Just a general question.... Is everyone currently mining here on ASICs? Or are there still some die-hard GPU hold outs?  No scrypt Asic's here There are many whales with huge datacenters full of gridseeds here. I was talking about my equipment, apologies for the confusion mate  |
|
|
|
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 50 nodes
Date: 5/20/2014 21:43
To: ak49er- payment for 1x Antminer S1 with broken fan controller
Debit: -0.30 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.0003 BTC
Net amount: -0.3003 BTC
Transaction ID: 9c6dbfcd04746880c971c203571c0378dfc95dd9eb266a8eb8949400cf873ff8-000
Payment sent for unit with the broken fan controller.
Tanks mate!
Thanks!!! All packed up and ready to go to post office tomorrow. Tracking info received  |
|
|
|
|
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 50 nodes
Date: 5/20/2014 21:43
To: ak49er- payment for 1x Antminer S1 with broken fan controller
Debit: -0.30 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.0003 BTC
Net amount: -0.3003 BTC
Transaction ID: 9c6dbfcd04746880c971c203571c0378dfc95dd9eb266a8eb8949400cf873ff8-000
Payment sent for unit with the broken fan controller.
Tanks mate!
|
|
|
|
Just a general question.... Is everyone currently mining here on ASICs? Or are there still some die-hard GPU hold outs? No scrypt Asic's here |
|
|
|
Im having an issue where the monitor does not show all the devises it has pinged. In the log they are responding just not displaying stats.
can you post a screenshot of what the browser status page looks like through your browser? M Yea I will sorry I been busy the last few days. Ill try to get that up tonight. 1.5 is looking awesome! I did however get this error again after attempting to use the browsers in the Ant Monitor. /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:448: Failed to execute function dispatcher target for entry '/'. The called action terminated with an exception: /usr/lib/lua/luci/sauth.lua:87: Session data invalid! stack traceback: [C]: in function 'assert' /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:448: in function 'dispatch' /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:195: in function </usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:194> Only 1 of my 3 Antminer S1 units is reporting this error after I attempt a login through FireFox. Also, 1 of my Antminers is not showing on the monitor. It was showing before the the issue above. I am sure a reboot of my S1 will resolve my issue (again) Should I have a certain version of IE installed? Thanks |
|
|
|
Scrypt-Based Mining now is just generally dead. I don't see the point anymore, even if you have Mh/s, you're still losing a LOT with electricity costs.
Some people have access to really cheap or even free electricity. True, however my single card rig (303KH/s) uses 240W solid when mining. I have it on for 9 hours each day during the night since mining scrypt is so unprofitable ~ at least for me anyway. Its around £9 a month now that I'm doing this minus a couple pound due to my solar panels which are grid tied. Pick up an R9 270 yo! Coupled with a Sempron 145 you can have a low power single rig pushing 430+ Kh/s and fairly low temps...should be under 175w! Also GOLD rated PSU or better helps a bunch. Sounds like a plan! Cheers! I had just checked my 3x 270 scrypt rig with my watt-meter and it was pulling +/-550W from the wall (3x 270, Sempron145, 4GB ballistix sport, 2.5" 500GB 7200 WDD Black and a single 140mm case fan) roughly 1.25 Mh/s with sub 70 degree temps and almost no HWE What PSU are you using? Are they undefvolted or overclocked? Currently they are on a Corsair TX750 but I am debating which PSU to upgrade to next since the TX750 is only bronze rated...I was running a Raidmax 850AE on my first scrypt rig that I sold and I run Corsair CS750M's on pairs of Antminer S1's. No voltage changes on any of my cards (as of yet) and only slight overclocking (+100-150 mHz) and NO changes to the memory clock. |
|
|
|
Scrypt-Based Mining now is just generally dead. I don't see the point anymore, even if you have Mh/s, you're still losing a LOT with electricity costs.
Some people have access to really cheap or even free electricity. True, however my single card rig (303KH/s) uses 240W solid when mining. I have it on for 9 hours each day during the night since mining scrypt is so unprofitable ~ at least for me anyway. Its around £9 a month now that I'm doing this minus a couple pound due to my solar panels which are grid tied. Pick up an R9 270 yo! Coupled with a Sempron 145 you can have a low power single rig pushing 430+ Kh/s and fairly low temps...should be under 175w! Also GOLD rated PSU or better helps a bunch. Sounds like a plan! Cheers! I had just checked my 3x 270 scrypt rig with my watt-meter and it was pulling +/-550W from the wall (3x 270, Sempron145, 4GB ballistix sport, 2.5" 500GB 7200 WDD Black and a single 140mm case fan) roughly 1.25 Mh/s with sub 70 degree temps and almost no HWE |
|
|
|
Hey everyone, need a bit of help, today itself I started using MultiMiner and now have encountered an issue: MultiMiner only checks profitability against BTC (coinchoose or coinwarz, doesn't matters which one you take)?! I tried even setting the program to not mine coins less profitable than LTC, but still it suggests and mines coins that are compared in terms of profitability to BTC!! I checked manually at both websites, and the profitability data given by MultiMiner is when compared to BTC and not LTC. So any help on how to correct this and mine coins compared to LTC in terms of profitability? I even tried using CGW, but in that app we can only set profitability check(vs BTC or LTC) while using coinchoose, and as I saw coinchoose has very fewer coins compared to coinwarz. When I chose coinswarz CGW also compared profitability against BTC, and not LTC.  So any useful help or suggestion is appreciated. I can look at adding this to a future update. CoinWarz didn't used to offer the Scrypt-based profitability via API. I think that is new. In addition, the CoinChoose.com coin list when using the LTC API feed is notoriously buggy and missing coins. That is why this feature was dropped quite a long time ago. Can you let me know how this would affect mining? Or is this only for viewing within the application? If a coin is profitable versus BTC, would it also not be profitable versus LTC? I would think the "most profitable coin" is the "most profitable coin", but I may be missing something. Hi nwoolls, I was basically talking feature-wise. However I prefer to mine a coin basically vs LTC in terms of profitability due to my certain calculations. Everyone has their at least one unique formula to mine cryptocoins know (though I'm not an expert in the cryptomining world). Btw, when do you plan to issue the next update? Will you be including new coin algorithms, as well as support for sgminer/sph-sgminer?? Thanks LTC profitability is based of BTC as Bitcoin is THE base coin from which ALL cryptocurrency values are based off. |
|
|
|
Would you mind posting up a "time stamp" pic of the miners (your Bitcointalk.org and date username on a sheet of paper in front of the miners)? Thanks! |
|
|
|
Anyone else has problems with last payout?
