we setup a profit-switching multi-pool, for those that mine coins. The foundation could still manage this & charge a fee, but then we could mine on our GPU's and support QRK's price by getting paid directly in Quark. This would sell the other alt for BTC, then sell the BTC for Quark automatically...
What do you think .... good idea or bad idea?"
I think it is good ides. You can use CPU to mine qrk directly and maintain the network. And use other miners to get qrk by mining Scrypt and SHA-256 coins. Hmm sounds like a good idea, so you mine another coin and it gets selled automatically for Quark? And is this done with the Quark wallet or how does it work? Yes, Mine another coin and sell it automatically for Quark like blackcoin and mintcoin did. http://bcmultipool.com/http://mint.mintpool.us/mint/index.php
|
|
|
|
btc38
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
March 20, 2014, 06:27:00 AM |
|
Hi we are btc38 from china, please add us under your exchange item.
|
|
|
|
Promethium
|
|
March 20, 2014, 10:03:58 AM |
|
Hi we are btc38 from china, please add us under your exchange item.
Your site is included in the exchange link.
|
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
March 20, 2014, 10:41:12 AM |
|
There is a discussion on Reddit about quark multipool. Quark Profit-Switching MultiPool Idea?
submitted 1 day ago by fiatfoolgot quark?
So, I've seen other coins do this. Some of the POS coins that you can no longer mine have been setting up multipools, which mines the most profitable scrypt coin and then pays out in their own coin. (Mintcoin/blackcoin did this)
Now that we have the in-built miner, I'm wondering if we really need a standard foundation pool, since with people's wallets open the network will be secure and more distributed. (Just remember to keep your wallet open!! )
What if we setup a profit-switching multi-pool, for those that mine coins. The foundation could still manage this & charge a fee, but then we could mine on our GPU's and support QRK's price by getting paid directly in Quark. This would sell the other alt for BTC, then sell the BTC for Quark automatically...
What do you think .... good idea or bad idea?"
I think it is good ides. You can use CPU to mine qrk directly and maintain the network. And use other miners to get qrk by mining Scrypt and SHA-256 coins. Hmm sounds like a good idea, so you mine another coin and it gets selled automatically for Quark? And is this done with the Quark wallet or how does it work? Yes, Mine another coin and sell it automatically for Quark like blackcoin and mintcoin did. http://bcmultipool.com/http://mint.mintpool.us/mint/index.phpWell why don't we do this? Do we have to contact quarks developer? Excluding miners is not a wise thing to do, you will lose lots of supporters. So this might help?
|
|
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
March 20, 2014, 11:57:50 AM |
|
[serious talk] More mining incentive http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/20w777/serious_talk_more_mining_incentive/Anyone else agrees that Quark should give more mining incentive to people? As you know the Crypto industry is very pro mining and has lots of supporters. After all Bitcoin invented this model. By pretty much eliminating mining you will lose lots of supporters which is the same as losing more advertising power, new ideas etc. Also indirectly you are showing your disagreement with Bitcoins model. Quark needs to do something about this. It's an already established coin so people will follow it. I hear something about a multipool, but in general mining right now is an important aspect of a Crypto and Quark should have it's doors open for it. We are at a time where people are very exited about mining it's a new concept and a real phenomenon. So is this possible? Does Quark have the spirit to change it's model and when it does, will it make gains? I think it will. If we can change something with Quark that addresses my points typed above and we time it the same time as the Shaq promotion we could go big. Please post your opinion
|
|
|
|
greentea
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1418
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 20, 2014, 02:57:34 PM |
|
[serious talk] More mining incentive http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/20w777/serious_talk_more_mining_incentive/Anyone else agrees that Quark should give more mining incentive to people? As you know the Crypto industry is very pro mining and has lots of supporters. After all Bitcoin invented this model. By pretty much eliminating mining you will lose lots of supporters which is the same as losing more advertising power, new ideas etc. Also indirectly you are showing your disagreement with Bitcoins model. Quark needs to do something about this. It's an already established coin so people will follow it. I hear something about a multipool, but in general mining right now is an important aspect of a Crypto and Quark should have it's doors open for it. We are at a time where people are very exited about mining it's a new concept and a real phenomenon. So is this possible? Does Quark have the spirit to change it's model and when it does, will it make gains? I think it will. If we can change something with Quark that addresses my points typed above and we time it the same time as the Shaq promotion we could go big. Please post your opinion I think having both the multipool that pays out in Quark and an official Foundation Pool would go a long ways in supporting Quark. As price rises the incentive to mine QRK will rise as well.
|
|
|
|
|