8888 Days need to transfer timemint.. hude amount.
I moved my DAYs out of the original address, where the TimeMint is. I assume the TimeMint is no longer working? Can I put them back? |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for that explanation. If you don't mind a few extra questions:
1 - So I take it these Timemints are valuable in a sense. I assume they work automatically and in order to keep them I need to control the private keys for the address?
2 - Is there a way to see a timeline of all the halving power of the timemints with the exact dates?
3 - Which tokens are the valid ones? YESTERDAY tokens are worthless?
|
|
|
|
Probably not the first guy asking this, but can someone explain the whole idea like I am a 6 years old.
I bought some day tokens back at the ico and now I don't know if it's worth keeping them or selling them?
I have 788 DAY tokens at the original purchasing address + 254 YESTERDAY tokens, which I seem to have moved from the original address to a new address.
In my opinion it is really worth keeping . Several reasons will make sense to you. First you have enough tokens to be a timenode where in your Day tokens are tasked to execute future or scheduled transactions for the EAC protocol. Second with the Day token's limited supply rest assured that your token will be worthy because of rarity factor. Last would be its role in the Ethereum ecosystem is essential to the development of it. Thanks for your reply, but I still don't know how all this works. What is a timemint? Why are there YESTERDAY tokens and are they different than DAY tokens? |
|
|
|
|
Probably not the first guy asking this, but can someone explain the whole idea like I am a 6 years old.
I bought some day tokens back at the ico and now I don't know if it's worth keeping them or selling them?
I have 788 DAY tokens at the original purchasing address + 254 YESTERDAY tokens, which I seem to have moved from the original address to a new address.
|
|
|
|
Update: We sold our ETH last week between 7th and 9th of February for a total consideration of USD 21MM (Average price of 814$). Wasn't it wiser to wait and sell at a higher price? Wasn't this something the investors should have voted for? |
|
|
|
|
Anyone knows why I haven't received the 30% bonus
I have received around 28%
CEO is not responding to my emails, which I definitely don't appreciate.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, how is the bonus calculated?
(ETH x 220)*30%
Please clarify.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Am I the biggest investor  |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I am disappointed too. The most important thing of the whole ICO and they got it wrong. Not a good start.
|
|
|
|
Any chance there will be modifications to account for ETH's recent increase? The "1 ETH = 220 tokens" plan was made when ETH was around $200. It's now nearly double that. In other words, the plan was for investors to obtain REAL tokens at around $1 each; now, investors would have to pay around $2 each.
There's been no change in what REAL brings to the table in that time, but now they stand to collect double their planned ICO proceeds merely because of a substantial change in ETH valuation. The end result being that investors stand to receive half the value they were intended to get. And, assuming REAL did a good job valuing their offering when initially announcing "1 ETH = 220 tokens," the current ETH exchange rate means REAL will start out being substantially overvalued.
I like the promise of the platform, but would be much more comfortable investing if the exchange rate were modified to give investors the value that the team had originally planned to provide.
Good point. They recently halved their soft and hard caps, because their target is around 30 MM USD for soft cap and 60 MM USD for hard cap. Given that the price will most probably reach $400 it seems they need to reduce their caps again to around 75,000 ETH soft and 150,000 ETH hard. |
|
|
|
It made our day!!  I don't get why this guy is considered an authority in the crypto world. For all I know I am more successful than him, just I am not boasting about it. |
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if you guys realise, but the pre-sale was just a registration form for people who want to invest over 100ETH.
No ETH was sent yet, so they haven't collected anything.
They asked for your ETH address and how much exactly you want to invest and will be checking the addresses today to make sure you have at least that amount.
But the ETH will be send on 31st.
|
|
|
|
Are they seriously asking for all this information for all pre-sale participants? |
|
|
|
1 - Your current sale is no different to what you are describing. You currently use 2 currencies (ETH + BTC) and 2 blockchains. If you used a Smart Contract you would still use 2 currencies (ETH + BTC) and 2 blockchains. There is no difference, apart from more security for you investors when using a Smart Contract, because then the token release is automatic. Now every investor has to trust you, that you will do as promised. This is the exact opposite of what the Smart contracts was designed for. And your point about fraud is equally relevant with or without Smart contracts. Actually it is more likely without a Smart Contract.
2 - I am not arguing over the existence of all investors' ether transactions. My point is that no tokens has been created. Please explain to me what Your token balance: XXXX means exactly. What tokens are these?
3 - You will be using ERC-20 tokens, but you won't be using a Smart Contract?
