Bitcoin Forum
December 16, 2019, 02:49:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 185 »
21  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 30, 2019, 03:06:11 PM
There is no 'evidence' even if anyone signs with such old keys (it just proves, one was just able to sign - nothing else)  

If you have a key it serves to show you at least might be its original owner but, more importantly, it results in the burden of proof being transferred to others to prove that you are not.

Without having a key you are no different to anybody else who does not have a key, meaning the burden of proof is on you to show you were its original owner.

Craig Wright is a proven liar who has repeatedly perjured himself and presented multiple forgeries as supposed proofs which have been exposed as such. That you still want to believe his word in the face of the facts showing him to be a liar and a fraud, is beyond absurd.

22  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 30, 2019, 11:18:21 AM

You would'nt ask such Thing from Satoshi, would you?


I think you'll find that is exactly what this community would, and does, ask of anyone asserting themselves to be Satoshi, that they sign a message with one of his keys. While that doesn't necessarily prove without doubt that such a person is Satoshi it would transfer the burden of proof to us to then show that they are not the original owner of the key they signed with.

So, seeing as Craig has not provided such cryptographic proof, what evidence do you have which would even serve to show he was aware of Bitcoin prior to 2013?

I'll answer that for you. You have zero evidence because there is no evidence. You are merely choosing to believe what you want to believe and that is solely derived from Craig, himself, making claims without proof.

Believing in claims that lack any evidence whatsoever is otherwise known as 'blind faith' and is not a healthy or reliable way to define the world around you.


23  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 30, 2019, 09:50:09 AM
and what only CSW is able to Report from the beginnings

I've not seen any evidence that CSW was even aware of Bitcoin prior to 2013. Do you have any that wasn't supplied (or 'leaked') by CSW himself?



I take it that's a no, hv_?

CSW has a history of 'assignment' of value to bitcoins he claims to own which are then proven to be other people's addresses. He has used this 'assignment of value' to claim rebates for cash from the ATO and, as seen in the Kleiman case, to pretend he owns addresses which are known to belong to Satoshi, none of which he has ever proven beyond his own assertion.

So I ask you again, what evidence do you have that CSW even held bitcoin prior to 2013, let alone was its creator?

24  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 29, 2019, 04:52:31 PM
is there a million bitcoins at Wright - is unknown, but the fact that they were with he - 100%

he either lost his keys or came up with the illusion of Fund to protect himself from burglars

LOL, sure, he owns a million bitcoins but decides to buy 17 for over twenty grand at its peak during the MtGox 'Willy Bot Bubble' of November 2013

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/
Quote
submitted 8 hours ago * by apoefjmqdsfls

As /u/winlifeat posted here, Craig was user 'e62d5e53-0dbc-44be-9591-725cd55ca9dd' at the Mtgox exchange. With this identifier, it's possible to look up his trades in the 2014 leak. I posted the raw data in this pastebin, you can import it into spreadsheet software like Excel to play with it yourself.

He started trading at 22/04/2013, this is just after the crash of the April 2013 bubble (or the 'Cyprus bubble'). He lost interest pretty quickly, because activity stopped 27/04, only to come back 25/11 around the peak of the last bitcoin bubble. His average price is actually $120 and he bought around 50 bitcoins, but his last buy was 17 bitcoins at around $1200. He ends up with a balance of just under 15 bitcoins when mtgox shuts down, so he probably lost another few bitcoins with trading. (The trade data in the leak stops at November 2013)

25  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 29, 2019, 01:58:40 PM
and what only CSW is able to Report from the beginnings

I've not seen any evidence that CSW was even aware of Bitcoin prior to 2013. Do you have any that wasn't supplied (or 'leaked') by CSW himself?

26  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Chatgasm - fake team! on: August 29, 2019, 12:49:47 PM
Considering the roadmap in their ANN thread claims they've been working on developing this platform since 2017 it begs the question of why they only recently bothered to register the .io domain for it:

Quote
Domain Name: CHATGASM.IO
Registry Domain ID: D503300001055537303-LRMS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2019-08-18T20:30:59Z
Creation Date: 2019-06-19T04:25:35Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2020-06-19T04:25:35Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: NameCheap, Inc
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@namecheap.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.6613102107
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: WhoisGuard, Inc.
Registrant State/Province: Panama
Registrant Country: PA
Name Server: NS15.FLAUNT7.COM
Name Server: NS16.FLAUNT7.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2019-08-29T12:42:00Z <<<

What with this and the deletion of reasonable questions concerning the supposed project team this stinks of the usual scam ICO attempt. Flag supported.

