|
? You avoid the issue SRoulette. There were communication that took place over about a month. You are just wrong when you say only two messages. I still have them all saved...
Please explain why you felt it was a good idea to take our private conversation public in a locked thread?
Why did you feel you should be able to make claims when I did not have the ability to respond?
Will you in the future post potential investors PMs in public when they are not happy with the way you operate?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
You did not decline until yesterday and after I pointed out that your behavior was not acceptable if you wanted my BTC. False Chaang, you must be confused. We are sorry if we got your hopes up, but you approached us and were politely told not at this time. We then followed up to let you know your behavior is unbecoming of any business person and that we would not be interested in any business dealings with you. I can see why you lost your composure and reacted in the way you did, you thought we considered you as part of team and as someone giving us valuable advice (lol). We are sorry if we ever lead you on to believe you were more than a forum member who contacted us requesting to invest - I guess your ego prevented you from seeing a polite "not at this time" for what is was. Yes you did say "not at this time" but you said soon you would be ready. That is why I contacted you. Also OP Please explain why you felt it was a good idea to take our private conversation public in a locked thread? Why did you feel you should be able to make claims when I did not have the ability to respond? Will you in the future post potential investors PMs in public when they are not happy with the way you operate? Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
OP
Please explain why you felt it was a good idea to take our private conversation public in a locked thread?
Why did you feel you should be able to make claims when I did not have the ability to respond?
Will you in the future post potential investors PMs in public when they are not happy with the way you operate?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
oh smoothie... OP is a big boy, let him answer for himself, trying to derail the thread is not helping your buddy...
Goat, Oh you would love it if I was trying to derail the topic. Your background has much to do with your claims here and your shady wiggling actions you keep on portraying on this forum. BTW he is not my buddy. I just don't like you because you are scum. You have proven to be someone that anyone on this forum should not be listening to in any form or manner. My claims are facts supported by linked evidence  Deal with the topic. Just cuz you yell pirate does not mean OP was correct in what he did. I'm sorry you can not understand that... But keep yelling..
I'm not yelling pirate. I'm simply stating that your involvement in the shady business operations/investments (i.e. your track record) should be brought to light when taking "facts" from you as "truth".off topic rant yell yell yell, grow up buddy. you clearly are just trying to deal with off topic stuff cuz dealing with on topic stuff is too hurtful to your friend. im done with you an will no longer respond to your crazyness... |
|
|
|
Calling me names and attacking me does not really help your friends here in their actions. I did not force them to do what they did.
Oh little one...i'm not calling you names. I am calling you as what I see you as. SCUM.
Oh wow what did they do? Change a poll and post a PM publicly in a locked thread. OH NO it's the end of the fucking world!
Get a grip douche bag (yes that is me calling you a name), crying about someone not wanting to work with you and making up lame excuses to cry on here is only making you look more pathetic.
Keep trying! It suits you!
SmoothieI'm not OP. you can not blame me for that post but nice try buddy. |
|
|
|
oh smoothie... OP is a big boy, let him answer for himself, trying to derail the thread is not helping your buddy...
Goat, Oh you would love it if I was trying to derail the topic. Your background has much to do with your claims here and your shady wiggling actions you keep on portraying on this forum. BTW he is not my buddy. I just don't like you because you are scum. You have proven to be someone that anyone on this forum should not be listening to in any form or manner. My claims are facts supported by linked evidence Deal with the topic. Just cuz you yell pirate does not mean OP was correct in what he did. I'm sorry you can not understand that... But keep yelling.. |
|
|
|
|
oh smoothie... OP is a big boy, let him answer for himself, trying to derail the thread is not helping your buddy...
|
|
|
|
Calling me names and attacking me does not really help your friends here in their actions. I did not force them to do what they did. |
|
|
|
Whats the problem when this was recognizable as a joke? When you dont read it or dont think its funny its your thing. But you didnt get harmed or something. So i wonder what your interest is in here.
And speaking agains wikileaks... that only show that they are idealists with a backbone.
Thank you for bringing some reason to this thread. I (SRoulette) personally do support Wikileaks, I made the mistake of creating the Donation game for our site without clearing it with my other 2 partners. The concern was raised 3 weeks ago by ThePitHelper and CodeMonkey that we should remain apolitical. Rather than simply removing the games we decided to remove them from our advertising links at the page footer. They are still available to play, we plan to wait until the thread several pages deep in the gambling section before disabling the game and manually paying out its current jackpot donation to wikileaks. The same will be done for erowid. Leave wikileaks alone  Yeah I would Looks like they removed the game They shouldn't fold under pressure like that From me or the US govt? Life in jail I'm sure sucks... This is quite amusing to see Chaang try and take credit for the games. We patiently explained our (and specifically my) regret about politicizing our site and the reason why the game had already been removed from the footer, prior to him posting these comments. I do not think it is a big deal or dishonest. He said that he was only taking positive votes into account.