I can see in my payout history entry from 6:02 and with exact same time in my wallet. But last payout is in history at 10:05 but nothing in my wallet and nothing in blockchain for my address - even if this transaction should have allready few confirmations?!
My payout arrived as posted... 2014-05-20 10:03:12 The amount posted is in my wallet and confirmed. |
|
|
|
Is there a way to see all my rewards and when i got them? The statistics page only shows the last few days worth.
View the payout history page yo |
|
|
|
yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50% oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106 my 200% more payout for 22106 in other block is normal payout sounds like you got the jackpot! normal payout is 0.00703204, in block 22106 first 0.02003204 down to payout 0.01350420 Why did my reward from block 22106 go from .04 to .01 just now heh, mine went back up to my avg. payout amount |
|
|
|
Just ordered 2 S1's Order says paid awaiting shipping. If they out of S1's I'll gladly accept an S2 in its place  So far these are turning out to be some of the best miners I have bought Nice! I am another week or so from my next purchase...going to pick up 3 this next time. Next will be S2 and/or newer miner tech. |
|
|
|
My reward was also "cut in half".  I raised a ticket, and things will be sorted out as usual.  Yep 22106 was also half here.. email sent to support:) Regards M My payout was lower by 18% relatively to the proportional number of my shares. A possible explanation to this is a sudden rise in the pool hash rate towards the end of the block, which decreases the payout of all the other miners (but at the same time make a significant contribution to solving that block faster). Let's try to illustrate this with an example: The pool hash rate= 1800000 GH/s Your hash rate=200 GH/s your expected reward=0.002777778 BTC Now assume that Miner X joined the pool with 200000 GH/s a few minutes before the end of the block, due to Slush's 'anti-hopping' algorithm, Miner X's contribution receives almost full 'weight' despite occuring towards the end of the block, so the increased short-term hash rate at the end of the block is now 2000000 GH/s, your reward drops by 10% to 0.0025 BTC. This is not due to any 'fault' at Slush. Actually it might have been caused by a technical or other problem on one of the competing pools, which caused briefly a massive shift of miners to Slush as their 'backup pool'. Just my 2 mbtc. Enjoy the recent burst of solved blocks, which more than compensates for that 'disaster'...  Cheers Very well said mate. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone have a list of the current, top 10 Dogecoin mining pools?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to move my existing scrypt DMD pool over to groestl but can't get block submissions working. I'm using nodejs and keep seeing:
"We thought a block was found but it was rejected by the daemon"
I'm using the coin settings:
{
"name": "Diamondcoin",
"symbol": "DMD",
"algorithm": "groestl"
}
Tried enabling TX messaging as well, same problems. Does DMD work with node? I have a Groestlcoin pool that works fine on node, am I missing something? Do I need some groestl algo setting in my wallet config? Checked my wallets debug log and can't find anything there, can't even see a submitblock at the same time as node attempts to submit.
Check out the new MultiMiner...it's offering support for x11, groestl and others with v3.0! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=248173.0 |
|
|
|
AntMiner S1 0.452 BTC; S2 $2319 NINJATECH.ORG -Coupons For Previous Customers
$400 off S2 for previous S1 Customers.
$1919 for S2 unit if you bought a S1 at .63 BTC or less.
I was just checking out your store and prepping for my next order when I noticed the following message in red at the top of the page... "Minimum order amount for Bitmain AntMiner S1 180GH/S Miner - 0.893 BTC (Delivery in around 3-5 Business Days) is 2!" Was the minimum order amount changed recently? Thanks! Ah well, either way looks like I am ramping up to purchase 3x S1's on this next order, might put me back another week but all good |
|
|
|
Shame this isn't a UK service. I'm looking for someone who can help nearby as I'm running through numerous prototypes. Great idea though and good luck! Check out www.3dhubs.comwww.MakeXYZ.comwww.Maker6.comYou might be able to find someone local to ya mate! Apologies on the late reply...I did not receive any notifications from Bitcointalk.org about any new posts. This is something ive been looking for ever since I cut the bottom of my plenum box in my truck to get to the Blend Door.
how does this work? if I cut a piece out of cardboard stock and send it to you - to the exact dimensions you can make what I cut out?
The piece I need is roughly the size of a 3" x 5" card. 95% is just a flat piece with a recessed round divot the size of like a dime
Yo, just sending you a PM now, apologies for the delayed/late reply, I didn't receive any notifications from the forums about a new post in my thread edit: I am now set to receive notifications of new postings in this thread, yay! Pics coming soon! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