27  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 28, 2019, 05:19:34 PM
I don't think this was mentioned during the trial and that might be on purpose. Ira Kleiman has no interest in debunking Dave's involvement with Craig since that might raise questions if Dave/Ira was/is entitled to 50% of Craig's BTC holdings.

Of course. Let's not forget that it serves CSW's claim to be Satoshi in his wrangles with the ATO over the money they say he scammed from them which was entirely predicated on his supposed significant bitcoin holdings. As long as he is being accused of stiffing someone out of billions of dollars-worth of bitcoins then he can pretend like he had those coins at some point and so totally didn't defraud the ATO out of millions of dollars several years ago.

As an asides from the circus surrounding the million+ bitcoin which we know he doesn't have and, also, that there's no reason to believe he was even aware of bitcoin until a few years after its inception, has there been any evidence presented which would even support Dave Kleiman as being Satoshi?

It suited CSW to convince the world that he and Dave were 'Satoshi' because then he got to contrive the extraordinary tale of the 'Tulip Trust' holding the keys to over a million BTC and, hopefully, get the ATO off his back. But if you remove all the falsified 'evidence' what are you left with to even propose that Dave Kleiman may have been SN?

28  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 27, 2019, 07:48:11 PM
Ok, I've a question for anybody in this thread who might have come across a suitable answer on the topic during this court process. I'm not claiming to be the first person to spot this (I think that kudos goes to this Redditor from 3 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4htw3t/how_to_steal_54_millions_of_dollar_from_the/ )

Dave Kleiman is listed in the UK's Companies House database as having been an officer of one of CSW's UK companes, namely, C01N LTD, (Originally called 'Design By Human Ltd' at incorporation in 2012, then changed to 'Moving Forward In Business Ltd in October 2013, before finally being renamed again, as 'C01N LTD' on January 2014)



We can see he is listed as having been appointed shortly after it's incorporation (when it was called 'Design By Human Ltd') and resigned as at the date of his death in April 2013



But, here's the thing, Dave Kleiman was appointed, and subsequently resigned, long after his death using back-dated dates of appointment and resignation documents filed in April 2014








Now, while filing back-dated appointment/resignation forms isn't that out of the ordinary, it is particularly questionable if it involves the deceased. Without there being supporting legal documentation proving that the deceased had previously accepted their appointment as an officer of a company, it runs the risk of looking like a fraudulent filing.

The issue here is:



Is there evidence that Dave Kleiman actually consented to act as director of this company back when it was still called 'Design By Human Ltd'? Evidence outside of the usual sloppy forgeries Faketoshi furnishes courtrooms with, of course.


29  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 26, 2019, 09:46:12 PM
I guess the main takeaway is that Craigy is now a rubber stamped and fully endorsed liar.

Oh the BSV fanbois will be spinning this into a win by the simple fact that they'll claim it shows that CSW must be Satoshi if he has been told to give half of the Satoshi stash to the Kleimans.

Although, as per the latest Coindesk article on this outcome:
Quote
According to the source, while the judge did not find Wright to be credible, he did not make a finding on whether or not Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin’s creator.


30  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 26, 2019, 09:01:21 PM
CRAIG FAKETOSHI WRIGHT BARBECUED IN FLORIDA

CASE LOST AGAINST IRA KLEIMAN, OWES 50% OF IP AND COINS MINED.

NO TULIP TRUST.

For anyone wanting a bit more info on the above, check out 22nd Century Crypto and Katie Ananina for a detailed blow-by-blow breakdown of the situation as it unfolded.

31  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: August 23, 2019, 10:55:24 AM


Craig: "I am Satoshi!"

Us: "Ok, can you sign a message with a key Satoshi would have had?"

