I'm sorry for your loss  Don't be sorry, I'm not! I meant to express my sympathy for the pain you experienced by losing. Did you experience pain? Not really. You could say I was slightly annoyed. But being a bull I was also happy to have the opportunity to buy some at lower prices. |
|
|
|
I'm sorry for your loss Don't be sorry, I'm not! |
|
|
|
I'm spontaneously giving away 0.5 LTC to the following person:
LarraGyq7AqiK4cDLwQssp9aNEtGkGsTeR  Sent  Thanks for playing! |
|
|
|
To the OP: Don't feel too bad, I bought [too many] coins at [much higher than] $230. I'm still eternally bullish, and have had the opportunity a few times since then to add to my wallet at lower prices (eg, at $60 when I got the chance). I have no doubt in my mind that the rate will get back to (and far beyond) what I paid for them eventually, just a matter of time. Meanwhile, here's to hoping there are still more opportunities yet for buying coins under $100!!  Much higher than $230? How is that possible? ATH was $266, and a few hours before the crash the price was BELOW $230 - how did you manage to buy "much higher" than $230??? $266 = Much higher than $230 Yes, I bought a lot of coins at $265-ish. It was only up there for a few hours but it was very high volumes being traded, and I was in there buying :/ Edit: I just noticed my forum activity is now 266. |
|
|
|
To the OP: Don't feel too bad, I bought [too many] coins at [much higher than] $230. I'm still eternally bullish, and have had the opportunity a few times since then to add to my wallet at lower prices (eg, at $60 when I got the chance). I have no doubt in my mind that the rate will get back to (and far beyond) what I paid for them eventually, just a matter of time. Meanwhile, here's to hoping there are still more opportunities yet for buying coins under $100!! |
|
|
|
A belated congrats to whoever won the 17 LTC jackpot recently Hopefully there'll be another big jackpot in the making soon... 1 LTC so far. |
|
|
|
Thanks for playing! Don't forget to share your referral link for extra coins. |
|
|
|
What is the Jackpot System?
In the case of Litecoin Kamikaze, the jackpot increases by 1% of each losing bet. |
|
|
|
|
So many offtopic replies, so little moderation...
|
|
|
|
maybe early adapters?
And they got 1 million usd worth of btc and don't sell it? Lol. Why would you sell it?  |
|
|
|
Site like [99designs] destroy prices
Sounds like the free market at work - As flibbr said, it's a voluntary interaction. |
|
|
|
- snip -
TECSHARE- snip - - snip - Note to self: Always create self-moderated threads. |
|
|
|
So, you buy a domain name, spend time and money building up a business on it, and have to be afraid that a competitor will outbid you and take the domain from under your feet at some point.
You have a 20 to 1 advantage in the auction. You could make it 100 to 1 by decreasing the "rental" to 1%. Have it as 2 steps - auction (owner doesn't participate) - If the owner doesn't pay 1% of the winner's bid within 60 days, the domain is transferred and the owner gets 99% of the bid (rest goes to support the network) I don't see any other way to figure out market price without actually attempting to sell the domain. Ah, I see, I guess that would be reasonable. Sorry I originally must have TLDR'd (is that a verb?) over your post. |
|
|
|
I like the idea of trying to prevent "name squatting", but honestly I doubt this would work. Since also in your system a name can't be "taken away" once it is registered (which I think is a highly desirable property), I think that a lot of good names will be "bought" right at the beginning ... and since then not yet many people are involved it doesn't really matter whether they are given directly to the first one interested or "auctioned off".
What about requiring that you pay a percentage of the current market value of the name. So, once every year, the name is auctioned again. The current holder has to bid too. So, you buy a domain name, spend time and money building up a business on it, and have to be afraid that a competitor will outbid you and take the domain from under your feet at some point. I'll stick to being afraid of Verisign thanks. |
|
|
|
Maybe in the custom hardware section the vendor should be required to demonstrate that they have registered their products with the FCC. That would keep all of them off the boards. I think that would leave us with, what, zero legitimate vendors?
What's the FCC? Maybe it will leave us with hundreds of legitimate foreign vendors. |
|
|
|
|
If this is the best job ever, then why is she wearing pants?
|
|
|
|
It sucks to spend hours working on something to perfect it, just to find that you get absolutely nothing to show for it.
No *direct* financial benefit, but if you really spent hours on something perfecting it, surely it would be a good addition to your portfolio, where you could *indirectly* benefit from the effort at some point in the future. A good investment in your own advertising, regardless of whether you get paid immediately or not. |
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty much against copyright laws as they exist today, but the one thing I like about the DMCA is that people can get in trouble for making false accusations.
Perhaps if people got a scammer tag for falsely accusing someone else of being a scammer, they'd think more carefully about it.
|
|
|
|
Looks like someone finally won this (over 17 LTC). Thanks everyone for playing! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
