|
1085
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [GIZMOcoin] 10% Rewarded PoS | 9% Sig Campaign Distributed | NEW is coming..
|
on: April 15, 2015, 09:06:33 PM
|
GIZMOcoin block explorer added. OP updated.  GIZMOcoin development roadmap "GIZMO's GREAT ESCAPE" will be up later today  Perfect timing, because I've got an issue. Need to know who to yell at. Did a transfer to Bittrex last night and it's not showing up on the blockchain. Here's the thing, I didn't know there was an update to the wallet and I would have sent it with the old one, which was working that evening for transfers just fine. In wallet the transaction is showing 284 confirmations, but transaction ID doesn't show up. Ok, found something here. My balance seems to be listed at the wallet's receiving address. Since I was staking and coins I was sending were part of that, would that be the root of the problem? How can we sort this out? Was a fair bit, half a mil. You should try to repair you wallet with that command from debug window then console and write help. Repair wallet command and this will resolve your problem. Here's what info I've got from the blockchain. This is the wallet address I transferred into. It shows a Balance of 567,798.52002918 GIZ. Received 586,039.84473749 GIZ in 4 transactions Sent 18,244.09705973 GIZ in 1 transactions Staked 2.77235142 GIZ in 2 transactions Balance showing in wallet: 0.02184294 Transaction ID does not show up in blockchain. Bugger. |
|
|
|
|
1086
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [GIZMOcoin] 10% Rewarded PoS | 9% Sig Campaign Distributed | NEW is coming..
|
on: April 15, 2015, 08:52:12 PM
|
You should try to repair you wallet with that command from debug window then console and write help. Repair wallet command and this will resolve your problem.
FIrst thing I tried. Nada, no go. Returns "true", good wallet. I think it must have something with the staking last night. I had old wallet and I was. In fact, I specifically transferred a Big chunk over from trex to stake, then I turned it around and sent it back. That's when things got messed up. Not something you normally do of course, check the BCT thread of a coin before you do a simple transfer. *sigh* |
|
|
|
|
1087
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: The cost of electricity in the world
|
on: April 15, 2015, 08:42:13 PM
|
I pay canadian 7 cents.
In bulk we can get it down to 5 or even lower
Exactly! Why does everyone hype Iceland all the time? Their duty tax on electronics can be something fierce as well. Factor in your cost of living, moving, doing anything. We've still got -40C winters here in Manitoba as well, great for overclocking. |
|
|
|
|
1088
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [GIZMOcoin] 10% Rewarded PoS | 9% Sig Campaign Distributed | NEW is coming..
|
on: April 15, 2015, 05:17:15 PM
|
GIZMOcoin block explorer added. OP updated. GIZMOcoin development roadmap "GIZMO's GREAT ESCAPE" will be up later today Perfect timing, because I've got an issue. Need to know who to yell at. Did a transfer to Bittrex last night and it's not showing up on the blockchain. Here's the thing, I didn't know there was an update to the wallet and I would have sent it with the old one, which was working that evening for transfers just fine. In wallet the transaction is showing 284 confirmations, but transaction ID doesn't show up. Ok, found something here. My balance seems to be listed at the wallet's receiving address. Since I was staking and coins I was sending were part of that, would that be the root of the problem? How can we sort this out? Was a fair bit, half a mil. |
|
|
|
|
1090
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: GPU and CPU
|
on: April 12, 2015, 05:53:09 AM
|
So ive had enough of antminers, and am going to build myself a GPU rig.
However is it worth getting a decent motherboard with a quad core CPU and have it doing both CPU, and GPU mining or am I talking bollocks and it wont work ?
Any advice, experiences would be great to hear about.