Let us say that he made a poll about whether or not someone was a scammer. He first had "yes" and "no" options and then he changed "no" to "of course" later to make the accused person look worse. If this were the case, I would say it is dishonest because his intentions were not good.
But that is not the case. The poll was about adding PPCoins to his own website. Changing "no" to "of course" did not hurt anyone and did not help him get more money. There were no good or bad effects of this other than making you mad. Why do you believe he had bad intentions? If his intentions were in fact bad what was he trying to achieve?
Indeed this was my reasoning for why the joke would have been taken in good humor, oh how wrong I was  My personal opinion was it was dishonest. This was sent to him in a PM. He then posted that PM in a public locked thread and responded to it.
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
False Chaang, we have ~ a brief discussion totaling 2 messages from each of us over the space of 1 2 days on the matter and we politely declined you. There was no ongoing discussion, you had no stake in our company at any time. Any mod wishing to audit our entire conversation history with Chaang to verify this is welcome to do so if Chaang also agrees to verify we are being factual while Chaang is being deceptive.
Could we get a MOD to verify SRoulette's claims about Goat lying about how much ongoing discussion there was in PMs about being business partners etc. This would expose Goat for the scum he is.I would have no problem sending the PMs to a Mod. They will have no doubt that there was talks about us working together. They could also show that OP lied when he said he declined working with us. That only happened yesterday. You will only show that OP is being deceptive. Remember he started this... |
|
|
|
|
Please explain why you felt it was a good idea to take our private conversation public in a locked thread?
Why did you feel you should be able to make claims when I did not have the ability to respond?
Will you in the future post potential investors PMs in public when they are not happy with the way you operate?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Your view on my investment skills does not make what OP did correct.
He took a PM personal advice in communication about us investing with him and posted it in a locked public thread.
You need to understand that I did not force him to do this and he did it out of spit because he did not live my advice or something, who know...
|
|
|
|
I unlocked it after receiving another abusive and belligerent PM from you. It was not our intent to offend you further. OP and I were having private conversations about working together and my investing in his operation.
He got upset when I thought his joke was not funny and said if he did stuff like this I could not work with him. He then responded to the private conversation in a locked public thread.
This is a warning to anyone who wants to work with this guy.
This is a half truth. Chaan approached us ~1.5 months ago wanting to invest and we politely declined, largely due to his involvement with Pirate and later GLBSE. It was quite scary honestly, he wanted to float our company on GLBSE then ~4 weeks later GLBSE tanks - it pays to be cautious. No further discussion with Chaang were had on the matter. During this PPC poll, but we did reconfirm we would not be working with him due to his recent behavior. We as a company enjoy a sense of humor and could not work with someone so easily offended. Unfortunately this only escalated matters. We are not upset just disappointed and regret that our joke caused Chaang so much personal anguish, this thread is to serve as an acknowledgement of our fault in the matter we will abide by forum protocol in regards to any polls we run in the future. You did not decline until yesterday and after I pointed out that your behavior was not acceptable if you wanted my BTC. You also were unprofessional when you took a private conversation and posted it in a public locked thread. Following forum protocol is key to having a business where you get your customers from here. I was giving you good advice and you had a fit and in a rage posted your sarcastic locked thread with a PM in it. I was giving you good business advice you abused my trust. |
|
|
|
|
OP and I were having private conversations about working together and my investing in his operation.
He got upset when I thought his joke was not funny and said if he did stuff like this I could not work with him. He then responded to the private conversation in a locked public thread.
This is a warning to anyone who wants to work with this guy.
|
|
|
|
|
My personal opinion was it was dishonest. This was sent to him in a PM. He then posted that PM in a public locked thread and responded to it.
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
|
|
|
|
|
His actions are his own. You can not blame me for them.
|
|
|
|
|
Responding to a private conversation in a locked public thread is clearly the way to deal with things...
OP was dishonest, and I could care less why you guys support his actions. It already shows me not to trust you either.
I do not see how using trickery and being dishonest is "funny" or acceptable.
Grow up guys.
|
|
|
|
Sorry about that. Paid Transaction ID: 6772c70e31031589e5557ea2e85a81f3c7c7bff2bc9e66127937259c42f61cee Said you paid out but did not... shock... |
|
|
|
Leave wikileaks alone Yeah I would Looks like they removed the game They shouldn't fold under pressure like that From me or the US govt? Life in jail I'm sure sucks... |
|
|
|
Leave wikileaks alone Yeah I would Looks like they removed the game Seems like a smart move.  |
|
|
|
Leave wikileaks alone Yeah I would |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
