Flat Earth

[Vod]

As for the power lines, they curve to the right a bit as they converge, combined with atmosphereic distortion and perspective the so-called Earth curvature is just not there. You're trying to debunk my post on angular size (and defend that PBS/Discovery fraud) with a bullshit illusion that's not about angular size.

No no no no no.  

Your atmospheric distortion is based on fantasy.  

Please link the report where we invented anti-gravity technology.

 

[1714147131]

1714147131

[—]

Some serious resolution (16200 / 8100) 4D square flat earth map
It should open about the 10% mark at 50% zoom Chinese Mountains just amazing, never know how big that range really is compared to others in world like Andes, Alps or Rocky Mountains, Greenland has some serious rocks too.
 (50% jpg compression version) https://imgur.com/xM7R4TO
 (70% jpg compression version) https://imgur.com/yI94ewM

And look “as it real is” with max extend of 6 months continuous light at south pole station.
(80% jpg compression used to keep file size down)
Crossing parallel lines,  
https://imgur.com/yr2WmdM
It is not something to work on with a 8 year old laptop imagine what dedicated 3D computers can do with this thing.

Highest tides in the world happening North and South at about 45°- 60° latitude twice a day ( every 740,5 minutes, one lunar full cycle 24h and 41min)
Moon acts like electric “bridge” and has most effect on that location because of the orbital path around earth.
Stronger with salt water as fresh water because higher electric conductivity with "impure" water (5 Siemens per Meter vs 0.005 – 0.05 S/m for drinking water)
https://i.imgur.com/PX1E35N.jpg

Depending in time available in a day or two will post steps i took to create it.

[notbatman]

@lightlord,

   That PBS/Discovery documentery is a proven fraud (watch the video I linked).

As for the power lines, they curve to the right a bit as they converge, combined with atmosphereic distortion and perspective the so-called Earth curvature is just not there. (^{edit: they may have used a manually calibrated distortion correcting camera lens to distort the right side a bit.}) You're trying to debunk my post on angular size (and defend that PBS/Discovery fraud) with a bullshit illusion that's not about angular size.

Here's a video filmed on the other side of the power lines with a P900. It shows the coastline on the other side, no curve, no hump of water, nothing but perspective and convergence on a plane.  
...

No no no no no.  

Your atmospheric distortion is based on fantasy.  

...


Lake Pontchartrain NO curve. Flat EARTH video. -- https://youtu.be/bD0WCdgl1PY



Time to find a rope for yourself yo!

Please link the report where we invented anti-gravity technology.

 

The power lines disappear into the distance and Vod debunks atmosphereic haze as his final proof the Earth is a spinning globe in a vacuum. Hahaha kill yourself!

[—]

Today is like learning how to ride a Bicycle even so I know how to ride one but been on the wrong type of Bicycle one all my life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFzDaBzBlL0 Take away the complex gears and lets move one.

Flora and Fauna north and south is extremely different. 60° north is some of the greenest places on earth and south of 60° not much else than penguins can be found. https://i.imgur.com/trzzErL.jpg Even Greenland is home to flowering plants and large and small mammals. Muskox can be found as far north as land extents north.
No amount of 66° tilt of earths axis can explain such differences with the suns suppose 150 million km distance to earth. Only earths magnet location can account for this. The Suns permanent location at geographic north (81°N, 64°S = 8,5° N) The maximum reach of the “spot light” from  Tropic of Cancer to Tropic of Capricorn and center of direct radiant heat at Equator coming from 8.5°N always.
https://imgur.com/KV2eSop

For today’s step by step exercise I have included 3 new lines. Pink line center of magnet / location of Sun, Yellow photographic prove of Suns path over the year and Green todays creation at 120°W.
https://imgur.com/8OVhO3t

Photographic path of sun over the year
https://i.imgur.com/bVquoTg.jpg



Step 1
Make a cylinder from  any proper 2:1 ratio map to have continuation and turn -45°.
As we make it for 120° W, Y = 60° and X,Z is 0.
There is the “Diamond” https://imgur.com/tO7SAQk

Step 2
Make a cylinder to have continuous forward movement (aka gravity), turn -90°
XYZ = 0.
https://imgur.com/qbhnh9F

Step 3
Resize, I used 1 : 1.296 ratio. (1.3) Edit: It actually needs to be square by look of things. https://imgur.com/G8URJcj
Width pole to pole, and height Earth radius at equator plus diameter of pole to pole (20k km)
Height needs to be looked at again.
https://imgur.com/slk0Ysu

