Recent stock-to-flow ratio posts impressed me as the most interesting new price model to come out in years. But this thread is really for following masterluc IMO, although he no longer posts here of course. Maybe we should make a new thread about bitcoin stock-to-flow.
|
|
|
I reported the fake account to Twitter. Perhaps everyone should do so.
|
|
|
New post: The weekly candle above the BB will close - there will be a quick happiness for everyone.
|
|
|
Yea, I think people got excited too easily.
|
|
|
It must be a joke! Anyone want a few thousand shares?
|
|
|
Holders may be idiots in the current average mindset of the crypto crowd, but it was traders that crashed the market.
And it was traders that provided the huge run-up.
|
|
|
Native speaker says the last line is idiomatic. Basically means, "if it crosses the line previous stated, I was wrong/give up."
|
|
|
Кстати. Bitcoin сегодня исполнилось 10 лет :пивас:
|
|
|
Onward to the next decade....
|
|
|
Nice work to whoever put this document together. Johann is definitely a scammer, perhaps a psychopath.
|
|
|
Now that is already a classic post!
|
|
|
New from the master :
Полгода прошло с начала коррекции, осталось еще столько же. Стоки расхотели падать. Биткоин тоже. Чем дольше мы держимся на текущих уровнях, тем выше вероятность падения на новые низы.
Я думаю будет многомесячный боковик. Время теперь против медведей.
Поправка: тем НИЖЕ вероятность падения
|
|
|
I kind of understand your approach but wouldn't it be better and more effective to find out where you fail exactly in your strategy and then focus on fixing the broken part in a right way? I mean, not by offsetting one bias by another bias. If your approach works for you, then certainly stick to it, but it may fail you one day. For example, when what you automatically consider a bias is not in fact a bias but actual representation of the market situation.
Absolutely. Correcting mistakes in your strategies is also crucial. But OP asked about controlling your emotions, and I believe (a) that emotions are unavoidable to some degree for human traders, and (b) that they can be seen as some form of statistical biases. If removing these biases is not an option, then countering them in the way I described seems to be the next-best option. Since when do you have a new avatar, oda.krell?
|
|
|
WTF?! First they laugh at us.... 2024 over 100,000? Reminds me of PeterR's work on the network effect with price vs number of addresses years ago.
|
|
|
WTF?! First they laugh at us....
|
|
|
Given what bitcoin's price will become down the road we may have to make Pluto a planet again.
|
|
|
|