Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 04:05:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 114 »
1041  Economy / Speculation / Re: Lord Christopher Monckton attacks Bitcoin on: July 09, 2015, 03:33:38 PM
They should have been executed for treason to humanity.

+1

I can't understand why is it so hard to just arrest those villains and throw them to prison for life. We know the names, we know where they live. Just catch them and throw them to jail.
1042  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin is now preferred to fiat on the street on: July 09, 2015, 02:51:55 PM
That might well of happend with your friend but everything else you wrote was crap lol

"Few" 'People taking out loans for bitcoin' guess what the banks still get their money back  Cheesy Yes at interest and yes with money that never existed, no room for loss there.

News to you fiat is already worthless and has been since not being backed by gold.

Oh dear gold and silver become worthless because of crypto, now I've heard it all.

These are the early signs. Just because it somehow hurts your ego does not make such events go away. We will start seeing more and more stuff like I described in OP. Gold and silver have only a small intrinsic value in comparison to their current speculative value. They will lose a great portion of their value just because so many people are so god damn sure of their value and don't expect it to fall. For example, look at yourself, you are so delusional that you refuse to think of the possibility that precious metals might lose their centuries old high value. The consequences of bitcoin are much bigger than you can think of.
1043  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin is now preferred to fiat on the street on: July 09, 2015, 02:32:45 PM
Are you unaware of how embarassing and desperate your fake, fabricated titles are?

If it embarrasses you but not me then it's your problem not mine you butthurt troll.
1044  Economy / Speculation / Re: Price of Euro after grexit? on: July 09, 2015, 01:57:32 PM
If EUR was to become equal to USD panic will start because that would be huge news. People remember that EUR is typically worth a bit more than 1 USD. When they hear it's equal they will start converting their euros into dollars and bitcoins which will further accelerate the fall of EUR. EUR is in dead cat bounce, see this topic:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1112770.0
1045  Economy / Speculation / Bitcoin is now preferred to fiat on the street on: July 09, 2015, 01:48:18 PM
Today I bought 2 jars of this:



... from my friend on the street who bench pressed a 170kg personal record today. He wanted 25 euros but I only had 20 and 50. I asked if he would be OK if paid him 20 and sent him 5 EUR worth of bitcoins later as payment. Guess what. He asked that he would like to have the whole payment in bitcoins only, if I was cool with it. I was cool with it. This means that people already have more trust in bitcoin than they have in fiat, especially euros.

He also told me that he is planning to take a loan to buy bitcoins with it. Guess what happens when people start taking loans to buy bitcoins? The banks will be milked as the value of their fiat crumbles into dust. The banks will then start to think that why on Earth should they give a loan to people who are going to buy bitcoins, so instead the banks themselves start to buy bitcoins. After that, fiat money will become worthless. Gold and silver will become almost worthless too because everyone realizes that cryptocurrencies are much better than precious metals. This will be the black swan event for precious metals. Bitcoin does not have to be afraid of a black swan event because BITCOIN IS THE BLACK SWAN EVENT.
1046  Economy / Speculation / Re: Rally!!!!! on: July 09, 2015, 11:47:47 AM
it seems that our rally, is in a pit stop right now, i'm expecting many of those stops while we climb

much better than a extraordinary pump if you ask me, we can valued better our position

that's normal. nothing goes up all the time. people will take profits if they are up $10 per bitcoin, hoping that they can buy back cheaper. i still think we'll head back to $250 level.

The current pace is very good. It is exactly as I predicted. Slow but sure rise for the 5th week in a row. Next week we should start seeing the first signs of a parabolic rise on the weekly log chart.
1047  Economy / Speculation / Re: 4000$ bitcoins in 4 months on: July 09, 2015, 11:42:14 AM
this sounds a bit too far fetched to me, I don't think the price will just jump like that for no reason. most predictions that people made that was just backed by the chart never came true anyway.

Who said the predictions are backed just by the chart? That would be stupid. Price won't obviously jump without any reason but right now the reason is that the time is ripe for such a big move. In my life I have seen many bitcoin bubbles and I recognize the vibe of what's going to happen soon.
1048  Economy / Speculation / Re: 4000$ bitcoins in 4 months on: July 09, 2015, 11:21:12 AM
OP,

please tell me when we will hit :

$2000
$1000
$750
$500

thanks.

I don't know, but the parabolic rise should become visible after 3 weeks and then we should be at 300+ prices. After that, price may dramatically change over night.
1049  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 28 000 unconfirmed TXs on: July 09, 2015, 01:34:37 AM

Upload your wallet and give us the password, let the experts investigate what happened Cheesy
1050  Economy / Speculation / Re: Speculation: Greece abandons the euro and adopts bitcoin on: July 09, 2015, 01:25:25 AM
No.