Step 4
Make it endlessly twist inside the “air-locked” world (at max reach of south pole station 6 month no sun)
https://imgur.com/lscuKjv

Turn to whichever location of the year it is inside of it. (from 45° to -45° and back…..)
https://imgur.com/XieS8S5
Blue line, Earth (galactic) path and Pluto at the bulge of it.
Gold line, Moons path around earth
Red, north star


The work only just starting, 3D modelers and animators need to take over at some stage.
One that note: Happy https://youtu.be/y6Sxv-sUYtM




Edit 2
As it is Tropic of Cancer day and sun at it northern most reach it is very likely a case like this.
In between the missing part the overlap acts like a shield.
https://imgur.com/c0m5oRp

[Vod]

The power lines disappear into the distance and Vod debunks atmosphereic haze as his final proof the Earth is a spinning globe in a vacuum. Hahaha kill yourself!

Easy to debunk - your fake photo shows the power lines hovering above the curvature of the earth.

It's not my final proof either.  I can keep debunking your lies until one of us dies - which explains your constant demands.

 

[notbatman]

The power lines disappear into the distance and Vod debunks atmosphereic haze as his final proof the Earth is a spinning globe in a vacuum. Hahaha kill yourself!

Easy to debunk - your fake photo shows the power lines hovering above the curvature of the earth.

It's not my final proof either.  I can keep debunking your lies until one of us dies - which explains your constant demands.

 

Lake Pontchartrain NO curve. Flat EARTH video. -- https://youtu.be/bD0WCdgl1PY

It's a screen capture from the video link you're ignoring and omitted in your response. You're making statements hoping readers won't watch the video. This is a dishonest tactic and you should feel bad kill yourself.

[eann014]

How as an individual can I know if the Earth is a sphere or a flat disc? What experiment can I do that doesn't involve trusting information from a 3rd party that would prove what the geometry really is?

Then, if you really want to know about this, be an astronaut and go outside our planet and check if the world is a sphere or a flat disc on your own. I think there is no astronaut here in the forum. LOL. But if there is someone who really knows this then maybe he/she can answer you here, I am just suggesting what you will need to do. LOL. 

[notbatman]

If you believe any of following then you are my enemy, fuck you!

1. If you belive we live on a globe then kill yourself.

2. If you believe in "outer space" then kill yourself.

3. If you believe planets are heavy balls in the sky then kill yourself.

4. If you believe we are in motion then kill yourself.

5. If you believe that the Sun is a "thermonuclear" bomb a million miles wide then kill yourself.

6. If you believe NASA landed men on the Moon then kill yourself.

7. If you believe that bodies of water are curved then kill yourself.

8. If you believe the horizon curves then kill yourself.

9. If you believe there are astronauts flying like birds inside a can in the sky below your feet then kill yourself.

10. If you believe the stars are Suns then kill yourself.

11. If you believe that boats sail up, over and behind a dome of water (see #7) three miles out then kill yourself.

12. If you believe the Sun (see #5) is millions of miles away then kill yourself.

13. If you believe there are multi-ton objects called satellites flying below your feet with nothing holding then "up" then kill yourself.

14. If you believe a sextant measures angles on a sphere then kill yourself.

15. If you believe that sailing or flying around the world proves we're on a globe (see #1) then kill yourself.

Fifteen reasons why you need to hang by the neck until dead.

[lightlord]

If you believe any of following then you are my enemy, fuck you!

1. If you belive we live on a globe then kill yourself.
2. If you believe in "outer space" then kill yourself.
3. If you believe planets are heavy balls in the sky then kill yourself.
4. If you believe we are in motion then kill yourself.
5. If you believe that the Sun is a "thermonuclear" bomb a million miles wide then kill yourself.
6. If you believe NASA landed men on the Moon then kill yourself.
7. If you believe that bodies of water are curved then kill yourself.
8  If you believe the horizon curves then kill yourself.
9. If you believe there are astronauts flying like birds inside a can in the sky below your feet then kill yourself.
10. If you believe the stars are Suns then kill yourself.
11. If you believe that boats sail up, over and behind a dome of water (see #7) three miles out then kill yourself.
12. If you believe the Sun (see #5) is millions of miles away then kill yourself.
13. If you believe there are multi-ton objects called satellites flying below your feet with nothing holding then "up" then kill yourself.
14. If you believe a sextant measures angles on a sphere then kill yourself.
15. If you believe that sailing or flying around the world proves we're on a globe (see #1) then kill yourself.