Nope! For GPU mining your best path is to get the most energy-efficient GPU you can, used if possible, and slap it on the cheapest piece of shit motherboard you can find. I've got two 2.2 Ghz P4's actually nailed to the wall downstairs. Under $15 each. 40G hd's, 1G ram. The two 6950's that they're running don't know the difference, or if they do, they don't seem to care. Invest the difference in Gelid coolers, you WILL need them and they'll increase your performance while saving your hardware (resale value!). These do just fine, even on 7950's. http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/MX40080The best power/performance ratio for CPU is still the FX-8350. You will pay double for 20% more performance with Intel. With good cooling, still under $100 (or half the price of the chip), you can match any 4-core I7. 9370's and 9390's are just binned 8350's, tested to run at higher clock. That benchmark by the way is my own 8350 at 5.25 Ghz. |
|
|
|
|
1091
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TEC] Tecoin - COMMUNITY TAKEOVER - TRADING - HEFTY-1 ASIC-Res. Algo
|
on: April 11, 2015, 11:39:02 PM
|
Uh... ok. From what I can understand, you're talking about the usefulness - or lack of - of Bitcoin and alts. I'd love to see the coins have mass-adoption. But, for now... Also, thanks for the support  Exactly. So what else can it be? Can we make a game of it? I know that sitting here trying to just crowbar the latest Killer App out of of our brains isn't easy, but perhaps if we start with most basic properties we can see something new. I originally got into crypto because I saw Dogecoin poising itself to be a social media tipping platform, and thus a way to earn micro-payments on my photography. Is there some way it could be made to be more friendly with that environment? Unfortunately it has been a VERY long time since I've done any coding. How long? Well, the last full application I wrote was in Autocad Lisp... on Acad 12... the first Windows version of Autocad. I somehow don't think that my fluency in 6502 machine language is going to be helpful. On a side-note I just gotta say... working in a 64K environment teaches you to be TIGHT!!! I look at ANY wallet software and wonder why it isn't under 16K. I look at any software and wonder why it isn't a fraction of the size. I blame it all on these newfangled MULT and DIV op-codes. Made kids Lazy and it's been downhill ever since! Raggafragginsagafragin... |
|
|
|
|
1092
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XMG] M7M CPU mining discussion thread
|
on: April 11, 2015, 10:41:14 AM
|
hi im planning to mine magi using a 4670k. will it gain decent profits? or i should just buy at the exchange?
What hashrate do you have with this ? a 4790 mines 30 kh so im guessing a little lower than that With my i5-3570k I got 60 KH/s and 6XMG/day so with 30 KH/s he should have 3 XMG/day. shouldnt i get much higher than you? 4670k > 3570k right? did you oc your procy? Yep, he's better. But I haven't oc my CPU so I don't understand where does the error com from. 4790? This 4790? https://cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-4790K+%40+4.00GHz&id=2275Yes, you should definitely be getting way more. I can match that score with my bulldozer, but never denied that it takes a hefty overclock to do so. At stock 4.0 Ghz I get 15 Kh/s per thread. |
|
|
|
|
1093
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TEC] Tecoin - COMMUNITY TAKEOVER - TRADING - HEFTY-1 ASIC-Res. Algo
|
on: April 11, 2015, 06:24:24 AM
|
Yeah, me again. I tossed a few bucks on there and have been bouncing a few trades around. Scooping up a few coins and giving the impression establishing a bit of a base-line. Figured, its there, may as well have one. I find the crypto scene with it's "pinball score" numbers quite amusing. Wow! 200,000 something or others! Um... It's a dime. Anyways, gonna use the last of my consciousness tonight on a few thoughts. Coinage... Really? Not yet by a long shot. Can't buy a beer at the local with the biggest and the best, Bitcoin, so what does it say about all these... things, for that's what I'll call them. The only reason we think of this 'thing' as coin is because the first one was, and all the others are, but what is it really and what can we do with it? I'm quite good at re-purposing things. Seeing them for what they are and finding ways to use them. Example... I've stripped down dozens of VCR's because their motors have almost friction-less bearings, and they're great for things like swivel mounts for monitors, or the base for my motorized telescope mount. That's just the start. You should really see my place, because it's fairly mad. I live in the upstairs of a renovated barn, so there's no vertical walls. High ceilings means space for mounting things, second floor door features a drawbridge to the deck, with a trap-door in it to haul wood up. And so on. So let's look at what this "thing' is, the block-chain, list its core properties and really THINK about what can be done with it. Because unless I can grab a beer at the local with it, it sure ain't coinage. How do you deal with your lions and dragons? I nail mine to the ceiling. |