And even if they wanted to... our 2.7 transactions per second capacity is plumb full already. Maybe dogecoin?

No.
1051  Economy / Speculation / Re: Rally!!!!! on: July 09, 2015, 01:24:32 AM
Apparently they prefer LTC.

Or haven't you noticed what a real rally looks like?  Wink

It's good I bought some LTC few years ago when they cost just 0.5$ per LTC. I still have some left and I will be dumping hard soon because I don't believe in LTC in the long term.

You missing some 0's there Hyena?// Wink

I don't understand what you mean. I don't miss anything. I would like to dump 20$ litecoins though.
1052  Economy / Speculation / Re: Speculation: Greece abandons the euro and adopts bitcoin on: July 09, 2015, 12:25:32 AM
http://cointelegraph.com/news/114787/greek-island-to-trial-gold-backed-digital-currency-alternative-to-the-euro


Greek Island to Trial Gold-Backed Digital Currency Alternative to the Euro


It's happening, the Greeks are turning to cryptos for real now. It's only a matter of time until they adopt Bitcoin.
1053  Economy / Speculation / Re: Rally!!!!! on: July 09, 2015, 12:08:21 AM
Apparently they prefer LTC.

Or haven't you noticed what a real rally looks like?  Wink

It's good I bought some LTC few years ago when they cost just 0.5$ per LTC. I still have some left and I will be dumping hard soon because I don't believe in LTC in the long term.
1054  Economy / Speculation / Re: Lord Christopher Monckton attacks Bitcoin on: July 08, 2015, 10:52:51 PM
Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and other religious people are on the sideline concerning Bitcoin for a few reasons:

1)  They see it as having the possibility of being used in some kind of "mark of the beast" situation in a worst case scenario.

2)  The establishment has said years ago they wanted to get rid of cash and force everyone into a digital currency, so if they don't know who created Bitcoin and for what purpose, they're hesitant to endorse it.  They're also unable to understand and forecast all the possibilities of what it could morph into even if it starts out benign.  Things like blacklists, fungibility, etc, and how they would affect liberty.


Word. If only we could convince them that Bitcoin is actually on their side we could get a massive boost in adoption.

edit:
Lord Monckton is a badass.  He's old and may be forgiven for not being an expert on the latest revolution in decentralized trustless database tech and the surrounding iterant drama/chaos/media circus.

He's done yeoman's work in debunking and publicly exposing the Global Warming Climate Change Chaotic Weather scam:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhu3ESXvGR4

Utter r3ckage begins at 4:40...  Cool

OMG that poor stupid hippie lady...so fukkin' r3kt...by a scrupulously polite Lord no less...  Grin

"I have faith in Greenpeace..."

Cool video Cheesy I like it, I guess that Lord Moncton is actually somewhat on our side but doesn't fully understand what bitcoin is and can do to the traditional financial system.
1055  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 28 000 unconfirmed TXs on: July 08, 2015, 10:48:53 PM
I am not saying that handling ever growing blocks is easy, and there are other scaling issues behind the 1MB, but these need to be found as demand rises, not hidden behind the 1MB which is already causing distortions in the functioning of the network.

Then let's raise the maximum block size already. Those Chinise miners can go fuck themselves with their whining. I have had enough of this moronic argument about the block size. Miners have no right to even open their mouth in this argument because one change to the protocol and their ASICs turn useless. The only real owners of the bitcoin network are the bitcoin holders who can vote with their private keys what to do next with the protocol. If you are a parasite miner who sells all their mined coins then you are not a stakeholder and have no right to participate in this discussion.
1056  Economy / Speculation / Re: 4000$ bitcoins in 4 months on: July 08, 2015, 09:36:19 PM
you are getting too optimistic here..! but I like it  Smiley

It's sorcery.
1057  Economy / Speculation / Lord Christopher Monckton attacks Bitcoin on: July 08, 2015, 09:27:50 PM
https://youtu.be/u4gWkd8UfCs?t=836

Quote from: OldFuck
Oh and Bitcoin I would attack.

Starting at 13:50 the old fart is proposing that to defeat the formation of the world government we must create our own electronic currency. I was already thinking that they are going to embrace bitcoin but instead that old fucker starts attacking bitcoin as if it was done wrong. Now that just tears it, there is no longer fiat vs bitcoin situation but instead fiat vs fuckers vs bitcoin situation. I thought Alex Jones was intelligent enough to understand that Bitcoin is our key to freedom but apparently he doesn't fully get it or has another agenda. (edit: Alex Jones says he's not attacking bitcoin so I guess he's alright)

But I guess that even bad marketing is marketing.

