PotCoin still lives for another week on Bittrex. But the price is taking a slide.
Probably a direct result of the lack of visibility of the developers.
Anybody know where this Coin is going on the roadmap?
this is what i don't get. POT techwise works for me. it stakes like a champ and i have yet to encounter buggy-ness. that's all i need from a dev ... a working network. <--- fullstop the end. what most of the complaints seem to be about "projects" and "revenue roadmap". that aint the devs problem ... that's the communities problem ... the problem is whining and not doing. so find your focus, and turn this coin into a proper DAC, cuz the tech is fine. |
|
|
|
|
okay so cheap gimmick to grab attention but almost nailed it with the algo
x15 POW = good
100000 blocks = minutes = 1667 hours = 70 days ... there's where your off 3months-1year POW is FHRITP correct
but you never know it may work
get it trading
get a community
if it is still around in 6 months it can roll back to the "FRED" brand and get a little more mainstream
|
|
|
|
this dev knows how to handle bct PR and his main priorities are clear What happened to the money for VNL from the Angel Investor (john-connor, which he came out and said he was so it wasn't a mystery anymore)
Even with Bittrex as the 2nd exchange there was a lot more BTC in buys on Poloniex until they just disappeared.
Has john lost interest ? As everything he seems to do to VNL with a new update just decreases the price....
Where's all the VNL banter & talk ? I remember it was everywhere, better than Dash with all its features & built different to Bitcoin.
Lies ? Lack of interest ? FUD ? Shakeout ? Whales/Big Players ?
You obviously do not watch Github. Bitcoin is on a run, alternative crypto interest is currently at a low. It comes in cycles. Wait until Bitcoin dumps. Besides, not even a year from launch, long term...  Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
funny thing is that this actually gives credence that Os76 might be a legit project. market cap $ 608 but it is listed on marketCap stick with it burn the leftovers (as stated) make sure to have nodes, and a block explorer make a decent website attract more pools to mine it earn the value, one step at a time this coin could stick around at such low market cap i am willing to watch and cheer it on. stuff like the below is of great concern and the code likely needs a scrub You see... You finally got what you deserved.
What would have happened to that poor guy who wanted to loan you the 3 btc earlier now? Thank God he did not do it.
Yeah sure... development... what development... walletbuilders built this coin.. there was nothing you did... nothing ... what about all your other coins, punishercoin... bitcoinhashcore etc. ..
You just tried to scam with punisher and lied about burned premine
walletbuilders not customize, nice appearance WalletI said it to you a thousand times already, don't lie and learn english. If this is no walletbuilders coin, why can I sync by specifying only one node, "node.walletbuilders.com": ./osmiumcoind getpeerinfo [ { "addr" : "node.walletbuilders.com", "services" : "00000003", "lastsend" : 1445882234, "lastrecv" : 1445882227, "bytessent" : 1081, "bytesrecv" : 625, "blocksrequested" : 0, "conntime" : 1445882226, "version" : 70002, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0.5/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 3780, "banscore" : 0, "syncnode" : true }, Try it yourself, run ./osmiumcoind --connect=node.walletbuilders.com
this node 195.34.100.2 hardcoded to source and wallet |
|
|
|
Vanillacoin - currently POW and POS
quick summary of vanillacoin? yes that, pls. still don't get VNL like NXT you need to run a server? (opinion) NXT, BTS, and likely VNL ... not POS in the common sense. BLK, RUBY, CLAM, MINT, SDC ... those are the POS ... the coins above them on the MarketCap list are more "2.0" or "Anon" and beyond the street level 'stakers'. Most active (over time) ... T3k, Hobo, Cap ... personally had a rough go keeping up-to-date and sync'd ... but willing to let that slide if they end up with a solid product ... (i know hybrids are a pain to code so no complaints). I'd don't know why Jyap doesn't get more attention. My experience is stable clients, timely updates, and no hype. |
|
|
|
"Xyz Dev releases the cool update that will integrate phone sex with the wallet in two years" i think UNO is already fon sex ready made  You can now place phone calls through Bitphone and pay for it with Uno, via Shapeshift.io. If you try this, let me know how it works.