|
|
|
|
1096
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin | WPX | ECC | O(1) routing | Random ports | CoinPP | POW/POS
|
on: April 10, 2015, 01:11:59 PM
|
ROFL
These fuckers are buying at incredible spreads thinking that this shitcoin will go on like this forever
this coin is better than any coin out there , so tell me why you see it as a shitcoin please? Problem is, it isn't "out there". What's wrong with this picture? Net hash = 300 Gh/s Rank Donor User Name KH/s VNL/Day 1 anonymous 99,931,580 13,910.653 2 kuyiuyzj 63,457,932 8,833.457 3 anonymous 9,162,597 1,275.450 4 vnl1234 8,142,145 1,133.401 5 anonymous 7,884,051 1,097.474 6 anonymous 6,751,714 939.851 7 |
|
|
|
|
1097
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BSTY2] Community Takeover of GlobalBoost-Y, following 51% attack
|
on: April 10, 2015, 12:00:49 PM
|
You don't need to explain me how using my computer for other needs amortizes cost. The whole point of my miner is that it's fire and forget. I mined while playing Qbeh-1{2} but for some more AAA action I'm currently mining and playing Borderlands 2{3}! I see things the other way around. Most people buy computers because they have other needs than mining. Most probably don't even consider mining when they buy it. However if they later find they can earn a few bucks each month mining, while the computer is idle, why not. It may even turn out that mining will amortize the whole computer cost within a year or two, so this would be really sweet. Lots of people will join in to mine. So the mining reward is very important, if you want to get all these users. And you do want to get all of them, to make a coin secure. Consider a coin with 100 million home-miners. That's pretty tough even for a government to attack. If not impossible. If the incentive is there, they will come eventually. If you want fire-and-forget miner, most already are, they set priority to IDLE, or even a better way to do it is to set it to PROCESS_MODE_BACKGROUND_BEGIN (win32). And you can tune it a bit, if it still hinders your performance, so you won't feel it at all when running (other than hearing the vents revving). My current CPU is an AMD 450 X3. It does not seem to have the power consumption characteristics you mention. Besides, being passively cooled, I cannot run it full load for much time and I don't see any good reason for which anyone should buy more powerful stuff.
That in particular won't be too good, but the majority of cpus are decent enough to turn a profit, if the right reward is there. What I'm talking about is bringing mining to the masses. GPUs have become proper turing-complete architectures about a decade ago therefore they can run everything a CPU can whatever they're efficient at this is another matter. Yescrypt is not compute-oriented and therefore won't be accelerated by compute-oriented architectures.
I'm not criticizing GPUs in general. But the fact is that the wide majority of users don't have a GPU that will turn a profit when mining. Once again, my goal would be getting *most* people into mining. The advantage over purpose built mining rigs is simply security. You can't compete with the kind of computing power that all the average users combined would bring into cryptos. GPUs are still ok, many users still have them, and they're readily available at your local computer store. However GPU algorithms can be implemented into ASICs if the incentive is there, that's why they're evil. So it's easy for a government to attack these kinds of coins. And the worst case scenario is bitcoin. Governments, have the ability to do a 51% percent attack on bitcoin right now at no cost, if they pass a law to seize all the ASIC farms. You probably already know, but since it's a public thread, let me make the point that ASIC farms exist because of the economics of manufacturing and purchasing ASICs, you'll get them a lot cheaper if you buy this hardware in mass. You can even develop it, at this level. And I believe (though I might be incorrect) that cex.io alone has enough hashpower to 51% attack bitcoin right now. If they're legitimate they have no incentive to do it, but still they put all the hardware in one place, ready