oh please, you didn't just try to explain that picture, it has been proven to be a hoax so many times... 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmnMJoFQHk0

Good point. Someone made a bad joke.

The moonlanding may or may not have been a hoax. What is a hoax is the videos and photo footage they showed to the public about the moonlanding.

Excellent references!

Yes, we made a little bit of history with this last run-up, but unfortunately it ended with a premature ejaculation. I guess good things come in small packages and we just have to wait a bit more for the 17 000$ prices. People seem to be quick to forget that some time ago we were infinitely hovering around 240$ prices. We are now at 340$ which is a huge win. Even as the rally stopped, we still ended up higher than before the mini-bubble. That's a good sign.

I wish it was just the bitcoin media, but a popular business media site has recently published the following article in my country:

Translated title: Terror Sets Bitcoin Under Fire


The rest of the article seems to be locked though and can be read by paying subscribers only.

So either you are wrong or my country's journalists are desperate rats who attempt to turn bitcoin media into real media.

Whatever it is, the price does not seem to give a fuck, we have just broken the 330$ resistance and are going to retest 350$ soon.

The shit thing is that now they are talking that bitcoin was used by terrorists to attack Paris. Interestingly, the price has not dropped because of it. I wonder how it plays out.

It's you who seems like a complete whack job after stating this. David Icke is even more trustworthy than Alex Jones because unlike Alex, David himself shows signs of spiritual awakening. Alex might be playing a double game here, so even though much of what he says is true, I never leave my guard off when processing the information he puts out. With David, he sounds like a reasonable man, his theories are plausible and many of them have already proven to be actually true. Respect the man who has spent 20 years seeking the truth and writing books about his findings. Without him, mankind would be worse off. Even when he is wrong in some cases, he is still doing a good job making people question the elite. Because psychopaths are willing to do things that normal people are not willing to do in order to gain power, it is easy to deduce that most of the psychopaths end up on the leading positions. Those psychopaths then go on to further defend their power by artificially creating organizations such as the ISIS.

A book titled Encyclopedia of Spirits by Judika Illes states that the name Paris literally means the City of Isis.

But I like to seem like a stupid conspiracy theorist insecure people will think that I'm an easy target to bully and then boom --- the 12-year old child turns out to be a vampire and kills the paedophile. Hunter becomes the hunted. 

I would guess that the terrorists really liked that band . Again, if I was a terrorist and Vader or Behemoth were on the stage I would never shoot at them because they are such awesome bands.

How do you know what the goal was? You just assume it. WTF is wrong with you people. You make so many assumptions it's just sickening. Don't you know that assumption is the mother of all fuckups?

I'd say the goal of a terrorist is to terrorize --- spread fear. Which one does spread more, killing 100 people instead of 80 or killing 80 people and the members of a world famous band? THINK!!!! You're not a baby any more, use your fucking common sense. I'm not your father. Don't expect me to babysit you through your life, telling you what's what.

And where's your evidence? You think that if you support the official story then you automatically don't need evidence? That's your biggest fallacy. You're just brainlessly accusing me of not checking my facts, which anyone can do. Why even say this? Because you don't have anything else to say, that's how lost you are.

Paris Terror Attacks are False Flags
Paris Attacks Truth: ISIS is a False Flag
Paris Terror Attack False Flag Proof REVEALED - What You're NOT Being Told!
Paris "Terrorist Attack" Hoax - CCTV Footage At Cafe Shows "Terrorist" Sparing Customers Lives

First of all, let me update my current view on this, so that I would not get unnecessary responses any more:
1. Fake passports were put near the corpses of suicide bombers
2. There were anti-terrorism drills planned for the same day
3. French LEs knew 1 month in advance that the terrorist attacks would happen
4. Multiple attacks all occurred at once
5. There were crisis actors involved in some places
6. There were real victims here and there (how many remains unknown)
7. Band members were not shot even though they were the easiest targets.
8. The cafe does not look like a place where a suicide bomb went off.
9, The French president did not directly refer to illuminati but might have given us a hint. This is unknowable to us.


Even though it's funny, what has this to do with anything here?


I don't pretend nothing happened. I am just not going to instantly believe the official story, so I question it. Seeing this as an insult makes you a person who is asking to be insulted. I don't know what sick satisfaction you get from it, but you should stop because it isn't the right thing to do. You must understand that no matter whether the official story is true or not, questioning it is what every one of us should do. So why the hell do you penalize a person such as myself for asking the uncomfortable questions? You are not positively contributing to the awakening of the mankind by doing so. Thanks for the pictures though, I appreciate it.