Craig: *writes rambling diatribe about how keys are not proof of ownership*

Us: "Well, sure, being in possession of a private key does not necessarily prove you are the owner of either the key or the property the key grants access to, but the burden of proof is yours to support your claim to be Satoshi and your signing of a message with a key we know Satoshi originally owned at some point would then transfer the onus on to us to prove you are not the original owner of said key, surely?"

Craig: "You're all supporters of terrorists and paedophiles!"


32  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [FRAUD] LEOcoin scam making demonstrably fraudulent claims to con general public on: August 20, 2019, 03:29:46 PM
Just as an update, seeing as Roel N. de Leeuw (LEOcoin Foundation) has locked the LEOcoin thread even as his last post in it continues to desperately shill for this scamcoin, I've added this flag to his profile based upon his continued dishonest promotion even in the face of mountains of irrefutable evidence surrounding its corrupt founders, particularly Dan Gunnar Bjarne Andersson.

'Behind MLM' have a decent update on his situation: https://behindmlm.com/companies/leo/high-court-order-sheds-light-on-dan-anderssons-fraud-in-pakistan/




33  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Buy ChronoBank TIME on KuCoin.com! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 on: August 16, 2019, 12:20:51 PM
The author is a contributing writer profiling tech entrepreneurs and disruptive startups for Forbes for 2 years.
Based on what do you suppose the mention has been paid for?

Because that's the nature of the business model she is working within. The clue is literally written in the linkedin title for her - content marketing.

I've idly followed this ICO since inception, ever since I questioned why a known forum scammer was calling Sergei out in this thread demanding the return of several hundred of his illicit BTC he said he had been asked to temporarily loan it (likely to 'pad out' the ICO deposit address to increase the FOMO) and all I've seen come out of this project so far is exchange listing announcements and a wallet for ERC tokens.

It hasn't been a particularly productive few years for the actual labour market blockchain platform it was meant to have produced.

34  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Buy ChronoBank TIME on KuCoin.com! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 on: August 15, 2019, 09:20:49 AM
Sergei Sergienko, CEO of ChronoBank, featured in
Forbes
.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joresablount/2019/08/13/10-tech-entrepreneurs-you-should-keep-your-eye-on/


Featured?

Quote
Joresa Blount - Content Marketing Strategist - Early Growth ...
https://www.linkedin.com/in/joresab

Paying a marketer to post flattering artices in Forbes is not being 'featured in Forbes'.


35  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: July 30, 2019, 04:22:09 PM
However for someone who claims to be a lawyer you would expect more careful use of language.

Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer".

But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too.

36  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: 💥💥[Investment Bounty Program ][bitrok.uk] [instant 100k $ eth Bounty Rewards] on: July 29, 2019, 05:34:35 PM
Warning!!!
This is a ponzi scam
Anybody who supports
this will be marked
as a scammer

You have been warned!!!

See this thread for details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170018.0
37  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: TIRUS - Ponzi scheme + few related scam projects on: July 26, 2019, 12:46:48 PM
Good work OP, I've raised a flag accordingly: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1182356
38  Economy / Securities / Re: Reliable Partnership TIRUS 🚀 long-term source of income on: July 26, 2019, 12:40:50 PM
Warning - A flag has been raised against
the OP for promoting a ponzi scam
See this thread for details:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169101.msg51957392#msg51957392
39  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: DeOS (by Razormind) is most likely a scam! EDIT: Ongoing investigation!!! on: July 02, 2019, 02:33:49 PM
Funny he is still "hiring people" under his fake company "Razormind"


https://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2017/01788_17IT.html

Is he still hiring? This case relates to early 2017.


40  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Livecoin.net Scam on: June 30, 2019, 05:25:33 PM
It turned out that they had such a point of the rules

Quote
The Customer guarantees not to disclose any information, obtained from the Service support operator, in any channels of communication. Violation of this rule will lead to the account termination without refunding of the remaining balance of the account.
but before that there was no such point!

Whether that clause was there recently or from before is irrelevant, it is illegal for them to refuse to return your funds to you. That's theft.

The most they can do for your supposed contravention of their T&C's is to bar you from using their services. They are not, under any circumstances, entitled to claim ownership of your balance on their platform as a result.

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 185 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!