Quote
The person who set it up committed suicide.
Did Mark Karpeles commit suicide? Who does he refer to?
1058  Economy / Economics / Re: USD/EUR dead cat bounce? on: July 08, 2015, 07:53:25 PM
the EUR  controversy is going on thesedays . People are losing faith over that currency . But i believe , eurozone is a strong clan , and yes it did get the blow , but it won't be long untilit has fully recovered from the crisis.And hence EUR is not a dead cat according to me.It's in a dormant stage, it needs to get active. That's all.

Considering the political momentum in my country, many people wish to exit EU because EU tries to force immigrants into our country against the will of the nation. If nations start to quit from the union then it would definitely be bad for the EUR. Things are bad in EU, and they will get worse in 3 months. That's why I think this is a dead cat bounce.
1059  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 28 000 unconfirmed TXs on: July 08, 2015, 07:45:33 PM
The node could see that all of these chained transactions stem from one transaction. It could block any transaction that has an ancestor of that particular transaction. If the node kept a database of the spam transaction chaintip, it could quickly determine whether the parent transaction was part of the spam chain and block the child.

That is actually a very good idea and could be reasonably feasible. Hopefully keeping the root TXs in the internal DB won't consume too much memory and checking their existence won't consume too much CPU.

It would require a soft-fork and we all know how long soft-forks take and their consequences.

As long as the devs are smart enough (I do hope they are) to not use an algo that has an ASIC (e.g. sha256 or scrypt) it could potentially work. How does bitmessage implement this and how do they determine the difficulty?

But this soft fork is backwards compatible. It would only make a difference when the network is flooded by TXs and it encourages people to update their clients because updated nodes would reject their TXs otherwise. Don't worry about the algorithm, it can safely use something such as SHA256 but have some bits swapped in the end or in between so that a plain SHA256 ASIC would be useless.

BitMessage uses SHA256 very similarly to bitcoin but the same ASICs can not be used that are used for bitcoin mining. BitMessage has a fixed difficulty on the protocol level. Not very good but it's way better than having no difficulty at all because it makes attacking many times more expensive. If Bitcoin was to implement TX mining, then its difficulty should be adjusted according to the number of unconfirmed TXs.

There is a patch called Replace-By-Fee where transactions spending the same inputs can be replaced with another that has a higher fee. The mempool should not drop "less important" transactions because some of them could be legit. Rather, miners should choose which transactions to include by their priority, which I believe already happens.

It's good to know that such a patch exists but it would be better if it was included in bitcoin-core.

The mempool should drop "less important" TXs because who cares if some of them could be legit if the node is running out of RAM. Dropping less important TXs is the lesser evil in comparison to an out of memory exception Cheesy. All it can do is to politely tell the other node that their TX could not be accepted at this time and that they should try sending it again later.

You should never see that your transaction be rejected, simply that it will take a while to confirm. I believe that all transactions should confirm eventually. Instead of having no chance for a low fee transaction to confirm, there should be a chance eventually for it to confirm in the future. The RBF patch allows you to replace the transaction in the mempool so that it has a higher priority with a higher fee, thus allowing your transaction to confirm sooner (hopefully).

I disagree but I might have used a wrong term. Instead of rejection I would rather call it postponing. The honest nodes whose TXs are postponed by neighbouring nodes must attempt to resend the TX in gradually increasing intervals. If a node resends the TX too often they would be banned by their neighbours.

Quote from: SoundMike
"The 1 MB blocksize limit was only put in as a tx spam limiting measure"
and
"The tx spam that is backing up in the memepool is proof we need to remove the blocksize limit"
Only one of these statements can be true.
Pick one.

I can't put it any better than that. People saying that we need to raise the blocksize limit to prevent DOS is utterly and obviously senseless, illogical, and untrue; contrary to all reason or common sense; laughably foolish and false*.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3cfext/bitcoin_under_attack/csvoxvp
*http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/absurd

You are absolutely right. I have previously proposed that every 144th block should have the technically maximal possible size or some other giant size such as 64 MiB just to clear the backlog of unconfirmed TXs once per day. Other blocks should have a size of 8 MiB which I believe is more reasonable than 1 MiB. That limit should not be raised in the future but instead if needed then the maximal size of the 144th block could be increased.
1060  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin to $50k before Xmas on: July 08, 2015, 05:01:52 PM
Log charts don't show more information

False, simply false. But I guess you're the kind of guy who would look at a pie chart of bitcoin price and also say that it doesn't show any less information than a log chart. They teach this stuff in the university, I believe in the data mining course, perhaps you should attend one and pay special attention to the part where they teach the pitfalls of data representation.
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 114 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!