dev was just in IRC earlier - he is working hard with exchanges to fix it. lets not all jump to conclusions
thanks for the heads up m8 ! ...dont wanna be in their shoes atm. by all means no fun thing to do on a monday mornin... btw. my wallet runs fine for 3 days straight without beeing offline and nicely moves along with the chain that's locked with suprnova, ipo and suchpool ('til the moment they put the pool on halt). internal block explorer & stats reflect their state as well and transactions also worked ('til lock on such'n'ipo) and still work on nova... at least this part of the network seems to continue without orphs (above normal) atm... considering pool vs. net hashpower most of the miningpower now should concentrate on suprnova... however, we'll see what happens in maybe little more than half a day when the last POW block is due... howsoever, I'd bet my ass on to wathever the bittrex wallet will be syncing eventually, this will be the chain to cope with. i doubt the dev is spending time trying to fix a corrupted chain. the silence suggests the dev isnt even working with the exchanges and they too are waiting for him. after this long in crypto it suggests he's abandoned the project. a fork doesnt take 3 days to fix. |
|
|
|
|
from what im seeing that chain is totally invalid. it is stuck on block 10935 and not moving with miners on hashot pool. it means that chain is dead and worthless. nova etc are on the healthy chain. its about time the dev gets his ass out of bed and makes a reply about this however and get it fixed.
edit: ok just notice it's moved up over block 11000
meh i think the coin is done. dev wont show to fix an issue as simple as a fork. casting in my chips elsewhere. glad i pulled all buy orders just moments before this crap happened.
|
|
|
|
|
cutting pow has never resulted in any good for any coin. it messes up investment strategy for major players and the coin ends up dumped and abandoned regardless of technological enhancements. its a 10 day pow. let it run out. ppl dont like when you change the original plan under them. it counts as manual manipulation which is not very acceptable in crypto.
|
|
|
|
yup just cleared my roaming folder and the wallet rebuilt everything and synced to block #11847 on its own. i think we're back on track.
Not at all! Windows wallet has no issue syncing to SuchPool/SuprNova/IpoMiner/minerpools. However, linux deamon does not do the same. I spinned up another wallet and I end up on the other fork with a fresh sync. Until this is checkpointed and fixed, it's not safe to mine or to move anything until we know which fork does the dev wants to resume on. weird. i dont even have a sparkcoin.conf file. totally fresh build synced right up. |
|
|
|
|
yup just cleared my roaming folder and the wallet rebuilt everything and synced to block #11847 on its own. i think we're back on track.
|
|
|
|
sorry i got it to sync at same as wallet from them 11813 as we speak
was that using the file i sent you or just from the official sparkcoin download? |
|
|
|
i think we on right block 10927
backup-pool.com
ok if that's the right block then where is the like 20gh of mining coming from on that chain? on a solo wallet? because i cant find that on any of the pools unless im missing something. that amount of hash will cause them to fork unto their own chain at low diff. which is what i think happened. |
|
|
|
Isn't the SuchPool, IPOminer, Suprnova, minerpools all on the right fork and only hashhot, trademybit, and bittrex on the wrong fork? Why is it a choice? All the hash and main pools are on the correct fork.
And if their was no 51% attempt or foul play, maybe dev could compensate hashhot or TMB with some of the premine to solve the issue.
There isn't a 'choice', it is impossible to sync to the 'IPOMiner/Suchpool/etc' fork without bootstrapping the blockchain. If you delete your data and resync you will never get to where those pools are, even if you add them as your only nodes and disallow any other connections.. because block 10042 fails proof-of-work verification. It is, by definition, invalid. That doesn't mean the dev won't take that as the proper chain. It's up t the dev lately as to what fork is correct, but in all honesty this fork is completely invalid  are transactions working on the other chain at all? we're talking a full day's transactions and mining on the dominant pools being reversed if we dont take up with the suchpool/nova blockchain. not sure i like the sound of that. |
|
|
|
Isn't the SuchPool, IPOminer, Suprnova, minerpools all on the right fork and only hashhot, trademybit, and bittrex on the wrong fork? Why is it a choice? All the hash and main pools are on the correct fork.