Fifteen reasons why you need to hang by the neck until dead.

1) If you believe we live on a flat earth then you're deluded

2) If you believe nothing is outside Earth then you're crazy

3) If you believe planets are not real then you are a nut case

4) If you believe we are not in motion then you are a science idiot

5) If you believe that the sun is not a "thermonuclear" bomb then you need to go back to school

6) If you believe Nasa moon landing is all a conspiracy then you need to put on a tin foil hat

7) If you think bodies of water are not curved then you are a visual idiot and need glasses to see.

8  If you believe the horizon doesn't curve then you are a moron

9) If you believe astronauts and NASA are all fakery/conspiracy then you need to hang out with other tin foil hatters on abovetopsecret.com  

10) If you believe the stars are not Suns then you are unknowledgeable

11) If you believe that boats sail flat forever (see #7) even three miles out then learn to observe

12. If you believe the Sun (see #5) is 1000s of miles away then go to a special class for people like yourself

13. If you believe satellites can't orbit the earth in space then again go back to elementary school

14. If you believe a sextant measure distance then you are delusional

15. If you believe that sailing or flying doesn't mean we are on a globe (see #1) then you belong in the looney bin.

Fifteen reasons why you are in a world of your own.

[notbatman]

A sextant measures angles on a plane and 1 minute = 1 mile; this can't be refuted.

[BADecker]

A sextant measures angles on  plane and 1 minute = 1 mile; this can't be refuted.

Space is made up of an infinite number of planes, all of which are either parallel to each other, or at an infinite number and variety of angles to each other. This is precisely why a sextant is not accurate for measuring distance and sizes of very distant objects in space.

Where is the distance limit on FE? Does FE go on forever in every direction? Even if there is a dome, why wold space not go on forever in every direction, right on through the water above and outside of the dome, just like FE might go on forever past the point where the dome touches down on the ice/land outside the ice limit that GE people call Antarctica?

Or do you think that the flat earth is a simple plane, made up of an infinite number of points that have a length/width relationship to each other, but no height relationship to each other?

You seem to be missing a lot in your primitive calculations.

[Astargath]

A sextant measures angles on  plane and 1 minute = 1 mile; this can't be refuted.

Show me the projector of the sun!!

[notbatman]

A sextant measures angles on a plane and 1 minute = 1 mile; this can't be refuted.

Space is made up of an infinite number of planes, all of which are either parallel to each other, or at an infinite number and variety of angles to each other. This is precisely why a sextant is not accurate for measuring distance and sizes of very distant objects in space.

Where is the distance limit on FE? Does FE go on forever in every direction? Even if there is a dome, why wold space not go on forever in every direction, right on through the water above and outside of the dome, just like FE might go on forever past the point where the dome touches down on the ice/land outside the ice limit that GE people call Antarctica?

Or do you think that the flat earth is a simple plane, made up of an infinite number of points that have a length/width relationship to each other, but no height relationship to each other?

You seem to be missing a lot in your primitive calculations.

The Sun's diameter is 32' (arc minutes/nautical miles) and this is a direct measurement with no calculations involved. Only when the question of distance (from viewer to Sun) comes into play is trigonometry involved and, the margin of error in either case is not millions of miles for God's sake.

My proof stands and can't be refuted.

[Astargath]

A sextant measures angles on a plane and 1 minute = 1 mile; this can't be refuted.

Space is made up of an infinite number of planes, all of which are either parallel to each other, or at an infinite number and variety of angles to each other. This is precisely why a sextant is not accurate for measuring distance and sizes of very distant objects in space.

Where is the distance limit on FE? Does FE go on forever in every direction? Even if there is a dome, why wold space not go on forever in every direction, right on through the water above and outside of the dome, just like FE might go on forever past the point where the dome touches down on the ice/land outside the ice limit that GE people call Antarctica?

Or do you think that the flat earth is a simple plane, made up of an infinite number of points that have a length/width relationship to each other, but no height relationship to each other?

You seem to be missing a lot in your primitive calculations.

The Sun's diameter is 32' (arc minutes/nautical miles) and this is a direct measurement with no calculations involved. Only when the question of distance (from viewer to Sun) comes into play is trigonometry involved and, the margin of error in either case is not millions of miles for God's sake.

My proof stands and can't be refuted.

