{
"blocks" : 1090,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.03301856,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 1360105,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

I think I was the only one mining this for some time.  303 coins, did I mine 30% ? Interesting... I feel... IMPORTANT!   

Learn something new every day.  My instinct is to push it till it moves, crank it to 11, but that doesn't work with the R9-290.  Doesn't work because it's throttling for power considerations long before you're hitting 1150.  Just dropped my voltages right down and finally got 23.5 at 1125, I-20.  New understanding of how to handle this card will make for better benchmarks, for true.

Oh, nice price jump today, from 60k to 70k.  Yeah, I'll take credit for that.  Put some orders up last night, woke up to find that I basically owned it on Cryptsy!  Drop a line with your DMD wallet address, I'll give you well earned reward from my ill gotten gains.

Sure!  Here's a quick cut 'n' paste from the /help.  These algos supported.

                          scrypt       scrypt(1024, 1, 1) (default)
                          scrypt:N     scrypt(N, 1, 1)
                          sha256d      SHA-256d
                          blake        Blake
                          cryptonight  CryptoNight
                          fresh        Fresh
                          heavy        Heavy
                          keccak       Keccak
                          lyra2        Lyra2RE
                          neoscrypt    NeoScrypt(128, 2, 1)
                          nist5        Nist5
                          pentablake   Pentablake
                          quark        Quark
                          qubit        Qubit
                          shavite3     Shavite3
                          skein        Skein
                          s3           S3
                          x11          X11
                          x13          X13
                          x14          X14
                          x15          X15


Edit:  WHUPS!!!!  That's not this cpu-miner, that's THIS cpu-miner...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841401.0

https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases

MUCH faster.  32 and 64 bit versions right there.

And then as usual everyone fights each other to sell the fastest and cheapest, so everyone tanks.  Guts!  Just... sheer... nerves of steel... right.

Nope and nope but you can crank your clocks up until they squeak.  I've found power limit at about 1150/1500, then x11 throttles the core clock down.  Unfortunately it's a matter of power, not temperature, so cooling isn't the thing at that point. 

I'm disabled and on disability.  I have no prospects and my body is slowly falling apart.  I hurt all over and there is nothing I can do about it.

Are you sure you're running the right algo?  Tell us more about WHAT you're running and how you're running it.   Software, hardware, that kinda stuff.

Hmmm!  Sure is a memory hog!  Glad I just tightened up the timings tighter than a snare-drum.  7 threads on an FX-8350 running at 5.0Ghz.  I'd feel better if it wasn't telling me "hashespersec" : 0   From peerinfo I'm gonna guess that rpcport=8876?

GX2?

7950's are great beastly cards and can be undervolted to 1.09V and still hit 1100/1500+ easy.  Therefore they're great for mining any damn thing.

They had nothing to do with it, that was the whole problem right from the start.  They had no input and were deliberately excluded.  Still one of the most beautiful places on earth, nothing can change that.


Waterfall-294s by Atomicat, on Flickr

Moved to a self-moderated thread so people can't tell you how stupid the idea is.  You seem to forget that this is all a zero-sum game here.  Why not let people just flip coins and reward or penalize themselves with the results?  Nobody MAKES money, it's just shifted around.  Hiding it in a cloud of nonsense changes nothing.  STUPID STUPID STUPID!!!

Kids these days.  Can't even add.

I quite agree.  The level of support, commitment, actually DOING THINGS puts most coins to shame.

Bullshit.

http://cointelegraph.com/news/112424/is-cointellect-a-scam

If there was anything with a return like that the big farms would be all over it.   That 2 euros a day is what they pay you to spread the word.

Ignore them, it's a why not situation.   I don't understand why people aren't mining Diamond, far and above the most profitable out there.  Ah shit.... there are optimized miners for ATI, but I don't see a ccminer variation.  Might wanna take a look around though.  Or... I could look just one page further and find an Nvidia miner on their main page.  DUh!  Good luck!

http://bit.diamonds/

Kids these days, got no sense of history.



Ah stickit...

Nope!  HW errors still there and a ton of rejects on the 7950.  Dug up the Stilt 290 bios mods, picked a middle-ground one and it's much more agreeable shall we say.  Now I can overclock that properly for Diamond, check out this algo with the 7950, of course 7 cores for the Magi and my dance card is full!  *sigh*  Still won't really know if miner's working until I pick up a block and I'm still completely um... indescribable... Now I stopped programming a long time ago, 386-486 long time ago, but I programmed a lot for a long long time before that, back past the Apple/Commodore 6502 can't mult or div back to punchcards and Fortran... and I can't imagine programing a set of tools like the qt wallet software, cgminer, minerd etc etc, and having NO FEEDBACK to see how they're communicating!  Why hasn't someone just added that in?  The wallet is the pipeline, no?  It coordinates, hands out work etc etc, so, well you know what I'm saying.  It doesn't seem to be a problem to add a network bandwidth monitor, why not a simple readout to show connected miners?

And just now I notice two Found Blocks for pool 0!   And then I notice that the wallet hasn't synched and is 22 hours behind on block 5654 for some reason.  *sigh*  Time for something else for a while.

Interesting, dropped the mult on the 7950 from 9 to 8, increased hash from 80 to 110 proving that just because you can, might not be good.  Still get hw error on 2'nd card when dropped from 6 to 4.  I'll try starting separate instances, see if that works.  If not, well, that 290 is great for mining Diamond.

It's an XFX I just picked up last week.  Cards max out at --shaders 1792,2560 --shaders-mul 9,6.  Got three New block detected's so far and four Found Block's.  Four hardware errors on the 290, none on the other.

Could be card/driver/bios.  I just picked it up and haven't thrashed it into shape yet (damn, no hynix mem!)  I think the person who sold it to me thought they were dumping a lemon.  It had one of those awful blocks for a cooler and my jaw dropped when I saw it was idling at 80C!  But I intended to slap this Thermaltake 2.0 on it anyways, and now it stays under 70 no matter what the voltage or load.  Quite possible he might have cooked it a bit just trying to run anything.

So, one valid block somewhere because I'm at 5613 now.  Going to update those drivers, back in a bit.

Just got up to date!

Edit"  And now we seem to be back to waiting for work, ah, there we go, and a block found but not showing up in transactions, still showing block 5612

Same here, block 5611, network traffic twitches but that's it.  Interesting that cgminer is cranking away, for better or worse.  71Kh/s from the 7950, 125Kh/s and an occasional error from the 290.  Ha!  Just said it found two blocks, still at 5611 though and nothing in the transactions log.  Think I"m gonna update my drivers.

"version" : 30600,
"protocolversion" : 70003,
"walletversion" : 10500,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 5611,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 3,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 31.99957275,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1418052350074,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""

"blocks" : 5611,
"currentblocksize" : 1864,
"currentblocktx" : 3,
"difficulty" : 31.99957275,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : -1,
"networkhashps" : 1402,
"pooledtx" : 3,
"testnet" : false,
"generate" : false,
"hashespersec" : 0