1) In our previous posts, we have already explained you the technical details and our approach, and how it will protect our investor. There is no need to repeat it twice or even three times. It is based on the many-years-successful expertise of our team, that we totally trust and believe in. The investor trusts the project and the team behind it. And we have it all. We do appreciate your opinion and respect it. We are also kindly asking you to respect bitcointalk participants and do an effort not using red colors while expressing your opinion. Thank you in advance. 2) The token balance on the account is a number of tokens that the investor will receive on his personal respective cryptocurrency wallet by the end of DMarket Tokens Sale phase #2 Everything is clear, transparent and equal for all DMarket investors. 3) . It is based on smart-contract technology as every token on ETH network. Once again: the combination of our service and smart contract technology of token sale will guarantee simplicity, reliability, clarity, and safety of the contributions and token accrual to the personal wallets of contributors. 1 - I appreciate you trying to explain it, but what you are saying still makes no sense and the reasons behind are invalid. You again failed to provide a valid reason why your method is better than a Smart Contract. 2 - That is the reason I said the number is cosmetic. There is no such token created yet = there are no transactions associated with it. 3 - You are absolutely contradicting yourself. First you say " As the Ethereum smart contract won’t be driving the marketplace, we’ve chosen the simplest and the safest way for token distribution during the token sale." and then you say " We will use a smart contact to distribute our tokens after the Token Sale phase#2" I see that a lot of people trust you, but when you fail to provide clear answers then for me that's a sign to be vigilant and I urge all your investors to so the same.The facts are: 1 - There is no valid reason not to have used a smart contract during the sale. 2 - I asked twice if akhavr was part of your team and you chose to be silent about it and neither confirm it, nor deny it. This clearly shows a lack of transparency. |
|
|
|
Hi! Thanks for the questions.
We don’t use the smart contract technology on the first stage. We have developed our own service which
allows us to process incoming transactions from different blockchains because smart contracts at Ethereum
can’t control transactions on bitcoin blockchain. The decision to develop our service can be supported by
the fact that the software used on the main computer has been developed for decades, while the Ethereum
smart contracts appeared only a couple years ago.
2. Our service is monitoring all incoming transactions to our accounts. The service accrues tokens to the
contributors’ accounts and saves this in the database according to the token sale policy, as described on our
landing page. The contributors can see the amount of accrued tokens on their profile pages. If a contributor
would like to check the accuracy of the token accrual, they can compare the correctness of the calculations
with the information from the blockchain. In this case, the blockchain is the source of the primary data.
4. The service described above also helps us check every transaction twice before sending the tokens and
therefore ensure the safety of gathered tokens. All transactions done by the rules of the service will be
taken into account in full.
5. At that, we are planning on using a simplified smart-contract based on the OpenZeppelin framework (see
GitHub V2) at the end of the second stage of the token sale, which will allow us to solve two main issues:
1) Implementation of the ERC20 interface, which will allow trading our tokens on the external stock
markets.
2) Accrual of the tokens bought by contributors to their wallets using the smart contract feature.
As a result, the combination of our service and smart contract technology of token sale will guarantee
simplicity, reliability, clarity, and safety of the contributions and token accrual to the personal wallets of
contributors.
1 - That makes no sense. You can still use a smart contract for the Ether payments and your own system for the BTC payments. The benefit for your investors is that with a smart contract your tokens will be automatically and certainly distributed, while with your approach there is only a promise and nothing else. The whole point of using a smart contract is to avoid the middle man, which is you. You offer a project based on the Ethereum network, yet you don't use the one benefit it provides. That is counter-intuitive and can be interpreted as a possibility to scam. 2 - The blockchain only shows how much Ether you have received from each investor. No tokens exist yet, so the balance on your website is purely cosmetic. 4 - How can you possible believe that your manual approach is more secure than an automated contract? You are basically denying the underlying principle behind the Ethereum network. 1) Our token sale is currently available for two currencies, and we are going to add more options to choose from for the second round. A smart contract doesn’t allow to work directly with other blockchains. As we’ve already noted, it can include only one cryptocurrency. In this case, ETH. Unfortunately, not all of the investors are working with Ether. Those, who prefer other options, have to search for a way to transfer their coins to Ether, create an Ethereum wallet and invest in the ICO. We believe that all the investors should have equal opportunities. We decided on the current method based on a unified approach for every customer and the simplicity of the investment process. Unfortunately, even the smart contract doesn’t eliminate the possibility of fraud or scammers. Moreover, recently there were safety concerns with the usage of smart contracts. 2) You can use other sources - they will show you the same numbers. Calling it “cosmetic” equals to calling every blockchain transaction “cosmetic” as there is no access to the account. 3) As the recent months demonstrated both smart contract and multisignature wallets do not guarantee complete security. It all depends on who writes the code. We are creating safe and secure code for DMarket marketplace. As the Ethereum smart contract won’t be driving the marketplace, we’ve chosen the simplest and the safest way for token distribution during the token sale. 1 - Your current sale is no different to what you are describing. You currently use 2 currencies (ETH + BTC) and 2 blockchains. If you used a Smart Contract you would still use 2 currencies (ETH + BTC) and 2 blockchains. There is no difference, apart from more security for you investors when using a Smart Contract, because then the token release is automatic. Now every investor has to trust you, that you will do as promised. This is the exact opposite of what the Smart contracts was designed for. And your point about fraud is equally relevant with or without Smart contracts. Actually it is more likely without a Smart Contract. 2 - I am not arguing over the existence of all investors' ether transactions. My point is that no tokens has been created. Please explain to me what Your token balance: XXXX means exactly. What tokens are these? 3 - You will be using ERC-20 tokens, but you won't be using a Smart Contract? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