 sidenote: Uno, via Shapeshift.io that's hella innovation and among my many personal goals is to see that UNO can function well with services like Shapeshift thus merchants only have to adopt 'digital payments' and not necessarily UNO ... it streamlines the system and grants UNO holders full access to the digital currency universe. "Part of what we have to do is fundamentally very basic: continue to exist." No I say aim higher. UNO community gains more mass and momentum constantly. I feel it and I see it. BCT is filled with coins that are left to the "just continue to exist" option. (Sorry Zeta, Quark, Mega, .... hope to see at the end of the line tho). The painting is slowly filling in detail by detail, and focal point, sticking with what UNO was intended to be, and continues to be is working out just fine. |
|
|
|
here's a clue on RUBY ... research and compare to the field how many wallets holding funds there are  |
|
|
|
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/weedmaps-bitcoin-marijuana/“The industry is about $2.5 billion dollars, and there is not a single banking partner in sight,” Hayner said at Coin Congress 2015 in San Francisco. Hayner had big predictions for the marijuana industry. "Big tobacco is about $35 billion per year. It's looking like cannabis will be $10 billion by early next year," he said. Although Hayner expressed an overall opinion that the marijuana industry will need Bitcoin, he doesn't' believe the time is now.
|
|
|
|
interesting if that's the tooth then hijack QuaRK and bring it along for the ride too ... just a suggestion ... but if MUE is a hub of activity (QRK is camp tumbleweeds) ... such a move will bring attention to the MUE project |
|
|
|
|
On that note.
I personally don't want code innovation.
I would like the guys who can hardcore C++ to do an intensive review on UNO as it is and suggest any need for a possible fork.
But I am happy if we are 'locked in' code wise from here on out. To fork never again.
Only update and maintain the core code in line with BTC protocols. Plus release improved GUI wallets, but that's just cosmetics.
Thus, I would suggest that early 2016 is the last chance to fork, so either there is a reason and cause to 'innovate' with the code now, or live with it as it is for forever. Investors, at least the intelligent ones, are going to want and demand that the "Code" is a scared public contract and "fork talk" is taboo. There are a number of misguided personalities in the BTC-sphere that think they can fork ... they can't ... it would cause a civil war ... and ultimately if it goes down there will be 2 chains and 2 coins and tremendous turmoil. It is to the advantage of UNO to be a hard line "No forks allowed" community past year 2016.
There is value in being a conservative community that doesn't fork or change course every other week.
Thus innovation comes from not the 'devs' but from the community with solid plans and programs for adding value to the project.
|
|
|
|
Thinking on it .
But rather avoid the burn route.
Wondering about a 1:1 exchange-able asset that trusted community members can manage.
An already proven system exists for managing an asset (Besides NXT which is kinda clunky imo) https://docs.openchain.org/en/latest/I was curious as to what sort of asset, etc. you guys are wanting to issue - maybe I missed it in the thread discussion. DVC was indeed nice for cryptoguild though I arrived late to that party. I am just wanting a way to list UNO on http://www.secureae.com/So more like a redeemable token 1:1 for UNO, the easiest way I see is a kind of periodic redeem dates managed by a small group. Also, if you want innovation, UNO is in an excellent position to spinoff assets (or launch them) A. Snapshots that create a new chain that is MM sha256 B. OR, snapshots that go onto NXT, XEM, or whatever proves to be a reliable 2.0 platform The key there is having a known community that can vet projects, review the business plan, and present it to the public. |
|
|
|
Hendo420 you going to lock this thread too? Are you going to vanish and leave the project broken and abandoned for another 18months? Pointing out facts is not 'trolling'. If you can get 3 credible devs to vouch for you then hey maybe there is reason to let you in the front door and still keep a constant eye on you. Mullick is on the record saying you are member of "developers who dont really know what they are doing". https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399658.msg12468096#msg12468096He also cautions to scrub your code for malicious content. |
|
|
|
|
Thinking on it .
