$ ./bitcoin
./bitcoin: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin: undefined symbol: gtk_widget_get_realized
Fedora 12 You'll have to build your own Fedora binaries. bitcoin is built on a recent Ubuntu. (this is one reason why I'm pushing to remove Linux binaries from our distribution entirely, leaving it up to packagers for each OS) Ah, don't you mean I'll have to uninstall the repository OpenSLL package, download OpenSLL tar ball and rebuild OpenSSL with ECDSA and EC support and then I can build my own bitcoin binaries on Fedora? Any dependencies to watch out for when putting my home-built OpenSLL into Fedora that you know of? |
|
|
|
What if I like Redhat or CentOS?
Just install OpenSSL from a tarball (from http://www.openssl.org/source/ ) instead of from the repository. You may also have to link the static libraries libssl.a and libcrypto.a into /usr/lib Have you actually done this or are you saying "this could be done"? |
|
|
|
|
Different age groups have different wants/needs and therefore spending habits.
Young people who are mining now will probably spend it up cause they need stuff ... sex 'n drugs 'n rock 'n roll mostly and who can blame (I would if I was young again, i did then too ...)
Middle aged people tend to save more and oldest spend up again or bequeath. Comes around and goes around, v. hard to not look at it through you own prism and say wth?
Young fella just starting out is better off spending up and getting the woman of his dreams than salting BTC away on his memory stick "for investment" and being lonely at 45 ... just saying.
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that it is highly deflationary actually encourages people to accept it as payment ... it is the opposite of an impediment to adoption, it is in fact a huge incentive.
Just take a look at all the merchants who would love to be getting paid in BTC. And you can be sure they will spend it only if they really need to.
Tight-fisted, you sure, ya betcha.
|
|
|
|
Anybody figure out to check on the unconfirmed blocks?
No. Just increase your hashing power if you want to see confirmations quicker  $./namecoind listtransactions ... but you need the 'right' build for it get immature blocks. |
|
|
|
$ ./bitcoin
./bitcoin: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin: undefined symbol: gtk_widget_get_realized
Fedora 12 |
|
|
|
If the wallet is gone forever so are the coins....sorry.
Can the coins really be gone forever? Technically, the coins are still there in the database and if you knew the public address you could look them up on the block explorer. But it would be like staring at the blue fairy through 9 feet of ice ... you could never spend them because the private key that is needed to transfer them is what has actually been lost, deleted or otherwise rendered inaccessible by your wallet.dat file mishap. |
|
|
|
|
What if I like Redhat or CentOS?
Bitcoin just cannot be built cleanly on them without a protracted battle with repository nazis or jacking your system (think SElinux scrap)?
Basically, I'm SOOL if I want to build "officially" on anything RH derived is what you are saying, right?
|
|
|
|
$ make -f makefile.unix bitcoind
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -DUSE_UPNP=0 -o obj/nogui/util.o util.cpp
In file included from util.cpp:4:
headers.h:38:27: error: openssl/ecdsa.h: No such file or directory
$ openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.0b-fips 16 Nov 2010
Soooo, no ecdsa.h included with openssl 1.0.0b. Do I need to ruin my repository 'adhering' linux just to build bitcoin? What gives here? |
|
|
|
|
Anybody figure out to check on the unconfirmed blocks?
|
|
|
|
|
+1 grue
traded namecoins for bitcoins, no worries.
|
|
|
|
biochem: And I keep temperature automatically by changing corerate What's "corerate" ... is that utility in linux? |
|
|
|
|
Offers to sell 500 namecoins?
Send to: NAQEuQg41qgFycNMr7GPMaJfNR7kYQAmuG
|
|
|
|
-v
EDIT: you sound like a noob so you had better read the OP (and whatever else you can get your hands on) ... and watch the temp.s if you are going to thrash these cards with mining or you'll fry your cores....
$aticonfig --adapter=all --odgt
get nervous with core temp above 80 C ... I keep mine 70 or below.
-v drop GPU consumption to 70 on average. I've got few boxes with 2x5970 under archlinux and ubuntu, running for months and never have such problems like I've got with 6990, so I'm completely disoriented  And I keep temperature automatically by changing corerate Okay, sorry about the noob comment then. I would have thought the 6990 was v. similar to 5970 but there ya go. I think it sounds like from some of the other threads that SDK 2.4 and 11.4 driver is better with 6990 ... also maybe phoenix miner might be different with high AGGRESSION setting ... |
|
|
|
|
If you can transfer between players and deposit with non-bitcoin currencies isn't that as good as a poker/exchange site?
|
|
|
|
|
-v
EDIT: you sound like a noob so you had better read the OP (and whatever else you can get your hands on) ... and watch the temp.s if you are going to thrash these cards with mining or you'll fry your cores....
$aticonfig --adapter=all --odgt
get nervous with core temp above 80 C ... I keep mine 70 or below.
|
|
|
|
|
HELD would have to include coins 'lost' to date also ... time held on those is large (i.e. infinite), so probably need to be omitted from the calc. ... otherwise good idea, would be a useful measure, average time held.
|
|
|
|
|
It is the public that will be watching Anne Tompkins from here forward, not the other way around, and as it should be.
That's some pretty dangerous, inflammatory rhetoric to be tossing around like candy, for a public, prosecuting official.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
