Flat Earth

[nomad13666]

What do you mean by "vortex math"?

I am not here to educate you... Forget what i have said and back to your coco.

No shit. Dude can type "vortex math" in his reply, but he lacks the sense to type it into the Google search bar.

"You can lead a horse to water..."

The best we can do is leave the clowns some bread crumbs in hopes that maybe they'll follow the trail and find a clue.

[IadixDev]

Those notions have not been installed by anyone lol

Faraday cant really explain fall of body as they do .. still less why things would float or sink because of their "density"

What do you mean by "vortex math"?

Classic geometry can modelize vortex fairly easily with trivial trigo ..

Decimal or any other base is not fundation of mathematics ..

I would say it's because of ten fingers ..

But either using base 2, 8, or 16, or 60 doesnt change anything. .

I am not here to educate you... Forget what i have said and back to your coco.

No Fortunately i dont count on you or this thread to educate me lol

Ill go back to my "coco" whatever that mean lol

[IadixDev]

What do you mean by "vortex math"?

I am not here to educate you... Forget what i have said and back to your coco.

No shit. Dude can type "vortex math" in his reply, but he lacks the sense to type it into the Google search bar.

"You can lead a horse to water..."

The best we can do is leave the clowns some bread crumbs in hopes that maybe they'll follow the trail and find a clue.

I know about vortex math .. no need to type in Google lol

It's just has no connection what-so-ever with static electricity, Faraday, density, or gravity ...

[nomad13666]

I know about vortex math .. no need to type in Google lol

Ok, great.

Enjoy your cartoons and cocoa.

Don't hurt your neck trying to suck yourself off.

[IadixDev]

I know about vortex math .. no need to type in Google lol

Ok, great.

Enjoy your cartoons and cocoa.

Don't hurt your neck trying to suck yourself off.

Ok I guess ill do that, cause it's not like trying to picture how vortex math will prove that Earth is flat and gravity is Faraday law with static electricity will be more interesting than Alice in wonderland, I think this point is pretty clear now.

[nomad13666]

I think this point is pretty clear now.

Put on a hat to prevent sunburn.

[IadixDev]

I think this point is pretty clear now.

Put on a hat to prevent sunburn.

My head can take more heat than that.

[nomad13666]

I think this point is pretty clear now.

Put on a hat to prevent sunburn.

My head can take more heat than that.

Great, then everyone will see your point.

[IadixDev]

I think this point is pretty clear now.

Put on a hat to prevent sunburn.

My head can take more heat than that.

Great, then everyone will see your point.

The earth is not flat, objects fall due to gravity, and float due to pressure differential, I though it was pretty clear for people with a decent brain.

All this having nothing to do with vortex math, Faraday, static electricity or i dunno what other non sense.

[notbatman]

Gravity is an unproven theory.

There are no experiments that show the Earth is in motion.

There is no measurable curvature.

The Earth is flat and motionless.

[IadixDev]

Gravity is an unproven theory.

Ok I can give you that, but then so is density, pressure, float/sink principles and so on.

Replacing it with static electricity additionally to be less accurate description of the phenomena, doesnt add more proof to it.

Equation describing electric current, induction , magnetic fields etc are not more proven than gravity, and doesnt describe the body fall accurately.

[notbatman]

^ why the fuck did you bring up magnetic induction? You're a fucking idiot changing the subject.

It's like I'm talking about sealing a window and you start talking about how big your dick is because you hear the word caulk.

bump.



edit:



Quote:

"But first, a little history. In some medieval castles, when enemies breached the first line of defense, the inhabitants would retreat from the outer courtyard (the “bailey”) to a tower on top of a mound (called the “motte”) where they could take refuge and shoot arrows at the enemy until the hostile forces gave up. After doing so, everyone would return to the more pleasant and productive bailey, secure in the knowledge that the motte would protect them if another attack were made. Mottes were safe but economically useless, and baileys were profitable but vulnerable. For best results, both were necessary." -- https://heterodoxacademy.org/2017/08/09/the-motte-and-the-bailey-a-rhetorical-strategy-to-know/




So why does the guy who claims we're living on a spinning ball need to use subversive debate tactics to win his argument?

[kissmarx]

Is a Flat Earth Coin existing now?

If non, anybody can develop it, and better promote awareness to Flat Earth.

[Guzztsar]

Since i heard some  plausible arguments, it really changed my mind a little bit.
i'm not sure of nothing, but this card are  well suited for this topic

"People laugh, but the flat earthers know something."

[bitgraphics]

what century is this? my time machine must have worked if this is a topic for discussion

[nomad13666]

Since i heard some  plausible arguments, it really changed my mind a little bit.
i'm not sure of nothing, but this card are  well suited for this topic

"People laugh, but the flat earthers know something."

Indeed, we "know something".

We even know who's is behind it.

The truth is often hidden in plain sight.

[IadixDev]

^ why the fuck did you bring up magnetic induction? You're a fucking idiot changing the subject.

It's like I'm talking about sealing a window and you start talking about how big your dick is because you hear the word caulk.

bump.



edit:



Quote:

"But first, a little history. In some medieval castles, when enemies breached the first line of defense, the inhabitants would retreat from the outer courtyard (the “bailey”) to a tower on top of a mound (called the “motte”) where they could take refuge and shoot arrows at the enemy until the hostile forces gave up. After doing so, everyone would return to the more pleasant and productive bailey, secure in the knowledge that the motte would protect them if another attack were made. Mottes were safe but economically useless, and baileys were profitable but vulnerable. For best results, both were necessary." -- https://heterodoxacademy.org/2017/08/09/the-motte-and-the-bailey-a-rhetorical-strategy-to-know/




So why does the guy who claims we're living on a spinning ball need to use subversive debate tactics to win his argument?

Im not the one who bring induction ..

Someone got on " electric field" , so I asked what he mean by that, and he got into induction ..

Where I posted that basically the two equation can look similar but are still different, and no unified field theory can match the two ..

Which mean magnetic field cant explain fall of body .. even if it can look close to a degree .. like attraction with force inversely proportional with squared distance, but it's not same equation. .

[kissmarx]

Since i heard some  plausible arguments, it really changed my mind a little bit.
i'm not sure of nothing, but this card are  well suited for this topic

"People laugh, but the flat earthers know something."

Indeed, we "know something".

We even know who's is behind it.

The truth is often hidden in plain sight.

How do you count the numbers? What's the significance of numbers?

[nomad13666]

Since i heard some  plausible arguments, it really changed my mind a little bit.
i'm not sure of nothing, but this card are  well suited for this topic

"People laugh, but the flat earthers know something."

Indeed, we "know something".

We even know who's is behind it.

The truth is often hidden in plain sight.

How do you count the numbers? What's the significance of numbers?

When I first started doing Gematria, I calculated it on paper, and then after awhile I could just do it in my head.

The more I researched, the more necessary it became to use a Gematria calculator, as there are many different ciphers (though there are only maybe 4 or 5 ciphers that were, and still are, used to encode our reality).

Edit: when I said "the more I researched", I didn't mean researching Gematria. I use Gematria as a tool to research our (so-called) history, and I continue to discover that nearly everything throughout our "recorded history" is a bunch of contrived bullshit, much of it not in the least factual, and all of it coded with certain numbers over and over. (It's no wonder 1933 was such an interesting year.)

There are several Gematria calculators available, but I mainly use this: http://www.gematrinator.com/calculator/index.php

After you see the same words over and over, you just know the sums when you see the words.

Example: when I see a "33" pop up in my research it throws up a red flag, and is cause for greater scrutiny.

The alphabet was created by the numbers, for the numbers. Words in the English language (specifically) were designed to encode numeric values and form certain numbers of significance. Quite often, words of the same numeric value bear a relation to each other. Research Gematria and occult numerology. Your entire reality is coded in numbers by the controllers of this physical plane. The Luciferian cult that runs this world knows how important it is to "spell" correctly.



Look at what others are doing with Gematria to decode our false reality, then try it yourself.

Some Gematria-related links of interest:
https://yourbrokenreality.tumblr.com
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com
https://extracapsa.wordpress.com

"The world has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the Truth."

[IadixDev]

For me the best reason why earth is more likely to be spherical is mostly because spheres are perfectly symetrical on all axis.

With a disc it imply a notion of direction, and asymetry, which would mean some directional force is needed to create it.

As all known forces tend to be factor of distance, it make sense all objects naturally evolve to spheroids as forces are equal at all point at equal distance from a center.

When you put a drop of ink in water, it will more get shaped as spheroids than a cube or a disc.

Even without counting for heliocentric system, it would not make sense that an object stay flat with known forces either it's gravity or magnetism. The force would tend to attract everything at equal distance from a center.

It's even the great misery of mathematician that all is so round, depending PI for calculus, and we still dont know how to compute PI properly.

Beyond this it's not that the heliocentric system is not bogus to a degree, but I dont really see flat earth making lot of sense in itself.


Galaxies still seem to be flats, at least some of them, and all planets orbits are more or less on same plane too, so that could imply directional force somewhere.

Even if i dont really mind in the end if it's flat cubical spherical or donut shaped. And I dont think there is easy way to demonstrate smoking gun proof evidence that it's round like this.

For me anyway gravity alone cant explain exactly how planets got to turn around the sun to begin with, or spiral shape of galaxies, so there is probably some missing forces or missing subtilety additionally to sheer gravity to explain cosmic motion and shapes.

Even all physics law are known to be bogus, they only work at a certain scale, for certain phenomena, it's still all very fragmented as patchwork of different set of equation to use at different scales for different situations.

But I still dont get this whole hate on gravity law, and bogus dodging of one set of equation  to replace them with other patchwork of equation that are even more bogus like it's always the trend with this flat earth thing.