Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 11:51:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 327 »
1241  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 04, 2014, 02:43:06 PM
It downloads whole blockchain right?
It talks to bitcoind, which does download the entire blockchain.
1242  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 04, 2014, 02:39:48 PM
Here is a very simple and secure way
Do you know what any of those words mean?

So many people have lost bitcoins because they tried to roll their own overly-complex cold storage.
1243  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: August 04, 2014, 02:38:08 PM

thanks Justus. this is big. I'm eagerly waiting for the day the documents about alleged market manipulation will be published.

tl;dr Jon Matonis Executive Director of The Bitcoin Foundation accused to manipulate the market through "The Exante Fund".

FYI the author have deleted the article from medium.com platform, strange.

Justus do you have any more info?
No, I found the link on Reddit and posted it here because it looked interesting.

I don't know what to think about the accusations.
1244  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: August 04, 2014, 04:04:23 AM
Out of curiosity, is anyone going to be at Defcon/Blackhat/Vegas this week? Want to spend some bitcoins on root beer?

I'll pack a pair of bitcoins and see what I can do.

C

Yamamushi is going to be there, trying to see if he can win the scavenger hunt for a sixth year in a row.
1245  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 04, 2014, 03:53:39 AM
Hasn't electrum SPV been proven safe yet?
Maybe.

I'm more worried about it being private than I am worried about it being safe.
1246  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 04, 2014, 03:45:27 AM
One of the reasons i heard is that it has deterministic wallets with 160 bit seed, vs 256bit seeds in armory.
But armory is switching to 160bit, soon anyway (bip32 i think).
It's possible to use 256 bit seeds with BIP32, and I'm sure Armory will do that. The only reason Electrum uses smaller seeds is to make their word list shorter.

And what improvement to electrum do you need, to finally make the switch to electrum?
thanks!
The user interface for Electrum is... primitive compared to Armory. I couldn't even begin to list all the things.
1247  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: August 04, 2014, 03:42:24 AM
I'm all for using PGP/GPG as much as possible, but it's not for everyone.
If you just upload keys to the keyservers for each address you advertise, then those who want to use it can do so without needing to bothering you. If you're going to be the only one reading them then you don't actually need to generate new keys - just add a new UID to yours.

Something else that would be nice is Bitmessages addresses as an alternate contact method. It's actually not too hard to integrate Bitmessage into an existing email workflow, as long as you operate your own IMAP/SMTP servers.
1248  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: August 04, 2014, 03:20:26 AM
Though, strictly speaking, it shouldn't really be necessary.
Maybe I don't want every ISP between you and me knowing which non-profits I choose to donate to(*).

In general, emails should be encrypted unless there's a very good reason to leave them in cleartext.


(*) What if the next presidential administration really dislikes the organization I donate to and directs the IRS to track down everybody who has ever donated to them and hit them with tax audits? That would never happen in a free country though, right?
1249  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 04, 2014, 03:18:05 AM
Thanks guys, I've gotten some really good replies. My only question at this point is, why does everyone suggest Armory over electrum? Is there any good reason for this or just preference?
Con: Electrum has a very primitive and unpolished UI.

Pro: It does require you to download the entire blockchain to use

Con: Not downloading the entire blockchain yourself means you're reliant on other servers to be able to use your wallet and you have less privacy.

Armory requires more resources, but it has a much better backup system, and makes complicated tasks easier.
1250  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: August 04, 2014, 03:11:46 AM
No PGP key on the keyservers for the donationmatch address?
1251  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory Wallet Intro Message - Scares me on: August 04, 2014, 02:57:42 AM
Can't really point fingers as we are lagging behind currently (not for long though!).
At least you've had deterministic wallets from the beginning and never encouraged address reuse. That's not lagging nearly as badly as some...
1252  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory Wallet Intro Message - Scares me on: August 03, 2014, 10:33:44 PM
You're exposing your private key to an online machine. If you can't see what's going wrong here, you need to do more research. You are literally negating the whole cold storage part. Also, using a single address is bad for your privacy, and the privacy of everyone who trades with you.
Blockchain.info has a lot to answer for, since they are the single biggest contributing factor to spreading the address reuse poison throughout the ecosystem.

At least Mycelium is actively working on BIP32 - I've heard of no such commitment from BC.i
1253  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 03, 2014, 10:23:27 PM
meaning we may end up plunking it into M1 in a 1 to 1 ratio with the USD monetary base forming a Bitcoin Standard serving as the foundation for the existing fiat debt system so as to prevent a severe debt implosion.
That's a thing that could be done, I suppose.

I consider it more likely that the USA goes the way of the USSR than the possibility that they could pull that kind of a rabbit out of their hat.
1254  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE: Super-lightweight HW wallets and offline data on: August 03, 2014, 05:35:25 PM
It is trivial to implement this on a new alt-coin. For bitcoin, however, this requires a CHECKSIG 2.0 or even Script 2.0. I doubt we would ever see it
Certainly altcoin pumpers have an incentive to spread the meme that it's impossible to upgrade Bitcoin, but that doesn't make it true.
1255  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE: Super-lightweight HW wallets and offline data on: August 03, 2014, 05:08:35 PM
So a year after this thread was started efficient offline signing is still not possible, and there is no clear path for getting features like new hash types into the protocol, even though everything is versioned and upgrades have happened in the past.
1256  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 03, 2014, 04:07:29 PM
While the concept of a "necessary backing" is a fallacy in my book
"Backing" is a kind of awkward hack that attempts to limit the production of currency.

It never really worked in the first place, and it's completely unnecessary now that we can just use math to limit the supply of the currency.
1257  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 03, 2014, 04:04:55 PM
I would just do 10 paper wallets with 10 Bitcoins in each - there is no real need to diversify wallet types, just diversify the coins

With 10 paper wallets you risk them being destroyed. You also have the problem of not having a true hot wallet in order to send bitcoins on the fly with unless you carry the paper wallet in addition to your phone and scan in the key.
That's exactly why deterministic wallets were invented.

You create one offline, print m-of-n paper backups of the seed, then you can have as many addresses as you could ever want and your backups are valid forever.
1258  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 03, 2014, 03:59:39 PM
~80% in 1 brain wallet, ~10-20 btc in Coinbase/Armory or similar trusted 3rd party.
Armory does not belong in the same category as Coinbase.

Coinbase is a Bitcoin bank that takes your actual coins and gives you bitcoin IOUs for them.

Armory is the best cold storage solution for holding your own coins, better than brainwallets or paper wallets by far.
1259  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would you store >100 Bitcoins? on: August 03, 2014, 01:58:45 PM
Armory.
1260  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [BOUNTY - 25 BTC] Audio/Modem-based communication library on: August 02, 2014, 08:54:55 AM
You are right, but this would require simulatenous bi-directional connection between the online and the offline computers, requiring two audio cables.
Since I have got only one audio cable, I am calibrating the sender manually. Smiley
Since the deployed solution is going to need to send data in both directions, you should probably just consider simultaneous bidirectional communication to be part of the requirements.
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 327 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!