Going on day 10 of no support on my ticket, they're still holding my BTC for ransom.
|
|
|
Looking for four 240V 30A switched PDUs. I'd like to buy APC AP7911A PDUs, but open to other similar PDUs.
Let me know what you have.
i have some pm me for more information thankyou Just PMed you.
|
|
|
I've had a BTC withdrawal stuck on "Awaiting Approval" for over 5 days now, with no answer to my ticket for over 4 days. Getting very fed up of their non existent service.
|
|
|
Looking for four 240V 30A switched PDUs. I'd like to buy APC AP7911A PDUs, but open to other similar PDUs.
Let me know what you have.
Edit: Found what I needed. Topic locked.
|
|
|
Seems like everything is back to normal on my end. Wonder what changed... No, it isn't fixed, unfortunately. My ZEC rigs still have lots of rejects. They work for few hours, then get new job from Nicehash, get all rejected shares for about 10 minutes, then switch to my backup pool which is Suprnova, and work perfectly there. Then again try to connect to Nicehash, work ok, then again produce stale shares right after getting new job from Nicehash. This is definitely a problem with Nicehash... or maybe with some of the renters at Nicehash using hash for mining some obscure fork - btw is there any new ZCash fork raising in popularity the last few days?? - that might be the reason of all this mess. I have switched all (but one) my rigs from Nicehash to other, more stable multipool for now. Actually I keep that single rig on Nicehash just to see when/if they fix the issue. If this continues, I expect a lot of hash sellers switching their rigs off Nicehash to other pools. Miners are losing money, and they do not really care who is the real guilty one - Claymore or Nicehash. As soon as they switch rigs off Nicehash, then Nicehash will be losing money instead. Instead of blaming Claymore and making dubious statements regarding "closed source software from completely anonymous source", Nicehash folks could have better contacted Claymore to work on this issue together. Well said. May I ask what multipool you switched to? Haven't had time to look for alternatives yet.
|
|
|
Seems like everything is back to normal on my end. Wonder what changed...
|
|
|
OK, just clicked 2 random links.. All I see is a bunch of noobs who are jumping headfirst into mining and have no clue what they're doing or how hardware works.
|
|
|
Seems Tahiti based rigs may be more susceptible. Just a quick observation, nothing concrete.
|
|
|
OP gives me anxiety. 20ish links? Really?
I've built tons of 7 GPU rigs since 2012 using Z77/87/97.
All you need is a troubleshooting oriented brain and a bit of patience. These days, it's easier than ever.
|
|
|
Doh! I just realized I was running 12.4 version.
Updated to 12.5, so far so good.
@Valgar nicehash released new version of the miner with updated CM miners, check if it helps.
12.5 has the issue as well. The problem is almost certainly on nicehash's side. Come report your problems here, doubt nicehash monitors this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=562238.msg19402626#msg19402626
|
|
|
What kind of mining sw are you using? Is it claymore, is it latest? Try with latest. Also try with latest NHM.
MY RIGS ARE LINUX-- They were working well until the last 48-72 hours. If you have NiceHashMiner for Linux, I may use it. Currently I am mining Equihash with Claymore 12.5. The indications are for a server-side problem. High latency or overload of some sort. --scryptr We ruled server side issue out, since all other software besides claymore is working just fine. Try upgrading claymore and see what happens then. Just to be clear, you work for nicehash? Can't update claymore, 12.5 is the latest release. Both 12.4 and 12.5 have this issue. 12.4 was working perfectly fine forever, so something changed on your end. The miner's code hasn't changed. I'd assume 12.5 would work perfectly fine as well if not for the issue on your end. I'll know that soon enough when I switch pools, currently fleshing out my options. I'm willing to bet claymore will work just fine on a regular pool.
|
|
|
What kind of mining sw are you using? Is it claymore, is it latest? Try with latest. Also try with latest NHM.
MY RIGS ARE LINUX-- They were working well until the last 48-72 hours. If you have NiceHashMiner for Linux, I may use it. Currently I am mining Equihash with Claymore 12.5. The indications are for a server-side problem. High latency or overload of some sort. --scryptr Yes, it's definitely a server side problem. Chop chop, nicehash. Fix this so I can keep mining here.
|
|
|
What kind of mining sw are you using? Is it claymore, is it latest? Try with latest. Also try with latest NHM.
Yes, claymore 12.5. Was working perfectly forever, until 2-3 days ago.
|
|
|
Same problem on 3 of my rig with equihash .With eth no issus. Problem server .Any Solution? Come to think of it, I haven't noticed if the issue was happening also on ETH.
|
|
|
What's up with the servers? I've (along with a friend on a different internet connection) been having frequent disconnects, fallbacks to secondary pools, and massive rejected shares. This is while mining on equihash and daggerhashimoto using claymore's miners.
Hash happened multiple times in the last 72 hours, across 30+ rigs.
SAME PROBLEM HERE-- The web charts are full of RED. My rigs are mining as normal, but receive an extremely high rate of stale shares. Are the NiceHash servers simply overloaded with new miners? AMD graphics cards are in short supply at most vendors. --scryptr Glad to hear I'm not alone. I'm pulling all my power off nicehash until they fix this, I've lost too much money already. Hopefully we can get a fix soon. Any similar alternatives to nicehash out there?
|
|
|
What's up with the servers? I've (along with a friend on a different internet connection) been having frequent disconnects, fallbacks to secondary pools, and massive rejected shares. This is while mining on equihash and daggerhashimoto using claymore's miners.
Hash happened multiple times in the last 72 hours, across 30+ rigs.
|
|
|
Stop with the fucking whining. You wouldn't be making shit without him obviously since you aren't aware that their are alternatives. Claymore opened the flood gates for all you noobs with his easy to use software. You should be thanking him.
If you don't like it, stop using his software.
|
|
|
|