Flat Earth

[Astargath]

^^^ If the Earth was a ball dogs would have chewed it to shreds by now.

Fact: The Sun's angular size is 32'.
Fact: One arcminute is one nautical mile.

You are making a fool out of yourself right now.   

If you have any cousins in school, ask them why you are wrong.

Tell me - how far away is 10 degrees?

 

That's like asking how far is 100 mph?

When you observe an object or area with the naked eye it has a measurable size, this is measured by viewing the angle formed between the sides of the object or area and the vanishing point at the horizon. It doesn't matter where the visible object is located in your field of view or how far away it is, the angle will always be the same and will correlate with a physical distance. In the case of an angle of 1' it correlates with a distance of 1 nautical mile.

In 1° there are 60' so if the angular size measured is 10° then the object is 600 miles wide and will most likely be a coastline or mountain range.

The Sun can be empirically measured and it's 32 miles in diameter.
^FTFY

The heat production of a 32 mile-object would be fairly immense and concentrated, so during an eclipse, the moon should be heated up and glowing, from being much closer to the object, and from the fact, the object is producing enough heat for that much warmth over a large area.

The Sun and Moon are holographic projections and not physical objects.

''The Sun and Moon are holographic projections and not physical objects.'' Prove it dipshit, you keep making ridiculous claims with 0 evidence. Show me the projector.

[1714152856]

1714152856

[1714152856]

1714152856

[1714152856]

1714152856

[1714152856]

1714152856

[Vod]

If the Earth was a ball dogs would have chewed it to shreds by now.

The Sun and Moon are holographic projections and not physical objects.

So in your flattard world, dogs are thousand of kilometers tall?

Your second sentence makes the same amount of sense.

The only way I feel heat from a hologram is if she is good looking and doing something naughty.

 

[notbatman]

If the Earth was a ball dogs would have chewed it to shreds by now.

The Sun and Moon are holographic projections and not physical objects.

So in your flattard world, dogs are thousand of kilometers tall?

Your second sentence makes the same amount of sense.

The only way I feel heat from a hologram is if she is good looking and doing something naughty.

 

Would you believe a bitch two miles tall? You've been lied to about fossils and the creation of Earth, fossils form like concrete and dry quickly. T-Rex is a lie, they've tricked you with a piece of giant chicken bone less than 10,000 years old and a bullshit story to go along with it.

... ''The Sun and Moon are holographic projections and not physical objects.'' Prove it dipshit, you keep making ridiculous claims with 0 evidence. Show me the projector.

The Sun is a light in the sky, how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein. 'you gonna tell me how heavy balls in the shed proves there's a heavy spherical bomb exploding up there? Maybe tell me how the flying underwater photoshop puppet masters at NASA use their Venusian radar to measure the Sun. Perhaps you'll show me Hollywood made moves of the hydrogen bomb exploding, followed The Moon Landing, The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut.

Asshat.

[Elijah Jackson]

Board on a ship for round the world sailing. This will be an experiment. Or try to fly to space (actually, you may just watch some pics and videos from there, but up to you).

[lightlord]

In the ocean, you see boats cut off, and slide off, while you argue its visual/distance.

There is an experiment that refutes this and further demonstrates the Earth is, in fact, a sphere.

1) Find a flat land patch, say desert, big field, etc.
2) Set a laser 3 meters above the ground
3) Drive in any direction you like for 15-20 KM.
4) Place a segmented graph that is 3 meters tall and see if the laser still shines at the 3-meter mark.

This strongly suggests a curvature earth model. As if the Earth was 100% flat, you'd see the laser at exactly the 3-meter mark.

[Vod]

Would you believe a bitch two miles tall? You've been lied to about fossils and the creation of Earth, fossils form like concrete and dry quickly. T-Rex is a lie, they've tricked you with a piece of giant chicken bone less than 10,000 years old and a bullshit story to go along with it.

Then I would have been lied to about carbon dating, evolution, fossils, etc.

Or.. OR.... you are lying to us right now.

The Sun is a light in the sky, how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein. '

Been done a million times, literally.

Why don't you prove you are not lying?


 

[BADecker]

Why the number 137 is one of the greatest mysteries in physics

Famous physicists like Richard Feynman think 137 holds the answers to the Universe.

The fine structure constant has mystified scientists since the 1800s.

The number 1/137 might hold the clues to the Grand Unified Theory.

Relativity, electromagnetism and quantum mechanics are unified by the number.

Does the Universe around us have a fundamental structure that can be glimpsed through special numbers?

The brilliant physicist Richard Feynman (1918-1988) famously thought so, saying there is a number that all theoretical physicists of worth should "worry about". He called it "one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man".

That magic number, called the fine structure constant, is a fundamental constant, with a value which nearly equals 1/137. Or 1/137.03599913, to be precise. It is denoted by the Greek letter alpha - α.

What's special about alpha is that it's regarded as the best example of a pure number, one that doesn't need units. It actually combines three of nature's fundamental constants - the speed of light, the electric charge carried by one electron, and the Planck's constant, as explains physicist and astrobiologist Paul Davies to Cosmos magazine. Appearing at the intersection of such key areas of physics as relativity, electromagnetism and quantum mechanics is what gives 1/137 its allure.

Physicist Laurence Eaves, a professor at the University of Nottingham, thinks the number 137 would be the one you'd signal to the aliens to indicate that we have some measure of mastery over our planet and understand quantum mechanics. The aliens would know the number as well, especially if they developed advanced sciences.

Fine Structure Constant - Sixty Symbols

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlSLIW0gZtk


In other words, standard science fits math almost completely. And vice-versa. But FE has almost an infinity to go to fit math and make sense at the same time.

[DireWolfM14]

how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

[suchmoon]

how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Thermonuclear bomb uses fusion.

[DireWolfM14]

how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Thermonuclear bomb uses fusion.

Thanks for the correction.  It's been many years since my last physics class.

[joerogers8]

how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Thermonuclear bomb uses fusion.

Thanks for the correction.  It's been many years since my last physics class.

If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so. 

[sirazimuth]

cue some moronic rebuttal meme .... delusional trolling nonsense in 3...2...

<juvenile drivel with a meme of all his playroom toys>

right on cue....

[sirazimuth]

If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so.  

jeezus christ dude, are you trolling like your buddy batshitcrazy now? ...pick up a basic physics textbook and read about stars...
oh wait...no that won't work... they are all  written by a conspiracy of lying nasa scientists...nm....

[DireWolfM14]

If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so.  

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Get back to me when you've proven you're qualified.

[joerogers8]

If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so.  

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Get back to me when you've proven you're qualified.

Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

[BADecker]

Flat earth people:




 

[DireWolfM14]

Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.

[sirazimuth]

  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

says the clown who still isn't convinced the earth isn't flat because water doesn't curve or some such ridiculous thing...
or is just trolling and likes getting attention like the other two silly twats in here...

[joerogers8]

Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.

But can you prove any of the claims you're making or are you just here running your mouth? 

Prove to us your claim of stars being what you stated them to be.  What type of experiments have you done to prove this claim to yourself?   

[BADecker]

Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.

I admire you. My mistakes usually aren't very big, but I have this false pride that makes it hard for me to admit to them.