Yeah GTFO phoenix1, you have proven to be just a lame ranter who fails at basic reasoning. Your description of the world is already so fragile that you get upset whenever something threatens it. Sooner or later you will get a punch in your teeth, suffer a temporary ego damage but then rise from the ashes being a smarter and better person than today --- like a true phoenix


It's always easy to suck a lame explanation out of the thumb and think that everything is OK. If I was a terrorist I would first shoot at the band members because they are the only group well lit during the concert making them an easy target. So for every lame sheeple-explanation there is a powerful contra argument. But the sheeple are always satisfied even with the dumbest official explanation while automatically discarding any contra arguments.

It's really laughable but you can track this stupidity down to people's egos. Ego always tries to defend itself. The ego of a sheep tries to defend its description of the world, so it is willing to believe anything that supports it. What is especially interesting about this is the fact that the sheeple will get angry if you try to threaten their ego. I have seen this so many times in this thread. I get responses such as "you are insulting the victims" and other dumb accusations. Believe me, if this was a real life debate, there would be people trying to physically assault me for my claims. On the other hand, I don't look like an easy target, being a 220 pound bodybuilder, so it would be interesting.

Objectively speaking, you are right. But the show must go on. We're on the 10th page already with such a poor quality OP it's just miraculous.

Oh you try so hard and fail even harder. Not all of those hundreds of people were directly in front of the shooters. Just probabilistically at least some of the people should have been able to capture something.


And you are just throwing things out, stating shit that fits your agenda while being overly emotional about it. I could as well as start insulting your mama in a response. 


I just gave you the evidence. Your answer of "this is not evidence" is the lamest answer one could give. You're like a dumb farmer who sees a picture of a giraffe and says "such an animal does not exist".


You don't know shit about my beliefs. You assume that what I post is what I believe. Where did you get the permission to make such assumptions? Your mama told you it was OK?

And what is it with your rage about me changing my opinion as the topic goes on? Are you mad that I don't stupidly defend some initial stance that has clearly some holes in it? Well guess what, that's what an effective discussion is supposed to achieve --- people changing their opinions in accordance to the new knowledge gained from other participants. And then you go on to include my ego in this. Would an egoistic person start a fight he knows he cannot win? This discussion was supposed to educate people on the both sides of the argument. What you are doing is turning it into a demeaning rant against ... me --- I suppose ... which sort of reveals your level of intelligence. I am slowly getting curious who put that carrot in your ass. It has to be huge telling by the tone of your messages. It could even have a handle. I think you should have it checked by a doctor  .

That's a good point. And where are the videos? I'm sick and tired of fake evidence.

Thanks for the photo, I really appreciate photo evidence. Here's my answer: since multiple terrorist attacks happened all at once, some of them were real and some of them were fake. This is deliberate because it will create just more chaos. The NWO attempts to manifest as order arising from the chaos. Right now they are creating as much chaos as possible. Divide and conquer. They divide us by making us argue amongst each other. You are right and I am also right, even though we state opposite things. You say the terrorist attacks were real. They were, in some places. I say they were faked. They were faked in other places. As a result, we fight each other rather than the illuminati, which is exactly what they want.

Watch this video if you don't know how real the illuminati and NWO threat really is, it explain everything:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvApvRL-LCE

Who knows how much of it is true, but it seems pretty serious. Even if 50% of it is true it's already relevant to our times. The thing is that the illuminati might (and hopefully will) fail. When they fail, most of you will probably think that the conspiracy theorists were wrong altogether.


You're right, but what choice do I have? I could either hide my head under the sand and be a sheep like the rest of us. Or, I can do my best to make sense of all of it, and perhaps survive. I prefer to be responsible for my actions and practise my free will. Besides, life is much more entertaining and interesting when you remain open minded to the alternative interpretations of reality. Conspiracy theories are like good science fiction with the plausible possibility of them actually being true in the end.

I have a lot of free time, so I can investigate anything I want. I have a lot of free time thanks to bitcoins I bought when they were 4.5$ each I wouldn't have done that if I didn't intend to investigate psychedelic substances such as DMT back then. So, ironically, thanks to drugs being illegal, I got into bitcoin when they were cheap, which made me some nice bucks.

So what? You take what is good and you discard what is foul. That's what I've been doing and that's what you should be doing. If you really live in a wet fantasy dream where you can either fully trust a source of information or not trust it at all then you're the one who is being naive, my little bro. The world is a greyish soup --- no black and white, no right and wrong, no good and evil. Start from that and then move forward. You live in a fallacy where you assume that it is all black and white while it's not. Instead of right and wrong we have right and right. You have to have common sense to navigate in this mess. The fact that I am referring to David Icke on some matters does not mean that I believe that 100% of what he says is the ultimate truth. We done?

So? You don't seem to know that what David Icke told the world 10 years ago (that no one believed back then) turned out to be true. Your analogy is just far-fetched, try harder.