How can you measure a projection? Impossible, the sun is nothing, it's just an image, you said that.

[lightlord]

A sextant measures angles on a plane and 1 minute = 1 mile; this can't be refuted.

Space is made up of an infinite number of planes, all of which are either parallel to each other, or at an infinite number and variety of angles to each other. This is precisely why a sextant is not accurate for measuring distance and sizes of very distant objects in space.

Where is the distance limit on FE? Does FE go on forever in every direction? Even if there is a dome, why wold space not go on forever in every direction, right on through the water above and outside of the dome, just like FE might go on forever past the point where the dome touches down on the ice/land outside the ice limit that GE people call Antarctica?

Or do you think that the flat earth is a simple plane, made up of an infinite number of points that have a length/width relationship to each other, but no height relationship to each other?

You seem to be missing a lot in your primitive calculations.

The Sun's diameter is 32' (arc minutes/nautical miles) and this is a direct measurement with no calculations involved. Only when the question of distance (from viewer to Sun) comes into play is trigonometry involved and, the margin of error in either case is not millions of miles for God's sake.

My proof stands and can't be refuted.

How can you measure a projection? Impossible, the sun is nothing, it's just an image, you said that.

Exactly, make your mind up, is it a holographic projection? How can you measure a projection, since its just an image and nothing else?
And if it's not a holographic projection, then during the eclipse the moon would be glowing and hot.

Another factor is telescopes can concentrate the light into a tiny beam, and burn wood and stuff. So if its a hologram, explain that.

[BADecker]

A sextant measures angles on a plane and 1 minute = 1 mile; this can't be refuted.

Space is made up of an infinite number of planes, all of which are either parallel to each other, or at an infinite number and variety of angles to each other. This is precisely why a sextant is not accurate for measuring distance and sizes of very distant objects in space.

Where is the distance limit on FE? Does FE go on forever in every direction? Even if there is a dome, why wold space not go on forever in every direction, right on through the water above and outside of the dome, just like FE might go on forever past the point where the dome touches down on the ice/land outside the ice limit that GE people call Antarctica?

Or do you think that the flat earth is a simple plane, made up of an infinite number of points that have a length/width relationship to each other, but no height relationship to each other?

You seem to be missing a lot in your primitive calculations.

The Sun's diameter is 32' (arc minutes/nautical miles) and this is a direct measurement with no calculations involved. Only when the question of distance (from viewer to Sun) comes into play is trigonometry involved and, the margin of error in either case is not millions of miles for God's sake.

My proof stands and can't be refuted.

Well, of course you say this. Everything we see is seen in 2D. The reason we understand 3D is that we have two 2D cameras - eyes - and a brain that interprets the 3D reality.

The sextant, being a 2D measuring system, has to be used to make many 2D "pictures" that we combine to form a 3D view of reality. The sextant is not made to interpret 3D from the one-at-a-time 2D pictures that it makes. When used this way, even the sextant shows us that its measurements are not accurate beyond a certain distance. That distance is understood by the relationship of, say, the number of distant stars we can observe with a single, optic nerve unit. This is why we have telescopes.

But you can't make the rest of a sextant (even one that has a telescope) to be more accurate, without greatly expanding its size. Standard big telescopes, mounted in domes so that they can be protected at the same time they are being adjusted, essentially act like giant sextants. They prove that the sky and sun are far bigger and farther away than the limited, hand-held sextant suggests. The difference is that the big telescopes simply aren't called sextants any longer... often because they have many additional items incorporated into them that sextants don't have.

[notbatman]

My proof is empirical and it stands.

[BADecker]

My proof is empirical and it stands.

Proof from telescope observatories is thousands of times more sensitive and accurate than sextant observations. Standard proof is empirical, and it stands. The earth is a globe, but certainly not flat.

[elenadivats@yandex.ru]

Actually I'm really in love with the theory of the flat Earth. Our adherents are all around the Earth globe. I truthly believe that the next Nobel reward in physics will be extradited for the research in the sphere of flat Earth evidence.
  hope you'll join our cult 

[notbatman]

My proof is empirical and it stands.

Proof from telescope observatories is thousands of times more sensitive and accurate than sextant observations. Standard proof is empirical, and it stands. The earth is a globe, but certainly not flat.

What proof? Show me an angular size measurement of the Sun made with a telescope that disproves the sextant's measured value of 32 arcminuets. I'm sick of you're bullshit you pathetic liar.

My proof is empirical and it stands.

bonus image: