notbatman (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
 |
June 23, 2017, 11:50:47 AM |
|
I don't believe in flat earth theory.
Earth is round. End of story.
Actually it's a flat motionless plane but don't let somthing like facts get in the way of a good shit-post. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
flekkelek
|
|
June 23, 2017, 12:57:46 PM |
|
I don't believe in flat earth theory.
Earth is round. End of story.
Actually it's a flat motionless plane but don't let somthing like facts get in the way of a good shit-post. Yeah, a good quality shitpost, like yours. :3 |
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
June 23, 2017, 03:10:00 PM |
|
I found out the Earth was flat and all I got was this stupid t-shirt.  |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
June 23, 2017, 04:03:38 PM |
|
I found out the Earth was flat and all I got was this stupid t-shirt. The earth absolutely MUST be globular. And this ^^^ picture proves it. Only FE people can see the guy in the t-shirt, lying on the ground. If the earth was flat, us GE people wouldn't be able to see the globe on the t-shirt either.  |
|
|
|
|
|
radokan
Member
Offline
Activity: 291
Merit: 15
|
|
June 23, 2017, 08:01:15 PM |
|
I don't believe in flat earth theory.
Earth is round. End of story.
Actually it's a flat motionless plane but don't let somthing like facts get in the way of a good shit-post. Facts are - earth is not flat. Your whole topic is one big shitpost. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
June 23, 2017, 08:10:48 PM |
|
Besides, you can't even find a flat spot on earth. If you look at the large, you find mountains and valleys. If you look at the small, you find atoms and molecules that are shaped like solar systems. If you look into space with your own telescope, from your backyard, with a little work, you can see that planets are round. "Flat" doesn't really exist.  |
|
|
|
|
serbad
|
|
June 23, 2017, 08:50:53 PM |
|
Besides, you can't even find a flat spot on earth. If you look at the large, you find mountains and valleys. If you look at the small, you find atoms and molecules that are shaped like solar systems. If you look into space with your own telescope, from your backyard, with a little work, you can see that planets are round. "Flat" doesn't really exist. ^^^^^^^^^^^ This is the sort of shit this cunt comes out with instead of posting any viable evidence of curvature.. THE CURVATURE OF YOUR GLOBE DOES NOT EXIST.! YOUR GLOBE DOES NOT EXIST.! |
|
|
|
|
psychosis7
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
severe mental disorder
|
|
June 23, 2017, 09:03:53 PM |
|
Oh look a nice sunrise and another pic showing perspective. Good job nomad you get an a+ in 9th grade art class. |
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2017, 09:24:59 PM |
|
Oh look a nice sunrise and another pic showing perspective. Good job nomad you get an a+ in 9th grade art class. Go suck a cock, pinhead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2017, 09:28:50 PM |
|
Besides, you can't even find a flat spot on earth. If you look at the large, you find mountains and valleys. If you look at the small, you find atoms and molecules that are shaped like solar systems. If you look into space with your own telescope, from your backyard, with a little work, you can see that planets are round. "Flat" doesn't really exist. Eat shit, you stupid cunt. You have the same retarded "nothing is really flat" argument every time. Go fuck yourself, asshole. And fuck your "planets are round" bullshit too, you horrendous twat. Hang yourself, douchebag. |
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2017, 09:30:46 PM |
|
'200 Proofs Earth IS NOT A Spinning Ball' is an excellent video. |
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
June 23, 2017, 09:37:16 PM |
|
@BADecker  |
|
|
|
|
Coffee_Lord
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
June 23, 2017, 10:11:57 PM |
|
BADecker, if you think "flatness" doesn't really exist, then get ready for a mental curveball... The universe is the biggest thing we can conceive and perceive. And by all accounts, it's flat as a pancake. Same goes for many (most?) galaxies - circular, yes, but flat. So, on the contrary, when you look at the big scale of things, you end up with flat things, not spherical things. "But average all those small-scale effects out and look at the big picture. When we examine very old light — say, the cosmic microwave background — that has been traveling the universe for more than 13.8 billion years, we get a true sense of the universe's shape. And the answer, as far as we can tell, to within an incredibly small margin of uncertainty, is that the universe is flat." Quoted from: "The Universe is Flat - Now What?" - https://www.space.com/34928-the-universe-is-flat-now-what.htmlMore reading: "Why is the Universe flat and not spherical?" - http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/103-the-universe/cosmology-and-the-big-bang/geometry-of-space-time/600-why-is-the-universe-flat-and-not-spherical-advanced When you get into atomic theory, it's very easy to think that atoms and/or subatomic particles are spherical, but much harder to prove. In fact, science says that only certain atoms are roughly spherical, the light ones. And that's a guess at best. Here's an interesting quote from a science forum discussion on whether atoms are spherical or not: "Not only is it not technically possible to make those measurements, quantum mechanics itself forbids such measurements at the atomic level. An atom not only is "not" spherical, the very idea of "shape" is meaningless here. You might as well ask what color an atom is!" http://www.sciforums.com/threads/are-atoms-spherical.25576/ |
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 04:06:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
June 24, 2017, 05:10:05 AM |
|
BADecker, if you think "flatness" doesn't really exist, then get ready for a mental curveball...
The universe is the biggest thing we can conceive and perceive. And by all accounts, it's flat as a pancake. Same goes for many (most?) galaxies - circular, yes, but flat. So, on the contrary, when you look at the big scale of things, you end up with flat things, not spherical things. You talk so silly. Pancakes have thickness, even as do lenticular galaxies. But the stars in those galaxies are globular, even if they are not spherical. "But average all those small-scale effects out and look at the big picture. When we examine very old light — say, the cosmic microwave background — that has been traveling the universe for more than 13.8 billion years, we get a true sense of the universe's shape. And the answer, as far as we can tell, to within an incredibly small margin of uncertainty, is that the universe is flat." Quoted from: "The Universe is Flat - Now What?" - https://www.space.com/34928-the-universe-is-flat-now-what.htmlAnybody can write or say just about anything. All you need to do is look in any direction at night to see stars. They are far enough away that without special calc and equipment, we can't tell how far. No flatness there. BB theory and 13 to 14 billion years is all fun and stuff. But just like flat earth, so far it is fictional. When you get into atomic theory, it's very easy to think that atoms and/or subatomic particles are spherical, but much harder to prove. In fact, science says that only certain atoms are roughly spherical, the light ones. And that's a guess at best. Here's an interesting quote from a science forum discussion on whether atoms are spherical or not: "Not only is it not technically possible to make those measurements, quantum mechanics itself forbids such measurements at the atomic level. An atom not only is "not" spherical, the very idea of "shape" is meaningless here. You might as well ask what color an atom is!" http://www.sciforums.com/threads/are-atoms-spherical.25576/By the same logic, there is no 3rd dimension. By the same logic, there is no thickness. By that logic, the earth is flat, the sky is flat, and we are flat, right in between. No dome. However, to all appearances in everyday life, there is no flat. Consider graphene. One molecule "thick." Not flat. Thick. Chemistry textbooks typically include illustrations of atoms, but with caveats. The drawings depict atomic nuclei surrounded by electron orbitals—fuzzy spheres, barbells, tripods, and so on—but those figures represent the probability of finding an electron at a certain place around the nucleus rather than an actual “shape.” Researchers have now managed to image the electron orbitals and show for the first time that, in a sense, atoms really look like those textbook images.
...
The pictures look, well, textbook, although only the outermost orbitals appear, which shroud the inner orbitals and the nuclei. By changing the intensity of the current, the team could switch the energy of the last atom’s outermost electron from a lower level to a higher level. Correspondingly, the shape of the orbital changed from spherical to barbell, as theory predicts. The group also observed electrons switching spontaneously from one state to another—for reasons that are unclear, Mikhailovskij says—and stranger shapes that may result from the presence of impurities, in the form of other atoms such as hydrogen. The results are in the October Physical Review B. When you search for it, you find that there are shapes that are not flat. But you never find anything that is absolutely flat. |
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 05:59:43 AM |
|
But you never find anything that is absolutely flat.
Except the top of your soggy melon, you drunken fuck. |
|
|
|
|
|
kdrama
|
|
June 24, 2017, 06:47:10 AM |
|
people keeps argue about this thing it is said that this issue is not true many people said that also the expert so we don't need to argue in this nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
XinXan
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:42:16 AM |
|
There are many ways to test it and people even hundreds of years ago knew the earth wasn't flat now that humanity knows quite positively that the Moon is not a piece of cheese or a playful god, the phenomena that accompany it (from its monthly cycles to lunar eclipses) are well-explained. It was quite a mystery to the ancient Greeks, though, and in their quest for knowledge, they came up with a few insightful observations that helped humanity figure out the shape of our planet.
Aristotle (who made quite a lot of observations about the spherical nature of the Earth) noticed that during lunar eclipses (when the Earth’s orbit places it directly between the Sun and the Moon, creating a shadow in the process), the shadow on the Moon’s surface is round. This shadow is the Earth’s, and it’s a great clue on the spherical shape of the Earth.
Since the earth is rotating (see the “Foucault Pendulum” experiment for a definite proof, if you are doubtful), the consistent oval-shadow it produces in each and every lunar eclipse proves that the earth is not only round but spherical – absolutely, utterly, beyond a shadow of a doubt not flat
If you stick a stick in the ground, it will produce a shadow. The shadow moves as time passes (which is the principle for ancient Shadow Clocks). If the world had been flat, then two sticks in different locations would produce the same shadow but they don't because the earth is round
|
|
|
|
|
|