And if their was no 51% attempt or foul play, maybe dev could compensate hashhot or TMB with some of the premine to solve the issue.
i dont think anyone was on those pools actually. it was just mainly suchpool and nova that were running together with about 4gh+ of solo hash running besides the pools. the pool only had about 2gh between them when the fork occurred if i remember correctly. the rest was solo/p2p/m2p. i was actually searching for that extra hash but couldnt find it on any of the listed pools. We had about 5gh when that happened on SuchPool itself, Ipominer had some hash too and Suprnova how long ago was that? ive got the fork happening a bit over 24hrs ago and had reported to bittrex and bter. |
|
|
|
Isn't the SuchPool, IPOminer, Suprnova, minerpools all on the right fork and only hashhot, trademybit, and bittrex on the wrong fork? Why is it a choice? All the hash and main pools are on the correct fork.
And if their was no 51% attempt or foul play, maybe dev could compensate hashhot or TMB with some of the premine to solve the issue.
i dont think anyone was on those pools actually. it was just mainly suchpool and nova that were running together with about 4gh+ of solo hash running besides the pools. the pool only had about 2gh between them when the fork occurred if i remember correctly. the rest was solo/p2p/m2p. i was actually searching for that extra hash but couldnt find it on any of the listed pools. |
|
|
|
Is Nova on correct fork? My payment to wallet works
i would think so, the bad fork will most likely have a high orphan rate. id say suchpool and nova are on the right fork. the pools on the wrong fork are reading a 236 diff. |
|
|
|
Spark mining is now halted on SuchPool.
There seem to be two forks, and it seems that SuchPool, Ipominer and all other large pools were all on this one, while hashhot and a multipool (trademybit) and bittrex where on another one.
A fresh resync ends me up at "blocks" : 10041, therefore I am stopping mining as of right now until the dev comes in and assesses the situation.
The last 12+ hours of mining would be wasted if the 10041 happens to be the proper fork.
if ur stopping at block 10041 then it means ur on the wrong fork. network transactions work for everyone else on the right fork. did you try the link i uploaded? that should have you on the right fork. |
|
|
|
decent volume, keen for mondays release
Glad to have you here sempyper! Remember PoW will end soon so make sure you all get your Spark before then! lol let's see how low they want to go. killed all my buy orders. |
|
|
|
decent volume, keen for mondays release
dont know why all the kids are in such a rush to give away their coins for small price but i guess,, they will learn with experience lol such panic sell, much wow. |
|
|
|
This coin is new and there are tons of FUD? Wow seems interesting.
Always a good sign. We are in the dip before the rise that most new coins on Bittrex go through. 90% of the time you can get x2 in 48 hrs. We shall see in the next 24 hrs but looks good to me. Yeah, but i've done my math and it's quite expensive now. No more room to grow, will wait for a deeper dip in the coming days. lol what kinda math is that? fudimatics? investment has only just begun. if you sold your coins below 5k.. well.. tough. Must be that new common core math they are teaching the kids now... where 2+2=10 as long are your reason for it is sound. lols at common core. whoever invented that hates all living things  |
|
|
|
This coin is new and there are tons of FUD? Wow seems interesting.
Always a good sign. We are in the dip before the rise that most new coins on Bittrex go through. 90% of the time you can get x2 in 48 hrs. We shall see in the next 24 hrs but looks good to me. Yeah, but i've done my math and it's quite expensive now. No more room to grow, will wait for a deeper dip in the coming days. lol what kinda math is that? fudimatics? investment has only just begun. if you sold your coins below 5k.. well.. tough. |
|
|
|
Any good news?
none im afraid. ive sent out an update via pm to all investors. we're delayed to the point where we're a bit stuck but im making arrangements to get us moving forward. Best Regards, Coinler |
|
|
|
|
ive got a contact for a good mac wallet dev if you need one.
|
|
|
|
roadmap looking good for this coin. I like the stability of the price also, you know it will not be dumped to 2200 like XST as it is a true value at the moment and can only go up. It usually floats between 9K and 11K so buying now is smart I think.  Yeah really GREAT looking roadmap, looks very much like the I/OCoin one. We are more ahead on our developments also.  looks good. the market looks good too returning to an organic growth pattern i believe. this road map looks the same for almost 3 months, beside the new wallet got finished. some things just take time. unless you're saying you think the devs are incapable of getting the coding done. been with vrc since the beginning as a miner and these guys know how to deliver. just they may not deliver on the day that you want to make money but then again.. what day dont you want to make money? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