But rather avoid the burn route.
Wondering about a 1:1 exchange-able asset that trusted community members can manage.
|
|
|
|
so there are more than 42 coins in the wild?
i saw 45.xxxx money supply
correct?
Correct. A common mistake by "developers" who dont really know what they are doingAre you serious Hendo? The only thing 42 has going for it is that you con'd out of it a long time ago. Go back under your rock. Hendo420 last seen scamming on: May 29, 2014, 08:06:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
Okay I get "it" better now.
My original impression was FRAC had a small sustain reward but it looks like it has zilch rewards, no?
So this "fee only" concept might have worked if FRAC managed 1000s of TX per day. But FRAC is not popular today (tomorrow maybe but today it is unnoticed). And I don't see anyone providing the hash until prices go way up.
So BARR is a good test and might get miners attention to grab some fees. And I think keeping the option of fully transport on to NXT platform (like NAUT) ought to be on the table say March 1 2016.
FRAC is a good brand and could become a good DAC/Asset/Community. So I welcome the BARR experiment.
And in a funny way this fractures FRAC (1M coins) into:
a. BARRs
b. FRACs traded on cryptsy (if it is still here in 2016)
c. FRACNXTs traded on the NXT system* b.&c. could be combined if BigVern isn't shut down by the Feds.
|
|
|
|
I really love your concept of burning coins. Especially multi proof of burn, this will lower the price of others coin and increase the price of BARR considerably. However, I think that based on NXT which is a currency got quite big blockchain right now will slow down the amount of user who hates waiting for things to sync
I agree. I wasted 1 month trying to sync NXT in the spring of 2015, it's a little geekish :/ But I've just played with the online wallet and it is fairly simple and easy too do. Also looking at the NXT exchange site and it is uber simple to use. However it seems all but half a dozen markets are actively traded. Hey I just created this account, and I noticed BARR! What a great idea, and it's good that my avatar already says BARR.me!
Very coin-cident-tal I suppose  I literally made an account on this forum (finally) just to point out the obvious scam in all of this:
So you're proposing burning a coin and receiving credit for burning in BARR, however this means eventually BARR is going to have some value on the asset exchange. That is 1 BARR = x units of NXT.
Since you control the supply of BARR, what is honestly preventing you from when x hits some desirable rate that you just don't dump a huge chunk of your BARR onto the market, make a nice profit and walk?
Also, lol the fact that you're doing this manually, this honestly wouldn't take more than a day or two to automate, since people can attach messages to transactions they could put their NXT address / pub key in the message field, submit the coins to the burn addresses listed and you have a worker bot that pays them out automatically -- literally a day of coding tops.
tl;dr
obvious (eventual) scam, dev probably doesn't know jack about coding
Yo did the devs actually just ignore this? i was browsing and noticed this, had to make an account just to point out how the devs tried to burry this without response... id like to hear what they have to say, for one. this concept requires a custodian. even if you code some auto-bot ... you still face the same trust issues. (someone holds the keys) solutions would be multisig or multiple trustees. i am willing to have a little faith because this an experiment and the guys managing the project have been around for some time. but yes as time goes by and if BARR becomes an asset of value then perhaps some safe guards are needed. i would suggest public dumps. example a BARR holder wants to improve XAI, so he says "I've got $50 of BARR and I am going to selling, the revenue will be used to pay for a block explorer". so thus you have micro budget projects DIY on the record. the sincere participants will become evident and hustlers would find it difficult to scam more than $5-$10 if even a $1. also this keeps more less a fixed market cap so there is little of a bubble to pop by dumping the reserve BARR. again as time goes by, and if it works, then find a way to safe guard the system so the market cap can increase. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