for the government to seize. Hence, the evilness. The higher rewards at the beginning structure is completely 180 to what it should be. This is what kills coins... Cypher right now... Rank Donor User Name KH/s CYPHER/Day BTC/Day 1 anonymous 9,614,267 154,653.797 6.6501 2 anonymous 775,289 12,471.198 0.5363 3 anonymous 252,787 4,066.303 0.1749 4 Monero30 158,558 2,550.538 0.1097 5 GPdigger 132,088 2,124.745 0.0914 Net hash... 32 Gh/s. One user.. NINE Gh/s??? A QUARTER of the network?!? Or START... Rank Donor User Name KH/s START/Day 1 overxltc 2,266,663 2,929.652 2 overnoob 2,124,156 2,745.463 3 overx11 934,766 1,208.181 4 neptvey 405,496 524.101 5 anonymous 399,217 515.986 Pool rate of 12 Gh/s, with 8,000+ users. Sick! Now combine that MASSIVE level of disparity with that reward structure? Why the hell would anyone want to mine a coin that's already mostly owned by under ten miners, or possibly only ONE! I honestly don't even know why anyone participates in a system like this. This is the last thing you want for network security. It's called a "distributed" network for a reason. So are we inventing new currency or just another tool for speculative purposes? Currency is meant to be used, and carried around in your pocket... like as in your phone.... so, coin... only mined with Android device, the 'wallet' that you carry around. To prevent virtual node farms, link it to a mobile phone number. Now nobody has much of an advantage, the network has the distribution it needs, and it's actually useful. Might want to check out MUE. Good dev, good philosophy, launched with no hype and with slow steady growth. Right now the GPU implementation of Quark algo gives GPU's about a 10:1 advantage (on my machine, 7970+R9-290 on an FX-8350). I think that's about the closest we've got right now to a GPU/CPU hybrid. Edit: Holy crap! Worst case yet! Vanilla: Rank Donor User Name KH/s VNL/Day 1 anonymous 99,931,580 13,910.653 2 kuyiuyzj 63,457,932 8,833.457 3 anonymous 9,162,597 1,275.450 4 vnl1234 8,142,145 1,133.401 5 anonymous 7,884,051 1,097.474 6 anonymous 6,751,714 939.851 Net hash of 300 Gh/s. Two users have 51%+ 7 |
|
|
|
|
1100
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: I need qubit rigs for this evening
|
on: April 07, 2015, 10:19:43 PM
|
Hi all, i've invested in the cyphercoin ico but i'm not feeling enough into it, so i'm looking for a couple of rigs with this algo. Honest prices please.
I've got a 7950 and an R9-290 I could toss at it. Looks like I'll get around 12 Mh/s. Just toss me settings, point and shoot. Not exactly the most valuable service in the world so, don't worry about it, future consideration ("There will come a time when I may ask you for a favor...") It's so kind of you to hear that! In final i wasn't able to be online during the launch, however thanks mate! Hope to do deals with you in the future! As it turns out, you're not missing much. Check this... Right now the net hash-rate stands at a 18,488.62 MH/s. Yes, gigahash. One user is showing 9,277 Mh/s. My cards are doing around 10 Mh/s. So that one user is in front of approx TWO THOUSAND hefty videocards!!!! That Is In Sane. Shit, now he's showing over 10... look at the top list. 1 anonymous 10,520,600 460,915.361 2 anonymous 1,452,081 63,616.737 3 anonymous 1,441,009 63,131.675 4 Destined 688,052 30,144.073 5 anonymous 563,745 24,698.070 6 getgo 382,709 16,766.773 7 anonymous 284,858 12,479.833 Now we're all used to the modest mining farms, can't get around em. But this... No, there's got to be something funny going on with that algo. Someone with a kernel that's 10X as efficient as anyone else's (I'm looking at you Wolf0). Geocoin is like this too... Rank Donor User Name KH/s GEO/Day 1 anonymous 849,728 967.058 2 kuyiuyzj 834,096 949.268 3 teomihsav 158,355 180.220 4 anonymous 95,582 108.779 5 daveolake 74,955 85.305 Those first two users totally blow the curve. I've really got to learn GPU coding. I was gonna crank at this for a while but I'm overwhelmed by the futility... And I've got a coin that I'm almost single-handedly hashing right now. https://te.suprnova.cc/Why isn't it being noticed? No outlandish and completely unrealistic promises. No meaningless graphic drivel. No Turboencabulator financial bullshit-double-speak that says nothing. No meaningless white paper. No wonder. These small coins are worth supporting though, because they're not made to flash and burn. Heavycoin algo. I'll post the CGminer version and settings if you want to mine it. Come to think of it, I should anyways. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/97iq9eeb1q0e7fw/AAAESeIxC29idraF7yzdTWz8a?dl=0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
